Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gpro From Htfed
Gpro From Htfed
Gpro From Htfed
Wings
3 I am really missing a lot of speed in straights
2 The car is lacking some speed in the straights
1 The car could have a bit more speed in the straights
-1 I am missing a bit of grip in the curves
-2 The car is very unstable in many corners
-3 I cannot drive the car, there's no grip on it
Engine
3 No, no, no!!! Favor a lot more the low revs!
2 The engine revs are too high
1 Try to favor a bit more the low
l ow revs
-1 I feel that I do not have enough engine power in the straights
-2 The engine power on the straights is not sufficient
-3 You should try to favor a lot more the high revs
Brakes
2 I think the brakes effectiveness could be higher if we move the balance to the back
1 Put the balance a bit more to the back
-1 I would like to have the balance a bit more to the front
-2 I think the brakes effectiveness could be higher if we move the balance to the front
-3 I would feel a lot more comfortable to move the balance to the front
Gear
2 The gear ratio is too high (?)
1 I cannot take advantage of the power of the engine. Put the gear ratio a bit lower
-1 I am very often in the red. Put the gear ratio a bit higher
-2 The gear ratio is too low
-3 It feels like the engine is going to explode. Put a lot higher ratio between gears
Susp
2 The suspension rigidity is too high
1 The car is too rigid. Lower a bit the rigidity
-1 I think with a bit more rigid suspension I will be able to go faster
-2 The suspension rigidity is too low
-3 The suspension rigidity should be a lot higher
Training
Fitness class:
+2 Stamina
-1, -2 Weight
-6, -7 Motivation
Yoga:
+5, +6 Concentration
-2 Aggressiveness
-2 Stamina
+5, +8 Motivation
PR training:
+7 Charisma
-3 Concentration
Tech training:
+5 Technical insight
+ -? Motivation
Sports psychologist:
+14 Motivation
Ninja Class:
+1 Concentration
+4 Aggressiveness
Tire wear
I'll try to describe what and how to affect the maximum mileage tires.
Everything written below - my expert assessment, prepared by a comparative analysis
of different races.
1. Type of rubber.
Each successive type of rubber is held up to 33% longer than the previous one. For
example, if the Extras would be enough for 50 km., The soft and up to 50 * 1.33 miles.,
Meda by 50 * 1.33 * 1.33 miles., Hardy 50 * 1.33 * 1.33 * 1 33 kms.
5. The level of some parts of the machine or their level of deterioration of (??).
In tests with the same amount of fuel, the type of rubber, the setup in two stintah with
the same number of laps (50), the first left tire 27%, while the second stinte remained
26%. In the second stinte only increased machine wear.
Parameters sponsors
• Finances: Represents the financial power of the sponsor (reflects the financial strength
of the sponsor).
• Expectations: This attribute shows how good results the sponsor expects from the
team they are negotiating with (reflects how good the results awaiting sponsor of the
player).
• Patience: Represents the patience of the sponsor. The higher the patience the higher
the chance that the sponsor is willing to make compromises about the contract details
during the negotiation process (patience sponsor, the higher it is, the greater the
likelihood that the sponsor will be ready to compromise about the parameters of the
contract during negotiations .)
• Reputation: Represents the reputation of the sponsor. The higher the reputation the
less is the chance the sponsor to throw a surprise at you (the higher the reputation, the
less likely it is that the sponsor will present you a surprise.)
• Image: Represents the overall image of the company on the sponsor market (overall
image of the sponsor to market the sponsors).
• Negotiation: This attribute shows how smooth the negotiations with the sponsor
normally flow (reflects how exactly is the process of negotiation, perhaps just with a high
increase in this parameter negotiation is less dependent on the results of the player in
the race).
As a result of wear tests 30-40-30 circles will be much less than 10 times for 10 laps.
The most optimal in terms of getting the test points - 2 sessions of 50 laps.
Testing options
I have here what was on A1Ring.
