Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SDG PDF
SDG PDF
ENVIRONMENT Conservationists HISTORY Ripping yarn of the EVOLUTION First biography of FUNDING Australia’s grant
call for a global zoning ape-man of Victorian W. D. Hamilton, the gentle system wastes centuries of
exercise for roads p.308 England p.310 giant of genetics p.313 researchers’ time p.314
ILLUSTRATION BY PHIL DISLEY
Sustainable development
goals for people and planet
Planetary stability must be integrated with United Nations targets to fight
poverty and secure human well-being, argue David Griggs and colleagues.
T
he United Nations Rio+20 summit life-support system and poverty reduction a prerequisite for a thriving global society.
in Brazil in 2012 committed govern- must be the twin priorities for SDGs. It is not With the human population set to rise to
ments to create a set of sustainable enough simply to extend MDGs, as some are 9 billion by 2050, definitions of sustainable
development goals (SDGs) that would be suggesting, because humans are transform- development must be revised to include the
integrated into the follow-up to the Millen- ing the planet in ways that could undermine security of people and the planet.
nium Development Goals (MDGs) after development gains. Defining a unified set of SDGs is challeng-
their 2015 deadline. Discussions on how to As mounting research shows, the stable ing, especially when there can be conflict
formulate these continue this week at UN functioning of Earth systems — including between individual goals, such as energy
headquarters in New York. the atmosphere, oceans, forests, waterways, provision and climate-change prevention.
We argue that the protection of Earth’s biodiversity and biogeochemical cycles — is But we show here that it is possible. By
2 1 M A RC H 2 0 1 3 | VO L 4 9 5 | NAT U R E | 3 0 5
© 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
COMMENT
A UNIFIED FRAMEWORK
A set of six sustainable development goals (SDGs) follow from combining the Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs) with conditions necessary to assure the stability of Earth's systems.
NEW PARADIGM
Earth’s life-
support system NEW DEFINITION
Sustainable development in the
Anthropocene: “Development that meets
Society the needs of the present while
safeguarding Earth’s life-support
Economy system, on which the welfare of current
and future generations depends.”
People Planet
UPDATED MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS + PLANETARY MUST-HAVES = SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
End poverty and hunger Materials use Thriving lives and livelihoods
Universal education Clean air Sustainable food security
Gender equality Nutrient (N and P) cycles Sustainable water security
Health Hydrological cycles Universal clean energy
Environmental sustainability Ecosystem services Healthy and productive ecosystems
Global partnership Biodiversity Governance for sustainable societies
Climate stability
combining the MDGs with global envi- people of all nations make the transition to of current and future generations depends”.
ronmental targets drawn from science and sustainable lifestyles. To set appropriate goals and targets,
from existing international agreements, we By coordinating actions internationally, environmental conditions have to be
propose six SDGs with provisional targets SDGs can address these risks. The MDGs identified that enable prosperous human
for 2030. have shown that a goal-setting approach development and set tolerable ranges for
raises both public and policy support and the biosphere to remain in that state. The
ENTER THE ANTHROPOCENE channels funds effectively towards urgent extraordinarily stable Holocene epoch that
Since 2000, the MDGs have focused on reduc- global problems2. However, the political allowed our ancestors to develop agricul-
ing extreme poverty in developing countries. reluctance to go beyond merely extending ture and modern societies during the past
But pursuing a post-2015 agenda focused the MDGs is a concern. 10,000 years provides a scientific reference
only on poverty alleviation could undermine The targets for the SDGs must be measur- point. Indeed, these are the only conditions
the agenda’s purpose. Growing evidence and able, based on the latest research and should we know that can support modern life.
real-world changes convincingly show that apply to developed and developing coun- Building on decades of research, a 2009
humanity is driving global environmental tries. First, however, we need to reframe the analysis defined planetary boundaries
change and has pushed us into a new geologi- UN paradigm of three pillars of sustainable which would be unsafe to transgress for
cal epoch — the Anthropocene1. development — economic, social and envi- nine Earth-system processes 3: climate
Further human pressure risks causing ronmental — and instead view it as a nested change; rate of biodiversity loss (terrestrial
widespread, abrupt and possibly irrevers- concept. The global economy services soci- and marine); interference with the nitrogen
ible changes to basic Earth-system pro- ety, which lies within Earth’s life-support and phosphorus cycles; stratospheric ozone
cesses. Water shortages, extreme weather, system. The definition of sustainable devel- depletion; ocean acidification; global fresh-
deteriorating conditions for food produc- opment, as laid out in the 1987 report from water use; change in land use; chemical pol-
tion, ecosystem loss, ocean acidification the UN World Commission on Environ- lution; and atmospheric aerosol loading.
