You are on page 1of 6

Akhtari‑Zavare et al.

SpringerPlus (2015) 4:692


DOI 10.1186/s40064-015-1491-8

RESEARCH Open Access

Barriers to breast self examination


practice among Malaysian female students: a
cross sectional study
Mehrnoosh Akhtari‑Zavare1*, Muhamad Hanafiah Juni2, Irmi Zarina Ismail3, Salmiah Md Said2
and Latiffah A. Latiff2

Abstract 
Introduction:  Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer and the second reason of cancer deaths among woman
worldwide, including Malaysia. The objective of this paper is to assess the practice of breast self-examination (BSE)
and identify the barriers of BSE practice among undergraduate female students in Malaysia.
Methods:  A cross-sectional study conducted among 810 female undergraduate students in Klang Valley, Malaysia
between April–Jun 2012. Data was collected via self-administered questionnaire which was developed and pre-tested
for this study.
Results:  The majority of respondents were Malay 709 (95.6 %) and single 719 (96.9 %) with a mean age of 21.7 (1.1).
Only hundred eleven (15 %) of the participants had a family history of breast cancer. 70.5 % of the respondents do not
practice breast self-examination, 70.5 % do not know how to do it, 64.7 and 61.5 % reported no symptoms of breast
cancer and worries to detect breast cancer, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that age, marital status and per‑
sonal history of breast disease were statistically associated with the practice of breast self-examination.
Conclusion:  In this study, a high percentage of respondents were aware of breast cancer but do not perform breast
self-examination. Knowledge, socio-cultural and environmental factors were identified as barriers; so it is recom‑
mended that knowledge among the public about breast cancer and promotion of public breast health awareness
campaigns through the media should be carried out.
Keywords:  Breast cancer, Breast self-examination, Barriers, Young female, Malaysia

Background (Youlden et al. 2014). Malaysia being one of the countries


Nowadays, breast cancer is one of the most frequently in the Asian region affected with modernization is heav-
detected cancers and is the major cause of death among ily burdened with the problem, with breast cancer occur-
women worldwide (Loh and Chew 2011). Based on the ring in 34.86 per 100,000 population (Hisham and Yip
National Cancer Registries in Asian countries, varia- 2004).
tion for crude incidence rate of breast cancer is 21.3 per In Malaysia, breast cancer is the most common cancer
100,000 population in Jordan (Petro-Nustus and Mikhail and the first cause of death from cancer among women.
2002), 21.4 per 100,000 in Iran (Sadjadi et al. 2009), 24.1 According to the National Cancer Registry, there were
per 100,000 in Turkey (Nahcivan and Secginli 2007) and 3525 female breast cancer cases registered in Malaysia,
52 per 100,000 population in Japan and South Korea and 1 out every 19 Malaysian women has the chance of
getting breast cancer during their lifetime (National Can-
cer Registry 2006).
*Correspondence: akhtari.mehrnoosh@gmail.com Early detection of breast cancer can reduce its morbid-
1
Cancer Resource and Education Center, Universiti Putra Malaysia, ity and mortality (Avci 2008). Mammography, clinical
43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
breast examination and breast self-examination (BSE) are

© 2015 Akhtari-Zavare et al. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons
license, and indicate if changes were made.
Akhtari‑Zavare et al. SpringerPlus (2015) 4:692 Page 2 of 6

