Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Barriers To Breast Self Examination Practice Among Malaysian Female Students: A Cross Sectional Study
Barriers To Breast Self Examination Practice Among Malaysian Female Students: A Cross Sectional Study
Abstract
Introduction: Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer and the second reason of cancer deaths among woman
worldwide, including Malaysia. The objective of this paper is to assess the practice of breast self-examination (BSE)
and identify the barriers of BSE practice among undergraduate female students in Malaysia.
Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted among 810 female undergraduate students in Klang Valley, Malaysia
between April–Jun 2012. Data was collected via self-administered questionnaire which was developed and pre-tested
for this study.
Results: The majority of respondents were Malay 709 (95.6 %) and single 719 (96.9 %) with a mean age of 21.7 (1.1).
Only hundred eleven (15 %) of the participants had a family history of breast cancer. 70.5 % of the respondents do not
practice breast self-examination, 70.5 % do not know how to do it, 64.7 and 61.5 % reported no symptoms of breast
cancer and worries to detect breast cancer, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that age, marital status and per‑
sonal history of breast disease were statistically associated with the practice of breast self-examination.
Conclusion: In this study, a high percentage of respondents were aware of breast cancer but do not perform breast
self-examination. Knowledge, socio-cultural and environmental factors were identified as barriers; so it is recom‑
mended that knowledge among the public about breast cancer and promotion of public breast health awareness
campaigns through the media should be carried out.
Keywords: Breast cancer, Breast self-examination, Barriers, Young female, Malaysia
© 2015 Akhtari-Zavare et al. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons
license, and indicate if changes were made.
Akhtari‑Zavare et al. SpringerPlus (2015) 4:692 Page 2 of 6
considered effective methods for early detection of breast and fear of detecting breast cancer (5.3 %). In Malaysia,
cancer (Avci 2008). There are arguments surrounding there are few research done on the elimination of barriers
the efficacy of BSE. A large well-conducted randomised of breast cancer awareness among young women (Hadi
controlled trial among 266,064 textile workers in Shang- et al. 2010); because young women believe that they are not
hai which teaching women to perform BSE showed dis- at risk of getting breast cancer (Johnson and Dickson-Swift
tribution of tumor size and stage at diagnosis as well as 2008). The emergence of breast disease and the subse-
mortality rate for breast cancer was nearly same between quent development of cancer tend to be more aggressive in
women in the two arms of the trial (Thomas et al. 2002). young patients compared with breast cancer progressions
With these result, numerous organisations including US in the older population (Johnson and Dickson-Swift 2008).
Preventive Service Task Force (2009), the Canadian Task Also, there is a lack of knowledge about the benefits of BSE
Force on Preventive Health Care (Baxter 2001) deter- among young women. For this reason, the aim of this study
mined that breast self-examinations no more benefit for is to identify the barriers of BSE practice among undergrad-
women. uate female students in Malaysia.
Although BSE alone is not sufficient for early detection
of breast cancer, but it is still an important screening tool Methods
for early detection of breast cancer in developing coun- Study design and sampling method
tries, because it is cheap, widely available, and does not A cross-sectional study was carried out among female
require complex technical training (Giridhara et al. 2011). undergraduate students in public universities in Klang
Overall, by performing regular BSE, women familiar with Valley, Malaysia, between April and Jun 2012.
the structure of normal breasts will be motivated to attend A multi-stage random sampling method was used to
screening clinics for mammography and clinical breast select students from public universities. A total of 810 stu-
examination (Giridhara et al. 2011; Tavafian et al. 2009). dents met the inclusion criteria and had gave informed
The Malaysian Ministry of Health has been promoting consent to participate in the study. The inclusion criteria
BSE and annual breast examinations by trained health for this study was; age 20 years old and above, no history of
workers as part of breast health awareness campaigns breast cancer, and not pregnant or breastfeeding. This study
since 1995 (Ministry of Health Malaysia 1999). While obtained approval from the Ethical Committee of Universiti
the majority of women seem to be aware of breast self- Putra Malaysia and the Ministry of Higher Education.