P H A Laps Sum
Test Limits 0.1 0.1 0.1 5 0.3
Top speed 3.6 0.5 0.5 5 4.6
Cornering 0.4 3.5 0.4 5 4.3
Hairpins 0.5 0.5 3.6 5 6.4
Braking 1.1 2.2 1.1 5 4.4
Overtaking 2.2 1.1 1.1 5 4.4
Chicanes 1.1 1.1 2.2 5 4.4
No special priority 1.5 1.5 1.5 5 4.5
Setup tuning 0.1 0.1 0.1 5 0.3
So, if I want to pump the car on all three parameters, it can be 2 sessions of 50 laps
with No Special Priority.
If the data is correct, it is most advantageous Overtaking. We lose a little in HA, but
building up the most expensive P, at a reasonable rate (better than on P only
TopSpeed, but there is a change after HA nichrome will not come)
Chassis - 0-2-1
level 1 ($ 1.292.539)
level 2 ($ 1.600.810)
level 3 ($ 1.982.603)
level 4 ($ 2.455.453)
Engine - 6-1-2
level 1 ($ 3.311.737)
level 2 ($ 4.101.586)
Underbody - 0-1-1
level 1 ($ 510.128)
level 2 ($ 631.794)
level 3 ($ 782.476)
level 4 ($ 969.097)
Sidepods - 2-0-0
level 1 ($ 459.831)
level 2 ($ 569.501)
level 3 ($ 705.327)
Cooling - 1-0-0
level 1 ($ 454.545)
level 2 ($ 562.954)
level 3 ($ 697.219)
Gearbox - 4-1-4
level 1 ($ 3.098.104)
level 2 ($ 3.837.002)
Brakes - 0-2-0
level 1 ($ 697.674)
level 2 ($ 864.069)
level 3 ($ 1.070.150)
level 4 ($ 1.325.380)
Suspension - 0-2-2
level 1 ($ 1.181.545)
level 2 ($ 1.463.343)
level 3 ($ 1.812.351)
Electronics - 0-0-1
level 1 ($ 938.416)
level 2 ($ 1.162.228)
level 3 ($ 1.439.420)
0.67-0.47-1.33 Chassis
5.73-1.07-1.47 Engine
0.93-3.33-0.40 Front Wing
0.13-2.00-2.00 Rear Wing
0.40-0.53-0.67 Underbody
0.67-0.40-0.40 Sidepods
1.33-0.00-0.00 Cooling
2.93-0.67-4.53 Gearbox
0.13-2.00-0.53 Brakes
0.00-1.47-1.20 Suspension
0.40-0.40-0.80 Electronics
Search setup
Basic postulates:
1. for each part there is an optimal value, deviations from which in greater or less than
worsens lap time. (The penalty for over-or shortage until the same, but different for
different routes).
2. in practice, the deviation from the optimal value of the pilot gives a clue. There are
several levels of prompting (satisfied, a little, medium, high). The deviation from the
optimum, in which the pilot gives different tips depending on the characteristics of the
pilot and tehdira (technical insight).
The range is searched 1 times and adjusted by changing the pilot, TD or significant
change tehinsayta pilot. Presumably the 4 points are 1 pilot tehinsayta point range.
There is a problem with the search for the wings, as the pilot gives a clue to the sum of
values for front and rear wing. The slope of the wings is determined only by time on the
disc for different values of the wings. We should not neglect the search slope, since this
value can sometimes be very substantial (more than 0.5 sec.)
Parsing search setup in the race of the season number 15 number 1 (Jerez).
Lap Lap time Drivermistake Net time Settings
FWing RWing Engine Brakes Gear Susp Tyres Comm
A 1:28.492 s 0.185s 1:28.307 s 500 500 500 500 500 500 Soft
2 1:26.819 s 0.056s 1:26.763 s 564 564 700 468 700 436 Soft
3 1:26.789 s 0.112s 1:26.677 s 596 596 832 436 668 468 Soft
4 1:26.948 s 0.009s 1:26.939 s 580 580 816 420 684 484 Soft
5 1:27.151 s 0.169s 1:26.982 s 572 572 800 428 692 492 Soft
6 1:26.689 s 0.166s 1:26.523 s 576 576 808 432 696 496 Extra Soft
7 1:26.584 s 0.121s 1:26.463 s 628 528 804 430 694 494 Extra Soft
8 1:26.572 s 0.108s 1:26.464 s 529 629 806 532 695 493 Extra Soft
Search was conducted "from scratch" (all values 500). In previous races was found
priblizitelnyydiapazon (101-103).