considered effective methods for early detection of breast and fear of detecting breast cancer (5.3  %). In Malaysia,
cancer (Avci 2008). There are arguments surrounding there are few research done on the elimination of barriers
the efficacy of BSE. A large well-conducted randomised of breast cancer awareness among young women (Hadi
controlled trial among 266,064 textile workers in Shang- et al. 2010); because young women believe that they are not
hai which teaching women to perform BSE showed dis- at risk of getting breast cancer (Johnson and Dickson-Swift
tribution of tumor size and stage at diagnosis as well as 2008). The emergence of breast disease and the subse-
mortality rate for breast cancer was nearly same between quent development of cancer tend to be more aggressive in
women in the two arms of the trial (Thomas et al. 2002). young patients compared with breast cancer progressions
With these result, numerous organisations including US in the older population (Johnson and Dickson-Swift 2008).
Preventive Service Task Force (2009), the Canadian Task Also, there is a lack of knowledge about the benefits of BSE
Force on Preventive Health Care (Baxter 2001) deter- among young women. For this reason, the aim of this study
mined that breast self-examinations no more benefit for is to identify the barriers of BSE practice among undergrad-
women. uate female students in Malaysia.
Although BSE alone is not sufficient for early detection
of breast cancer, but it is still an important screening tool Methods
for early detection of breast cancer in developing coun- Study design and sampling method
tries, because it is cheap, widely available, and does not A cross-sectional study was carried out among female
require complex technical training (Giridhara et al. 2011). undergraduate students in public universities in Klang
Overall, by performing regular BSE, women familiar with Valley, Malaysia, between April and Jun 2012.
the structure of normal breasts will be motivated to attend A multi-stage random sampling method was used to
screening clinics for mammography and clinical breast select students from public universities. A total of 810 stu-
examination (Giridhara et al. 2011; Tavafian et al. 2009). dents met the inclusion criteria and had gave informed
The Malaysian Ministry of Health has been promoting consent to participate in the study. The inclusion criteria
BSE and annual breast examinations by trained health for this study was; age 20 years old and above, no history of
workers as part of breast health awareness campaigns breast cancer, and not pregnant or breastfeeding. This study
since 1995 (Ministry of Health Malaysia 1999). While obtained approval from the Ethical Committee of Universiti
the majority of women seem to be aware of breast self- Putra Malaysia and the Ministry of Higher Education.
examinations, yet many still do not know how to perform
it properly (Soyer et al. 2007). Studies conducted among Instrument
different groups of women in Malaysia showed that Data was collected via self-administrative a question-
monthly BSE practice ranged from 19.6 to 36.7 %, respec- naire which was developed by the researchers based on
tively (Akhtari-Zavare et  al. 2015; Rosmawati 2010). an extensive review of the literature. The content validity
Although early detection of breast cancer can increase was evaluated by three expert from Community Health
the survival rate, many women miss early detection due Department at Universiti Putra Malaysia to examine each
to lack of knowledge and information about breast health item for congruence. The reliability of the questionnaire
awareness (Avci 2008). Also, as the American Cancer was determined by using test–retest reliability conducted
Society has proven, if breast cancer is detected at an among 80 female undergraduate students at Universiti
early stage (stage I–II), a 100–93  % survival rate can be Putra Malaysi not included in the study, and distributed
achieved, and this rate decreases to 72–22  % if breast in both English and Bahasa Malaysia language. The value
cancer is diagnosed at later stages (III–IV) (American of kappa for categorical data ranged between; breast can-
Cancer Society 2013). cer awareness (0.80–0.90), Breast cancer and BSE aware-
Many investigators have tried to determine the factors ness (0.70–0.97). The value of intra-class correlation
that affect women’s practice of BSE, because these factors coefficient (ICC) for barriers of BSE practice (continuous
are essential to plan effective intervention programs to data) was (0.70–0.80).
improve BSE practice (Tarawneh and Attiyat 2013; Gumus The questionnaire obtained information on respond-
et  al. 2010). Current literature showed many barriers to ents’ socio demographic characteristics, awareness of
BSE practice, which include social and cultural perceptions breast cancer and BSE, barriers for BSE practice, practice
of breast cancer and breast self examination, socio-demo- of BSE and source of information.
graphic factors, level of knowledge, and awareness (Hisham Socio demographic variables included: age, race, mari-
and Yip 2003; Rasu et al. 2011). Result of study done (Bit- tal status, family income, family history of breast cancer
Na et al. 2012) among Korean women shows (31.7 %) did (yes/no), personal history of breast disease (yes/no), hor-
not know how to do it, they would never have breast cancer monal drug usage (yes/no) and check the breast by doc-
(26.3 %), not effective for detecting breast cancer (17.1 %) tor (yes/no).
Akhtari‑Zavare et al. SpringerPlus (2015) 4:692 Page 3 of 6