examinations, yet many still do not know how to perform
it properly (Soyer et al. 2007). Studies conducted among Instrument
different groups of women in Malaysia showed that Data was collected via self-administrative a question-
monthly BSE practice ranged from 19.6 to 36.7 %, respec- naire which was developed by the researchers based on
tively (Akhtari-Zavare et al. 2015; Rosmawati 2010). an extensive review of the literature. The content validity
Although early detection of breast cancer can increase was evaluated by three expert from Community Health
the survival rate, many women miss early detection due Department at Universiti Putra Malaysia to examine each
to lack of knowledge and information about breast health item for congruence. The reliability of the questionnaire
awareness (Avci 2008). Also, as the American Cancer was determined by using test–retest reliability conducted
Society has proven, if breast cancer is detected at an among 80 female undergraduate students at Universiti
early stage (stage I–II), a 100–93 % survival rate can be Putra Malaysi not included in the study, and distributed
achieved, and this rate decreases to 72–22 % if breast in both English and Bahasa Malaysia language. The value
cancer is diagnosed at later stages (III–IV) (American of kappa for categorical data ranged between; breast can-
Cancer Society 2013). cer awareness (0.80–0.90), Breast cancer and BSE aware-
Many investigators have tried to determine the factors ness (0.70–0.97). The value of intra-class correlation
that affect women’s practice of BSE, because these factors coefficient (ICC) for barriers of BSE practice (continuous
are essential to plan effective intervention programs to data) was (0.70–0.80).
improve BSE practice (Tarawneh and Attiyat 2013; Gumus The questionnaire obtained information on respond-
et al. 2010). Current literature showed many barriers to ents’ socio demographic characteristics, awareness of
BSE practice, which include social and cultural perceptions breast cancer and BSE, barriers for BSE practice, practice
of breast cancer and breast self examination, socio-demo- of BSE and source of information.
graphic factors, level of knowledge, and awareness (Hisham Socio demographic variables included: age, race, mari-
and Yip 2003; Rasu et al. 2011). Result of study done (Bit- tal status, family income, family history of breast cancer
Na et al. 2012) among Korean women shows (31.7 %) did (yes/no), personal history of breast disease (yes/no), hor-
not know how to do it, they would never have breast cancer monal drug usage (yes/no) and check the breast by doc-
(26.3 %), not effective for detecting breast cancer (17.1 %) tor (yes/no).
Akhtari‑Zavare et al. SpringerPlus (2015) 4:692 Page 3 of 6
Breast cancer and BSE awareness questions (yes/ Table 1 Demographic and health characteristics of the
no response) included: “Have you ever heard about participants (n = 742)
breast cancer?”, “Have you ever heard about BSE?”, Variables No %
“Do you know how to do BSE?”, and “What is the age
of BSE?”. Age (mean ± SD) 21.7 ± 1.1
The practice of BSE was assessed by asking respondents Marital status
if they had ever done BSE (yes/no), and the frequency of Single 719 96.9
doing BSE (once a month, occasionally and others). Others 23 3.1
The section about barriers for BSE practice had seven Ethnicity
questions and respondents had to either “agree” or Malay 709 95.6
“disagree”. Non-Malay 33 4.4
Family income (Mean ± SD) 4730.3 ± 2122.2*
Analysis Family history of breast cancer
All data was analyzed using PASW version 20.0 and a p Yes 130 16.4
less than 0.05 was considered as a level of significance. No 662 83.6
Descriptive statistics (mean and SD) were obtained for all Personal history of breast disease
the variables in the study. Chi-square analysis was used Yes 11 1.5
to determine the relation between categorical variables No 731 98.5
and BSE practice, and an independent sample t test was Hormonal drug usage
made for continuous data (age and family income). Yes 40 5.1
No 752 94.9
Results Check your breast by doctor
Respondent rate Yes 73 0.5
A total of 810 female students were selected as the sam- No 705 95.0
ple of the study. However, 68 respondents (8.3 %) refused
to participate. The respondents’ rate derived in this study
was 91.6 %. Among those who practice BSE, most of them practice
BSE occasionally at 96 respondents (50.8 %) and only 59
Socio‑demographic characteristics of the respondents (31.2 %) respondents practice BSE once a month. The
The mean (SD) age of respondents was 21.7 (1.1) and majority (50.2 %) stated the reason for performing BSE
ranged between 20 and 25 years old. The majority of was to check their breast regularly, while 57 (30.1 %)
them were Malay 709 (95.6 %), single 719 (96.9 %) and had family history of breast cancer, 27 (14.2 %) had per-
with monthly incomes of RM 4730.3 (2122.2). Family his- sonal histories of breast diseases and 10 (5.2 %) had other
tory of breast cancer was reported by 111 (15.0 %) of the reasons.
