Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chandler - Conflict, Poverty, Resilience PDF
Chandler - Conflict, Poverty, Resilience PDF
RESEARCH ARTICLE
This linking of international and national with crises, with the emphasis on the devel-
security with conflict and poverty was a opment of self-organisation and internal
major concern amongst critical commenta- capacities and capabilities rather than the
tors worried over what was seen as the politi- external provision of aid, resources or policy
cisation or securitisation of fundamental solutions. For example, the United Nations
humanitarian questions by both domestic defines resilience as:
and international elites. For example, the
ease with which international aid or assis- The capacity of a system, community
tance can be made fungible and diverted to or society potentially exposed to haz-
support vested interests (especially in non ards to adapt, by resisting or chang-
fully marketised economies or weak states ing in order to reach and maintain
dependent upon military or business elites) an acceptable level of functioning
is well demonstrated by Ayesha Siddiqa in and structure. This is determined by
her work on the military-business complex: the degree to which the social sys-
‘Milbus’ (Siddiqa 2007). Jennifer Hyndman tem is capable of organizing itself to
has written powerfully on how emergencies increase its capacity for learning from
have been politicised by the international past disasters for better future protec-
community, encouraging the securitisation tion and to improve risk reduction
of refugees and displaced persons through measures (UN/ISDR 2005).
more interventionist practices of humani-
tarian organisations, especially the UNHCR, Resilience has been highlighted as a key to
now involved in the politics of problem-solv- a broad raft of international policy-making
ing in states and preventing refugee prob- from conflict resolution to climate change
lems spilling over into the West (Hyndman and sustainable development (Chandler
2000; Duffield 2007). 2014; Evans & Reid 2014; Pugh 2014). Thus
Today the biggest concern of international we are witnessing nothing less than a revolu-
policy-makers is not so much the need to tion in international policy-thinking, with a
cohere interventionist programmes to address shift from imagining that international pol-
the impact of conflict and poverty, but rather icy-makers can solve development/security
the alleged dangers of the unintended conse- problems through the export or transfer of
quences of policy-making in a complex and policy practices or their imposition through
interconnected world. This paper focuses on conditionality, to understanding that prob-
these assumptions to explain how the con- lems should be grasped as emergent conse-
flict/poverty nexus has been reconceptualised quences of complex social processes which
away from an emphasis on the asymmetrical need to be worked with rather than against.
and potentially oppressive discourse of secu- Over the last decade, policy debates have
ritisation and militarisation. Instead there has shifted away from intrusive forms of coer-
been an increasing emphasis on the problem cive international governance and towards
of the linear and reductive understandings existing practices and knowledge, to be
of policy-intervention itself (and the unin- worked with on the basis that local capaci-
tended consequences of such mechanistic ties for resilience need to be at the heart of
approaches in the international sphere). approaches to conflict and poverty.
The transformation away from previous For these reasons, my paper for this con-
understandings of the conflict-poverty nexus ference focuses on a slightly different con-
is highlighted by the increasing interna- vergence, not so much the politicisation
tional policy focus on the need to develop and securitisation of questions of conflict
resilience. Resilience is defined broadly as and poverty but rather the depoliticisation of
the internal capacity of societies to cope questions of conflict and poverty, especially
Chandler: Rethinking the Conflict-Poverty Nexus Art. 13, page 3 of 14
long been upheld after decolonisation in the based upon these mechanistic assumptions
1950s and 1960s. Many commentators have led to an extension of the cause-and-effect
raised problems with the idealisation of lib- paradigm in the form of peacebuilding and
eral Western societies and the holding-up of statebuilding. These extensions were based
abstract and unrealistic goals which tended upon the assumption that it was necessary to
to exaggerate the incapacity or lack of legiti- understand the endogenous causal processes
macy of non-Western regimes (Heathershaw at play and to search for the societal precon-
& Lambach 2008; Lemay-Hébert 2009). ditions necessary for the establishment of lib-
Beneath the universalist claims of promoting eral regimes of markets, democracy and the
the interests of human rights, human secu- rule of law (Paris 2004; Chandler 2010).
rity or human development, critical theorists
suggested that new forms of international Reductionist
domination were emerging, institutionalis- Thirdly, this framework was reductionist.
