Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(eds)
© 2013 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-62095-6
L.F. Vesga
Domeight Research Institute, Bogotá, Colombia
L.E. Vallejo
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA
ABSTRACT: The mechanics of crack propagation in clay under uniaxial cyclic stresses is presented.
Prismatic samples of kaolinite clay with induced cracks at different inclination angles were tested. The
level of uniaxial stress at which the cracks do not propagate (the threshold strength) is investigated.
The samples with the induced cracks were unsaturated with water contents variable between 3% and 25%.
The strength of the samples to cyclic loading was found to vary with water contents because the capillary
effects in the samples. The tests also indicated that the pre-existing cracks in the clay samples propagated
from their tips in a direction parallel to the applied uniaxial compressive stress. In addition, the threshold
strength at which the cracks did not propagate in the samples varied between 30% and 70% of the static
stress that caused the sample failure.
397
cracks. Vallejo and co-workers did several tests using respect to cyclic loads levels below which the cracks
rectangular kaolinite specimens with single or mul- do not propagate. Samples of fissured clays were
tiple cracks prepared in accordance with a special subjected to uniaxial cyclic stress conditions. The
process that he developed; cracks of different orien- cyclic stress ratio was defined as the ratio between
tations and specimens with different water contents the applied deviator dynamic vertical stress (d) on
were used. The specimens were subjected to monot- a fissured specimen and the monotonic compres-
onic uniaxial, biaxial, triaxial and shear stress fields. sion strength (u) of a similar specimen having the
The research used Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics same water content and crack geometry. The cyclic
(LEFM) to theoretically study the tension and com- stress ratio is given as:
pression stress concentrations around the cracks.
Four important conclusions can be derived d
d
(1)
from their findings as follows. (1) The critical pre-
existing crack inclination, which corresponds to
the condition of the lowest compression strength The purpose of the dynamic-load testing was to
for crack propagation, varies between 45º and 60º find the threshold load (fraction of the static load),
with respect to the direction of the applied prin- expressed as the cyclic stress ratio rd, at which,
cipal stress. (2) The maximum tangential stress regardless of the number of cycles applied, there is
criterion for a sharp crack of the type earlier pro- no crack propagation in an unsaturated kaolinite
posed by Erdogan and Sih (1963) was used to pre- clay subjected to dynamic loading conditions.
dict the angle between the pre-existing crack plane
and the crack propagation direction; this criterion
was selected by Vallejo et al. (1995) as the closest 4 DESCRIPTION OF LABORATORY TESTS
to their findings between of all the criteria that
were applied; (3) Fissures propagate as a result of Prismatic kaolinite specimens were prepared for
constant compressive stresses (creep), which are the tests. The liquid, plastic and shrinkage limits
much less than the crack-propagation compression of the kaolinite are 44, 26 and 24 respectively and
strength of monotonically loaded clays (Vallejo and the specific gravity is 2.59. The SWCC curve of
Shettima, 1997). (4) Multiple cracks will make the the clay used in this research is described by Vesga
clay weaker, especially if superposition of tensile- (2008). The sample preparation was done with the
stress concentration zones develops (Vallejo, 1994). following process:
Lefebvre et al. (1988) studied the cyclic undrained 1. Mixing the dry powdered kaolinite with distilled
resistance of non-fissured, intact saturated Hudson water to moisture content of 40% and until a
Bay clay and described the threshold as the stress smooth and uniform paste was obtained.
level below which the soil suffers no failure regard- 2. Casting the paste into molds (prismatic of
less of the number of applied cycles. The research- 7.5 cm 7.5 cm 2.5 cm or cylindrical 6.35 cm
ers used the term cyclic stress ratio to describe this in diameter and 2 cm thick).
stress level which relates to both the applied triaxial 3. Applying a vertical pressure of 30 kPa for con-
cyclic stress and the triaxial compression strength solidation during 24 hours in a closed environ-
of the intact clay. They found that for the saturated ment with 75% of relative humidity (RH).
