Professional Documents
Culture Documents
**Discussed 3.1
In addition, the law serves a practical purpose as well: One’s financial status should be a private matter.
**Discussed 3.2
Question:
A depositor, who is a journalist, was looking over the shoulder of another person. The journalist then
discloses the existence of the bank account of the other person.
Here, the bank officials or employees are not liable because the disclosure was not done by them.
**Discussed 3.3 as exceptions; Note that the instances under 3.3 (j) are without court order
Deposits under RA 1405 pertains to an act which gives rise to a creditor-debtor relationship. **How
banks came about possession of the money. To be a deposit, the bank must be allowed to lend out the
money.
- Facts: an account was turned into a Trust account. It was argued that this is not a trust account
because it cannot be lent out by the bank.
- However, the SC said that a trust account is not a real trust. It does not dictate how the money is
to be used because there are conditions as to how the money will be used. It can be used by the
bank in any manner as it may deem fit as long as it would benefit the trustee.
Discussion for Foreign Currency Deposit Act – See reviewer page 46. Read 3.8, 3.9, 3.10
In Chinabank vs CA – December 2006 **Note that this is a pro hac vise decision
- Facts: A and B maintained a foreign currency dollar account with Citibank. B withdrew the
amounts deposited and deposited the same to Chinabank but it was only under his name. A
then filed an action for recovery.
- B deposited a check from Citibank payable to A or B. Chinabank allowed the account to be
opened only in the name of B. A sought to recover the amount from Chinabank and A asked a
subpoena to be used to respondent officers of Chinabank.
- Chinabank resisted the subpoena.
- Chinabank used RA 6426 as a contention: Absolutely confidential. Exceptions do not apply.
- SC said: Chinabank must comply with the subpoena on the ground that A’s request for subpoena
operates as his written consent for the details of the account to be disclosed. The basis being
the check presented to Chinabank is payable to A or B.
- A has a share here.
***Read notes on Garnishment both for domestic and foreign bank secrecy laws.
Discussion on Safety deposit box
The relationship created here is bailor-bailee. The Safety deposit box is actually for hire here and it is for
the mutual benefit of the parties.
There is no full and absolute custody and control granted to the renter of the safety deposit box because
there is a counterpart key on the part of the bank and the renter cannot open the safety deposit box on
his or her own.
***Di ko sure kung ano sagot sa tanong haha sorry wala ako nanote ask natin iba nalang
Without notice to the depositor (as an exception to the GR that there must be a written permission of
the depositor) only in the following instances:
The only amendment is the increase in the amount of the coverage of the insurance – 500K
Deposit under this law: Unpaid balance of money or its equivalent by a bank in its usual course of
business for which it is given and it is obliged to give credit.
Accounts referred to: Savings, Current, Foreign Currency either savings or current, Time Deposit
Account.
- In cash
- Thru transfer deposit: Bank A closed. PDIC may say your money is now deposited to Bank B.
See two years sa notes? D ko alam bakit di ko na note yung 2 years ang sabi lang sa notes ko ay must file
within such period.
Six months: PDIC must settle with the depositor because if it does not settle and it is due to grave abuse
of discretion, bad faith, malice and GN (d ko maalala ano ang GN hahaha ask tayo ulit), the officer in
charge may be imprisoned for 6 months to 1 year. But if the non-settlement is due to conflicting claims,
PDIC has no fault with its inability to settled within the six months from filing of the claim.
Suppose:
A has a:
How much is insured? Since the accounts are maintained under the same name and under the same
capacity, the amounts are treated together and considered only as one account. Hence, only 500K is
insured and 500K is uninsured.
Suppose:
A has a:
Suppose:
For B, since sya ang beneficial owner and A only holds deposits in trust for B, B is entitled to separate
insurance coverage.
Suppose: INSURED
A B C
**No uninsured here because none of the accounts were more than 500K.
Also, a joint account is subject to separate insurance. The presumption is the sharing is equal unless
otherwise stated.
**Note that if the co-depositor in a joint account is a juridical person, the rule on equal shares does not
apply. In the absence of any indication amounts deposited are presumed to belong to the juridical entity
entirely.
What If:
A/B/C – 750K Uninsured and insured? Pro rata. 250K each ang hatian pero ang insured and uninsured
must be of equal amounts since the deposit exceeded 500K.
Exceeds 500K ang deposit tapos amount is deposited to two or more accounts under a natural or
juridical person who have no beneficial interest in the deposit.
There is splitting when it is done within 120 days immediately preceding or during a bank-declared
holiday or closure by the Monetary Board.
- This is a prohibited act and if found guilty, the penalty of prision mayor or fine may be imposed. Fine is
not less than 50K but not more than 2M.