Breast cancer and BSE awareness questions (yes/ Table 1 Demographic and  health characteristics of  the
no response) included: “Have you ever heard about participants (n = 742)
breast cancer?”, “Have you ever heard about BSE?”, Variables No %
“Do you know how to do BSE?”, and “What is the age
of BSE?”. Age (mean ± SD) 21.7 ± 1.1
The practice of BSE was assessed by asking respondents Marital status
if they had ever done BSE (yes/no), and the frequency of  Single 719 96.9
doing BSE (once a month, occasionally and others).  Others 23 3.1
The section about barriers for BSE practice had seven Ethnicity
questions and respondents had to either “agree” or Malay 709 95.6
“disagree”.  Non-Malay 33 4.4
 Family income (Mean ± SD) 4730.3 ± 2122.2*
Analysis Family history of breast cancer
All data was analyzed using PASW version 20.0 and a p  Yes 130 16.4
less than 0.05 was considered as a level of significance.  No 662 83.6
Descriptive statistics (mean and SD) were obtained for all Personal history of breast disease
the variables in the study. Chi-square analysis was used  Yes 11 1.5
to determine the relation between categorical variables  No 731 98.5
and BSE practice, and an independent sample t test was Hormonal drug usage
made for continuous data (age and family income).  Yes 40 5.1
 No 752 94.9
Results Check your breast by doctor
Respondent rate  Yes 73 0.5
A total of 810 female students were selected as the sam-  No 705 95.0
ple of the study. However, 68 respondents (8.3 %) refused
to participate. The respondents’ rate derived in this study
was 91.6 %. Among those who practice BSE, most of them practice
BSE occasionally at 96 respondents (50.8 %) and only 59
Socio‑demographic characteristics of the respondents (31.2  %) respondents practice BSE once a month. The
The mean (SD) age of respondents was 21.7 (1.1) and majority (50.2  %) stated the reason for performing BSE
ranged between 20 and 25  years old. The majority of was to check their breast regularly, while 57 (30.1  %)
them were Malay 709 (95.6  %), single 719 (96.9  %) and had family history of breast cancer, 27 (14.2 %) had per-
with monthly incomes of RM 4730.3 (2122.2). Family his- sonal histories of breast diseases and 10 (5.2 %) had other
tory of breast cancer was reported by 111 (15.0 %) of the reasons.
respondents while 11 (1.5 %) had histories of breast prob- There were statistically significant relationships
lems (Table 1). between those practicing BSE and those who did not
practice BSE with age (t = −3.21, p = 0.001), marital sta-
Awareness of breast cancer and knowledge of BSE tus of respondents (χ2  =  8.91, p  =  0.003) and personal
Seven hundred thirty-eight (99.5  %) respondents have history of breast disease (χ2 = 4.97, p = 0.02). There were
heard about breast cancer. Five hundred thirteen (69.1 %) no statistical differences between performing BSE with
had heard about BSE, but only 289 (38.9 %) respondents the rest of the variables.
know how to do BSE. Regarding the age to begin BSE,
only 303 (40.8) knew about it. Among those 513 who Barriers towards BSE practice
had heard about BSE, the main source of information A total of 533 (74.5  %) respondents who did not prac-
was printed media (newspapers, brouchures) with 270 tice BSE had nominated barriers for not performing it.
respondents (52.6  %), followed by information obtained The most common causes for not performing BSE were:
from medical health personnel at 150 respondents I don’t know how to do it at 390 respondents (70.5 %); I
(29.2 %), media at 60 respondents (11.7 %) and others at don’t have any symptoms at 358 respondents (64.7  %);
33 respondents (6.4 %) (Table 2). and I have worries in detecting breast cancer at 340
respondents (61.5  %). About 299 (54.1  %) respondents
Practice of BSE said that “doing BSE will take too much time” and 294
Although 738 (99.5  %) of the participants have heard (53.2  %) respondents do not have enough privacy to do
about breast cancer, only 189 (25.5  %) performed BSE. BSE (Table 3).
Akhtari‑Zavare et al. SpringerPlus (2015) 4:692 Page 4 of 6

