Additional Comments (see the eNotebook for specific comments and suggestions)

Conclusion
(2.5 marks) = 2.5/2.5
Conclusions and interpretations are Superficial and immediate Most results are explicitly Results are explicitly interpreted and
Logical conclusions based missing. conclusions are recorded. interpreted. compared with literature data
on data presented Conclusions are not logical and/or An attempt at interpreting results Conclusions are mostly justified by and/or concepts discussed in class.
do not agree with data presented. has been made but is not explicit. data presented. Conclusions are completely justified
Conclusions are written in a non- Conclusions are not written Conclusions are written coherently by data presented.
coherent manner with many spelling coherently and contain some with some spelling or grammatical Conclusions are written coherently
and grammatical errors. spelling or grammatical errors. errors. with no spelling or grammatical
errors.
Hi Georgia, well done with your ELN. You have shown great technical expertise with the ELN and your use of figures and tables made this ELN a pleasure to read.
Easy to follow layout of your ELN.
All data was logically presented with concise explanations and interpretations enhancing the readability.
Your use of table and figures to highlight your methodology and results made reading this ELN a pleasure. Well done. You have obviously put a lot of thought into the
layout.
The consistency of your ELN design also made the interpretation of the 3 experiments easy. This also assisted the ability to compare the experimental results, which was
supported by your use of a page for the project conclusion.
Importantly you have showed all data and conclusions and have described the experimental methodology and results in enough detail that others would be able to repeat
your experiments but also write up any of this work in the future.
Your use of references was excellent.