respondents while 11 (1.5 %) had histories of breast prob- There were statistically significant relationships
lems (Table 1). between those practicing BSE and those who did not
practice BSE with age (t = −3.21, p = 0.001), marital sta-
Awareness of breast cancer and knowledge of BSE tus of respondents (χ2 = 8.91, p = 0.003) and personal
Seven hundred thirty-eight (99.5 %) respondents have history of breast disease (χ2 = 4.97, p = 0.02). There were
heard about breast cancer. Five hundred thirteen (69.1 %) no statistical differences between performing BSE with
had heard about BSE, but only 289 (38.9 %) respondents the rest of the variables.
know how to do BSE. Regarding the age to begin BSE,
only 303 (40.8) knew about it. Among those 513 who Barriers towards BSE practice
had heard about BSE, the main source of information A total of 533 (74.5 %) respondents who did not prac-
was printed media (newspapers, brouchures) with 270 tice BSE had nominated barriers for not performing it.
respondents (52.6 %), followed by information obtained The most common causes for not performing BSE were:
from medical health personnel at 150 respondents I don’t know how to do it at 390 respondents (70.5 %); I
(29.2 %), media at 60 respondents (11.7 %) and others at don’t have any symptoms at 358 respondents (64.7 %);
33 respondents (6.4 %) (Table 2). and I have worries in detecting breast cancer at 340
respondents (61.5 %). About 299 (54.1 %) respondents
Practice of BSE said that “doing BSE will take too much time” and 294
Although 738 (99.5 %) of the participants have heard (53.2 %) respondents do not have enough privacy to do
about breast cancer, only 189 (25.5 %) performed BSE. BSE (Table 3).
Akhtari‑Zavare et al. SpringerPlus (2015) 4:692 Page 4 of 6
Table 2 Awareness of breast cancer and knowledge of BSE Based on the results of this study, age, marital status
(n = 742) and personal history of breast disease effect BSE prac-
Statements Yes No tices (p < 0.05), but no association was found among
no (%) no (%) those who practice BSE and the rest of the variables.
This result is similar with the findings of other stud-
Ever heard about breast cancer 738 (99.5) 4 (0.5)
ies done by Redhwan et al. (2011) among female uni-
Ever heard about BSE 513 (69.1) 229 (30.9)
versity students in Malaysia and Al-Azmy et al. (2013)
Know how to do BSE 289 (38.9) 453 (61.1)
among women attending primary health care clinics
The age of BSE is starting from 20 years old 303 (40.8) 439 (59.2)
in Kuwait. There have been studies with conflicting
BSE is important for women to know how their 260 (35.0) 482 (65.0)
breasts normally feel results as well. While finding of studies done in Tur-
key (Doganer et al. 2014) and Kuwait (Al-Azmy et al.
2013) claimed that family history of breast cancer
was related to performing BSE, another two studies
Table 3 Barriers towards BSE practice among respondents
(n = 742)
revealed no significant relationship between BSE per-
formance and family history of breast cancer (Tava-
Statements No % fian et al. 2009).
