Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that Mr. Tejas Borate , Mr. Rahul Borude
Mr. Mithil Chavan and Mr. Nilesh Giram have successfully completed the
Dissertation entitled “Investigation of Divided Helmholtz Resonator by
Perforated Plate for Acoustic Performance” under my supervision, in the
partial fulfilment of Bachelor of Engineering -Mechanical Engineering of
Savitribai Phule Pune University.
Date:
Place: Balewadi, Pune
Acknowledgement
We wish to express our deep sense of gratitude and honor towards our respected
guide Mr. S. S. Patil for his inspiring guidance and constant encouragement. His
committed devotion, dedication and encouragement with full faith on us were like a lamp
in our path which keeps us constant throughout project work.
Special thanks to Mr. A .R. Jain & Prof. M. J. Sature for his guidance and support
at various stages during the course of our project completion.
We also express our honor and gratitude to our Head of Mechanical Department
Dr. Ashfaq Sayyad for consistent encouragement for completing our project work
successfully.
We are also thankful to our respected Principal Dr. F. B. Sayyad and the Genba
Sopanrao Moze Trust for supporting our project which helped us in successfully
completing our project.
We are thankful to all Teaching and Non-Teaching staff member of the institute
and our classmate who had directly or indirectly made us enthusiastic for the project
work.
As we conclude, we would like to state that just as a positive attitude pays off our
hard efforts to bring this project to successful end, would also pay off. We hope that this
project would be one of the most significant steeping stones for our career and would
fulfill our aspiration in every aspect.
Name: Signature
Mr. Tejas Borate (B120300814)
Mr. Rahul Borude (B120300815)
Mr. Mithil Chavan (B120300817)
Mr. Nilesh Giram (B120300843)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Sr. Page
TITLE
No. No.
Acknowledgement i
List of Table v
List of Figures vi
ABSTRACT x
1 INTRODUCTION 1-3
1.3 Motivation 2
1.3.1 Scope 3
1.3.3 Methodology 3
3 ANALYSIS 9-26
5 COSTING 31
8.0 CONCLUSION 49
REFERENCES 50
APPENDIX 51
List of Abbreviations
dn Diameter of neck mm
dc Diameter of cavity mm
ac Area of cavity mm2
an Area of neck mm2
C Velocity of sound mm/sec
V Volume of cavity mm3
F Natural frequency Hz
K Spring stiffness N/mm
m Mass of neck & hole Kg
Lc Length of cavity mm
Ln Length of neck mm
t Thickness of perforated plate mm
k Wave number cm-1
HR Helmholtz Resonator Hz
TL Transmission loss dB
List of Figures
Figure Figure Designation Page
No.
No.
3.1 Conventional Helmholtz Resonator with spring mass system 9
3.2 Two degree of freedom system with one hole 12
3.3 Two degree of freedom system with two hole 15
3.4 Graph of frequency with variation in neck length 19
3.5 Graph between frequency with variation in cavity length 19
3.6 Graph between frequency with variation in sound velocity 20
3.7 Layout of Helmholtz Resonator 20
3.8 CAD model of Helmholtz Resonator 21
3.9 CAD model of Perforated Plate 22
3.10 Drawing of Helmholtz Resonator with perforated plate 22
3.11 Design model of Simple Helmholtz Resonator 25
3.12 Acoustic pressure plot of Helmholtz Resonator with perforated plate 26
4.1 Complete assembly of Helmholtz Resonator with perforated plate 30
6.1 Upper Cavity of HR 32
6.2 Piston arrangement for different cavity lengths 32
6.3 FFT analyzer 33
6.4 Microphone 34
6.5 Amplifier 35
6.6 Experimental setup of HR with divided perforated plate 35
6.7 Experimental setup of HR without divided perforated plate 36
6.8 Swept-Sine waveform signal 37
7.1 Sound pressure level with. frequency plot at inlet & outlet side 39
(Swept-Sine) For cavity length of 88.5mm
7.2 Sound pressure level with frequency plot at inlet & outlet side 39
(Swept-Sine) For cavity length of 98.5mm
7.3 Sound pressure level with frequency plot at inlet & outlet side 40
(Swept-Sine) For cavity length of 68.5mm
7.4 Sound pressure level with frequency plot at inlet & outlet side 41
(Swept-Sine) For cavity length of 158.5mm
7.5 Sound pressure level with frequency plot at inlet & outlet side 42
(Swept-Sine) For cavity length of 78.5mm