Rubber: when the border was more or less defined and the value of parts already
changed slightly, I changed the tires (Lap 5-6) and found the speed difference between
Soft and Extra Soft.
Wings: the lower bound is found to within 1 point. 4 disc has determined that the
boundary below 580, and a 6 disc - it is above 576. 7 round, I checked the value of 578
with slope +50 (FW) -50 (RW). At 8, I checked the disc 579 and the slope of -50 (FW)
+50 (RW). In this case, could not find a better slope. But often it is immediately obvious.
Engine: has found an upper limit. True, up to 2 points. (804-806).
Brakes: 6-7 circles found the lower limit (430-up a little higher, 432-satisfied). On the 8th
circle of refined range. If the 532 response - satisfied, it means that the range of> 100. If
the feedback is - omitted below, it means that the range of <101. (532-431 = 101).
Box: An upper boundary of the box to within 1 point.
Suspension: Suspension is found the lower bound up to a point.
Judging by the lay out settings, not everyone knows how to find the exact settings. In
principle, the algorithm is not described.
So I spread one of the search options.
Because the pilot my tehnikal = 41, then I suggest dapazon about "pretty"
120.Accordingly, for a range of practice settings, subtracted from 60. Splashes - the
average value.
A 1:22.270 s 0.470s 1:21.800 s 490 (+) 490 (+) 532 (+) 586 439 (+) 355 Soft
(+) - The pilot asked to raise
(-) - A pilot requests to lower.
Then there where the pilot requests the upgrade - add 16, which does not ask - taking
up 16.
2 1:22.013 s 0.238s 1:21.775 s 506 (+) 506 (+) 548 570 (+) 455 (+) 339 Soft
Further, in one case the pilot was satisfied, the other not - are starting to narrow down
the corridor to 8. If both times was pleased (susp) - even taking a step down to 16. If
dissatisfied both times (wing) - a step up on 16.
3 1:22.083 s 0.311s 1:21.772 s 522 522 540 578 (+) 471 323 Soft
The corridor is defined everywhere except in the Susp. Begin to narrow it to 2 times. On
Susp walks further down to 16.
4 1:22.080 s 0.265s 1:21.815 s 514 (+) 514 (+) 536 582 (+) 463 (+) 307 Soft
Everywhere narrowing corridor, Susp another step down on 16.
5 1:22.120 s 0.284s 1:21.836 s 518 (+) 518 (+) 534 (+) 584 467 291 (+) Soft
Finally, the pilot is not satisfied suspension!
To narrow down the corridor to Susp 8. And where as a narrow corridor - trying to find
an upper bound rather pilot.
Engine 534 small, 536-pleased. As a result, we take the average of 535, and lay off up
(120-4). That is, 535 +120-4 = 651
Brakes 582-584-a little pleased. Take the average of 583 and lay off up (120 4). That
is,583 +120 +4 = 707
We take the (120-4) and (120 4) and thus forms a corridor for the band, hoping that
would get into it.
6 1:22.399 s 0.546s 1:21.853 s 520 (+) 520 (+) 651 (-) 707 (-) 465 299 (+) Soft
Sorry, but because pilot both times dissatisfied and Engine Brakes, then our desired
range of less and 116 and 124. So, in our passage 116-124 he has not got.
Since the find a range of corridor we were not able - to determine the upper bound
tightens Gear. Configuration Engine Brakes and reduce by 16 to obtain a range of 100
to 108.
And to put a Gear Range 92. That is, 466 +92 = 558
7 1:21.937 s 0.223s 1:21.714 s 521 (+) 521 (+) 635 691 558 303 Soft
Since the Pilot Gear and happy and Engine and Brakes, then our range of more than
92, 100 and 108, respectively.
That is, 108 more, but less than 116.
For the last step of putting off of the first lower value, the pilot does not swear
prikotorom different values from step 1.
Wing 522 + 110 = 632
Engine 535 + 111 = 646
Brakes 583 + 113 = 696
Gear 464 + 114 = 578
Susp 301 + 112 = 413
8 1:22.341 s 0.546s 1:21.795 s 632 632 646 696 578 413 Soft
The pilot of all content. This means that our range (the maximum difference between
the values of where the pilot satisfied) is equal to 114 or 115.
