Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Us10034880 PDF
Us10034880 PDF
A(%)ofComnptoeuntd
8
o
0 12 24 36 48 60 72
Time (hr )
Change of Particle Size of Compound A (250 )
250
SizeofCMeanPAoamrptoiucnlde (nm)FinSoursmpelnastion Z
o
5 10 15
Time ( day )
US 10 ,Page
034 ,2880 B2
Fig . 1
t | i
sion
#
Sto e Stabi to
have
1
Formulation ( 37°C )
Alo Ac o onwww texto
Cofomnptoeuntd
)
%
(
A
0 12 24 36 48 60 72
Time (hr)
Change of Particle Size of Compound A ( 250 )
P hot
w twice ithmete www ph
.
CAofSPMoamireptoziaucneld (nm)FSinoursmpuelnastion
õ
ý
o kecset
A pewtwo
5 10 15
Time (day )
U . S . Patent Jul. 31, 2018 Sheet 2 of 8 US 10 , 034 ,880 B2
Fig . 2
Ophthalmic imeansa ,
1?? ? ww w . ALASAWASAMBANA
Formulation A1 WASEMAVOKUW A
ACofonmceptoruaniod
*.
10 . 2
Retina Cornea Plasma
)
mL
/
ug
:
Plasma
Cornea
Retina
,
g
pg
(ug
/
:
A pp
Ophthalmic (maanse, n = 4 )
Formulation Z
A . ago ROOTERS
ACofonmceptoruanido
?eoð85oŠ 74 . 3
0 .0473 WeAre
0 .0437
Retina Cornea Plasma
ACofonmceptoruaniod de
93
o?
Cornea
)
mL
/
ug
:
Plasma
,
g
Retina
(
7 .8 3 .6 7 .5
Retina Cornea Plasma
50 ,0
45. 0 Weedlewa .
40. 0 33 . 5
35 .0
30. 0
P/ofRleatsimnoa 25 . 0
20 .0
STA TUT
15 .0
sest 1 .1
- Swe a tshirtwwwwwwat c h Beanserkonaklepeta motardivemus
Oral Ophthalmic Ophthalmic
Administration Formulation z Formulation 1
U . S . Patent Jul. 31, 2018 Sheet 3 of 8 US 10 , 034 ,880 B2
Fig . 3
700 (mean I se ,044 )
600 www .MWAMW A MBA
500
ACofonmceptoruanid 40
342
)
g
/
ug
(
Retina
in
??? 1
0 ,0473
Ophthalmic Ophthalmic
Formulation Z Formulation A1
( Solution ) ( Suspension )
1400 (mean . se ,nd)
HORMOSWOOONOTO
1030
ACofonmceptoruanid
)
9
/
ug
(
Cornea
in
. . .
74 . 3 SA
Ophthalmic Ophthalmic
Formulation Z Formulation A1
( Solution ) (Suspension )
(meant se , n = 4 )
OLMANINDA
10 .2 /
inACofonmceptoruaniod
)
mL
/
ug
(
Plasma
0 .0437
Ophthalmic Ophthalmic
Formulation 2 Formulation A1
( Solution ) {S??????????? )
U . S . Patent Jul. 31, 2018 Sheet 4 of 8 US 10 , 034 ,880 B2
Fig . 4 .
| Ophthalmic (mean se , n = 5 )
Formulation A2 044 tonesho M wah
ACofonmceptoruaniod
)
g
/
ug
(
Retina
in
Dang MARIA
Once
ANEIRA
SADA
NSS
3 times
Number of administration in eyedrops
5 times
( times / eye )
1200 por HASSIM Me sentencom
Ophthalmic Whean * * 5€
- Formulation A2
ACofonmceptoruanid
)
g
/
ug
(
Cornea
in
Š
o
inACofoncmeptoruaniod festes
VAATA
)
mL
/
ug
(
Plasma
Fig . 5
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwW .
(meanse
MA L
* 5 - 7) i
AYALAM
wwwwww
ACofonmceptoruaniod ?
ve
)
g
/
vg
(
Retina
in
nowiec
'. " .
