Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assessment 1: Report
Jeremy Odang-Rohan
18017742
Executive summary……………………………………3
Background information………………………………5
Comparative table……………………………………..6
Recommendations…………………………………….11
Concept map………………………………………….20
References…………………………………………….44
Appendices……………………………………………48
taught was for a Year 10 mixed-capability History classroom consisting of 20 students with moderate-low attendance rates and varying economic backgrounds.
Despite the school statistics below, only one student came from a language background other than English.
Doonside Technology High School is a co-educational school that offers streamed classes for all teaching areas with the support of numerous student learning
support officers (SLSO). The population of the school demonstrates diversity amongst its 617 enrolled students, with 42% being from a language background
other than English (LBOTE), 16% identifying as Indigenous or Torres Strait Islander, and a relatively even split of 54% male and 46% female students as of
2018 statistics. The school’s location is within a low-socioeconomic area, with 61% of parents placed in the bottom quarter of earners. Despite this, Doonside
Technology High School provides students with adequate access to learning materials through its technological resources including interactive smartboards,
Google Chromebooks (laptops), 3D printers and utilising programs including Google Classroom and CANVAS.
The following report focuses on the evaluation and redesign of the Stage 5, Year 10 History Core Unit: Rights and Freedoms. The unit under evaluation was
originally developed for a mixed-capability class, with the sequencing of lessons and activities designed for students to successfully complete a separate
assessment task previously created for the unit that demonstrated the application of the Understanding by Design framework. The assessment task created was
issued to students and the pre-service teacher shortly after the unit had begun (Week 1, Lesson 2) and did not align with the sequencing nor depth required of
the topic as stated in the unit program and therefore lesson content, sequencing and resources required adjustments to cater to this change for students to
achieve the required outcomes by Week 4, Lesson 12. Despite this, efforts were placed to backward map lessons to prepare students for the assessment task
requirements though the limited time and unexpected change resulted in struggles to efficiently deliver the unit program and meet the outcomes required.
Furthermore, students demonstrated difficulty in grasping key historical concepts and ideas that impacted their historical investigation, acquirement of
evidence, composition of comprehensive texts and connection between past and contemporary issues.
Area of Strengths of the area of Concerns of the area of Suggested Changes to counteract Research support for the
consideration consideration consideration concerns changes suggested.
Students focus on the U.S. Civil The unit provided minimal Implementing a stronger focus on (Australian Curriculum,
Rights Movement and how this opportunity for students to learn to vocabulary goals in the history Assessment and Reporting
Literacy specific section of history use appropriate language features classroom. Fully understanding the Authority [ACARA], 2019);
explores historical, and text structures to comprehend vocabulary used in historical Alexander-Shea, 2011)
geographical, civic and cohesive texts and to compose their studies allows students to develop
economic concerns to build own. This would have allowed their ability to interpret, analyse
knowledge on related students to evaluate texts for shades and evaluate information from
information, concepts and ideas. of meaning and opinion in more various texts for different meanings
depth. and opinions. Students can utilise
this knowledge when composing
comprehensive and cohesive texts.
Students progressively utilise a The unit provides inadequate Unfamiliar vocabulary terms, (ACARA, 2019; Alexander-
wide variety of informational, opportunities for students to make including those referring to Shea, 2011)
persuasive and imaginative increasingly sophisticated language concepts, people, places, and
texts, ranging from speeches, and text choices to understand how events, impede learning in social
confronting images, language varies according to context. studies classrooms. Improving
declarations, animations and Furthermore, although concepts and student vocabulary can assist
documentaries in visual, audible ideas are studied, improvements can students in grasping a complete
and written modes. be made to support students’ scope of social concepts they’re
understanding of them. studying and plays a critical role in
determining their drive to learn and
improving their ability to make
sophisticated language and text
choices relevant to the context.
