©MIL-S1D-798(sHIF5) NOPICE-2 27 November 1968 MILITARY StanDARD NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING, WELDDG, QUALITY CONTROL, MATERIAL CONTROL AND IDENTIFICATION AND HI-SHOCK TEST REQUIREMENTS FOR PIPING SYSTIM COMPONENTS FOR NAVAL SHIPBOARD USE 70 ALL HOLDERS OF MIL-STD-798(sHIRS) |” Sy {SUPERSEDED PAGE SHOULD BE REMOVED AND THE REVISED PAGE SHOULD BE INSERTED IN ITS PROPER LOCATION. 3+ SUPERSEDED PaGs MUST BE RETAINED FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES, Bio PE FOMLOWING PAGE OF MIL-StD-798(SHIES) Has ‘BEEN REVISED AND SUPERSEDES THE PAGE LISTED: NEW PAG] A su NEW PAGE DATE ‘SUPERSEDED DATE PAGE ' 9 27 November 1968 9 16 Decenber 1965 10 16 December 1965 Roprinted without change 2+ RETAIN THIS NOTICE AND DISERT BEFORE THE TABLE OF CONTENTS, Cseal@idere of HIL-S7D-796(SHIPS) WLI verify that Page change indicated in Preparing activity: Navy - SH (Project: MIsc_ns79) Sc MISCMaL-s7D-798(5HF5) 27 Novator 1968 Ah, oie Dipacr siock TESTS 11.1 Valves shatl be tested a0 spectfied in table V. The valve shall be mubjected to a pressure (the test sedia shall be at axbient of room tenperature) equal £0 the prinary service rating of the valve, as defined in 5:1 or 3.2. Test of the aizee listed in table VI vill be extended an indicated upon cotpliance vith the eon Aitsons for extension ef Al shock tents in 11-3. Teste shall be conducted in accordance with HDCS-901- then shock testing te required for casponents other than Valver, taste and aubeequent inapacticne heli’ be opecified 1n the contract of order. Table V - HI shock teste rr = TE ee a Teste, ene [ung | esate, | Bae] pemerat Sua; ae So Tat ee = satin | meen ore St eer emma Ae Sra wo a sepa rm sgn reper somnrte cs wc mish poseassuee ner ee. | Sse wn ow wie 8 na ews | hema nts Notes: 2, The validity of ahock test approval of pressure regulating or control valven tested at the "naxizin deetgn pressure differential” ax required by the previous some of thie standard ahall not be affected by this change. 2, Helief valves shall be shocked tested at the setting required by the application for wich they are being Precured, and preamurized on the inlet vith the corresponding systen cperating pressure. Shock approval note ‘hall record the aetting and inlet pressure under which the valve ime tested, however normally this same bite od design relief valve, when used Gr a subsequent application invelving & different. set preswure,, shell roe require re-shock test (or extension action) because of the different sot prepeure (thie applies to multiple Spring a0 voll as eingle epring Conigua). In other vorde, generally « differest setting (aid inlet pressure) “D"bot, h teeeat, be cate for rerahock testing, Hovever in inetances shore 11 is deoned advientle ty the Spproving authority’ re-ebock testing for « nev appilestion (er set proasure) may be required,MIL-STD-798¢SH1PS) 16 December 1965 Table VI - Sizes to be Shock Tested “Approves All These Site Tented | “Rice (eee 11-3) aches) aches) 2/4 | 3/4 and smaller 2 310 2, inclusive ‘ 251/2'ws, iacluaive 8 Tad 8 10 9 and 10 over 10__| All sizes shall be tested 11.2 Post shock caamination and testing to determine acceptance of the itam shall be as specified in the applicable specification or drawing for production teats, except that the tested unit shall receive a com- plete visual and dimensional examination before and after the post-shock taste. The "before" visual and Glmeneional checks shall be performed on the external curtacce only since the valve te not to be dlaaseer bled for internal visual and dimensional checking until after all post-shock tests have been completed, relaxation oF deviations in post-ahock testing shall be permitted unless specifically approved by the Bureat (pe Ships. 11.3. The following conditions shall be met to permit an extension of « ahock test {rom one size to another (ave table VI), except ae epecifiod in 11.4 (a) Same geometry and design. () Same materiale, 6) Saine pressure rating. (@) Same bounet constructi {e) Same end connection construction. () Same methods of sealing throughout. {) Same mode of operation and operator attachm: 11.4. The following conditions shall apply to the requirements governing test extensions: (2) The vendor oF shipbutlder (or activity requesting extension) should supply supporting evidence which should include: (1) Detailed drawings of tested and untested items. 12) A-copy of the Teport of the shock test which the requested extension 18 based upon (3) A detailed comparison of the differences in materials and design showing that the uateated em haw equal or greater shock cestatance tan the tested ftem- 1%) Extensions should ot be granted for equipments based upon taste in dtazent weight clasatica- (c) Tir acceptability of the lst report should be considered. Was It perfectly acceptable, oF ‘marginal, oF might \t by present standards be unacceptable? (6) When a doubt existe, Bureas of Shipe chain coden should a contacted to provide ganaral guidance in their cognizant areas as fo allowable size epreads between tested and untested fems. (©) Teste provide assurance af shock resistant equlpment. Extensions should not be granted whenever reasonable doubt exists in the area of the original shock test, the design or fabrica tion of the unit or the intended use of the equipment. It should be noted that Tepeat testa of Identical items are sometimes desirable aa 2 quality control measure. Where desired, tt will be permisaible to test separate valves ia the principal operating condi lions specitied, provided the valves teated under each set ol conditions are completely identical inal respects, 11.5 Table VI is a representation of the general situation throughout the valve industry, with regard as toshere changes occur in the design appronch. If a manufacturer has a design seriee with changes curring st sizes other than those listed in table Vi, an extenaiea to apply different aizes ahould be requested rom the Bureau of Ship Reprinted without change.