As a result, we have to qualify for the lower boundary of the pilot rather we add half of
the range, ie, 57.
TOTAL:
Q1 1:21.356 s 564 594 592 640 521 358 Soft
We still have a community to identify the type of tires or the distribution of the wings.
came to the conclusion that when you know the range of the pilot - you can make the
second round in increments of 64 from the first, if the pilot is satisfied or somewhat
dissatisfied. If the pilot is strongly dissatisfied (-2 or +2), then step 128. Then 2nd step
32, 16, ..., a
On the 8th round is guaranteed to select the settings, with the last 4 circle of dough tires
/ wings.
So: goals for the practice - as clarify its range of "from scratch". So tune in estessno
Plus, can be useful nubam my 'intuitive configuration scheme and the search range. "
Outcome Study:
Damn it is not clear, moreover, that pilot error are great (Talent - 41)
A 1:42.808 s 2.321s 1:40.487 s 500 500 500 500 500 500 Rain
2 1:41.447 s 1.317s 1:40.130 s 750 750 400 400 600 600 Rain
3 1:41.446 s 1.373s 1:40.073 s 710 710 415 440 585 585 Rain
4 1:40.625 s 0.560s 1:40.065 s 730 730 425 460 575 575 Rain
5 1:41.153 s 0.954s 1:40.199 s 620 820 430 450 570 580 Rain
6 1:41.677 s 1.729s 1:39.948 s 825 625 427 455 573 583 Rain
7 1:42.088 s 2.102s 1:39.986 s 777 677 429 452 571 581 Rain
8 1:42.039 s 2.104s 1:39.935 s 829 629 497 454 502 510 Rain
wings:
500-500 - up (-2) / / raise the average
750-750 - ok / / in the range foolishly got
710-710 - up / / raise the minimum
730-730 - ok (0) / / we assume that the 4th circle of other settings have little effect
620-820 - up (+0.134) / / spacing of the wings increased the time on the t rack
825-625 - up (-0.117) / / time has decreased
777-677 - up (-0.079) / / and there is less then 100 / -100 optimally (or more)
829-629 - ok / / finally found the range
engine:
500 - down
400 - up
415 - up
425 - up
430 - ok
427 - up
429 - ok / / lower bound almost found, but you need to specify the range
497 - ok / / refine the upper bound
The range of no more than 72 (groups 1 and 6), namely - 428-499 or less.
Range not less than 69 (groups 7 and 8), namely - 429-497 or more
brakes:
500 - down
400 - ok
440 - ok
460 - down
450 - ok
455 - down
452 - ok
454 - down / / continue to clarify the upper limit
gear:
500 - up
600 - down
585 - down
575 - down
570 - ok
573 - down
571 - ok
502 - ok / / similar engine to try and hence to obtain information on the range
suspension:
500 - up
600 - down
585 - down
575 - ok
580 - ok
583 - down
581 - ok
510 - up / / try to clarify the range
hi - 581-582 (circles 6 and 7)
The lower bound is almost set, but it does not matter. Circles 6 and 8 do not provide
new information on the range. He was not more than 72 (511-582)
Conclusion:
Range 70-72, with the TI 186 - not bad for a setup from scratch.
On the example of the wings: the range of 728-800 (maximum lower limit of 729 + max.
Range 72). According to the "method of Japanese Crosswords" postpone the probable
range of the optimum settings.
At a minimum range of the suspension seems to be 510-581 (581-72 +1 = 510), but the
8th circle indicates that the 510 - outside. That is, the minimum range of 511-581, the
middle - 546
Total:
Skills pilot
Currently, there is a hypothesis about the degree of influence on the rate of pilot State
(in order of importance):
8 / 48 - Concentration
12/48 - Talent
7 / 48 - Aggressiveness
4 / 48 - Experience
6 / 48 - Technical insight
7 / 48 - Stamina
4 / 48 - Charisma
4 / 48 - Motivation
-4/48 - Weight (kg)
----------
48/48
Tips amateurs
Welcome!
So, the end - factors affecting the fastest lap in the race.