The following are evidence-based recommendations to be applied to evaluated unit utilising the Understanding by Design framework to reconstruct the
program. The following recommendations are separated into their general capabilities categories and address the requirements of students, indicate concerns
with observed inadequacies and propose approaches to target these deficits. The final sub-heading, Understanding by Design (UbD) and Assessment address
the frameworks requirements, application into a history unit and student assessment.
Literacy
The Australian Curriculum General Capabilities standards regarding literacy in Humanities and Social Sciences (HASS) requires students to make increasingly
sophisticated language and text choices to understand how language varies according to context, use language features and text structures to compose cohesive
texts and understand how language can be manipulated to make meaning (ACARA, 2019). Alexander-Shea (2011) states the primary impediment to learning in
social studies classrooms is unfamiliarity with relevant vocabulary terms related to concepts, people, places and events on the topic studied which plays a
critical role in a student’s drive to learn the content (Anderson, 1983). Students who have trouble understanding key historical terms will struggle to see the
importance of a word or concept when surfaced, impeding their ability to interpret, analyse and evaluate key information to build their knowledge on these
ideas. Furthermore, it places limitations on their comprehension of key texts and language use when composing cohesive responses.
Alexander-Shea (2011) believes the overarching goal of social studies is to involve students in civic activities, to understand their world and place in it better,
though to achieve this requires grasping a complete scope of social concepts which require strong vocabulary skills. Implementing a stronger focus on
vocabulary and literacy-based activities could assist students in building knowledge on relevant historical, civic, economic and geographical information,
Numeracy
The Australian Curriculum General Capabilities standards regarding numeracy in HASS requires students to utilise numerical information to construct and
interpret tables, graphs and statistics when conducting historical investigations. Additionally, students are required to analyse numerical data to construct
meaning of the past, test patterns and variables to draw their own conclusions (ACARA, 2019). Utilising numerical data in historical topics can expand beyond
the generic timeline and calendar dates into evidence-based material to support personal inquiries conducted by students.
A proposed solution is suggested by Kobrin et al. (1993), who encourages students to work as historians, to accept and master complicated skills and attitudes
when investigating history and understanding the importance behind the passage of time. Implementing an opportunity for students to conduct their own
surveys and field tests to collect qualitative and quantitative data as supportive evidence to their historical investigations encourages students to work as
historians, to analyse their research and evaluate information from it. Furthermore, focusing on the numerical data from certain historical periods and
comparing them to contemporary data on the same topic educates students on patterns between the past, indicating the passage of time and evaluating the
The Australian Curriculum General Capabilities standards regarding critical and creative thinking in HASS requires students to develop critical thinking by
creating and clarifying investigative questions, develop an argument using evidence through interpretation and analysis of key information, think logically
when evaluating and utilising evidence, thinking deeply about questions presented, apply concepts and skills to new contexts and interpretations, be curious and
imaginative when conducting investigations and to consider multiple perspectives (ACARA, 2019). With various requirements for students to achieve, Virgin
(2014), King et al. (2009) and Obenchain et al. (2011) address the issue of low-level thinking and memorization of facts over higher-level thinking,
interpretation and focus on concepts and inquiry in social studies; reinforced by the exposure of considerable amounts of information leaving students
undernourished as breadth of a topic is focused over depth leaving students rarely seeing the significance of courses (Conderman, & Bresnahan, 2008). King et
al. (2009) proposes the focus on authentic intellectual work that involves original application of knowledge and skills guided by disciplined inquiry. This
enables teachers to utilise students’ prior knowledge, strive for in-depth understanding and to develop and express ideas and findings in their own inquiry,
connecting their own information and experiences to new concepts and ideas (Alexander-Shea, 2011).