ing market inequalities or restoring tradi- Conflict and poverty were understood in
tional hierarchies of power reminiscent of highly reductionist ways as if they were dis-
the colonial era (see, for example, Chandler tinct fields with distinct problems and mech-
2006; Douzinas 2007; Duffield 2007; Pugh anisms of measurement which could be
et al 2008; Dillon & Reid 2009). brought into a relationship, and this relation-
ship could be analysed in terms of cause-and-
Mechanistic effect. This approach left out the interactive
Secondly, the conflict/poverty nexus frame- relationship between the state and society
work was mechanistic. The problems of non- as well as multiple possible responses to the
Western states were understood in simple appearance of certain problems or govern-
terms of the need to restore the equilibrium ance failings (Scott 1998). Firstly, certain soci-
of the status quo - which was understood eties may be more prone to certain problems
as being disrupted by new forces or events. more than others. Rather than viewing these
Illustrated, for example, in the popular ‘New problems as discrete threats to otherwise
Wars’ thesis, which argued that stability healthy systems, vulnerability to conflict /
was disrupted by exploitative elites seek- famine / environmental changes should
ing to destabilise society in order to cling to therefore be seen as a product of the social,
resources and power (Kaldor 1999) or that economic and political systems in place,
the lack of human rights could be resolved and addressed at that level (Commission for
through constitutional reforms (Brandt et al Africa 2005). Secondly, conflict, corruption,
2011). The assumption was that society was poverty or other problems manifest them-
fundamentally healthy and that the problem- selves differently in different societies and
atic individuals or groups could be removed have different consequences and impacts,
or replaced through external policy-interven- making any external measure or comparison
tion (which would enable equilibrium to be impossible (with regard to development and
restored). This was a mechanistic view of how poverty, see Sen 1999). Some societies may
societies operated - as if they were machines be better able to cope with the stresses and
and a single part had broken down and strains of poverty or inequality than others,
needed to be repaired. There was no holistic for example. Similarly, conflict, corruption
engagement with society as a collective set or other problems might be understood as
of processes, interactions and inter-relations. reflecting processes of change and devel-
The assumption was that external policy opment, and therefore be seen as coping
interveners could come up with a ‘quick fix’ mechanisms, depending on the context of
– perhaps sending troops to quell conflict or the society concerned (Cramer 2006).
legal experts to write constitutions – followed The universalist, mechanistic and reduc-
by an exit strategy. The problems of policy tionist approach to conflict/poverty policy
Chandler: Rethinking the Conflict-Poverty Nexus Art. 13, page 5 of 14
which informed policy-interventions and same). Crucially, this framing takes inter-
produced the hubristic and reductionist vention out of the context of policy making
promises of transformative outcomes (Owen and policy understanding and out of the
2012; Stewart & Knaus 2012; Mayall & Soares political sphere of democratic debate and
de Oliveira 2011; Mazarr 2014). According to decision-making. The focus therefore shifts
the critical consensus, international policy- away from international policies (supply-
makers need to liberate themselves from the driven policy making) and towards engaging
constraints of their outmoded mechanistic with the internal capacities and capabilities
models, inherited from the Enlightenment in that are already held to exist. In other words,
the seventeenth century and associated with there is a shift from the agency, knowledge
Descartes’ strict mechanical division between and practices of policy interveners to that of
the mind and the body and Isaac Newton’s the society, which is the object of policy con-
view of the universe as a mechanical clock- cerns. As the 2013 updated UK Department
work model of timeless universal laws. for International Development Growth and
Resilience Operational Plan states: ‘We will
The Rise of Resilience produce less “supply-driven” development of
The focus on resilience, increasingly taken product, guidelines and policy papers, and
up by international policy-interveners, foster peer-to-peer, horizontal learning and
thereby insists that problems cannot be dealt knowledge exchange, exploiting new tech-
with merely at the level of causation - i.e. by nologies such as wiki/huddles to promote
identifying and categorising a problem as if the widest interaction between stakeholders’
it could be understood in the reductionist (DfID 2013: 8).
