Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Nannochloropsis sp. and Tetraselmis sp. are widely used in aquaculture as a source of protein, lipid and
Received 14 January 2014 carbohydrate. The growth and proximate composition of microalgae could be affected by different cul-
Received in revised form ture conditions especially salinity, temperature and light. Thus, this study was aimed to compare the
24 June 2014
growth and proximate composition of Nannochloropsis sp. and Tetraselmis sp. cultured in different sa-
Accepted 29 June 2014
Available online 19 July 2014
linities and pH under different culture conditions. In this study Nannochloropsis sp. and Tetraselmis sp.
were isolated from South China Sea and cultured at different salinities of 20, 30 and 40 ppt and different
pH of 5.5, 7.5, 8.5 and 9.5 under natural and control condition until stationary phase. Results showed that
Keywords:
Salinity
Nannochloropsis sp. and Tetraselmis sp. had significantly higher (p < 0.05) cell density, lipid and carbo-
Growth rate hydrate content under control condition at 30 ppt. However, protein content was significantly higher
Proximate composition (p < 0.05) in Nannochloropsis sp. when cultured under natural condition at 30 ppt. High cell density,
pH protein, lipid and carbohydrate content was obtained when cultured at pH 7.5 and 8.5 for both species.
Nannochloropsis sp. The output of this study could be considered for Nannochloropsis sp. and Tetraselmis sp. cultivation to
Tetraselmis sp. provide appropriate levels of protein, lipid and carbohydrate as feed supplement for aquaculture
organisms.
© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.06.022
0964-8305/© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
12 H. Khatoon et al. / International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 95 (2014) 11e18
natives to these sources (Shepherd, 2013). A good alternative is a Conway medium (Tompkins et al., 1995)
commercial-scale production of microalgae biomass because this Nitrate KNO3 (100 g m3)
could reduce the cost and ecological impact of intensive fish Phosphate Na3PO4 (20 g m3)
farming (Muller-Feuga, 2000). Trace metal Na2H2EDTA$2H2O (45 g m3)
However, the growth and nutrient content of microalgae is FeCl3$6H2O (1.3 g m3)
ZnCl2 (4.2 g m3)
affected and influenced by the culture conditions such as light in-
MnCl2$4H2O (0.36 g m3)
tensity, nutrient limitation, temperature, pH, and salinity (Cho CoCl2$6H2O (4.0 g m3)
et al., 2007). Thus, even a slight fluctuation in those factors can CuSO4$5H2O (4.0 g m3)
caused changes in the growth and proximate composition of the (NH4)6Mo7O24$4H2O (1.8 g m3)
H3BO3 (33.4 g m3)
microalgae either by increasing the nutritional value or decreasing
Vitamin Thiamin HCl (200 mg m3)
it and affect the overall value of the microalgae. Cyanocobalamin (10 mg m3)
Variations in salinity also influence the growth and proximate
composition of the marine microalgae even though it is tolerant to
changes in salinity. According to Rao et al. (2007), adaptability to
milliliter of macronutrient, 0.5 mL of trace metal, and 0.1 mL of
salinity differs between algae and they are grouped as halophilic
vitamins were added to 1000 mL of filtered and sterilized seawater
(salt requiring for optimum growth) and halotolerant (having
at 30 ppt salinity prior to the inoculation and maintenance of pure
response mechanism to survive in saline medium). Decreasing
microalgae seed culture.
salinity is a unique way to change the biochemical composition of
marine microalgae although the changeable role of salinity on
starch metabolism indicates its species-specific and cultivation 2.3. Experimental design
condition-dependent nature (Yao et al., 2013). High salinity has
been reported to inhibit the growth, lipid and triacylglyceride Experiments were carried out in 1 L working volume under
accumulation of Dunaliella sp. (Takagi et al., 2006). natural and control condition in three different salinities which
Another important factors that also seriously affect the optimal were 20, 30 and 40 ppt. For the maximum density of Nanno-
growth of algal cultures is the hydrogen ion concentration (pH) of chloropsis oculata, the optimal salinity condition was 30 ppt ac-
the culture medium (Khalil et al., 2010). Algal species can only grow cording to Cho et al. (2007). Hence, 20 ppt and 40 ppt salinity were
well when the pH is within a certain range, without taking into included in this study to see the performance on both species when
account other environmental factors (Wang et al., 2011). Never- cultured under variable range of salinity other than the normal
theless, any changes in the pH can cause changes either by inhib- 30 ppt seawater salinity.