Mean Particle Size (nm ) 227 451 610 801 1944 9560 20430
Ophthalmic Formulation A3 8 C D F G
g
8 (meant se , n 5 - 711
ACofonmcepotruanido
)
9
/
ug
(
Cornea
in V
Ž
0
Mean Particle Size (nm ) 227 451 610 801 1944 9560 20430
Ophthalmic Formulation A3 B C D E F G
MASA
means , 4 * $ - 7 )
ACofonmcepotruanido w
wo
a
mepsananvoruwoasvtranvmuepmjnaitsaenminetu
)
mL
/
vg
(
Plasma
in in
same
the
at
best
Mean Particle Size (nm ) 227 451 610 801 1944 9560 20430
Ophthalmic Formulation A3 B C D E F G
* W omen
( =57)
PR/ofleatsimnoa
Mean Particle Size (nm ) 227 451 610 801 1944 9560 20430
Ophthalmic Formulation A3 B C D E F G
U . S . Patent Jul. 31, 2018 Sheet 6 of 8 US 10,034 ,880 B2
Fig . 6
MKATABORA
meanse , * SI
400
350
ACofonmceptoruanid 300
250
)
g
/
ug
(
Retina
in + H * ** * * * * ** *
pH 5 pH 3 pH 7
Ophthalmic Ophthalmic Ophthalmic
Formulation Formulation Formulation
ACofonmceptoruaniod 300
)
g
/
pg
(
Cornea
in
se
e
a
?
u
DISE PH 3
Ophthalmic Ophthalmic Ophthalmic
PH 7
SA
one w
(meant 59, 825)
CAinofonmceptoruaniod
o
)
mL
/
ug
(
Plasma
N
o
PH 5 pH 3 PHY
Ophthalmic Ophthalmic Ophthalmic
Formulation
By
Formulation Formulation
im
U . S . Patent Jul. 31, 2018 Sheet 7 of 8 US 10 , 034 ,880 B2
Fig . 7
(meanse , n = 5 )
)
g
/
RConectnirantiaon
in
ug
( oPro trastot n co
§
o
Mean Particle Size (nm ) 263 9560 20430 556 8970 291 5430
Ophthalmic Formulation F G X1 X2 Y2
Compound A Compound B Compoundc
Fig . 8
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW SISWAHIBA
(mean I se , nx4 )
Hindir
MDMean
)
%
( igsrta nicoen
ashinwmbg
N
5
www
12
1
*
**
2
*
*
#
4
+
*
R
*
7
*
+
whitew . *
*
Fig . 9
2. 2 . ' ' ' ' ' 2 . 122 .
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww w wwwwwwwwwww
R8OS O minangioweunamj
wwwwwwwwwwwww w wwww .press wwwwwwwww wwwwwwwwwww w wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww . WANN
.
)
g
/
ug
(
Retina
in 444444444: . . . rrrr444 4
. . . . . . . . . ..2
M ATARAM
20 200
Concentration of Ophthalmic Suspension (mg /mL)
Www
500 .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .
wise
CAofonmceptoruanid 400
300
w w w .k . .. .. . . ..
virravure
. . . ..
. . ..
)
g
/
ug
(
Cornea
in
100
20 200
Concentration of Ophthalmic Suspension (mg /mL)
www . wwwrie wwwwwwwwww Pin AAVAA word
.
meanse , n ?
Covotel ? ?
…
.
*
,
-
"
…
.
we W ALAWW W . HAWWwwww . . t
CAinofonmceptoruaniod
"
,
"
+
,
"
+
+
)
mL
/
ug
(
Plasma . . . . . ...
femel
N
w S .. ' > > > > >> > > > > Wwwww w wwwwwwwwwww . . . . ' ww W
O.
O HO O wwwww w ww !
o
20 200 .