Table 2  Awareness of breast cancer and knowledge of BSE Based on the results of this study, age, marital status
(n = 742) and personal history of breast disease effect BSE prac-
Statements Yes No tices (p  <  0.05), but no association was found among
no (%) no (%) those who practice BSE and the rest of the variables.
This result is similar with the findings of other stud-
Ever heard about breast cancer 738 (99.5) 4 (0.5)
ies done by Redhwan et  al. (2011) among female uni-
Ever heard about BSE 513 (69.1) 229 (30.9)
versity students in Malaysia and Al-Azmy et al. (2013)
Know how to do BSE 289 (38.9) 453 (61.1)
among women attending primary health care clinics
The age of BSE is starting from 20 years old 303 (40.8) 439 (59.2)
in Kuwait. There have been studies with conflicting
BSE is important for women to know how their 260 (35.0) 482 (65.0)
breasts normally feel results as well. While finding of studies done in Tur-
key (Doganer et al. 2014) and Kuwait (Al-Azmy et al.
2013) claimed that family history of breast cancer
was related to performing BSE, another two studies
Table 3  Barriers towards BSE practice among respondents
(n = 742)
revealed no significant relationship between BSE per-
formance and family history of breast cancer (Tava-
Statements No % fian et al. 2009).
I don’t know how to do it 390 70.5 In this study, the main reasons for not practicing BSE
Doing BSE will take too much time 299 54.1 were “don’t know how to do BSE” (70.5  %); followed by
I don’t have any symptoms 358 64.7 “don’t have any symptoms” (64.7 %). Many young women
I am scared of being diagnosed with breast cancer 340 61.5 believe that breast cancer affects only older women and
I don’t have enough privacy for BSE practice 294 53.2 thus, they are not at risk for getting breast cancer (Avci
I don’t feel it is necessary 317 57.3 2008). Also, lack of knowledge about how to do BSE
BSE will be embarrassing to me 334 60.4 among young Malaysian women have been due to inade-
quate education programs about breast health awareness
for this target population. Consistent with our results,
Discussion in many studies, women had mentioned that they don’t
This study was conducted in order to examine BSE prac- know how to do BSE (Redhwan et al. 2011; Tavafian et al.
tice and barriers to BSE practice among Malaysian female 2009) and they did not believe that they are at risk for
students. In the current study, 69.1  % respondents were getting breast cancer (Redhwan et al. 2011).
informed about breast self-examination. This is similar Others mention barriers towards breast self-exami-
with the results of a previous study done in University of nation practice such as “scared of being diagnosed with
Gezira, Sudan (Abdelrahman and Yousif 2006) and incon- breast cancer” and “BSE will be embarrassing to me”.
sistent with the findings of a study from Malaysia (Al-Dubai Similar to previous studies in Malaysia (Redhwan et  al.
et al. 2012) which found that 91 % of women were aware of 2011), Turkey (Avci 2008) and Iraq (Alwan et  al. 2012)
breast self-examination. In this study, 189 (25.5 %) respond- these fears may be a result of wrong perception of women
ents perform BSE, but a small number of students (31.2 %) on being diagnosed with breast cancer. Consequently,
perform BSE once a month. The main reason for practic- providing health educational programs about breast can-
ing BSE was to check their breast regularly. Similar to our cer and the significance of breast self-examination prac-
findings, a study from Iran reported that 100 (26 %) women tices can reduce these worries due to wrong beliefs and
practice BSE, and most of them 53 (13.8  %) practice BSE motivate them to practice breast self-examination.
occasionally (Akhtari-Zavare et  al. 2014). This poor prac- In the current study, “not enough privacy for BSE prac-
tice may be due to young women’s perceptions that they are tice”, “not necessary” and “BSE takes too much time”
healthy and thus do not need to perform a BSE. were other barriers for performing BSE among young
Additionally, amongst this study samples, the most women in Malaysia. Providing breast health education
common source of information on BSE were printed programs among young women may help change the
media (newspapers, brochures) followed by information negative barriers towards breast self-examination and
from medical health personnel. Similarly, in a study done empower women to participate actively in making deci-
by Al-Dubai et  al. (2012) reported that newspapers and sions regarding their health.
magazines were the main source of information on BSE.
But, this finding is inconsistent with a previous study Limitation of study
from Iran (Akhtari-Zavare et al. 2014) and Malaysia (Al- Since this study has been done among female undergrad-
Naggar et al. 2011) who reported that television was the uate students, the findings cannot be generalized to the
most common source of information. whole population in Malaysia.
Akhtari‑Zavare et al. SpringerPlus (2015) 4:692 Page 5 of 6