Additionally, Virgin (2014) recommends implementing essential questions into a unit program to equip students with the skills and interests to develop their
own inquiry that goes beyond the classroom setting, to allow students to experience history. Essential questions address the big ideas presented in history and
have multiple answers that enable students to construct their own understanding of the past, revealing history as an ongoing and developing narrative (Lattimer,
2008). Furthermore, they promote higher-order thinking to help students focus on important organizational ideas and deep inquiry, changing their mindset from
question-answer to question-answer-question (Virgin, 2014; Obenchain et al., 2011). Essential questions assist students by providing a critical frame for them to
Ethical Understanding
The Australian Curriculum General Capabilities standards regarding ethical understanding in HASS requires students to investigate diverse values and
principles influencing human activity, critically explore ethical behaviour of historical figures influenced by differing standards and societal attitudes, discuss
and apply ethical concepts including equality, respect and fairness, develop informed, ethical values through the exploration of differing perspectives and
become aware of their own roles, rights and responsibilities as participants in the world (ACARA, 2019).
Virgin (2014) states the National Council for the Social Studies [NCSS] want students to approach subjects as questions that require research, discovery,
analysis and contextualisation to their local conditions, and to further apply them into personal life, to connect personally with the content studied to learn
essential skills and aptitudes to be applied as active and engaged citizens (NCSS, 2011). To further educate students on ethical understanding, King et al. (2009)
stresses the importance of students evaluating historical situations and synthesizing information to make connections between historical events and
The inclusion of ethical-based questions, activities and content will help enable students to connect history to their personal lives, developing their knowledge
of ethical concepts and attitudes and how their beliefs impact historical investigation. Further, it provides a connection between contemporary issues and past
events, to influence students to consider their roles and responsibilities as active and engaged participants of potential solutions. This can be harnessed to create
activities requiring students to compose texts that propose solutions to contemporary issues and educate them on ethical procedures.
The UbD framework provides a planning process and structure that guides curriculum, assessment and instruction (McTighe, & Wiggins, 2012). It focuses on
the teaching and assessing for understanding of students, to assess whether students have autonomously made sense of their learning and are able to transfer it.
McTighe & Wiggins (2012) states effective curriculum is planned backwards through a three-stage process of desired results, evidence and learning plan that
helps avoid the common textbook as curriculum issue. McTighe & Thomas (2003) believes for backward mapping to work, teachers need to identify these
desired results for the students, analyse multiple sources of data and determine an appropriate action plan to help students achieve those results. This requires
educators to unpack the standards expected of students, and ensure students develop and deepen their understanding of key concepts and processes (McTighe,
& Wiggins, 2012; McTighe, & Thomas, 2003). It is advised teachers are required to change their approach to curriculum development and delivery by thinking
like assessors and acting as facilitators of meaning making who coach students using feedback on utilising content effectively (McTighe, & Wiggins, 2012;
Applying the UbD framework into a history program involves the inclusion of essential questions and big ideas that bring life to issues of the time and place
studied, connecting history to familiar concerns, deeper inquiry using case studies, analysis of primary documentation to explore multiple perspectives and
regular reflection on new information and ideas (Lattimer, 2008). It further includes a question-driven approach with open-ended questions at the heart of
design for students to develop their ability to evaluate historical sources, weight multiple interpretations and formulate their own based on reasoned analysis
learning. The UbD framework identifies six facets for understanding assessment purposes: explain, interpret, apply, perspective, empathy and self-knowledge
(McTighe, & Wiggins, 2012). A robust assessment task must implement these and allow opportunities for students to express themselves and demonstrate their
learning; assessments through performance-based, constructed-responses in combination with multiple choices to provide evidence of their understanding as
students’ answers are not small nor simple and should be given various options to communicate their responses. (McTighe, & Thomas, 2003; King et al., 2009).