aw
227.0 nm 207 .1 mg/mL
451.2 nm 211.0 mg/mL
609.9 nm 195 .6 mg/mL
801.2 nm 218 .8 mg/mL
1944 nm 135 . 4 mg/mL
9560 nm 201.8 mg/mL
20430 nm 224 .5 mg/mL
Example 2 3 .09 352. 1 nm 217 .9 mg/mL
5 .07 263.2 nm 220 .0 mg/mL
7 . 10 256 .0 nm 222.4 mg/mL
Reference Z I — 400 ug/mL
example 1
Reference X1
example 2 X2 au5 - 555.7 nm
8970 nm
215 .4 mg/mL
187 .7 mg/mL
US 10 ,034 ,880 B2
19
TABLE 4 - continued
Example / Ophthalmic pH of
Reference formulation
example ( suspension /
number solution )
Det pitof persone content
added
dispersion
Compound medium
pH of
suspension
Mean
particle
size Content
Y1 290 .8 nm 214 .1 mg/mL
Y2 au 5430 nm 196 .8 mg/mL
— no analysis
Test 1 : Evaluation of Storage Stability with Ophthalmic wherein Compound A was dissolved (400 ug/mL ) was
Suspension Formulation Comprising Compound a administered in eyedrops in the amount of 5 uL for one eye
With regard to the ophthalmic suspension formulation , the (which is a maximum tolerated dose for eyedrops in rats )
content change of Compound A stored at 37° C . and the 15 totally 5 times at intervals of 5 minutes . 60 minutes after the
particle size change of Compound A stored at 25° C . were administration , each concentration of Compound A in cor
evaluated according to the following procedures. nea , retina and plasma was measured .
According to the procedure described in Example 1, an Eyedrop has a limitation about tolerated volume of one
ophthalmic suspension formulation was prepared with a shot, which is different from other dosage forms. Thus, the
dispersion medium (pH 5 .0 ) and beads having a diameter of 20 delivery amount of the drug to the target tissue which is
0 .5 mm . The content of Compound A in the obtained obtained from eyedrop of a maximum tolerated dose is
ophthalmic suspension formulation and the mean particle important. The tolerated volume varies depending on animal
size of the suspending Compound A were analyzed by the species, and the maximum volume in rats is 5 uL for one eye .
above -mentioned method . The analytical results were The solubility of Compound A in water is very low , thus,
220 . 95 mg/mL and 170 . 2 nm , respectively . The prepared 25 in preparing an ophthalmic solution formulation thereof, an
ophthalmic suspension formulation was stored at 37° C . in additive was added to the solution to make the solubility of
a given time, and then subjected to ultrasonication to be Compound A higher than the original solubility to prepare
homogenized . To 100 uL of the ophthalmic suspension ophthalmic solution formulation Z ( 400 ug /mL ).
formulation were added 800 uL of 1 % HPMC and 100 uL In addition , Diabetic Retinopathy , INTECH , Chapter 15
of acetonitrile, and the mixture was shaken with a vortex . 30 " Prophylactic Medical Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy " ,
100 uL of the shaken mixture was put into a 10 mL Akihiro Kakehashi et al. disclose an experiment of oral
measuring flask , and 2 % HPMC /acetonitrile ( 1 : 1 ) was added repetitive administration of Compound A to SDT rats ,
thereto to adjust the total volume of the solution accurately wherein the dose of Compound A making the retinal capil
to 10 mL . The obtained solution was used as an analysis lary weakened and the VEGF production in retina inhibited
sample of Compound A . Each sample of each store timewas 35 is 1 . 0 mg/kg. In the present test, the dose of Compound A
analyzed with a ultra high -performance liquid chromato - ( 1. 0 mg/kg ) was orally repeatedly administered once a day
graph ( SHIMADZU ) using column YMC -Pack Pro C 18 5 for 21 days . 60 minutes after the final administration , each
um 150x4 .6 mm . The analytical results are shown in FIG . 1 . concentration of Compound A in cornea , retina and plasma
Subsequently , according to the procedure described in was measured . The results are shown in FIG . 2 and FIG . 3 .
Example 1, an ophthalmic suspension formulation was 40 FIG . 2 shows the delivery amount ( concentration ) of
prepared with a dispersion medium (pH 5 .0 ). In the milling, Compound A to plasma, cornea, and retina by the eyedrop
beads having a diameter of 0 .5 mm was used for 2 hours, and administration of ophthalmic suspension formulation A1,
then the beads was changed to beads having a diameter of the eyedrop administration of ophthalmic solution formula
0 .02 mm and the mixture was milled for 2 hours. The tion Z , and the oral repetitive administration . Each delivery
content of Compound A in the obtained ophthalmic suspen - 45 ratio of Compound A into plasma, cornea , and retina is
sion formulation and the mean particle size of the suspend shown as follows.