Implication for practice Akhtari-Zavare M, Ghanbari-Baghestan A, Latiffah AL, Matinnia N, Hoseini


M (2014) Knowledge and belief towards breast cancer and breast self-
Although there is no evidence that BSE lowers mortality examination practice among Iranian women in Hamadan Iran. Asian
from breast cancer, it should not be promoted to effec- Pacific J Cancer Prev 15(16):6531–6534
tively detect breast cancer tumors in women. Women are Akhtari-Zavare M, Muhamad HJ, Irmi AM, Salmiah MS, Latiffah AL (2015)
Health beliefs and breast self-examination among undergraduate female
at risk of harm from BSE including unnecessary breast students in public universities in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Asian Pac J Cancer
biopsies, imaging tests and emotional duress (Hackshaw Prev 16(9):4019–4023
and Paul 2003). Al-Azmy SF, Alkhabbaz A, Almutawa HA, Ismaiel AE, Makboul Gamal et al
(2013) Practicing breast self-examination among women attending
Breast self-examination (BSE) might still be an impor- primary health care in Kuwait. Alex J Med 49:281–286
tant tool to improve breast awareness. Women are encour- Al-Dubai SAR, Ganasegeran K, Alabsi AM et al (2012) Exploration of barriers to
aged to take responsibility for their own health by taking breast-self examination among urban women in Shah alam, malaysia: a
cross sectional study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 13:1627–1632
opportunities such as during bathing or dressing to become Al-Naggar RA, Al-Naggar DH, Bobryshev YV et al (2011) Practice and barriers
familiar with their breasts at different times of the month toward breast self-examination among young Malaysian women. Asian
and with age, looking and feeling for any changes from nor- Pac J Cancer Prev 12:1173–1178
Alwan NAS, Al-Diwan JKA, Al-Attar WM, Eliessa RA (2012) Knowledge, attitude
mal, and reporting any obvious changes promptly. There- and practice towards breast cancer and breast self examination in Kirkuk
fore, appropriate educational interventions are needed to University Iraq. APJR 1(4):308–311
encourage women to engage in regular breast awareness as American cancer society (2013) Breast cancer fact and figure 2013–2014.
American cancer society, Atlanta, GA
well as to practice BSE (Bit-Na et al. 2003). Avci IA (2008) Factors associated with breast self-examination practices and
beliefs in female workers at a Muslim community. Eur J Oncol Nurs
Conclusion 12:127–133
Baxter N (2001) Preventative health care, 2001 update: should women be
In conclusion, the rate of BSE practice among young routinely taught breast self-examination to screen for breast cancer?
females in Malaysia is low and there are some barriers for CMAJ 164(13):1837–1846
doing BSE among this group. But as a this group is an edu- Bit-Na Y, Kui SC, Kyu-Won J, Jae KJ (2012) Awareness and practice of breast self-
examination among Korean women: results from a nationwide survey.
cated group and has positive attitudes toward learning BSE Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev 13:123–125
from practice instructors, it is recommended to promote Doganer YC, Aydogan U, Kilbas Z, Rohrer JE, Sari O, Usterme N (2014) Predic‑
public breast health awareness campaigns through the tors affecting breast self-examination practice among Turkish women.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 15(20):9021–9025
media. Also, it is mandatory to establish or improve nation- Giridhara RB, Goleen S, Sharon PC et al (2011) Breast cancer screening among
wide policy guidelines to increase the dissemination of females in Iran and recommendations for improved practice: a review.
information about breast cancer, the importance of breast Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 12:1647–1655
Gumus AB, Olcay Cam O, Malak AT (2010) Socio-demographic factors and
self examination and other screening methods for control- the practice of breast self examination and mammography by Turkish
ling breast cancer among young females in Malaysia. women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 11:57–60
Hackshaw AK, Paul EA (2003) Breast self-examination and death from breast
Authors’ contributions cancer: a metaanalysis. Br J Cancer 88:1047–1053
MA-Z, MHJ, IZI designed the study. MA-Z and SMS analyzed the data. MA-Z Hadi M, Hassali M, Shafie A et al (2010) Evaluation of breast cancer aware‑
and LAL wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version ness among female university students in Malaysia. Pharm Pract
of the manuscript. 8(1):29–34
Hisham AN, Yip CH (2003) Spectrum of breast cancer in Malaysian women:
Author details overview. World J Surg 27:921–923
1
 Cancer Resource and Education Center, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Ser‑ Hisham AN, Yip CH (2004) Overview of breast cancer in Malaysian women: a
dang, Selangor, Malaysia. 2 Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medi‑ problem with late diagnosis. Asian J Surg 27:130–133
cine and Health Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Johnson N, Dickson-Swift V (2008) It usually happens in older women: young
Malaysia. 3 Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health women‘s perception about breast cancer. Health Educ J 67(4):243–257
Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. Loh SY, Chew SL (2011) Awareness and practice of breast self examination
among Malaysian women with breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev
Acknowledgements 12:199–202
This work was supported by University Putra Malaysia through the Graduate Ministry of Health Malaysia (1999) National health and morbidity survey, 1996.
Research Fellowship. We acknowledge all the students who took part in the Institute of public health, Kuala Lumpur
study. Nahcivan NO, Secginli S (2007) Health belief related to breast self examination
in a sample of Turkish women. Oncol Nurs Forum 34(2):425–432
Competing interests National Cancer Registry (2006) Malaysian cancer statistics, data and figure
The authors declare that they have no competing interests. peninsular Malaysia. Ministry of Health Malaysia, Malaysia
Petro-Nustus W, Mikhail BI (2002) Factors associated with breast self examina‑
Received: 17 March 2015 Accepted: 30 October 2015 tion among Jordanian women. Public Health Nurse 19:263–271
Rasu RS, Rianon NJ, Shahidullah SM et al (2011) Effect of educational level on
knowledge and use of breast cancer screening practices in Bangladeshi
women. Health Care Women Int 32:177–189
Redhwan AA, Dhekra HA, Yuri VB et al (2011) Practice and barriers toward
breast self-examination among young Malaysian women. Asian Pac J
References Cancer Prev 12:1173–1178
Abdelrahman S, Yousif M (2006) Self examination of the breast for early Rosmawati NH (2010) The usage and knowledge of mammography among
detection of breast cancer: the role of medical students in the Faculty of women in sub-urban area in Terengganu, Malaysia. Asian Pac J Cancer
Medicine University of Gezira-Sudan Sudanese. J Public Health 1:36–42 Prev 11:767–771
Akhtari‑Zavare et al. SpringerPlus (2015) 4:692 Page 6 of 6