Restrictions:
1. On the study allowed the pilots with a total of more than 17 races.
2. Data on the pilots are taken off the market drivers, ie they are publicly available.
Methodology:
1. Take the drivers of the market
2. Brings all the data in Excel
3. We use the ratio - FL per races
4. Sort all the drivers for this factor, and try to find patterns.
Conclusions:
The group of pilots with a mean number of CMV FL = 30% -36%
Concentration: 112-172
Talent: 81-118
Aggressiveness: 77-111 ... that's where she needs my dear:)
Experience: 47-62
Technical insight: 27-78
Stamina: 4-17
Charisma: 37-189
Motivation: 112-250
Weight (kg): 64-87
Age: 27-30
Again, a little research on the same basis of the pilots, exploring the factors affecting the
receipt points in the race.
Everything is done on the knee (ie not split into groups of pilots novice amateurs, etc.).
Restrictions:
1. On the study allowed the pilots with a total of more than 17 races.
2. Data on the pilots are taken off the market drivers, ie they are publicly available.
Methodology:
1. Take the drivers of the market
2. Brings all the data in Excel
3. We use factor - the average number of points per race
4. Sort all the drivers for this factor, and try to find patterns.
5. We use the ratio - WPR = average probability of winning the race
4. Sort all pilots at a rate of WPR and try to find patterns.
Conclusions:
The group of pilots with a mean number of CMV points = 5.0-7.3
Concentration: 122-234
Talent: 50-149
Aggressiveness: 0:)
Experience: 48-124
Technical insight: 11-131
Stamina: 0-48
Charisma: 107-209
Motivation: 0-240
Weight (kg): 73-100
Age: 24-36
Restrictions:
1. On the study allowed the pilots with a total of more than 17 races.
2. Data on the pilots are taken off the market drivers, ie they are publicly available.
Methodology:
1. Take the drivers of the market
2. Brings all the data in Excel
3. Introduce a new factor PPR - pole per race
4. Sort all the drivers for this factor, and try to find patterns.
Conclusions:
The group of pilots with an indicator PPR = 30% -38%
Concentration: 150-235
Talent: 83-207
Aggressiveness: 0-13
Experience: 62-141
Technical insight: 0-100
Stamina: 0-65
Charisma: 40-203
Motivation: 0-250
Weight (kg): 73-100
Age: 25-36
Welcome!
Decided to share his formula of finding the best pilot among pilots on the market.
Algorithm:
1. throws his shortlist of pilots, but there do not recommend throwing only pilots with a
high OA.
My experience shows that a pilot with the OA = 87 can be a better driver with OA =
120:) It's all in the "right" choice of skills.
2. transfer the pilots in Excel and write a formula for each species:
TOTAL = Weight 1 * Conc + Ves2 * Tal + Ves3 * Agg + Ves4 * Exp + * TI + Ves5 Ves6 *
St + Ves7 * Cha + Ves8 * Mot + Ves9 * Wei + Ves10 * Age.
3. Sort by TOTAL, then watch the pilot to have a high experience and stamina
(compared with other pilots in the list), and the concentration was higher than 150
(preferably above 200), and the talent of the higher, the better.
But the key performance indicators - is the experience and stamina.
4. Pay attention to the salary and bonus for signing. Prices are sometimes simply
devastating!
Note. If the pilot to take off the market, he loses concentration and stamina points, and it
depreciates in value.
The key question - how to pick up the weights for the formula?
Previously, I used:
Conc = 1.5
Talanat = 2
Aggressiveness =- 0.5
Experience = 1
TI = 0.1
Stamina = 3
Charisma = 0.1
Motivation =- 0.1 (because I was searching for pilots with low motivation and hence OA)
Weight =- 0.2
Age = 0
Now use a more appropriate weight:
Conc = 1
Talanat = 1
Aggressiveness =- 0.1
Experience = 1.5
TI = 0
Stamina = 2
Charisma = 0
Motivation = 0
Weight =- 1
Age = 0
the new formula, my pilot with OA = 87 TOTAL = 549.2 is, and before that was a pilot
with the OA = 97 TOTAL = 306.4 (selected according to the old formula)
a new pilot for 3-4 seconds. faster than the old one in Kwale:)))
In the process of communicating with the elite of fish for crumbs of information that do
not understand how you can get:)
Depreciation and speed of the car in all situations (even in heavy traffic) affects only
clear track risk!
risk and protection for overtaking only affects the increase / decrease the probability of
overtaking.
set to overtake-protection with inexperienced drivers should not exceed 20, otherwise
they would back.