and sea-level rise are real dangers that ment and Development (the Brundtland Adapting this planetary boundaries work,
could threaten development and trig- Commission), should therefore be rede- and using recent credible scientific studies
ger humanitarian crises across the globe. fined to “development that meets the needs and existing international processes — such
Growing affluence and the right to develop- of the present while safeguarding Earth’s as the United Nations Framework Conven-
ment among the world’s poor demand that life-support system, on which the welfare tion on Climate Change — we extracted a
3 0 6 | NAT U R E | VO L 4 9 5 | 2 1 M A RC H 2 0 1 3
© 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
COMMENT
list of sustainability ‘must-haves’ for human by addressing other sustainability concerns. planet ceases to function for the benefit of a
prosperity (see ‘A unified framework’). The SDG framework manages trade-offs global population. ■
We combined these with the MDG and maximizes synergies between targets,
targets, updated and extended for 2030, and can be implemented from international David Griggs is professor and director of
to produce six SDGs: thriving lives and to city scales. It integrates social, economic the Monash Sustainability Institute, Monash
livelihoods, sustainable food security, and environmental dimensions and pro- University, Victoria 3800, Australia. Mark
sustainable water security, universal clean vides guidance for humanity to pros- Stafford-Smith, Owen Gaffney, Johan
energy, healthy and productive ecosystems, per in the long term. A small number of Rockström, Marcus C. Öhman, Priya
and governance for sustainable societies goals is essential for Shyamsundar, Will Steffen, Gisbert
(see ‘Some provisional targets for 2030’). “None of this focus; others could Glaser, Norichika Kanie, Ian Noble.
The driving principles remain: reduc- is possible be added but should e-mail: dave.griggs@monash.edu
ing poverty and hunger, improving health without build on the core six.
1. Steffen, W. et al. Ambio 40, 739–761 (2011).
and well-being and creating sustainable changes to There are many 2. United Nations. The Millennium Development
production and consumption patterns. A the economic gaps and uncertain- Goals Report 2012 (UN, 2012).
3. Rockström, J. et al. Nature 461, 472–475 (2009).
goal of improving lives and livelihoods, for playing field.” ties in our knowledge 4. Biermann, F. et al. Science 335, 1306–1307
example, would promote sustainable access of global environ- (2012).
to food, water and energy while protecting mental risks and how to enable societies to 5. Glaser, G. Nature 491, 35 (2012).
biodiversity and ecosystem services. become resource-efficient, sustainable and 6. Shindell, D. et al. Science 335, 183–189 (2012).
7. Sutton, M. A. et al. Our Nutrient World (Centre for
None of this is possible without changes wealthy. Research initiatives such as Future Ecology and Hydrology, 2013).
to the economic playing field4. National Earth, a ten-year programme coordinated 8. Carpenter, S. R. & Bennett, E. M. Environ. Res.
policies should, like carbon pricing, place a by the International Council for Science5, Lett. 6, 014009 (2011).
9. Smakhtin, V. U. & Batchelor, A. L. Hydrol. Process.
value on natural capital and a cost on unsus- are needed to refine targets and provide 19, 1293–1305 (2005).
tainable actions. International governance sustainable solutions for human well-being. 10. Huntingford, C. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 7, 014039
of the global commons should be strength- But the first step is for policy-makers to (2012).
ened, for example through binding agree- embrace a unified environmental and social
Supplementary information and full author
ments on climate change, by halting the loss framework for the SDGs, so that today’s affiliations accompany this article online at
of biodiversity and ecosystem services and advances in development are not lost as our go.nature.com/zowqiw.
2 1 M A RC H 2 0 1 3 | VO L 4 9 5 | NAT U R E | 3 0 7
© 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved