Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OF STATE POLICY
SYNOPSIS
BASICS OF LEGISLATION
This project deals with relation between fundamental rights and directive principles of state policy. They share
a very good relation. Both of them are important for the welfare of the people. The Fundamental rights seek
to achieve the goal by guaranteeing certain minimal rights to the individual as against State action, the
Directives enjoin the State to ensure the welfare of the people collectively.
The idea of embodying a code of Directive Principles has been borrowed by the framers of the Constitution
Fundamental Rights are justifiable and enforceable rights while directive principles are non -justifiable and
cannot override fundamental rights. Fundamental rights provide political rights whereas social and economic
rights are provided through DPSP. Fundamental Rights are mentioned in the articles from 12 to 35 while
Presiding over a seminar organised by the Confederation of Indian Bar, the CJI said: “In a sense, the Directive
Principles of State Policy epitomise the ideals, aspirations, sentiments, precepts and goals of the entire freedom
movement. The Directive Principles impart a sort of continuity in our national policies.”1
In the Champakam Dorairajan case (1951), the Supreme Court ruled that in case of any conflict between the
Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles, the former would prevail. It declared that the Directive
Principles have to conform to and run as subsidiary to the Fundamental Rights. But, it also held that the
Fundamental Rights could be amended by the Parliament by enacting constitutional amendments acts. As a
result, the Parliament made the First Amendment Act (1951), the Fourth Amendment Act and the Seventeenth
Amendment Act to implement some of the Directives. The above situation underwent a major change in 1967
Whenever conflicts arise between fundamental rights and directive principles, fundamental rights prevail over
the directive principles because, in terms of Arts. 32 and 226, fundamental rights are enforceable by the courts.
If a law is in conflict with a fundamental right, it is declared void by the Supreme Court. But no law can be
declared void on the ground that it is violative of a directive principle. In 1951, in Champakam Dorairajan vs.
1
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/rights-and-directive-principles-must-be-harmonised-cji/article5183014.ece
the state of Madras, the Supreme Court held “The chapter on Fundamental Rights is sacrosanct and not liable
to be abridged by any legislative or executive act. The Directive Principles of State Policy have to conform
The following are the tentative chapters of the project titled relationship between fundamental right and
1. Introduction
5. Important cases
6. Suggestion to improve the relation between fundamental rights and directive principle of state policy
7. Conclusion
BIBLIOGRAPHY
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/rights-and-directive-principles-must-be-harmonised-
cji/article5183014.ece
https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/difference-between-fundamental-rights-and-directive-
principles-1473930891-1
https://blog.ipleaders.in/dpsp-and-fundamental-rights/