You are on page 1of 2

SECTION-I: KRAs (Key Result Areas) SETTING

PART I: Personal details in columns below shall be filled-in by the HR department

Name Mr.N.Ananth Function Edible Salt -Operations

Designation Dy.General Manager Sub-Function Operations


Grade 8
Appraiser
Assessment Yr. 2008 - 09 Reviewer
Location Edible Salt - Chennai HOD S.Ramesh

PART II: The employee has to list 4-5 KRAs, set targets for the year and assign weightage
in weightage column in order of importance of a KRA in discussion with the appraiser. The
sum total of assigned weightage MUST BE 100.
Target
Key Result Areas Key Performance Indicators (Timeline, Cost,
Weightage
(KRAs) (KPls) Quality, Quantity or
Asset utilization
1.To reduce power Absolute reduction (Unit per MT of Frrom 32 to 27 units 30
Consumption in refined salt production) per MT of refined salt
Refined Salt (
Avg.yearly production
vis-a visa vg yearly,
poer consumption)

2.To reduce & save Savings in Rs. RS.0.78Iakhs 20


EB Power cost by
reduction from
RS.1.08 lacs per
month to RS.0.95
lakhs per month from
Oct.08 onwards

3.To Control Capex As per Budget RS.53.50 lakhs 30


expenses of
Thiruporur plant by
not overshooting the
total approved
expenses.

4.10 Control FIXED Rs. As against last year of Rs. RS.600 per MT of 20
OVERHEADS AT Product.
Thiruporur Plant

Total KRAs Weightage 100

Signature of Employee Signature of Immediate Manager


With date with date
I Name of Employee: N.Ananth r

SECTION -II: MID TERM PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL


(To be filled in by the Appraiser & Appraisee)

The individual and the appraiser have to assess the performance for the period of last six
months (April-September) and the appraiser has to provide improvement guidance !counseling
to the individual employee.

Performance Rating Scale & Parameters


Rating Point 10 9 8 7 6
Rating Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
Achievement% 111% 101-110% 91-100% 81-90% 80%

KRA Self-Appraisal Appraisal by APpraiser


s Achievement Weight- Rating Achievement Weight- Rating
No. age Point WxR age Point WxR
% %
(W) (R) (W) ( R)
1 NIL 30 0 0
2 NIL 20 0 0
3 100 , 30 8 240
4 81 20 7 140

100 3.8 380 100


KRA Score (KS)

Improvement Quidance. if any by the Appraiser


The objective is to re-align the efforts of the employee if the achievements made so far, are not
as per the desired level! standard. (Attachsheets,if required)

Signature of appraiser with date

You might also like