terms of cause-and-effect, with every prob- ‘Supply-driven’ policies – the stuff of poli-
lem having a specific causation, which could tics and of democratic decision-making –
be universally addressed through the devel- are understood to operate in an artificial or
opment of a specific ‘cure.’ This reductionist non-organic way, and to lack an authentic
view was held to fit well with a mechanistic connection to the effects which need to be
understanding of policy intervention, the addressed. The imposition of (accountable)
assumption being that the body of the state external institutional and policy frameworks
or society was essentially healthy and that a has become increasingly seen as artificial
specific external cause could be isolated and and thereby as having counterproductive
addressed to produce a cure and a return or unintended outcomes. Resilience-based
to equilibrium and stability. This approach approaches thereby seek to move away
entirely excluded the specific internal and from the ‘liberal peace’ policy interven-
external historical, social, political and eco- tions – e.g. seeking to export constitutional
nomic environment and also any under- frameworks, train and equip military and
standing of what was necessary to encourage police-forces, impose external conditionali-
the state’s or society’s own capacities and ties on the running of state budgets, export
capabilities to manage resiliently. managerial frameworks for civil servants and
Intervention based on developing resil- political representatives, impose regulations
ience therefore has no need for ready-made to ensure administrative transparency and
international policy solutions that can sim- codes of conduct – which were at the heart
ply be applied or implemented. This there- of international policy prescriptions in the
fore implies little possibility of learning 1990s and early 2000s (World Bank 2007;
generic lessons from interventions applica- Eurodad 2006; ActionAid 2006).
ble to other cases of conflict or underdevel- It is argued that the ‘supply-driven’
opment (on the basis that if the symptoms approach of external experts exporting or
appeared similar the cause must be the developing liberal institutions does not grasp
Art. 13, page 8 of 14 Chandler: Rethinking the Conflict-Poverty Nexus
the complex processes generative of instabil- problem: ‘Conflict is a normal part of human
ity or insecurity. Instead, the cause-and-effect interaction, the natural result when individu-
model of intervention is seen to create prob- als and groups have incompatible needs,
lematic ‘hybrid’ political systems and fragile interests or beliefs’ (UK Government 2011:
states with little connection to their societies 5). The problem which needs to be tackled
(Roberts 2008; Mac Ginty 2010; Richmond & is the state’s or society’s ability to manage
Mitchell 2012; Millar 2014). The imposition conflict: ‘In stable, resilient societies con-
of institutional frameworks, which have little flict is managed through numerous formal
connection to society, is understood as fail- and informal institutions’ (UK Government
ing, not only in not addressing causal pro- 2011: 5). Conflict management, as the UK
cesses leading to poverty and conflict but as government policy indicates, is increasingly
making matters worse through undermining understood as an organic set of societal pro-
local capacities to manage the effects of prob- cesses and practices, which international
lems (and thereby shifting problems else- policy-intervention can influence but can-
where and leaving states and societies even not import or impose solutions from the
more fragile or vulnerable). This approach is outside. This brings into the mainstream the
alleged to fail to hear the ‘message’ of prob- approach advocated by the peace theorist
lematic manifestations or to enable societies’ Jean Paul Lederach who states: ‘The great-
own organic and homeostatic processes to est resource for sustaining peace in the long
generate corrective mechanisms. Triggering term is always rooted in the local people
external interventions is said to shortcut and their culture’ (1997: 94). For Lederach,
the ability of societies to reflect upon and managing conflict means moving away
take responsibility for their own affairs and from cause-and-effect forms of instrumental
is increasingly seen as a counterproductive external intervention which see people as
‘over-reaction’ by external powers (see fur- ‘recipients’ of policy; instead people should
ther, Desch 2008; Maor 2012). be seen as ‘resources,’ integral to peace pro-
There is an increasingly prevalent view cesses. Therefore it is essential that:
that, contrary to earlier assumptions, policy
solutions can only be developed through …we in the international commu-
practice by actors on the ground thus invers- nity adopt a new mind-set - that we
ing the traditional disciplinary understand- move beyond a simple prescription
ing of intervention as an exercise of external of answers and modalities for dealing
political power and authority. It does this with conflict that come from outside
through denying intervention as an act of the setting and focus at least as much
external decision-making and policy direc- attention on discovering and empow-
tion as understood in the political paradigm ering the resources, modalities, and
of liberal modernist discourse. This can be mechanisms for building peace that
seen through an examination of the policy exist within the context (1997: 95).