Hudson Bay clay, the stability threshold is defined 4. Extracting the specimens from the molds and
by a cyclic stress ratio of between 0.60 and 0.65. inducing the primary crack with inclination
In a similar way, the stability threshold concept is angles of 15º, 30º, 45º, 60º and 75º with respect
applied in this research to the study of crack propa- to the horizontal; samples were still saturated
gation in clays under dynamic loads. during this stage. Each crack was made using
a blade which produced a crack having a length
of 25 mm and a thickness of 1 mm.
3 STABILITY THRESHOLD APPLIED 5. Subjecting the specimens to a drying process
TO FISSURED CLAYS into an environment with a RH 30%.
6. After each specimen reached the desired mois-
The stability threshold research will now be ture content (between 2% and 34% with inter-
extended to fissured clays. The laboratory tests vals of around 3%) it was stored into a plastic
for this research focused on specimens of fissured membrane during a minimum 24 hour period
clays that were subjected to cyclic loads; the loads in order to obtain equilibrium of the moisture
applied were just a fraction of the static loads that through the sample.
caused the failure of the clay (Vesga, 2005). The
research investigated the influence of the resulting Uniaxial constant water content tests were
fatigue on the propagation of cracks in unsatu- done using both intact and pre-cracked specimens
rated kaolinite clay and on the threshold stress with (Fig. 1). Each sample tested was maintained inside
398
Figure 2. Failed specimen. Secondary crack curved to
follow the direction of the principal stress.
399
soil strength does not change; this statement can be
supported not only experimentally as shown here,
but also theoretically (Vesga, 2008). On the other
hand, a capillary contact can break for two principal
reasons: cavitation pressure in the water is reached
as the soil is dried, or the particles forming the con-
tact are separated a distance and the capillary neck
cannot survive if the water volume is reduced and
some distance between particle remains. Capillary
neck breakings produce the soil to be weaker as
the soils is dried (suction stress is increased) in the
Zone III. The soil has a minimum resistance after it
is completely dried; its resistance depends on the van
der Waals inter-particle attractions (Vesga, 2005).
Soil behavior in the complete-pendular and
partial-pendular states as explained here in invali-
date the empirical soil strength equations based on
the suction stress as proposed by several authors.
In other words, measuring the suction stress in
soils for evaluating strength or compressibility is
waste of time if the soil is in such pendular states.
Other efforts of expressing the strength in terms
of tensile strength or the equivalent effective stress
seem to be more reasonable and scientifically sound
Figure 4. Vertical stress producing crack propagation c. (Lu, 2008, Lu et al., 2009; Vesga 2008).
Comparison of results from different tests does
above 26% (Zone I), the strength is almost constant not show important variation of the crack propa-
for the intermediate interval between 12% and 26% gation angle with water content. After the second-
(Zone II) and reduces as the soil is dried below ary crack started the propagation, the crack curved
12% (Zone III). towards the vertical direction which is the orien-
Vesga and Vallejo (2006) explain the observed tation of the principal stress applied on the speci-
variation of the soil strength with the moisture mens (Fig. 1 and 2).
content using the concept of equivalent effective The cyclic stress ratio was earlier defined as the
stress (EES) proposed by Cho and Santamarina ratio between the applied dynamic vertical stress
(2001). Vesga and Vallejo (2006) propose that the and the ultimate monotonic compression strength
EES is dependent on the water distribution in the of a similar specimen (with the same water content
pores of the clay: saturated, funicular and pendular and the same primary crack inclination). The pur-
states as defined by German (1989). All the pores pose of the dynamic loading test was to find the
within the soil are full of water in the saturated threshold load (fraction of the static load) at which
state, air penetrates in the soil but water phase is no crack propagation occurred under dynamic
still continuous in the funicular state and capillary loading conditions regardless of the number of
meniscus between particles (discontinuous water applied cycles.