ing Compound A were analyzed by the above -mentioned The concentration ratio of Compound A in each tissue by
method . The analytical results were 168 .5 mg/mL and 180 .5 the eyedrop administration of ophthalmic suspension for
nm , respectively. The prepared ophthalmic suspension for - mulation A1 is
mulation was stored at 25° C ., and the mean particle size of 50 plasma: cornea :retina = about 1 : 101:33 .5 .
the sample stored for each period was analyzed by the The concentration ratio of Compound A in each tissue by
above-mentioned method . The analytical results are shown the eyedrop administration of ophthalmic solution formula
in FIG . 1 . tion Z is
FIG . 1 shows that the content of Compound A in the plasma: cornea :retina = about 1 : 1689: 1.
present ophthalmic suspension formulation did not decrease 55 And , the concentration ratio of Compound A in each
very much even after the storage for 72 hours . And , the mean tissue by the oral repetitive administration is
particle size thereof also did not changed even after the plasma: cornea :retina = about 1 : 1 : 1.
storage for 14 days. This result indicates that the present In addition , each retina/plasma ratio in each administra
ophthalmic formulation is chemically and physically stable tion group [ retina/plasma ratio = ( the concentration of Com
and does not need to be stored in cold place , i.e ., can be 60 pound A in retina ( ug /g ) / (the concentration of Compound A
stored at ambient temperature. in plasma (ug/mL )) ] is shown as follows.
Test 2 : Evaluation of Transferability to Posterior Eye Seg - The retina /plasma ratio by the administration group of
ment in Rats (I- 1 ) and (1-2 ) ophthalmic suspension formulation A1 =33 .5 .
To both eyes of rat model of diabetes, ophthalmic sus - The retina/plasma ratio by the administration group of
pension formulation Al wherein Compound A was sus - 65 ophthalmic solution formulation Z = 1 .1 .
pended in a generally - tolerated dose as a suspension formu The retina /plasma ratio by the oral repetitive administra
lation (200 mg/mL ) or ophthalmic solution formulation Z tion group = 1 .0 .
US 10 ,034 ,880 B2
21 22
In the rats to which ophthalmic solution formulation Z frequency of the administration , namely a needed amount of
was administered in eyedrops, the retina/plasma ratio was Compound A was delivered to retina in one administration .
1. 1 which was almost the same as the retina / plasma ratio From this result , it has been found that an ophthalmic
(1 .0 ) by the oral administration . This result suggests that suspension formulation comprising Compound A or a physi
most of ophthalmic solution formulation Z went to blood in 5 ologically -acceptable salt thereof can suppress the elevation
general- circulation via nasolacrimal canal and then reached in circulating levels and also make the formulation suffi
retina . ciently delivered into retina, by such few frequency of the
On the other hand , in the rats to which the present administration .
invention , ophthalmic suspension formulation A1 was Test 4 : Evaluation of Transferability to Posterior Eye Seg
administered , the retina /plasma ratio was 33. 5 which was 10 ment in Rats ( III )
more than 30 - fold higher than the retina /plasma ratio ( 1 . 0 ). To both eyes of SD rats , ophthalmic formulation A3 or
that was the result of oral administering an effective dose of ophthalmic formulations B -G was administered in eyedrops
Compound A for diabetic retinopathy to SDT rats or the in the amount of 5 L for one eye once. 60 minutes after the
retina /plasma ratio ( 1 . 1) that was the result of administering administration , each concentration of Compound A in cor
ophthalmic solution formulation Z . This suggested that the 15 nea , retina and plasma was measured . The result is shown in
ophthalmic suspension formulation can be delivered to FIG . 5 .
retina via a direct delivery route . In addition , ophthalmic formulation A3 was diluted with
Each concentration of Compound A in each tissue in the dispersion medium to prepare an ophthalmic suspension
which ophthalmic suspension formulation A1 and ophthal- formulation having a different concentration of Compound
mic solution formulation Z were administered to the rats in 20 A ( 20 mg/mL ), and then the diluted formulation was admin
Test 2 is shown in FIG . 3 . In the rats to which ophthalmic i stered to SD rats . 60 minutes after the administration , each
solution formulation Z was administered , the delivery rate to concentration of Compound A in cornea , retina and plasma
retina was low (0 .0473 ug / g ) though the concentration of was measured (III- 2 ). The result is shown in FIG . 9 .
