Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Course Description
The Law of Torts is primarily concerned with redressal of wrongful civil actions
by awarding compensation. In a society where men live together, conflicts of
interests are bound to occur and they may from time to time cause damage to one
or the other. In addition, with the rapid industrialization, tortious liability has come
to be applied against manufacturers and industrial units. The Law of Torts had
originated from Common Law and by and large this branch of law continues to be
uncodified. Tortious liability has been codified only to a very limited extent such
as workmen’s compensation, motor vehicle accidents, consumer protection and
many more.
As the Law of Torts is basically a judge made law, students are required to study it
in the light of judicial pronouncements. They are required to equip themselves with
the latest developments extending to the entire course. Keeping in mind all these
aspects, the syllabus has been framed and it will surely fulfill the changing legal
perspective in the post liberalized era.
Pedagogy
A various learning methods will be used which will emphasize a cooperative learning format.
Student led discussions and presentations will be combined with instructor facilitated
experiences and lectures. Specific methods include:
COURSE OUTLINE
Module 1: Introduction
Readings Material:
Cases:
W.V.H Rogers, Winfield & Jolowicz on Torts (Sweet & Maxwell Publication, London, 2002) p.
(845 - 877)
Ratanlal and Dhirajlal, The Law of Torts, Revised by G.P Singh (Wadhwa and
Co. Nagpur, 2004) p. (1-21)
Clerk and Lindsel, Clerk and Lindsell on Torts, Margaret R. Brazier, Daniel Alexander(ed.),
(Sweet & Maxwell, 17th edn., 1995) p. (3-01 – 3-57)
Cases:
Hall v. Brooklands Auto Racing Club (1932) 1 KB 205
Smith v. Baker and Sons (1891) AC 325
South Indian Industrial Ltd. Madras v. Alamulu Anmal (1923) MWN 344
Haynes v. Harwood (1935) 1 KB 146
Ramchand Ram Nagaram Rice & Oil Mills Ltd. v. Municipal Commissioner of Purilla
Municipality (1943) ILR 22 Pat 359
Gillick v. West Norfolk & Wiseback Area Health Authority (1985) 3 All E R 402
Negligence
Nervous Shock
Product Liability
Defamation
Trespass
Nuisance
Cases:
Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932) AC 562
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Sushil Devi AIR 1999 SC 1929
Association of Victims of Upahar Tragedy v. Union of India 86 (2000) DLT 246
Lucknow Development Authority v. M K Gupta AIR 1994 SC 787
Indian Medical Association v. V P Shantha AIR 1996 SC 550
Nemi Chand v. Wallace (1907) ILR 34 Cal.
Tushar Kanthi Ghosh v. Bina Bhowmick (1952) 57 CWN 3778
R K Karanjia v. K M D Thakersey AIR 1970 Bom 424
Reading Material:
SK Verma and M Afzal Wani - A Treatise on Consumer Protection Laws, Indian Law
Institute 2004.
Krishnamurthi S – Consumer and Law-Redressal of Grievances (Vinoc Law
Publications, Lucknow, 2002)
Avtar Singh, Law Relating to Consumer Protection (Eastern Book Co, 2005)
DN Saraf – Law of Consumer Protection in India’, Tripath, Bombay (1990)
Cases:
Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) ac 562
Dr Laxman Balakrishna Joshi v Dr Trimbak Bapu Godbole AIR 1969 SC 128
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893) 1 QB 256
While v John Warrick and Co Ltd (1953) 1 WLR 1285
Indian Medical Association v VP Santha AIR 1996 SC 550
M/s India Photographic Co Ltd v HD shourie AIR 1999 SC 2453
Module-6: Motor Vehicles Act 1988 and Motor vehicle (Amendment) Act 2012
Definitions;