shifts in the key areas of conflict and poverty
and the reduction of the security/poverty One of the central shifts in understanding
nexus to the self-activity of empowerment. conflict as something that needs to be ‘coped
Policy-interventions are increasingly shift- with’ and ‘managed’ rather than something
ing in relation to the understanding of that can be ‘solved’ or ‘prevented’ is the view
conflict. There is much less talk of conflict that state-level interventions are of limited
prevention or conflict resolution and more of use. Peace treaties can be signed by state par-
conflict management. As the UK government ties but unless peace is seen as an ongoing
argues in a 2011 combined DfID, Foreign and transformative inclusive societal process
and Commonwealth Office and Ministry of these agreements will be merely superficial
Defence document, conflict per se is not the and non-sustainable (Lederach 1997: 135).
Chandler: Rethinking the Conflict-Poverty Nexus Art. 13, page 9 of 14
Just as peace and security are no longer assumes the existence of poverty as the basis
understood to be securable through cause- of policymaking (Aradau 2014). As she states:
and-effect forms of intervention reliant ‘resilience responses entail a change in how
on policy-interveners imposing solutions poverty, development and security more
in mechanical and reductive ways, there broadly are envisaged.’ This is clearly high-
has also been a shift in understanding the lighted in DfID’s 2011 report outlining the
counterproductive effects of attempts to UK government’s humanitarian policy:
export the rule of law (Cesarine & Hite 2004;
Zimmermann 2007; Chandler 2015). The Humanitarian assistance should be
resilience approach is driven by a realisation delivered in a way that does not under-
of the gap between the formal sphere of law mine existing coping mechanisms
and constitutionalism and the social ‘real- and helps a community build its own
ity’ of informal power relations and infor- resilience for the future. National
mal rules. This perspective has also been governments in at-risk countries can
endorsed by Douglass North, the policy guru ensure that disaster risk management
of new institutionalist economics, who has policies and strategies are linked to
highlighted the difficulties of understand- community-level action. (DfID 2011:
ing how exported institutions will interact 10, cited in Aradau 2014)
with ‘culturally derived norms of behavior’
(1990: 140). The social reality of countries As George Nicholson, Director of Transport
undergoing post-conflict ‘transition’ could and Disaster Risk Reduction for the
not be understood merely by an analysis of Association of Caribbean States argues
laws and statutes. In fact, there appears to explicitly: ‘improving a person’s ability to
be an unbridgeable gap between the artifi- respond to and cope with a disaster event
cial constructions of legal and constitutional must be placed on equal footing with the
frameworks and the realities of everyday process to encourage economic develop-
life, revealed in dealings between individual ment,’ highlighting the importance of dis-
members of the public and state authorities. aster risk as a strategy for resilience versus
A key policy area where this shift (from the cause-and-effect approach associated
addressing causes to resilience approaches) with poverty reduction policy interventions
has had an impact has been in the sphere (Nicholson 2014). Whereas development
of poverty and development – the policy approaches put the emphasis on external
sphere previously most concerned with policy assistance and expert knowledge, dis-
transformative policy interventions. Coping aster risk reduction clearly counterposes an
with poverty and natural disasters is clearly alternative framework of intervention, where
a very different problematic from seeking it is local knowledge and local agency that
to use development policy to reduce or to count the most. Disaster risk reduction strat-
end extreme poverty. However, discourses of egies stress the empowerment of the vulner-
disaster risk reduction have increasingly dis- able and marginalised in order for them to
placed those of sustainable forms of devel- cope and to manage the effects of the risks
opment because of the unintended side and contingencies concomitant with the
effects of undermining the organic coping maintenance of their precarious existence.
mechanisms of communities and therefore Understanding empowerment in instru-
increasing vulnerabilities and weakening mental cause-and-effect terms based upon
resilience. Claudia Aradau has highlighted the external provision of legal and political
the importance of the UK Department for mechanisms for claims is increasingly seen
International Development (DfID) shift in to be ineffective. Rights-based NGOs now
priorities from poverty reduction strategies seek not to empower people to access for-
to developing community resilience, which mal institutional mechanisms but to enable
Art. 13, page 10 of 14 Chandler: Rethinking the Conflict-Poverty Nexus
Chandler, D 2015 Resilience and the ‘Eve- Dobbins, J, Jones, S G, Crane, K, and
ryday’: Beyond the Paradox of ‘Liberal DeGrasse, B C 2007 The Beginner’s Guide
Peace.’ Review of International Studies, to Nation-Building. Santa Monica, CA:
41(1): 27–48. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ RAND.