Sadjadi A, Nouraie M, Ghorbani A, Alimohammadian M, Malekzadeh R Thomas DB, Gao DL, Ray RM et al (2002) Randomized trial of breast self-
(2009) Epidemiology of breast cancer in Islamic Republic of Iran: first examination in Shanghai: final results. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1445–1457
results from population based cancer registry. East Mediterr Health J US Prevention Service Task Force (2009) Screening for breast cancer: U.S.
15:1426–1431 preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern
Soyer MT, Ciceklioglu M, Ceber E (2007) Breast cancer awareness and practice Med 151(10):716–726
of breast self examination among primary health care nurses: influencing Youlden DR, Cramb SM, Yip CH, Baade PD (2014) Incidence and mortal‑
factors and effects of an in-service education. J Clin Nurs 16:707–715 ity of female breast cancer in the Asia-Pacific region. Cancer Biol Med
Tarawneh E, Al-Attiyat N (2013) Exploration of barriers to breast-self examina‑ 11(2):101–115
tion and awareness: a review. ME-JN 7(6):3–7
Tavafian SS, Hasani L, Aghamolaei T, Zare SH, Gregory D (2009) Prediction of
breast self-examination in a sample of Iranian women: an application of
the health belief model. BMC Womens Health 9:37

You might also like