From here, backward mapping is applied to lead students in acquiring the important information and skills to make meaning of content and to effectively
Conclusion
The following recommendations are suitable changes for a HASS program, specifically focusing on History unit. These recommendations were written with the
intention of successfully redesigning and improving a Year 10 History Core Unit: Rights and Freedoms; though with adjustments, these can be applicable to
other history units and topics. These recommendations, however, are not guaranteed to be successful and therefore consistent unit reflection and evaluation is
Doonside Technology High School History Stage 5 Scope and sequence: 2018 Semester 2 – Year 10
The Modern World and Australia + Overview: The Modern World and Australia (integrated through Depth Studies 4 and 6)
Term 1 Focus: Students will investigate the significant impact that the World Wars had, particularly examining the decolonisation of European empires and the emergence of new nations, particularly within Asia and
Africa. There is a strong focus on the significant advances in technology, especially in communications, public health and living conditions across the world.
Weeks Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11
Overview: The Modern World and Australia (integrated throughout Depth Studies 4 and 6)
Sub-Topics Depth Study 6 – School Developed Topic: The Holocaust Depth Study 4 – Rights and Freedoms (Core
Study)
Outcomes HT5.1, HT5.4, HT5.5, HT5.6, HT5. 7, HT5.9 HT5-2, HT5-3, HT5-6, HT5-8, HT5-9, HT5-10
Comprehension: Chronology, terms and concepts – Read and understand historical texts; use historical terms and concepts in appropriate contexts; sequence historical events to demonstrate the relationship
between different periods, people and places
Skills
Analysis and use of sources – Identify different types of sources; identify the origin, context and purpose of primary and secondary sources; process and synthesise information from a range of sources as
evidence in a historical argument; evaluate the reliability and usefulness of primary and secondary sources for a specific historical inquiry
Perspectives and interpretations – Identify and analyse the reasons for different perspectives in a particular historical context; Recognise that historians may interpret events and developments differently
Empathetic Understanding – Interpret History within the context of the actions, values, attitudes and motives of people in the context of the past
Research – Ask and evaluate different kinds of questions about the past to inform a historical inquiry; plan historical research to suit the purpose of an investigation; identify, locate, select and organise
information from a variety of sources, including ICT and other methods
Explanation and communication – Develop historical texts, particularly explanations and historical arguments that use evidence from a range of sources; select and use a range of communication forms, such
as oral, graphic, written and digital, to communicate effectively about the past for different audiences and different purposes
Assessment AT1 – 50%: Source Task Handed out: Week 4 Due date: Week 8 AT2 – 50%: Take home Essay
Handed out: Week 1,
The Modern World and Australia + Overview: The Modern World and Australia (integrated through Depth Studies 4 and 6)
Term 2 Focus: Students will investigate the significant impact that the World Wars had, particularly examining the decolonisation of European empires and the emergence of new nations, particularly within Asia and
Africa. There is a strong focus on the significant advances in technology, especially in communications, public health and living conditions across the world.
Weeks Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10
Overview: The Modern World and Australia (integrated throughout Depth Studies 4 and 6)
Sub-Topics Depth Study 4 – Rights and Freedoms (Core Study)
Outcomes Assessed:
HT5-2: SEQUENCES AND EXPLAINS THE SIGNFICANT PATTERNS OF CONTINUITY AND CHANGE IN THE
DEVELOPMENT OF THE MODERN WORLD AND AUSTRALIA
HT5-3: EXPLAINS AND ANALYSES THE MOTIVES AND ACTIONS OF PAST INDIVIDUALS AND GROUPS IN THE
HISTORICAL CONTEXTS THAT SHAPED THE MODERN WORLD AND AUSTRALIA
HT5-6: USES RELEVANT EVIDENCE FROM SOURCES TO SUPPORT HISTORICAL NARRATIVES, EXPLANATIONS
AND ANALYSES OF THE MODERN WORLD AND AUSTRALIA
HT5-8: SELECTS AND ANALYSES A RANGE OF HISTORICAL SOURCES TO LOCATE INFORMATION RELEVANT TO
AN HISTORICAL INQUIRY
HT5-9: APPLIES A RANGE OF RELEVANT HISTORICAL TERMS AND CONCEPTS WHEN COMMUNICATING AN
UNDERSTANDING OF THE PAST
HT5-10: SELECTS AND USES APPROPRIATE ORAL, WRITTEN, VISUAL AND DIGITAL FORMS TO
COMMUNICATE EFFECTIVELY ABOUT THE PAST FOR DIFFERENT AUDIENCES
Task:
Evaluate the impact the US Civil Rights Movement had on implementing and maintaining human rights for diverse ethnic groups in the United
States and Australia. In your response, refer to the impact of at least two key historical figures and/or activist groups studied throughout the unit
and one of your choice.