10.1017/S0260210513000533 Douzinas, C 2007 Human Rights and Empire:
Chomsky, N 1999 The New Military Human- The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitan-
ism: Lessons from Kosovo. London: Pluto. ism. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish.
Commission for Africa 2005 Our Common Drabek, T E and McEntire, D A 2003 Emer-
Interest: Report of the Commission for gent Phenomena and the Sociology of
Africa. Available at: http://www.commis- Disaster: Lessons, Trends and Opportuni-
sionforafrica.info/wp-content/uploads/ ties from the Research Literature. Disas-
2005-report/11-03-05_cr_report.pdf. ter, Prevention and Management, 12(2):
Cramer, C 2006 Civil War is not a Stupid 97–112. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/
Thing: Accounting for Violence in Develop- 09653560310474214
ing Countries. London: Hurst & Co. DSG 2012 Sustaining US Global Leadership:
Desch, M C 2008 America’s Liberal Illiberal- Priorities for 21st Century Defense. Wash-
ism: The Ideological Origins of Overreac- ington, DC: White House.
tion in US Foreign Policy. International Duffield, M 2007 Development, Security and
Security, 32(3): 7–43. DOI: http://dx.doi. Unending War: Governing the World of
org/10.1162/isec.2008.32.3.7 Peoples. Cambridge: Polity.
DfID (Department for International Eurodad 2006 World Bank and IMF Condi-
Development) 2011 Saving Lives, Pre- tionality: A Development Injustice. Brus-
venting Suffering and Building Resilience: sels: European Network on Debt and
The UK Government’s Humanitarian Pol- Development. Available at: http://www.
icy. London: DfID. Available at: https:// eurodad.org/uploadedfiles/whats_new/
www.gov.uk/government/uploads/ reports/eurodad_world_bank_and_imf_
system/uploads/attachment_data/ conditionality_report.pdf.
file/67468/The_20UK_20Governme Evans, B and Reid, J 2014 Resilient Life: The
nt_s_20Humanitarian_20Policy_20- Art of Living Dangerously. Cambridge:
_20September_202011_20-_20Final. Polity.
pdf. Gillespie, D and Melching, M 2010 The
DfID (Department for International Transformative Power of Democracy
Development) 2013 Operational Plan and Human Rights in Nonformal Edu-
2011–2015 DFID Growth and Resilience cation: The Case of Tostan. Adult Edu-
Department. London: DfID. cation Quarterly, 60(5): 477–498. DOI:
Dillon, M 2007 Governing Terror: The State http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741713
of Emergency of Biopolitical Emergence. 610363017
International Political Sociology, 1(1): Heathershaw, J and Lambach, D 2008
7–28. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ Introduction: Post-Conflict Spaces and
j.1749-5687.2007.00002.x Approaches to Statebuilding. Journal of
Dillon, M and Lobo-Guerrero, L 2008 Intervention and Statebuilding, 2(3): 269–
Biopolitics of Security in the 21st Cen- 289. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/
tury: An Introduction. Review of Inter- 17502970802436296
national Studies, 34(2): 265–292. DOI: Hehir, A and Robinson, N (eds) 2007 State-
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S026021 Building: Theory and Practice. Abingdon:
0508008024 Routledge.
Dillon, M and Reid, J 2009 The Liberal Way Held, D 1995 Democracy and the Global
of War: Killing to Make Life Live. London: Order: From the Modern State to Cosmo-
Routledge. politan Governance. Cambridge: Polity.
Chandler: Rethinking the Conflict-Poverty Nexus Art. 13, page 13 of 14
How to cite this article: Chandler, D 2015 Rethinking the Conflict-Poverty Nexus: From Securitising
Intervention to Resilience. Stability: International Journal of Security & Development, 4(1): 13,
pp. 1-14, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/sta.fb
Copyright: © 2015 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.