7.6 Sound pressure level with frequency plot at inlet & outlet side 42
(Swept-Sine) For cavity length of 108.5mm
7.7 Sound pressure level with frequency plot at inlet & outlet side 43
(Swept-Sine) For cavity length of 98.5mm
7.8 Sound pressure level with frequency plot at inlet & outlet side 44
(Swept-Sine) For cavity length of 78.5mm
7.9 Sound pressure level with frequency plot at inlet & outlet side 45
(Swept-Sine) For cavity length of 158.5mm
7.10 Sound pressure level with frequency plot at inlet & outlet side 45
(Swept-Sine) For cavity length of 148.5mm
List of Table
Symbol Description
ω Angular speed in rad/sec
ϒ Ratio of specific heat
𝜌 Density of air
𝜏 Transmission ratio
ABSTRACT
Now-a-days there has been great growth in noise level in our surrounding. This problem
causes health issues, environmental issues will make sense to go for noise attenuation. In
this project, investigation is done for the performance of a Helmholtz Resonator using a
perforated panel. The simple Helmholtz Resonator has a drawback of low frequency
bandwidth. This project deals with perforated plate which will behave like inertial mass
under incident sound wave. Perforated plate is used in combination with resonator to find
out the attenuation in sound pressure level. Noise reduction is dependent on acoustic
variables like pressure, get affected with introduction of perforated plate. Microphone
attachment with FFT analyzer will give the frequency range that may helpful for
numerical analysis. Numerical analysis of Helmholtz Resonator is carried out with or
without the perforated plate to summarize the acoustic behavior of the resonator. An
impedance tube measurement technique is performed to validate the numerical results for
resonator. Dimensional and shape modification can be done to get the acoustic
performance of dividing perforated plate with a resonator.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Sound is all around. Sometimes it is experienced as pleasant, sometimes as unpleasant.
Unwanted sound is generally referred to as noise. Noise is a frequently encountered
problem in modern society. One of the environments where the presence of noise causes
a deterioration in people’s comfort is in aircraft cabins. Noise encountered in daily life
can, for example, be caused by domestic appliances such as vacuum cleaners and
washing machines, vehicles such as cars and aeroplanes. So it has to be reduce to some
extent level for reducing the undesirable effects on environment and social area.
Common methods of passive noise reduction are the use of porous materials such as glass
wool or foam, double wall panels with thin air layers, or the application of acoustic
resonators. Knowledge of Helmholtz resonance and its theoretical description have been
used over the years to design and analyse various systems. An advantage of the
Helmholtz Resonator is that it has the characteristic of strong sound attenuation, even
though its geometry is relatively simple. When it, is appropriately tuned, it can
substantially reduce noise over the low frequency domain. Many researchers and
engineers have been interested in, and employed, the Helmholtz Resonator for a variety
of applications, including a range of geometries, some of them as part of complex
configurations. Helmholtz Resonators are in common use in applications such as acoustic
elements in rooms and in duct silencers. They can take two principal forms: single
resonators or distributed resonators. The perforated panels often used in rooms is an
example of distributed Helmholtz Resonators. The geometries of Helmholtz Resonators
are very diverse, but they all have two characteristic features in common: A cavity and a
relatively small opening through which the sound energy enters the cavity. In the case of
the distributed Helmholtz Resonator, the cavity is shared by the resonator openings. For a
limited frequency range, a Helmholtz Resonator is analogous to a simple mechanical
damped resonator system. The resilience of the air in the cavity makes it similar to a
spring. The mass of the air in and around the orifice is equivalent to a mechanical mass.