I don’t know how to do it 390 70.5 In this study, the main reasons for not practicing BSE
Doing BSE will take too much time 299 54.1 were “don’t know how to do BSE” (70.5 %); followed by
I don’t have any symptoms 358 64.7 “don’t have any symptoms” (64.7 %). Many young women
I am scared of being diagnosed with breast cancer 340 61.5 believe that breast cancer affects only older women and
I don’t have enough privacy for BSE practice 294 53.2 thus, they are not at risk for getting breast cancer (Avci
I don’t feel it is necessary 317 57.3 2008). Also, lack of knowledge about how to do BSE
BSE will be embarrassing to me 334 60.4 among young Malaysian women have been due to inade-
quate education programs about breast health awareness
for this target population. Consistent with our results,
Discussion in many studies, women had mentioned that they don’t
This study was conducted in order to examine BSE prac- know how to do BSE (Redhwan et al. 2011; Tavafian et al.
tice and barriers to BSE practice among Malaysian female 2009) and they did not believe that they are at risk for
students. In the current study, 69.1 % respondents were getting breast cancer (Redhwan et al. 2011).
informed about breast self-examination. This is similar Others mention barriers towards breast self-exami-
with the results of a previous study done in University of nation practice such as “scared of being diagnosed with
Gezira, Sudan (Abdelrahman and Yousif 2006) and incon- breast cancer” and “BSE will be embarrassing to me”.
sistent with the findings of a study from Malaysia (Al-Dubai Similar to previous studies in Malaysia (Redhwan et al.
et al. 2012) which found that 91 % of women were aware of 2011), Turkey (Avci 2008) and Iraq (Alwan et al. 2012)
breast self-examination. In this study, 189 (25.5 %) respond- these fears may be a result of wrong perception of women
ents perform BSE, but a small number of students (31.2 %) on being diagnosed with breast cancer. Consequently,
perform BSE once a month. The main reason for practic- providing health educational programs about breast can-
ing BSE was to check their breast regularly. Similar to our cer and the significance of breast self-examination prac-
findings, a study from Iran reported that 100 (26 %) women tices can reduce these worries due to wrong beliefs and
practice BSE, and most of them 53 (13.8 %) practice BSE motivate them to practice breast self-examination.
occasionally (Akhtari-Zavare et al. 2014). This poor prac- In the current study, “not enough privacy for BSE prac-
tice may be due to young women’s perceptions that they are tice”, “not necessary” and “BSE takes too much time”
healthy and thus do not need to perform a BSE. were other barriers for performing BSE among young
Additionally, amongst this study samples, the most women in Malaysia. Providing breast health education
common source of information on BSE were printed programs among young women may help change the
media (newspapers, brochures) followed by information negative barriers towards breast self-examination and
from medical health personnel. Similarly, in a study done empower women to participate actively in making deci-
by Al-Dubai et al. (2012) reported that newspapers and sions regarding their health.
magazines were the main source of information on BSE.
But, this finding is inconsistent with a previous study Limitation of study
from Iran (Akhtari-Zavare et al. 2014) and Malaysia (Al- Since this study has been done among female undergrad-
Naggar et al. 2011) who reported that television was the uate students, the findings cannot be generalized to the
most common source of information. whole population in Malaysia.
Akhtari‑Zavare et al. SpringerPlus (2015) 4:692 Page 5 of 6
Sadjadi A, Nouraie M, Ghorbani A, Alimohammadian M, Malekzadeh R Thomas DB, Gao DL, Ray RM et al (2002) Randomized trial of breast self-
(2009) Epidemiology of breast cancer in Islamic Republic of Iran: first examination in Shanghai: final results. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1445–1457
results from population based cancer registry. East Mediterr Health J US Prevention Service Task Force (2009) Screening for breast cancer: U.S.
15:1426–1431 preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern
Soyer MT, Ciceklioglu M, Ceber E (2007) Breast cancer awareness and practice Med 151(10):716–726
of breast self examination among primary health care nurses: influencing Youlden DR, Cramb SM, Yip CH, Baade PD (2014) Incidence and mortal‑
factors and effects of an in-service education. J Clin Nurs 16:707–715 ity of female breast cancer in the Asia-Pacific region. Cancer Biol Med
Tarawneh E, Al-Attiyat N (2013) Exploration of barriers to breast-self examina‑ 11(2):101–115
tion and awareness: a review. ME-JN 7(6):3–7
Tavafian SS, Hasani L, Aghamolaei T, Zare SH, Gregory D (2009) Prediction of
breast self-examination in a sample of Iranian women: an application of
the health belief model. BMC Womens Health 9:37