Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Answers
customs, and conventions which define the composition and powers of organs of state and
regulate the relations of various organs of the state and regulate the relations of various organs
to one another and to the private citizen. The Federal Constitution of Malaysia has a significant
feature of providing freedom of liberties of its subjects enshrined in Part II: Fundamental
Liberties, article 5 to 13. However, these Fundamental Liberties are not absolute and have
restrictions.
Article 5 sets the right to life and personal liberty. Every person has a right to life and
liberty. A person’s life or personal liberty cannot be taken away unless it is in accordance with
law. The courts have said that the right to life includes a right to livelihood and quality of life,
grounds of the arrest. It’s because, they have the right to consult and be defended by a lawyer
of his/her choice (this is known as ‘access to legal representation’) and they must be brought
before a magistrate within 24 hours and cannot be detained further unless it is with the authority
Corpus to the High Court and if the judge is satisfied, he is ordered to be released. As in the
case of Government of Malaysia v Loh Wai Kong, in which Kong came back to Malaysia
after working in Australia. He was charged for a criminal offence and required to hand over
his passport to the authorities. Consequently, he was denied renewal upon expiry of the
passport and was brought to the Federal Court. The case was dismissed because the issuance
of passport was the prerogative right of the government and the government may deprive his
liberty from leaving the country due to his criminal charges because Article 5 does not confer
Next, Article 6 sets no slavery or forced labour. No one can be made a slave or forced
to work. However, Parliament may make laws to require Malaysians to provide compulsory
national service i.e. Program Latihan Khidmat Negara. Work or service required from a person
Furthermore, Article 7 sets the protection against retrospective criminal laws and
repeated trials known as double jeopardy. A person cannot be punished for something which
at the time when it was done was not an offence. For example, if a law is passed to make it
illegal to drive past a speed limit of 80km/h, a person driving past that speed limit before the
law is passed cannot be punished. This is known as the prohibition against retrospective
criminal laws. If the punishment for a crime is increased, a person who committed the crime
before the punishment was increased cannot be given that increased punishment. For example,
if the law is amended to change the punishment for breaking a speed limit from a fine to a
prison sentence, a person breaking the speed limit before the law is amended cannot be
punished with a prison sentence. A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence
shall not be tried again for the same offence, unless the conviction or acquittal is quashed (set
equal protection of the law. Unless the Constitution says so, citizens cannot be discriminated
only because of their religion, race, descent, place of birth or gender. It include in under any
law like in the employment by a public authority or how any law is applied relating to property
However, Article 8 does not apply to laws that regulating personal law, laws relating to
office or any employment connected to any religion or religious institutions, laws for the
public service for the Orang Asli of Peninsula Malaysia, laws that say that a person to be elected
or appointed into a State authority, and any person who can vote in such elections, must reside
in that State, laws in the Constitution of a State that were made before Merdeka Day (31 August
excluded from the country. In general, every citizen has the right to move freely and stay in
any part of the country except where any law is passed relating to the security of the country,
public order, public health or the punishment of offenders. The special position of Sabah and
Sarawak compared to other States also allows for laws to be made to control who can enter and
stay in Sabah and Sarawak. We talk about the special interests and safeguards for Sabah and
freedom of speech, assembly and association but these freedoms may be restricted by
Parliament for reasons permitted by the Constitution. The Courts have said Parliament may
only impose restrictions where they are reasonably necessary. We have freedom of speech and
expression. It’s where every citizen has the right to freedom of speech and expression.
However, Parliament may make laws to restrict this right if they are necessary or expedient in
the interest of the security of Malaysia, friendly relations with other countries, public order or
morality or the protection of the privileges of Parliament or any State legislative assembly or
In imposing restrictions on the freedom of speech and expression in the interest of the
security of the country or public order, Parliament may pass laws prohibiting the questioning
of matters relating to citizenship, the national language, the special position of Malays and the
natives of Sabah and Sarawak and sovereignty of the Rulers. However, it is not illegal to
Then, right to assemble peaceably and to form associations. All citizens have the right
to assemble peaceably and without arms and to form associations. However, Parliament may
make laws to restrict these rights if they are necessary or expedient in the interest of the security
of the country, public order or morality (only for the right to form associations)
Furthermore, Article 11 sets freedom of religion. This Article states that every citizen
has a right to profess and practice his faith and religion peacefully in this country. However,
this liberty is restricted by Article 11(4). Basically, it prohibits the propagation of any religious
doctrine among persons professing the religion of Islam. Plus, this Article must be read with
Article 3 (1) and Article 11 (5) which state the practice of religion must not disturb
peacefulness, and must not adversely affect public order, public health or morality.
Cases that related with this Article is Meor Atiqulrahman Ishak & Ors v Fatimah bt
Sihi. Meor Atiqulrahman and 2 others wore turban as part of their school uniform. They were
repeatedly asked not to wear the turban as it was not in compliance with the school regulation.
They refused to follow the regulation, and as a result, the headmistress expelled them from the
school. In the court, the plaintiffs argued that the headmistress’ action had violated their right
to practice freedom of religion. They further argued that the wearing of turban is part and
integral of Islamic practice. Their case was dismissed that the Federal Court opined that the
school regulations (that prohibits the wearing of turban) does not contravene Article 11 of the
Federal Constitution.
by a public authority), the admission of students and the payment of fees – Article 12 prohibits
any form of discriminations on the grounds of religious, races, descent or place of birth in these
matters.
Lastly, Article 13 sets about Right to Property. This Article guarantees the citizen’s
right to own property and he shall not be deprived of this right, except in accordance with law.
No law shall provide for compulsory acquisition or use of property unless adequate