The value of the “spring constant” and the mass is what mainly determines the resonance
frequency.
In a Helmholtz Resonator, it produces a low frequency tonal noise. The air in its neck
behaves as a discrete mass, while the air in the cavity has the role of a spring. During
oscillation, the gas within the volume of the resonator is alternately compressed and
expanded at very low magnitudes. The inertia of the air in the neck of the resonator plays
an important role.
1.1 Purpose of using perforated plate
Previous worked has been done in Energy Conversion and Management 109
(2016) 86–93 by Jin-yuan Qian on Transmission loss analysis of thick perforated plates
for valve contained pipelines. Valve contained pipelines have witnessed a great growth
and there exists a lot of noise caused by valves. Thick perforated plates are especially
used is valve contained pipelines for the noise control. In this paper, transmission loss
(TL) predictions of various thick perforated plates are carried out to analyse the noise
control performances. This work can give several advices for similar perforated plates
design works and someone who are dealing with decreasing the noise effects from the
valves in pipelines.
So, by combining the advantages of perforated plate and resonator, we investigate
the performance of Helmholtz Resonator by using perforated plate inside it.
1.3 Motivation
In the present work, the acoustic behaviour of one type of acoustic resonator, so-
called Helmholtz Resonators, is investigated. To gain some insight into the working
principle of the resonators, a simple geometry is considered. A schematic representation
of such a resonator with plate inside it is shown in Fig.1.3. The resonator is close at
cavity end and open at neck end and in the region of cavity the perforated plate is kept
which is interest of this work to find how transmission loss we get by using this method.
In this project work, the possibilities for the application of Helmholtz Resonators
for the latter purpose are investigated. In HR, due to its limitation of low frequency
bandwidth, we are going to investigate experimentally in order to increase the frequency
bandwidth.
1.3.1 Scope
To find out the resonance frequency of the Helmholtz Resonator with perforated
plate inside it in order to attenuate the noise at a require frequency.
1.3.3 Methodology
1. Study research paper and other literature related to Helmholtz Resonator and
perforated plate.
2. Understand the basic principle of Helmholtz Resonator
3. Numerical, Analytical & Experimental analysis of natural frequency of Helmholtz
Resonator with and without perforated plate.
periodic shape, which may weaken the effects of noise control. Besides, based on the
analytical solution of TL for the chamber muffler, a linear correction formula of
maximum TL is proposed for the thick perforated plate. This work can give several
advices for similar perforated plates design works and someone who are dealing with
decreasing the noise effects from the valves in pipelines.
Thick perforated plate is widely used in valve contained pipelines in order to
reduce noise. In this work, TL curves of both perforated plate and orifice are consist of a
steady range of low frequency and a fluctuating region at high frequency. The thick
perforated plate has better noise control performances because of the narrow margin, and
reducing the margin or arranging the holes can extend the noise elimination frequency
range of the thick perforated plate. Besides, the thinner plate has a wider steady region
but smaller TL at low frequency, while the thicker one has a better performance at low
frequency and narrower steady region. Finally, the low velocity flow does not affect the
TL curve so much and when the inlet velocity of mean flow increases.
This research paper has been beneficial for us in this project to find out the
geometry of the perforated plate.
using COMSOL. All analytical and numerical results were validated using experimental
results from published data. Attenuation of around 40 dB has been achieved which proves
not only the efficiency of the proposed design procedure but also the straightforward
method to dimension the resonators.
This work also helps us to find out the Transmission loss of HR & resonant
frequency of the Helmholtz Resonator as this project work aims at the two degree of
freedom.
mounted model; and (c) experiments on an impedance-tube test setup with one fabricated
prototype installed in a side branch orientation (pipe-mounted model). Closed-form
expressions have been developed in the present study for the resonance frequencies and
the transmission loss of this two degree-of-freedom system based on the Newton’s
second law of motion for a lumped system. The resonance frequencies and the
transmission loss from this theory agree well with the analytical results, while showing a
reasonable comparison with both the numerical predictions and the measurements.