iting, change the biochemical composition or causing cell death to Four different pH of 5.5, 7.5, 8.5 and 9.5 were varied. The pH was
the microalgae. For example, the dry weight gain and the adjusted using hydrochloric acid and sodium bicarbonate. Indoor
biochemical components of Dunaliella bardawil were greatly culture condition was maintained inside the room at 25 C with a
enhanced at pH 7.5 while Chlorella ellipsoidea attained their light intensity of 1588 lux using cool fluorescent light and 24 h
maximum dry weight and carbohydrate content at alkaline pH photoperiod. The microalgae culture under natural condition was
(Khalil et al., 2010). kept outdoor under shade and relied on natural illumination. The
This study was aimed to determine the optimum salinity, pH initial cell density was 1 105 cells mL1 for each treatment.
and culture condition that can results in higher growth and prox- Growth parameters in terms of cell density and optical density
imate composition (protein, lipid and carbohydrate) of Nanno- were measured daily. Cells were harvested at their stationary phase
chloropsis sp. and Tetraselmis sp. These results can be applied by by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 10 min followed by washing
farmers and industry in culturing microalgae with a targeted twice with sterilize distilled water. Samples were then freeze-dried
growth and proximate composition that can only be achieved un- and kept at 20 C until further analysis. Batch experiments for
der certain culture conditions. each microalgae species at various salinities, pH and culture con-
ditions were carried out in three replicates. Filtered aeration was
2. Material and methods provided to all culture flasks throughout the experimental period to
provide agitation and facilitate gas exchange.
2.1. Sample collection, culture and maintenance
2.4. Growth parameters analysis
Nannochloropsis sp. and Tetraselmis sp. were isolated from the
South China Sea and maintained at the laboratory of Faculty of Microalgae growth was determined based on the cell density
Fisheries and Aqua-Industry, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu. The and optical density techniques. Microalgae cells were sampled and
pure Nannochloropsis sp. and Tetraselmis sp. was cultured in Con- counted daily using a rhodium-coated haemacytometer (Hawksley
way culture medium (Tompkins et al., 1995). Sub-culturing was AC1000, UK). The specific growth rate (SGR) of microalgae was
done every two weeks to maintain pure and healthy stock culture. calculated with Eq. (1).
Pure seed culture of Nannochloropsis sp. and Tetraselmis sp. were
maintained at 30 ppt salinity in Conway medium. SGR/day ¼ ln (X2/X1)/t2 t1 (1)
2.2. Media preparation where, X1, biomass concentration at the beginning of the selected
time interval; X2, biomass concentration at the end of the selected
Preparation of Conway medium involves the preparation of time interval; t2 t1, selected treatment period (in days) for the
stock solutions which consisted of the macronutrients, trace metal determination of biomass of microalgae species.
solutions and vitamins. For the preparation of stock solutions, the The optical density was determined using a spectrophotometer
chemical compositions were diluted in distilled water. Chemical (Shimadzu UV-1601, Japan) at the wavelength of 540 nm and
composition of Conway medium was shown in Table 1. One 530 nm, respectively, for Nannochloropsis sp. and Tetraselmis sp.
H. Khatoon et al. / International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 95 (2014) 11e18 13
Fig. 1. Cell density (cells mL1 107) versus culture period (day) for Nannochloropsis Fig. 3. Optical density (abs) versus culture period (day) for Nannochloropsis sp. and
sp. and Tetraselmis sp. cultured in three different salinities (20, 30 and 40 ppt) under Tetraselmis sp. cultured in three different salinities (20, 30 and 40 ppt) under natural
natural and control condition (values are mean ± standard error). and control condition (values are mean ± standard error).
14 H. Khatoon et al. / International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 95 (2014) 11e18
Fig. 4. Optical density (abs) versus culture period (day) for Nannochloropsis sp. and
Tetraselmis sp. cultured in four different pH (5.5, 7.5, 8.5, 9.5) under natural and control
condition (values are mean ± standard error).