Compound A was higher (400 ug/mL ) than the original As shown in FIG . 5 , the smaller the mean particle size
solubility , i.e ., it was not thought that this trial promises the 25 was, the higher the concentration of Compound A in retina
therapeutic effect. On the other hand , in the rats to which was. In cornea and plasma, however, there was no big
ophthalmic suspension formulation Al was administered , difference about the concentration of Compound A as far as
the delivery rate to retina was sufficiently high (342 ug/g ) the mean particle size is less than 9560 nm . The ophthalmic
enough to be expected to be the therapeutic effect, in which administration with the suspension formulation showed
the concentration of Compound A in the formulation was 30 higher retina /plasma ratio (about 4 - 12 ) than that of the oral
generally - tolerated dose ( 200 mg/mL ) as a suspension . administration or the ophthalmic administration with the
The concentration of Compound A in the suspension solution ( oral administration: 1 .0 , ophthalmic administration
formulation administered in eyedrops was 500 - fold higher with the solution : 1 . 1 ) , even for all the ophthalmic suspen
[( 200 mg/mL )/ (400 ug /mL) ] than that of the solution for sion formulations having various mean particle sizes . And ,
mulation , but the amount thereof in retina derived from the 35 the ophthalmic suspension formulation comprising Com
suspension formulation was much higher (7230 - fold higher pound A having a mean particle size of 700 nm or less had
| (342 ug / g )/( 0 .0473 ug / g ) ]) than that of the solution formu- a bigger difference between the concentration in retina and
lation . On the other hand , as for the delivery to cornea in the concentration in plasma. Considering this result , it is
anterior eye segment and the delivery to plasma, each thought that the ophthalmic suspension formulation can
amount thereof in cornea and plasma derived from the 40 exhibit high effect and also reduce side - effects .
suspension formulation was only 14 - fold and 232 - fold As shown in FIG . 9 , the higher the concentration of
higher than that of the solution formulation , respectively, Compound A in the suspension formulation was, the higher
though the amount of Compound A in the suspension the concentration of Compound A in retina was. It is
formulation administered in eyedrops was 500 -fold higher generally thought that the drug delivery to posterior eye
than that of the solution formulation . 45 segment depends on the amount of the drug dissolved in
It has been found that the ophthalmic suspension formu - water. In this test , however, surprisingly the delivery amount
lation comprising Compound A can be delivered in more of Compound A to retina increased with the concentration of
enough concentration of Compound A than by the oral Compound A in suspended state , regardless of the amount of
administration via general- circulation or by the eyedrops of the dissolved Compound A . And , the ophthalmic adminis
the ophthalmic solution formulation . Thus, it is thought that 50 tration with the suspension formulation showed higher
an ophthalmic suspension formulation comprising Com - retina/plasma ratio (about 12) than that of the oral admin
pound A or a physiologically -acceptable salt thereof has a istration or the ophthalmic administration with the solution
sufficient diremption between its effect and its side - effect (oral administration : 1 .0 , ophthalmic administration with the
and hence can make a disease in posterior eye segment solution : 1 . 1 ), regardless of the suspension concentration .
including retina treated safely . 55 Test 5 : Evaluation of Transferability to Posterior Eye Seg
Test 3: Evaluation of Transferability to Posterior Eye Seg - ment in Rats ( IV )
ment in Rats (II) To both eyes of SD rats, ophthalmic formulation H (PH3) ,
To both eyes of SD rats, ophthalmic formulation A2 was ophthalmic formulation I (pH 5 ), or ophthalmic formulation
administered in eyedrops in the amount of 5 uL for one eye J (pH 7 ) was administered in eyedrops in the amount of 5 uL
once , three times , or five times at intervals of 5 minutes . 60 60 for one eye once . 60 minutes after the administration , each
minutes after the administration , each concentration of concentration of Compound A in cornea , retina and plasma
Compound A in cornea , retina and plasma was measured . was measured . The result is shown in FIG . 6 .
The result is shown in FIG . 4 As shown in FIG . 6 , all of ophthalmic formulation I (pH
As shown in FIG . 4, the ophthalmic suspension formu - 5 ), ophthalmic formulation H (pH 3 ), and ophthalmic for
lation made the concentration of Compound A in plasma 65 mulation J (pH 7 ) showed a delivery level to retina enough
increased with the frequency of the administration . How to enable a disease in posterior eye segment to be treated . In
ever, the concentration in retina was not influenced by the particular, ophthalmic formulation I (pH 5 ) exhibited a very
US 10 ,034 , 880 B2
23 24
high delivery to retina . However, the delivery to cornea and TABLE 5
plasma was not so influenced by pH .