In this work, the acoustic performance of a dual Helmholtz Resonator composed
of two Helmholtz Resonators in series (neck–cavity–neck–cavity) is investigated. The
effects of the 2nd neck and cavity have been illustrated: the resonance frequencies
decrease with the increasing length of the 2nd neck, decreasing radius of the 2nd neck,
and increasing volume of the 2nd cavity; while the influence of the shape of the 2nd
cavity (diameter to length ratio) remains same.
This research help us to dealing with space constraints in a Helmholtz Resonator.
In this work author Myonghyon Han says that The goals of the present
investigation were,· first of all, to investigate the resonance characteristics of an isolated
Helmholtz Resonator, then to attenuate the oscillations in a deep cavity duct, i.e., a side
branch, via attachment of the resonator to the wall of the duct. The volume of the
Helmholtz Resonator, as well as the geometrical details of its neck and its opening
(mouth), influence its resonance characteristics, as determined by spectral analysis of
pressure fluctuations within the resonator. These variations can lead to a substantial
increase or decrease of the resonant frequency. Also, furthermore, the theoretically
predicted resonant frequencies are compared with those measured experimentally. When
the resonator is attached to the wall of the deep cavity duct, i.e., side branch, the
oscillation of the entire deep duct~ Helmholtz Resonator system can be substantially
attenuated.
From the literature survey we come to know that how the Helmholtz Resonator is
working and how the noise is attenuated by using the same. There are some major
findings which we have obtained from the above literature survey are as follows:
3.0 ANALYSIS
In this section derivation for finding the natural frequency of Helmholtz Resonator with
divided perforated plate is described.
𝑚 = 𝜌𝑆𝐿eff
The effective length is given by
Leff = L+1.7a
Where,
a = radius of neck &
L = actual neck length
The stiffness of the resonator is define as the reciprocal of the compliance.
The force is written as F=PS
Where,
P=pressure of the neck entrance
S=surface area of the neck
PVϒ=constant
Where,
ϒ=ratio of specific heat
V=cavity volume of the Helmholtz Resonator
𝑃 −ϒΔV ϒSx
∴ = =
𝑃𝑎 𝑉 𝑉
Where 𝑃𝑎 = atmospheric pressure
F = mA
Where,
A=acceleration
Or
𝑑2𝑥 𝐹
=
𝑑𝑡 2 𝑚
𝑑2𝑥 𝑃𝑆 −ϒSPa
∴ 2
= = ∗𝑥
𝑑𝑡 𝜌𝑆𝐿 𝜌𝑉𝐿
As process is simple harmonic motion,
Hence,
𝑑2𝑥
𝐹𝑛𝑒𝑡 = m = −𝐾𝑥 …as F=-Kx
𝑑𝑡2
𝑑2 𝑥 −𝑘
∴ 2= ∗𝑥
𝑑𝑡 𝑚
And
𝐾
∴ω=√
𝑀
Where, K is the spring constant (N/m) of the spring and M is the mass (kg). In a Helmholtz
Resonator an arbitrarily-shaped container of volume V (m3) with an circular opening of
cross-sectional area S (m2), the mass of air M contained within the opening “neck” of the
container oscillates back and forth due to the effective spring constant associated with the air
contained within the volume V of the whole container alternatively being compressed as
above/below atmospheric pressure once each cycle of oscillation. Since the mass of air
oscillating back and forth in the neck of the Helmholtz Resonator at a frequency shown
below.
Equation of the frequency is given by
ω
𝑓=
2𝜋
1 ϒ𝑆𝑃𝑎
∴𝑓= ∗
2𝜋 𝜌𝑉𝐿
Where C is determined by density, pressure and ϒ,
𝐶 𝑆
𝑓= ∗√
2𝜋 𝑉𝐿
________(Δ)
m1
𝑘1
m2
𝑘2
Fig 3.2: Two degree of freedom system of perforated plate with one hole
From FBD of two masses m1 and m2 the two differential equations of motion are:
m1ẍ1-𝑘1 (x2-x1)=0 …1
m2ẍ2+𝑘2 x2+𝑘1 (x2-x1)=0 …2
By rearranging the terms of equations, we get,
m1ẍ1-k1x2- k1x1=0 …3
m2ẍ2 + (𝑘2 + 𝑘1 )x2-𝑘1 x1=0 …4
x1 = Asin(ωt) …5
x2 = Bsin(ωt) …6
where A and B are the amplitudes of the two vibrations of the two masses m1 and m2
under steady condition.
Therefore,
∴ ẍ1= - Aω2sin(ωt) …7
∴ ẍ2= - Bω2sin(ωt) …8
Substituting equ. 5, 6 & 7 in equ. 3, we get,
𝐴 𝑘1
∴ =
𝐵 𝑘1 − 𝑚1 ∗ ω2
…9
… 10
𝑘1 𝑘1 + 𝑘2 − ω2 𝑚2
∴ =
𝑘1 − 𝑚1 ∗ ω2 𝑘1
the above equation is quadratic in ω2 and gives two values of ω2, (two positive values of
ω and two negatives values of ω). The two positive values of ω give natural frequencies
ωn1 and ωn2 of the system.
Therefore above equation is called as frequency equation.
Consider following special cases to study the behaviour of the system.
Hence,
Hence,
a= m1 m2
b= -(𝑘1 m1+ m1(𝑘1 +𝑘2 ))
c= 𝑘1 𝑘2
𝑘1
m1 m2
𝑘2
m3
Fig 3.3: Two degree of freedom system of perforated plate with two hole
From FBD of two masses m1 and m2 the two differential equations of motion are:
m1ẍ1+m2ẍ1+𝑘1 x1-𝑘2 (x2-x1) = 0
m3ẍ2+𝑘2 (x2-x1) = 0
ẍ1= - Aω2sin(ωt)
ẍ2= - Bω2sin(ωt)
𝐴 𝑘2
∴ =
𝐵 𝑘1 + 𝑘2 − ω2 (𝑚1 + 𝑚2 )
𝐴 𝑘2 − ω2 𝑚3
∴ =
𝐵 𝑘2
𝑘2 𝑘2 − ω2 𝑚3
∴ =
𝑘1 + 𝑘2 − ω2 (𝑚1 + 𝑚2 ) 𝑘2
m1=m2=m
(𝑘2 -m3 ω2)( 𝑘1 +𝑘2 -2m ω2)= 𝑘2 2
𝑘1 𝑘2 + k22-2m ω2𝑘2 -m3𝑘1 ω2-m3 ω2𝑘2 +2mm3ω4=𝑘2 2
2mm3 ω4+(-2m𝑘2 -m3𝑘1 -m3𝑘2 ) ω2+𝑘1 𝑘2 =0
By comparing above equ with quadratic equation as shown below
−𝑏 ± √𝑏 2 − 4𝑎𝑐
2𝑎
Hence,
a= 2m1m2
b= -(2m𝑘2 + m3(𝑘1 +𝑘2 ))
c= 𝑘1 𝑘2
Similarly,
For perforated plate with three holes, Quadratic parameters are as follows,
a= 3m1m2
b= - (3m𝑘2 + m3(𝑘1 +𝑘2 ))
c= 𝑘1 𝑘2
Therefore, perforated plate with n number of holes, Quadratic parameters are as follows,
a= nm1m2
b= -(nm𝑘2 + m3(𝑘1 +𝑘2 ))
c= 𝑘1 𝑘2
By solving quadratic equation.
=ω2
Hence,
Where,
𝑘2 𝑘1 + 𝑘2 𝑘22 (𝑘1 + 𝑘2 )2 𝑘22 𝑘1 𝑘2
√
ω𝑛1 ,𝑛2 = ( + )± √ + + −
N= total number of holes2𝑚3 2𝑛𝑚 4𝑚32 4𝑛2 𝑚2 2𝑛𝑚𝑚3 2𝑛𝑚𝑚3
Where,
n = Number of holes
𝑘1 = spring (air) stiffness for hole mass in N/mm
𝑘2 = spring (air) stiffness for neck mass in N/mm
m = Total mass of air in holes of perforated plate
m3 = Mass of air inside the neck
Therefore by analytically we get the equation of resonance frequency of Helmholtz
Resonator with perforated plate inside it.
3.4.1 Design parameters selected for Helmholtz Resonator with perforated plate
We calculate resonator frequency value which further required for determining its
application on the basis of its frequency range. The neck area should be equal to total
number of holes in perforated plate in order to reduce the back pressure. We have done
the calculation on basis of getting lesser resonant frequency for noise attenuation criteria
due to sound energy loss. Analytical calculation was done on basis of neck length and
cavity length variation represented in table.
2. From using constrain values, for the frequency of 200HZ, other various parameters
calculated by using HR resonance formula are as follows:
𝐶 𝑆
𝑓= ∗√
2𝜋 𝑉𝐿
Table 3.1: Resonator frequency calculation with ±10% variation in neck & cavity length
SR. Speed of Cavity diameter Neck Cavity Neck Frequency
NO. sound (mm) diameter length length(mm2) (Hz)
(mm/s) (mm) (mm)
1. 3.4902E+05 100 37 188.8 72 210.823
2. 3.4902E+05 100 37 132 80 200
Also following graphs show frequency vs parameters with ±10% variation in neck &
cavity length.
Design model of Helmholtz Resonator was done in CATIA software include above
dimensions shown in below fig. 3.8 & fig. 3.9
The derived equation for resonance frequency of Helmholtz Resonator with plate
is as follow:
Hence,
∴ 𝑘1 =2153.5252N/m
∴ 𝑘2 =985.3644*103N/m
∴ m=4.01118*10-5kg
∴ m3=1.0322*10-4kg
Assume the perforated plate placed in such a way that the cavity is divided into two equal
parts. Hence, the volume is divided into two parts
𝜋
∴ V1=4 ∗ 𝑑𝑐2 ∗ 𝐿1
𝜋
∴ V2=4 ∗ 𝑑𝑐2 ∗ 𝐿2
Where,
L1=L2=48.5mm.
∴ f1= 176.6548 HZ
∴ f2= 9505.629 HZ
The conventional measure for sound insulation is the sound transmission loss, which is
the ratio of the incident and transmitted sound powers in logarithmic form.
𝑃
TL = 20log10(𝑃 𝑖 ) dB
𝑜
By putting all the respective values in (Δ) equation, we get the resonance frequency of
200 Hz which is approximately equal to the numerical value of 203.84 Hz. Following
table shows numerical frequency values at different nodes.
Hence, we get approximately same values, therefore our design of resonator is correct.
The analytical analysis is done on Ansys Workbench for the following parameters
Cavity diameter = 100mm
Cavity length = 48.5+48.5mm
Neck length = 80mm
Neck diameter = 37mm
Perforated plate = 35mm thickness with 19 holes
Fig 3.12: Acoustic pressure plot of Helmholtz Resonator with perforated plate
By putting all the respective values in (*) equation, we get the resonance frequency of
176.6548 Hz which is approximately equal to the numerical value of 162.51 Hz.
Hence, our derived equation for resonator with perforated plate is correct. For obtaining
different values of resonance frequency, variation in cavity length is done. Hence for
experimentation, there is slightly change in resonator in which upper rigid cavity is
replace by the variable piston cylinder arrangement as shown in fig.4.1
Raw Material:
Mild Steel
Raw Material:
Mild Steel
After manufacturing all the components, the complete assembly of Helmholtz resonator
with divided perforated plate is shown in below
5.0 COSTING
The manufacturing cost, all the material cost and additional accessories cost are
mentioned in the tabulated format below
Additional accessories required during manufacturing and assembly of the resonator are
mention below
Table 5.2: Additional Costs
Mechanical Parts Cost Per Quantity Total Cost
in Rs in Rs
Sand paper 20 20
Carbide tool 100 100
O-ring 60 120
Piston rod bolt and nut 160 160
Nut and bolts 10 120
Overheads 1000 1000
Total - 1520
There is a standardized method used for measuring the normal incidence sound wave
pressure and transmission loss: one uses Two Microphone measurement method referred
in ISO 10534-2.