Submission details:
Students must upload an electronic copy of their assessment to the assigned folder in Google Classroom named
10HI3_A2_SUBMISSION by Friday 09/11/18, Week 4 – 11:59pm
Word length: Essay – 1500 words (+/- 10%)
Duration: Multimodal Presentation – 10 minutes (+/- 10%)
Evaluate: Make a judgement based on criteria; determine the value of
Multimodal Presentation: Multimodal text requires a minimum of three multimodal elements. Examples include but are not limited to:
Live recording
Animated material
Useful programs/ideas that may assist in the composition of your presentation include:
TED-ED talks
Prezi
Pechakucha 20x20
Powtoon animation
Key:
Literacy
Numeracy
Critical and Creative Thinking
Ethical Understanding
Understanding by Design
During WW2, the name “United Nations”, coined by United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt on 1st January 1942, though it wasn’t till the 24th October, 1945 when the
United Nations officially came into existence with the aim of preventing another conflict. Soon to follow, the United Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was adopted by the
UN on the 10th December 1948.
The US Civil Rights movement, 1954-1968, saw various events and nonviolent actions taken by African Americans to gain legal equality and the enforcement of constitutional
rights for them. Throughout the years, African Americans fought against racial segregation that saw them as inferior and separated from ‘white’ Americans in daily life. Effects
of these actions are still seen in present day with demands for equal treatment still ongoing in the United States. Actions taken by African Americans during the US Civil Rights
movement had also inspired similar actions in Australia, with the fight for equal rights and treatment for Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
Since European invasion in 1788, Indigenous Australians have struggled to retain their rights and freedoms and to have governments recognise them. Over time, state and
Commonwealth governments have implemented policies that have discriminated against Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, denying them equality,
opportunity and control of their children.
Indigenous Australians have been politically active in demanding their rights. They have achieved some signifi8cant changes in the struggle for recognition, for justice for the
Stolen Generations and for legal acknowledgement of their land rights. The period from the 1960s onwards has seen significant improvements in these areas.
United Nations’ declarations and conventions provide an international framework against which people can measure what remains to be done here, and throughout the world,
to secure indigenous peoples’ civil rights and freedoms. As a signatory to these documents, Australia has made a commitment to achieving their goals.
selects and
analyses a US Civil Rights Movement
range of
Background to the struggle
historical
sources to View Crash Course:
locate 1950s and Civil Rights (11.58) –
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S64zRnnn4Po
information 1960s in America (15.15) –
relevant to an https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkXFb1sMa38
historical
inquiry HT5-8 Students examine the Jim Crows implemented into the United
States and investigate its affect upon people of ‘colour’ in various
ways.
Watch short clip introducing the Jim Crow Laws (3.13)
o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2Iwa9Le
uFM
• outline the aims and
methods of the US civil Outline the definition of segregation – class discussion: should
rights movement segregation exist in society and how would their lives change if
segregation was implemented in contemporary society?