Depreciation of machinery risks 100/100/0 is the same as the risks 0/0/0. But the speed
will be the same.
Just when you come across a slower driver, in the first case, the probability to overtake
or get maximum spin and the second - is minimal.
The probability depends also on the beat to protect from the risk of someone trying to
overtake (and vice versa), and possibly the talent and experience of pilots (but not
proven).
First, the value of the sponsorship contract depends on what you already have an
income.For example, if the elite do not have sponsors and you get a first in first place,
the contract amount will be higher than if you get 3 or 4 to sponsor a vacant seat. That
is, the more you get, the harder you increase revenue from sponsors. This is logical and
correct, sinceallows players with fewer sponsors to compete with the leaders, who can
get more sponsors.
Second, the size and duration of the contract have vliyaenie place occupied in the race,
when offered a magnitude and duration of the contract. If you won the race, then you
will be offered much more than if you came last.
1. Hypotheses
Hypothesis 1. The more points PHA has a car, the better it is.
This is a simplification. It was better to consider separately P, H and A.
Also, comrades, maybe you can tell - what is more important in the car - P, H or A?
Then I would do weights and said would work.
Hypothesis 2. Under the efficient replacement of parts means that the car we have
maximum points PHA at minimal cost.
Thus, the aim is to find the optimal path replacement parts at the lowest cost funds.
2. Basic data
3. Calculations
4. Findings
So, based on the last factor, in view of the above hypotheses, it turns out - HIT
PARADE most effective parts:
1. Cooling (1)
2. Sidepods (1)
3. Electronics (1)
4. Underbody (1)
5. Cooling (2)
6. Sidepods (2)
7. Electronics (2)
8. Underbody (2)
9. Chassis (1)
10. Cooling (3)
11. Sidepods (3)
12. Electronics (3)
13. Suspension (1)
14. Rear Wing (1)
15. Front Wing (1)
16. Underbody (3)
17. Chassis (2)
18. Gearbox (1)
19. Cooling (4)
20. Brakes (1)
21. Sidepods (4)
22. Electronics (4)
23. Suspension (2)
24. Engine (1)
... Read more positions 13-24 are repeated.
That is, the bare mathematics dictates that it is desirable to upgrade the car in that
order.In practice, it is not very realistic, because in every detail of their wear and easier
it will result in the following table:
The following are levels of detail on the car, providing the most optimum ratio of the sum
score (P + H + A) and the cost of an upgrade.
1. The initial level (beginners start with) - the cost for a race = 3.7 mln. - Ch (1), En (a),
FW (1), RW (1), Un (1), Si (1), Co (1), Ge (1), Br (1), Su (1) , El (1)
2. The second level of development - the cost of a race = 4.1 mln. - Ch (2), En (a), FW
(1), RW (1), Un (3), Si (4), Co (4), Ge (1), Br (1), Su (2) , El (4)
3. The third level - the cost of a race = 5.1 mln. - Ch (3), En (2), FW (2), RW (2), Un (4),
Si (5), Co (5), Ge (2), Br (2), Su (3) , El (5)
4. The fourth level - the cost of a race = 6.3 mln. - Ch (4), En (3), FW (3), RW (3), Un
(5), Si (6), Co (6), Ge (3), Br (3), Su (4) , El (6)
5. The fifth level - the cost of a race = 7.8 mln. - Ch (5), En (4), FW (4), RW (4), Un (6),
Si (7), Co (7), Ge (4), Br (4), Su (5) , El (7)
6. The sixth level - the cost of a race = 9.7 mln. - Ch (6), En (5), FW (5), RW (5), Un (7),
Si (8), Co (8), Ge (5), Br (5), Su (6) , El (8)
7. The seventh level - the cost of a race = 12.0 mln. - Ch (7), En (6), FW (6), RW (6), Un
(8), Si (9), Co (9), Ge (6), Br (6), Su (7) , El (9)
Thank you!