Critical Reflection Marking Guide

Criteria Excellent Good Fair Needs work

7.5 5.0 2.5 0
Reflection Response Response Response Response
demonstrates an in- demonstrates a demonstrates a demonstrates a lack of
7/7.5 depth and insightful general reflection on minimal reflection on reflection on or
reflection on and the related readings. or engagement with engagement with
engagement with the Sources are the related readings. related readings.
related readings. occasionally used to Viewpoints and Viewpoints and
Sources are support ideas, points interpretations are interpretations are
consistently integrated of view are unsupported. Partially missing, inappropriate,
to support ideas, while acknowledged. Mostly responds to the and/or unsupported.
other points of view responds to the assignment guidelines. Does not respond to
are acknowledged. assignment guidelines. the assignment
Fully responds to the guidelines.
assignment guidelines.

Writing Writing is clear, Writing is mostly clear, Writing is unclear Writing is unclear and
and concise, and well concise, and well and/or disorganized. disorganized. Thoughts
structure organized with organized with good Thoughts are not ramble and make little
6/7.5 excellent sentence/paragraph expressed in a logical sense. There are
sentence/paragraph construction. There are manner. There are numerous spelling,
construction. There a few errors in many errors in grammar, or syntax
are no grammar grammar. Thoughts grammar and/or errors throughout the
errors. Thoughts are are expressed in a format. There are response. Many errors
expressed in a coherent and logical several errors in APA. in APA or does not use
coherent and logical manner. A few errors APA.
manner. No errors in in APA.
APA.
Total Comments: Nice work Pratha and Sukhleen – good discussion of some of the key issues. A
13/15 few formatting/APA issues – easily addressed for next time.