phase) exist in the pendular state (German, 1989). Figures 5 and 6 show the obtained results; the
Zone I corresponds to saturated-funicular state, in cyclic stress ratio is expressed as a function of the
which since the water phase is continuous then the water content in the specimens. The dark points
strength increases as the suction stress in the soil in this figure represent the cyclic stress ratios (rd)
is increased (Vesga, 2008). Zone II corresponds to for which crack propagation occurred; the clear
complete-pendular state in which the soil strength points represent the cases for which no crack prop-
remains almost constant. Zone III corresponds to agation was observed after 7200 cycles of load
partial-pendular state in which strength diminishes applications.
as the water content is reduced below 12%. The general trend observed in these tests was
Vesga (2005) subdivides the pendular state in com- that the crack stability threshold is almost con-
plete pendular and partial-pendular states. All the stant regardless of the moisture content for water
contacts between particles in the soil have capillary contents of less than 26% (complete-pendular and
meniscus in the complete-pendular state (Zone II) partial-pendular states). For water content above
and some capillary contacts break in the partial- 26% in funicular-saturated state, the crack stabil-
pendular state (Zone III) as the soil is dried. When ity threshold diminishes noticeably; at a moisture
suction is increased in the partial-pendular state the content of 30%, the threshold was found to be as
400
Figure 6. Crack propagation threshold 45, 60, and
Figure 5. Crack propagation threshold 0, 15, and 75 deg.
30 deg.
401
of the clay and diminishes remarkably for higher Saada, A.S., Bianchi, G.F. and Liang, L. “Cracks, bi-
moisture contents when the water distribution is in furcation and shear bands propagation in saturated
the saturated-funicular state. clay”. Geotechnique, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 35–64. 1994.
More research is necessary in order to confirm Saada, A.S., Chudnovsky, A. and Kennedy, M.R. “A frac-
ture mechanics study of stiff clays”. Proceedings of the
that the low threshold values observed for high Eleventh Int. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Found. Eng., San
moisture contents close to saturation (saturated- Francisco, Calif., Vol. 2, pp. 637–640. 1985. Sherard, J.L.
funicular state) are due to the pore pressures devel- “Embankment dam cracking”. Embank- ment Dam
oped in the clay during dynamic loading and if Engineering, Hirchfeld, R.C. and Poulos, S.J., eds., John
there occurs local liquefaction around the crack Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 271–353.
tips due to the high compressive stress concentra- 1973.
tions which produce the pore pressure to rise and Skempton, A.W. “Long term stability of clay slopes”.
the crack to propagate. Geotechnique, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 77–102. 1964.
Skempton, A.W. and LaRochelle, P. “The Bradwell slip:
a short term failure in London Clay”. Geotechnique,
Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 221–242. 1965.
REFERENCES Terzaghi, K. “Stability of slopes in natural clays”. Proceed-
ings of the First Int. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Found.
Bishop, A.W. “Progressive failure with special reference Eng., Cambridge, Mass., Vol. 4, pp. 2353–2356. 1936.
to the mechanism causing it”. Proc. Geotech. Conf., Vallejo, L.E. “Mechanics of crack propagation in stiff
Oslo, Vol. 2, pp. 142–150. 1967. clays”. Geotechnical Aspects of Stiff and Hard Clays.
Broek, D. “ Elementary engineering Fracture Mechanics”. ASCE’s Geotechnical Special Publication No. 2.
Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Boston. p. 469. 1984. Khera, R.P. and Lovell, W., es., pp. 14–27. 1986.
Cho, G.C and Santamarina, J.C. “Unsaturated particu- Vallejo, L.E. “The brittle and ductile behavior of clay
late materials—Particulate-level studies”. Journal of samples containing a crack under mixed-mode load-
Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. ing”. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics,
ASCE. Vol. 127, No. 1, pp. 84–96. 2001. Vol. 10, pp. 73–78. 1988.
Covarrubias, S.W. “Cracking of earth and rockfill dams”. Vallejo, L.E. “Fissure parameters in stiff clays under
Harvard Soil Mechanics Series, 82. 1969. compression”. Journal of Geotech. Eng., ASCE,
Dataq Instruments. “Waveform recording systems”. 2003 Vol. 115, No. 9, pp. 1303–1317. 1989.