Test 6 : Evaluation of Transferability to Posterior Eye Seg AR inhibitory action ,
AR inhibitor Ki (nM )
ment in Rats (V )
To both eyes of SD rats , ophthalmic formulation I, oph - 5 Compound A 0 . 23 ( 1.0 )
thalmic formulation F , ophthalmic formulation G , ophthal Compound C 1 . 9 (x8. 3)
Compound B 62 (x270 )
mic formulation X1, ophthalmic formulation X2 , ophthal
mic formulation Y1, or ophthalmic formulation Y2 was Diabetic Retinopathy, INTECH , Chapter 15 , “ Prophylac
administered in eyedrops in the amount of 5 uL for one eye
once . 60 minutes after the administration , each concentra- 10 Kakehashi
tic Medical Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy" , Akihiro
et al. shows that the repetitive oral administration
tion of Compound A in retina was measured . The result is
shown in FIG . 7 . of Compound A to SDT rats which are nonobese type 2
As shown in FIG . 7 , the ophthalmic suspension formu diabetic models can weaken retinal capillary and inhibit
lation comprising Compound Awas delivered to retina much 15 prophylacticVEGF
producing in retina , and the finding suggests that the
administration of Compound A for a disease
more than the ophthalmic suspension formulation compris related to VEGF before facilitating the VEGF production is
ing Compound B or C . Even when Compound A in the expected to inhibit the progress to some level. However, the
ophthalmic suspension formulation had a mean particle size literature did not make it clear that Compound A is effective
of 9560 nm , a needed amountof Compound A was delivered for the treatment after the onset of the disease , by reducing
to retina . In case of Compound B or Compound C , however, 20 the action of the already - produced VEGF. In addition ,
the compounds having any mean particle size were hardly Non -Patent Literature 1 showed only the data of oral admin
delivered to retina . istration, but did not show the possibility to inhibit the
Test 7 : Inhibitory Action for Facilitatory Action of Cell progress by eyedrop administration .
Migration by VEGF Stimulation of Compound A The present test has made it clear that Compound A or a
The anti- VEGF action of Compound A was evaluated by 25 physiologically - acceptable salt thereof can inhibit the facili
an experimental method ( cell migration assay) described in tatory action of cell migration by the VEGF stimulation, and
I Diabetes Complications. 2012 ; 26 ( 5 ): 369-77 . In the also show the anti- VEGF action for already- produced
experiment, a normal human retinal capillary endothelial VEGF. This finding suggests that the present invention can
cell (HREC ) which was obtained from Cell System Co., treat a disease related to VEGF such as age-related macular
LTD . was used , and a cell culture used herein was CS - C 30 degeneration and diabetic retinopathy, after the onset . And ,
medium (Cell System Co., LTD .). Compound A , Compound the anti -VEGF action of Compound A is more potent than
B , or Compound C was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide the other aldose reductase inhibitors, and it is in the same
(DMSO ), each solution was diluted with the cell culture to level as Lucentis which is an anti - VEGF antibody formu
adjust the concentration in DMSO to 0 . 1 % , and each 0 . 1 % lation .
solution was used in the experiment. As for Lucentis , its Reference Example 6
formulation stock solution was diluted with the cell culture ,
wherein the dilution ratio was 50 uL of the formulation stock Preparation of Suspension Formulation Samples (1)
solution per 4 mL of the cell culture , and the diluted solution to (4 )
was used in the experiment. The HREC was seeded in 6 -well 40
plate , and it was incubated until the confluency became Preparation of Sample (1 ): According to the steps of
80 - 90 % . 20 - 24 hours before assaying the cell migration by Example 1, an ophthalmic suspension formulation com
the VEGF stimulation , the cell culture was changed to a cell prising Compound A (250 mg/mL ) was prepared with the
culture containing 0 . 1 % fetal bovine serum . Then , the cul dispersion medium (pH 5 .0 ) and beads having a diameter
ture cell monolayer was wounded with a 200 UL pipette tip 45 of 0 . 5 mm .