Develop students’ ethical attitudes – segregate the
class for the week (seating allocations)
Introduction (overview)
Montgomery Bus Boycott | American Freedom Stories |
Biography (3.51) -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FE6Yvy--5aw
Montgomery Bus Boycott
o https://www.history.com/topics/black-
history/montgomery-bus-boycott
o https://www.britannica.com/event/Montgomer
selects and y-bus-boycott
o https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/encyclopedia
uses /montgomery-bus-boycott
appropriate Students begin to investigate the principles of people involved in
Civil Rights activism and investigate the ethical behaviour of key
oral, written, historical figures.
visual and The Story of Rosa Parks (1.34.40) –
digital forms https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1fGdGjitNY
to Students write an obituary or article on Rosa Parks celebrating
communicate her life, achievement and impact on the US Civil Rights
effectively Movement.
Students refer notable principles, behaviour, decision
about the past making and perspective she shared upon the topic of
for different the US Civil Rights Movement.
audiences
HT5-10 Freedom Rides – 1961
• outline the aims and
methods of the US civil Discuss how the US Civil Rights movement’s for greater equality
rights movement and rights was highly publicised, and how the strategies and
gradual successes of civil rights activists in the US inspired
campaigners in Australia to push for greater rights and freedoms
for Indigenous Australians.
What does this tell students about the impact of the Poor People’s
Campaign and the US Civil Rights Movement over time?
• outline the aims and Students create a Venn Diagram in the books to compare the
methods of the US civil perspectives, principles, behaviours and actions of both Martin
rights movement Luther King and Malcolm X to determine similarities and
differences.
Explore the different perspectives, arguments and
decisions of different historical figures to gain a broader
view of how civil rights issues were tackled and the
impact they had.
• outline the aims and Civil Rights Act of 1957 – Allowed federal prosecution
methods of the US civil of anyone who tried to prevent someone from voting.
rights movement Civil Rights Act of 1964 – Guaranteed equal
employment for all
Voting Rights Act of 1965 – Banned all voter literacy
tests and provided federal examiners in certain voting
jurisdictions
Fair Housing Act of 1968 – Prevented housing
discrimination based on race, sex, national origin and
religion.
Evaluation/variation
After you have taught the unit of work, record in this section your evaluation of the unit and any variations you implemented or would choose to implement the next time you teach the
unit.
Alexander-Shea, A. (2011). Redefining Vocabulary: The New Learning Strategy for Social Studies. The Social Studies, 102(3), 95-103. doi:
10.1080/00377996.2010.509371
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2019). General Capabilities in the Australian Curriculum: Humanities and Social Sciences.
Conderman, G., & Bresnahan, V. (2008). Teaching Big Ideas in Diverse Middle School Classrooms. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 44(4), 176-180. doi:
10.1080/00228958.2008.10516519
King, M. B., Newmann, F. M., & Carmichael, D. L. (2009). Authentic intellectual work: common standards for teaching social studies (Research and Practice)
Kobrin, D., Abbott, E., Ellinwood, J., & Horton, D. (1993). Learning history by doing history (interpreting history). Educational Leadership, 50(7), 39-41.
com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/ga/default.aspx
McTighe, J., & Thomas, R. S. (2003). Backward Design for Forward Action. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 52-55. Retrieved from
http://edml260.pbworks.com/f/Backward+Design+for+Forward+Action+.pdf
McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2012). Understanding by Design Framework. ASCD. Retrieved from
https://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/siteASCD/publications/UbD_WhitePaper0312.pdf
Obenchain, K. M., Orr, A., & Davis, S. H. (2011). The Past as a Puzzle: How Essential Questions Can Piece Together a Meaningful Investigation of History.
Virgin, R. (2014). Connecting Learning: How Revisiting Big Idea Questions Can Help in History Classrooms. The Social Studies, 105(4), 1-212. doi:
10.1080/00377996.2014.917065
Voelker, D., & Armstrong, A. (2013). Designing a Question-Driven U.S. History Course. OAH Magazine of History, 27(3), 19-24. doi: 10.1093/oahmag/oat021
http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=f3c7962b-5487-4be2-8a4d-9f986706ba97%40sdc-v-
sessmgr02&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=32135634&db=ehh