1) FFT ANALYZER:
Four channel Bruel & Kjaer FFT analyzer is used for the experimentation. For this work
only two channels are used. Both the microphones are connected with channel one and
two. Output of the FFT is given to the PC.
2) MICROPHONES:
Two microphones of B & K are used for the measurement of sound pressure. Both the
microphones are mounted on the impedance tube with provision.
3) AMPLIFIER:
An impedance tube is available in our lab for experimentation, using that measurement
was done with use of two microphones. A speaker is used as sound source which is
connected at one end of the measurement tube and resonator-perforated plate assembly
was installed in between the microphone attachments of measurement tube. An amplifier
is connected before the speaker to increases the strength of a weak electrical signal. For
the experimentation, FFT analyzer is used to measure the performance of the resonator.
Two microphones are placed inside the measurement tube which was connected with
FFT analyzer. The perforated plate was mounted inside the resonator to get performance
characteristics of assembly by experimentally.
The main benefit of swept-sine analysis is the ability to measure harmonic distortion
simultaneously with linear response. This technique is best suited to making
measurements where very high SNR is needed, like acoustic measurements in noisy
environments, or when measuring very low level signals, like distortion or filter stop-
band performance. Using this waveform signal, measurements were taken on impedance
tube setup shown in result section.
Fig 7.1: Sound pressure level with frequency plot at inlet & outlet side (Swept-Sine)
For cavity length of 88.5mm
Fig 7.2: Sound pressure level with frequency plot at inlet & outlet side (Swept-Sine)
For cavity length of 98.5mm
Fig 7.3: Sound pressure level with frequency plot at inlet & outlet side (Swept-Sine)
For cavity length of 68.5mm
Fig 7.4: Sound pressure level with frequency plot at inlet & outlet side (Swept-Sine)
For cavity length of 158.5mm
Fig 7.5: Sound pressure level with frequency plot at inlet & outlet side (Swept-Sine)
For cavity length of 78.5mm
Fig 7.6: Sound pressure level with frequency plot at inlet & outlet side (Swept-Sine)
For cavity length of 108.5mm
Fig 7.7: Sound pressure level with frequency plot at inlet & outlet side (Swept-Sine)
For cavity length of 98.5mm
Fig 7.8: Sound pressure level with frequency plot at inlet & outlet side (Swept-Sine)
For cavity length of 78.5mm
Fig 7.9: Sound pressure level with frequency plot at inlet & outlet side (Swept-Sine)
For cavity length of 158.5mm
Fig 7.10: Sound pressure level with frequency plot at inlet & outlet side (Swept-Sine)
For cavity length of 148.5mm
The above results shows that the attenuation in sound field is uneven with respect to the
length of the cavity for the simple Helmholtz Resonator. For the resonator with
perforated plate, as cavity length increases the sound attenuation is increases up to certain
length then it is again decreases.
Also, as the cavity length increases the resonance frequency decreases.
The above results shows that as the number of holes increases, the resonance frequency is
decreases.
Also, as the number of holes on the perforated plate increases, the sound attenuation
mostly increases.
From the above table, we can say that as the thickness of the perforated plate increases,
the resonance frequency decreases.
Also, as the thickness of the perforated plate increases, the sound attenuation is also
increases because there is increase in air mass in a hole of the perforated plate.
As we can see in the tabulated results, there are some negative values obtained in
attenuation column. The reason behind this, at few lengths it is observed that noise is
generated i.e. waves are in phase. Hence, there is more noise level in the downstream
area.
8.0 CONCLUSION
Perforated plate is the main module of this project which was implemented for noise
attenuation criteria. The present study involves the acoustic performance of Helmholtz
Resonator with and without perforated plate inside it analytically and experimentally.