at one point per well, and the width of the wounds were Preparation of Sample (2 ) : According to Reference example
measured with a microscope . After the wound, the cell 2 , dispersion medium (pH 5 .0 ) comprising 0 . 3 % poly
culture was changed to a cell culture containing VEGF, each oxyethylene hydrogenated castor oil was prepared by
aldose reductase inhibitor (Compound A , Compound B using polyoxyethylene hydrogenated castor oil instead of
Compound C ), or Lucentis, depending on each test condi- 50 polysorbate 80 in the steps of Reference example 2 . 15
tion . About 18 hours after changing the cell culture , each mL of the dispersion medium and 5 g of Compound A
width of the wounds was measured with a microscope , and were put into a screw bottle , and the mixture was sub
the anti- VEGF action was evaluated by comparing the width jected to ultrasonication for 5 minutes. The whole of
with that of the just-wounded one. The results are shown in content was transferred into a syringe for milling , Star
FIG . 8 . 55 Burst Mini (Sugino Machine Limited ), and the screw
As shown in FIG . 8 , the results showed that the VEGF bottle was washed with 5 mL of the dispersion medium
stimulation facilitated the HREC migration , and Lucentis and the washing solution was also put into the syringe.
and the aldose reductase inhibitors inhibited the migration . The content in the syringe was milled under a milling
The action inhibiting the HREC migration with 1 nM ( (0 .42 pressure of 245 MPa for 30 minutes to prepare an oph
ng/mL )L ) Compound A was in the same level as that of 100 60 thalmic suspension formulation comprising Compound A
nM (( 28 ng/mL )/ L ) Compound C , and more potent than that (250 mg/mL ).
of 1000 nM (( 320 ng/mL )/ L ) Compound B . In addition , the Preparation of Sample (3 ): 1 g of jet-milled Compound A
migration inhibition of Compound A was more potent than was added to 10 g of glycerin , and the mixture was stirred
those of the other aldose reductase inhibitors , as an action with a stirrer for 1 hour to prepare a suspension formu
ratio shown in the table shown below . And the migration 65 lation comprising Compound A .
inhibition of 1 nM Compound A was in the same level as Preparation of Sample (4 ): 1 g of jet-milled Compound A
Lucentis which is an anti - VEGF antibody. was added to 10 g of water , and the mixture was stirred
US 10 ,034 ,880 B2
25 26
with a stirrer for 1 hour to prepare a suspension formu 8. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the pH of the
lation comprising Compound A . suspension is 3 to 9 .
Test 8 : Evaluation of Solubility of Compound A 9 . The formulation of claim 1 , wherein the osmotic
Each 500 uL of Samples (1 ) to (4 ) was centrifuged pressure of the suspension is 20 mOsm to 1000 mOsm .
( 150 ,000 rpm , 10 minutes , 5º C .) with a centrifugalmachine , 5 10 . The formulation of claim 1 , which comprises 1 mg to
HITACH -GX (Hitachi Koki Co ., Ltd .) . To 100 uL of the 500 mg of Compound A or a physiologically - acceptable salt
obtained supernatant were added 800 uL of 1 % HPMC and thereof per 1 mL of the suspension .
100 uL of acetonitrile or water, and the mixture was shaken 11. The formulation of claim 1 , wherein the ratio of
with a vortex to give each analysis sample thereof. EachCompound A or a physiologically -acceptable salt thereof
content of Compound A dissolved in each sample was 10 dissolved in the suspension to all of Compound A or a
analyzed with a ultra high -performance liquid chromato
graph ( SHIMADZU ) using column YMC - Pack Pro C 185 physiologically -acceptable salt thereof in the formulation is
um 150x4 .6 mm . The analytical results are shown in Table 0 .001 % to 10 % .
6 . Table 6 showed that the percentage of Compound A 1 Compound12 . The formulation of claim 1 , wherein the ratio of
dissolved in the aqueous suspension was very little . A or a physiologically - acceptable salt thereof
dissolved in the suspension to all of Compound A or a
TABLE 6 physiologically -acceptable salt thereof in the formulation is
0 .001 % to 1 % .