Catalog. Akron, OH. 2003. Vallejo, L.E. “Application of fracture mechanics to soils:
Duncan, J.M. and Dunlop, P. (1969). “Slopes in stiff fissured an overview”. Fracture Mechanics Applied to Geo-
clays and shales”. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and technical Engineering. ASCE’s Geotechnical Special
Found. Div. ASCE, Vol. 95, No. 2, pp. 467–491. 2003. Publication No. 43. Vallejo, L.E. and Liang, R.Y.,
Erdogan, R. and Sih, G.C. “On the crack extension in Editors, pp. 1–20. 1994.
plates under plain loading and transverse shear”. Jour- Vallejo, L.E., Al-Saleh, S. and Shettima, M. “Evaluation
nal of Basic Eng. ASME, Vol. 85, pp. 519–527. 1963. of fracture criteria for fissured clays”. Proc. Tenth
German, R.M. Particle packing characteristics. Metal Pow- Pan. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Found. Engineering,
der Industries Federation. Princeton, New Jersey. 1989. Mexico. 1995.
Lefebvre, G., LeBoeuf, D. and Demers, B. “Stability Vesga, L.F. “Crack Propagation Threshold in Fissured
threshold for cyclic loading of saturated clay” Cana- dian Clays”. 4th Int. Conf. Geotechnical Earthquake Engi-
Geotechnical Journal. Vol. 26, pp. 122–131. 1988. neering, Thesaloniki, Greece, 2007.
Lu, N. “Is s matric suction an independent stress Vesga, L.F. “Equivalent Effective Stress and Compress-
variable?”.J. of Geot. And Geoenv. Eng. ASCE, Vol. ibility of Unsaturated Kaolinite Clay Subjected to
134, No. 7, 2008. Drying”. J. Geot. Geoenv. Eng. ASCE. Vol. 134,
Lu, N., Kim, T.-H., Sture, S. and Likos, W.“Tensile Strength No. 3, 2008.
of Unsaturated Sand”.J. of Eng. Mech. Vol. 135, No. Vesga, L.F. Mechanics of Crack Propagation in Clays
12, 2009. under Dynamic Loading. Ph.D. Dissertation. Depart-
Marsland, A. “The shear strength of stiff fissured clays”. ment of Civil and Environmental Eng. University of
Stress strain behavior of soils, R.H. Parry, ed., G.T. Pittsburgh. 2005.
Foulis and C., London England, pp. 59–68. 1972. Vesga, L.F., Caicedo, B. and Mesa, L.E. “Deep cracking
Morgenstern, N. “Slopes and excavations in heavily over- in the ‘Sabana de Bogota’ clay”. Proceedings of the
consolidated clays”. Proceedings of the Ninth Int. Twelfth Panamerican Conf. on Soil Mech. and Geotech.
Conf. on Soil Mech. and Found. Eng., State of the Art Engineering. Cambridge, Mass. pp. 737–742. 2003.
Report, Tokio, Japan. Vol. 2, pp. 567–581. 1977. Vesga, L.F. and Vallejo, L.E. “Direct and Indirect Tensile
Morris, P.H., Graham, J. and Williams, D.J. “Cracking in Tests for Measuring the Equivalent Effective Stress in
drying soils”. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. Vol. 29, a Kaolinite Clay”. 4th International Conference on
pp. 263–277. 1992. Unsaturated Soils. ASCE. Arizona, USA. 2006.
Peterson, R., et al. “Limitations of laboratory shear Williams, A.A.B. and Jennings, J.E. “The in-situ shear
strength in evaluating the stability of high plastic clays”, behavior of fissured soils”. Proceedings of the Ninth
Proc. ASCE Res. Conference on the Shear Strength of Int. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Found. Eng., Tokio,
Cohesive Soils, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 701–765. 1996. Japan. Vol. 2, pp. 169–176. 1977.
Rizkallah, V. “Stress strain behavior of fissured stiff clays”.
Proceedings of the Ninth Int. Conf. on Soil Mech. and
Found. Eng., Tokio, Japan. Vol. 1, pp. 217–220. 1977.
402