Fig. 5. Total protein content (% dry weight) of Nannochloropsis sp. and Tetraselmis sp.
2.443 107 cells mL1, respectively. The differences of cell density cultured in three different salinities (20, 30 and 40 ppt) under natural and control
of Tetraselmis sp. in other salinity were insignificant. condition (values are mean ± standard error).
At the end of the experiment, the specific growth rate of both
Nannochloropsis sp. and Tetraselmis sp. was found to be significantly
higher when cultured at 30 ppt under control condition (Table 2). In
addition to salinity stress, the differences in pH were also showed to
lead to the change in the specific growth rate of both microalgae. In
this study, both Nannochloropsis sp. and Tetraselmis sp. cultured at
pH 5.5 and 9.5 showed a significantly lower cell density as
compared to pH 7.5 and 8.5.
Fig. 7. Total lipid content (% dry weight) of Nannochloropsis sp. and Tetraselmis sp.
cultured in three different salinities (20, 30 and 40 ppt) under natural and control
condition (values are mean ± standard error).
Fig. 9. Total carbohydrate content (% dry weight) for Nannochloropsis sp. and Tetra-
selmis sp. cultured in three different salinities (20, 30 and 40 ppt) under natural and
control condition (values are mean ± standard error).
content in 30 ppt under control condition followed by 40 ppt and
20 ppt. The difference in the pH value caused changes in the total
lipid content of both Nannochloropsis sp. and Tetraselmis sp. (Fig. 8). Nannochloropsis sp. cultured at 20, 30 and 40 ppt under control
Both culture under natural and control condition showed a signif- condition yields significantly higher total carbohydrate content
icantly high (p<0.05) lipid content when cultured at pH 7.5 which is compared to natural condition. Nannochloropsis sp. culture at 20, 30
also the optimal pH for higher growth. and 40 ppt under control condition (31%, 34.5% and 33.5%,
respectively) also yielded significantly higher total carbohydrate
3.4. Carbohydrate content of Nannochloropsis sp. and Tetraselmis content as compared to the natural condition (16.5%, 15%, 6.9%,
sp. cultivated in natural and control condition respectively).
Nannochloropsis sp. and Tetraselmis sp. cultured at different pH
The carbohydrate content of Nannochloropsis sp. and Tetraselmis also showed significant changes on the total carbohydrate content
sp. in response to 20, 30 and 40 ppt salinities under natural and of both microalgae (Fig. 10). Increase or decrease in the normal
control condition was shown in Fig. 9. Results showed that there seawater pH of 7.5e8.5 towards acidic and alkaline pH leads to the
was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the different sa- decrease in the carbohydrate content. Nannochloropsis sp. showed a
linities for Nannochloropsis sp. when cultured in control condition. significantly higher carbohydrate content when cultured at pH 8.5
On the other hand, Tetraselmis sp. cultured in both natural and whereas Tetraselmis sp. showed the highest value at pH 7.5 under
control condition at 30 ppt had significantly higher (p < 0.05) control condition. For significantly higher yield of carbohydrate,
carbohydrate when cultured in 30 ppt compared to 40 ppt. But natural condition at the salinity of 30 ppt and pH 7.5 to 8.5 favors all
there was no significant difference between 30 and 20 ppt. At 20, 30 other treatment conditions for both Nannochloropsis sp. and Tet-
and 40 ppt, Nannochloropsis sp. accumulated significantly higher raselmis sp.
carbohydrate content as compared to Tetraselmis sp.
At another perspective, accumulation of carbohydrate in natural
and control condition was apparent. Tetraselmis sp. and
Fig. 8. Total lipid content (% dry weight) of Nannochloropsis sp. and Tetraselmis sp. Fig. 10. Total carbohydrate content (% dry weight) of Nannochloropsis sp. and Tetra-
cultured in four different pH (5.5, 7.5, 8.5, 9.5) under natural and control condition selmis sp. cultured in four different pH (5.5, 7.5, 8.5, 9.5) under natural and control
(values are mean ± standard error). condition (values are mean ± standard error).