Experimental analysis also done in the range of resonance frequency which were
calculated analytically for the evaluation of attenuation in sound pressure level. Variation
in cavity length of Helmholtz Resonator was studied analytically to get resonator
frequency. Perforated plate was designed on basis of opening area of perforated plate
should be equal to the neck opening area of Helmholtz Resonator. Similarly, different
plate thickness was considered for the analysis to get an effect of it on acoustic
performance. The experimentation was carried out on impedance tube to measure natural
frequency of resonator-perforated plate assembly.
The overall conclusions obtained from this work are summarized as follows:
There is more resistance occurs for the sound waves as the cross-section area of
the plate increases as thick perforated plate has better noise attenuation
performance at low frequency.
There is more attenuation of sound pressure level as the opening holes in
perforated plate increases because there is net increase in mass of air in the holes
of the plate. Hence there is resistance of sound waves.
As variation is done on the cavity length, so that the attenuation of sound pressure
level is obtained at every step of the cavity length.
REFERENCES
[1] Jin-yuan Qian , Lin Wei , Guo-rong Zhu , Fu-qiang Chen, Zhi-jiang,’Transmission
loss analysis of thick perforated plates for valve contained pipelines’, Energy Conversion
and Management 109 (2016) 86–93
[2] Stefano Malavasi, gianandreamessa, umbertofratino, alessandropagano,’On the
pressure losses through perforated plates’, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 28
(2012) 57–66
[3] S. Mekid and M. Farooqui, ’design of Helmholtz Resonators in one and two degrees
of freedom for noise attenuation in pipelines’, Acoustics Australia December 2012
[4] Xiao-Ling Gai ⇑, Tuo Xing, Xian-Hui Li, Bin Zhang, Wen-Jiang Wang, ‘Sound
absorption of micro perforated panel mounted with Helmholtz Resonators’, Applied
acoustics 114 (2016) 260–265
[5] M.Alster, ‘improved calculation of resonant frequencies of Helmholtz Resonators,’,
journal of sound and vibration (1972) 24 (1) 63-85
[6] S. K. Tang, ’on sound transmission loss across a Helmholtz Resonator in a low Mach
number flow duct’, 2010 Acoustical Society of America
[7] Marieke Hannink, ‘acoustic resonators for the reduction of sound radiation and
transmission’, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands May 2007
[8] K. T. Chen, Y. H. Chen, K. Y. Lin and C. C. Weng, ’The Improvement on the
Transmission Loss of a Duct by Adding Helmholtz Resonators’, chen1998
[9] M.B. Xu, A. Selamet *, H. Kim, ‘Dual Helmholtz Resonator’, Applied Acoustics 71
(2010) 822–829
[10] Xiaofeng Shi, Cheuk Ming Mak, ‘Helmholtz Resonator with a spiral neck’, Applied
Acoustics 99 (2015) 68–71
APPENDIX
Matlab program for calculating dimensions of simple Helmholtz Resonator for
avoid time consuming
function resonator()
clc
x1=input ('\n Enter the diameter of neck :');
x2=input ('\n Enter the diameter of cavity:');
x3=input ('\n Enter the required frequency:');
x4=input ('\n Enter the velocity of sound:');
x5=input ('\n Enter the length of neck:');
if x1>37||x1<37
x1=37;% (all dimensions should be in mm)
fprintf('\n Neck diameter has been change to its constrained value %f',x1);
end
if x2>100||x2<100
x2=100;% (all dimensions should be in mm)
fprintf('\n Cavity diameter has been change to its constrained value %f',x2);
end
x7=(pi/4)*x1^(2);
fprintf('\n Area of neck is %f',x7);
x8=(pi/4)*x2^(2);
fprintf('\n Area of cavity is %f',x8);
x6=(x4/(2*pi*x3))^2*((x1*x1)/((x2*x2)*x5));
fprintf('\n Length of cavity is %f',x6);
end