Concentration Percentage ( % ) Percentage ( % ) 13 . A method of treating a disease in an anterior eye
of Compound of Compound A of Compound A 30 segment and /or a disease in a posterior eye segment, com
dissolved in dissolved in dissolved in
saturated 250 mg/mL 20 mg/mL prising administering the formulation of claim 1 to an eye of
state (mg/mL) suspension suspension a subject in need thereof.
Sample (1 )
14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the disease is a
0 .02 0 . 007 0 .081
disease related to VEGF.
Sample (2 ) 0 .08 0 .031 0 . 383
15 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the disease is
Sample ( 3) 0 . 38 0 . 152 1 .900
Sample (4 ) 0 . 12 0 .049 0 .611 age -related macular degeneration , diabetic retinopathy , dia
betic macular edema, myopic choroidal neovascularization ,
Each mean particle size of Compound A suspended in retinal vein occlusion and/or cataract.
samples ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) was analyzed in the above -mentioned 16 . A kit , comprising:
manner. The results were 244 .2 nm and 276 .7 nm , respec - 30o ( 1) a formulation comprising Compound A : (R )- (- )-2 -(4
bromo -2 -fluorobenzyl) -1 ,2,3 ,4 -tetrahydropyrrolo [ 1,2
tively . Each particle size in sample ( 2 ) which was stored at
25° C . for one month and two months was 277 .3 nm and a ]pyrazine -4 -spiro -3'-pyrrolidine - 1,2 ,3,5 '-tetrone or a
256 .9 nm , respectively . physiologically -acceptable salt thereof; and
( 2 ) a formulation comprising a dispersion medium ,
INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY 35 wherein mixing formulation ( 1) and formulation (2 ) pro
duces the formulation of claim 1 .
Considering these examples , reference examples, tests , 17. The kit of claim 16 , wherein Compound A is present
etc ., the ophthalmic formulation of the present invention has in formulation ( 1 ).
a good transferability to posterior eye segment, and can be 18 . The kit of claim 16 , wherein themean particle size of
suitably used for treating ophthalmic diseases such as a 40o Compound A or a physiologically -acceptable salt thereof in
formulation ( 1) is from 10 nm to 20 um .
disease in posterior eye segment . 19. The kit of claim 16 , wherein formulation ( 1 ) or
The invention claimed is: formulation (2 ) further comprises a dispersant and/ or a
1. An ophthalmic formulation , comprising :
an eye drop suspension including Compound A : (R )- (-) 45 surfactant.
2 -(4 - bromo- 2 -fluorobenzyl)- 1,2 ,3 ,4 - tetrahydropyrrolo 45 20. A method of treating a disease in an anterior eye
[ 1,2 -a ]pyrazine-4 - spiro - 3'-pyrrolidine -1, 2 ,3 ,5 -tetrone segment
S and /or a disease in a posterior eye segment, com
or a physiologically -acceptable salt thereof and a dis mixing formulation ( 1) and formulation (2 ) of the kit of
persion medium in which Compound Aor a physiologi
cally -acceptable salt thereof is partially dissolved . claim 16 to obtain a mixture; and
2 . The formulation of claim 1, wherein Compound A is 5050 administering the mixture to an eye of a subject in need
thereof.
present in the formulation . 21. A method of administering the formulation of claim 1
3. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the mean particle to an eye of a subject in need thereof, comprising adminis
size of Compound A or a physiologically - acceptable salt tering the formulation to the anterior of the eye , whereby the
thereof in the suspension is from 1 nm to 20 um .
4 . The formulation of claim 1, wherein the mean particle 5555 Compound A transfers to the posterior of the eye .
22 . The method of claim 20 , wherein the disease is
size of Compound A or a physiologically -acceptable salt
thereof in the suspension is from 10 nm to 20 um . age - related macular degeneration and / or diabetic retinopa
5 . The formulation of claim 1 , wherein the dispersion thy .
medium is an aqueous dispersion medium . 23. The formulation of claim 2 , wherein the suspension
6 . The formulation of claim 1, wherein the dispersion spersion 60
60 comprises a dispersant and/ or a surfactant.
con
medium comprises a dispersant and /or a surfactant. version 24 . The formulation of claim 23 , wherein the suspension
7 . The formulation of claim 1, wherein the dispersion comprises a dispersant and a surfactant.
medium comprises a dispersant and a surfactant. * * * * *