16 H. Khatoon et al. / International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 95 (2014) 11e18
Liu, W., Au, D.W.T., Anderson, D.M., Lam, P.K.S., Wu, R.S.S., 2007. Effects of nutrients, Siaut, M., Cuine, S., Cagnon, C., Fessler, B., Nguyen, M., Carrier, P., Beyly, A.,
salinity, pH and light:dark cycle on the production of reactive oxygen species in Beisson, F., Triantaphylides, C., Li-Beisson, Y., Peltier, G., 2011. Oil accumulation
the algae Chattonella marina. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 346, 76e86. in the model green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: characterization, vari-
Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L., Randall, R.J., 1951. Protein measurement ability between common laboratory strains and relationship with starch re-
with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265e275. serves. BMC Biotechnol. 11, 7.
Marsh, J.B., Weinstein, D.B., 1966. Simple charring method for determination of Taelman, S.E., De Meester, S., Roef, L., Michiels, M., Dewulf, J., 2013. The environ-
lipids. J. Lipid Res. 7 (4), 574e576. mental sustainability of microalgae as feed for aquaculture: a life cycle
Mata, T.M., Martins, A.A., Caetano, N.S., 2010. Microalgae for biodiesel production perspective. Bioresour. Technol. 150, 513e522.
and other applications: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14, 217e232. Takagi, M., Karseno, Yoshida, T., 2006. Effect of salt concentration on intracellular
Muller-Feuga, A., 2000. The role of microalgae in aquaculture: situation and trends. accumulation of lipids and triacylglyceride in marine microalgae Dunaliella
J. Appl. Phycol. 12, 527e534. cells. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 101, 223e226.
Pal, D., Khozin-Goldberg, I., Cohen, Z., Boussiba, S., 2011. The effect of light, salinity, Talebi, A.F., Tabatabaei, M., Mohtashami, S.K., Thidfar, M., Moradi, F., 2013.
and nitrogen availability on lipid production by Nannochloropsis sp. Appl. Comparative salt stress study on intracellular ion concentration in Marine and
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 90, 1429e1441. salt-adapted freshwater strains of microalgae. Not. Sci. Biol. 5, 309e315.
Parmar, A., Singh, N.K., Pandey, A., Gnansounou, E., Madamwar, D., 2011. Cyano- Tompkins, J., DeVille, M., Day, J., Turner, M., 1995. Culture Collection of Algae and
bacteria and microalgae: a positive prospect for biofuels. Bioresour. Technol. Protozoa: Catalogue of Strains. Titus Wilson and Son Ltd., UK.
102, 10,163e10,172. Wang, X., Hao, C., Zhang, F., Feng, C., Yang, Y., 2011. Inhibition of the growth of two
Radakovits, R., Jinkerson, R.E., Darzins, A., Posewitz, M.C., 2010. Genetic engineering blue-green algae species (Microsystis aruginosa and Anabaena spiroides) by
of algae for enhanced biofuel production. Eukaryot. Cell. 9, 486e501. acidification treatments using carbon dioxide. Bioresour. Technol. 102,
Rao, A.R., Dayananda, C., Sarada, R., Shamala, T.R., Ravishankar, G.A., 2007. Effect of 5742e5748.
salinity on growth of green algae Botryococcus braunii and its constituents. Williams, P.J.l.B., Laurens, L.M., 2010. Microalgae as biodiesel & biomass feedstocks:
Bioresour. Technol. 98, 560e564. review & analysis of the biochemistry, energetics & economics. Energy Environ.
Rodolfi, L., Chini Zittelli, G., Bassi, N., Padovani, G., Biondi, N., Bonini, G., Tredici, M.R., Sci. 3, 554e590.
2009. Microalgae for oil: strain selection, induction of lipid synthesis and Yao, C.-H., Ai, J.-N., Cao, X.-P., Xue, S., 2013. Salinity manipulation as an effective
outdoor mass cultivation in a low-cost photobioreactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 102, method for enhanced starch production in the marine microalga Tetraselmis
100e112. subcordiformis. Bioresour. Technol. 146, 663e671.
Shepherd, C.J., 2013. Aquaculture: are the criticisms justified? Feeding fish to fish.
World Aquac. 3, 11e18.