Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Delivery Format:
Shipped
Download Free View TOC and Study
Excerpt List of Exhibits Snapshot Key Findings
Industries Profiled:
High Tech; Biotech; Telecommunications; Financial Services; Banking; Medical Device;
Utilities; Manufacturing; Aerospace; Energy; Computer Hardware; Computers;
Pharmaceutical; Consumer Products; Automobile; Diversified; Health Care; Chemical;
Technology; Insurance; Defense; Retail; Research; Internet; Electronics; Professional
Services; Government
Companies Profiled:
Agilent Technologies; Allergan; Avaya; Bank of America; Baxter Healthcare; Bechtel; Bell
Helicopter; Boeing; Bombardier Aerospace; British Telecom; ConocoPhillips; Dell Computer;
Dow Corning; DSM Pharmaceutical; DuPont Pharmaceuticals; Eastman Kodak; Eaton Corp;
Entergy; First Data Corporation; Ford Motor Company; GE; GE Consumer Finance; Hewlett-
Packard; Honeywell; Johnson & Johnson Healthcare Systems; Johnson Controls; JP Morgan
Chase; Kodak; Korry Electronics; Medtronic; Motorola; NCR; Northrop Grumman;
PerkinElmer; Pfizer; Raytheon; Rockwell Automation; Saint-Gobain; Siemens; Sony; Home
Depot; US Army; Verizon
Study Snapshot
With these companies' results, targets and lessons learned known, executives can
confidently plan and execute an improvement project or program. Key benchmarks that will
help you along this path include: amount of cycle time/cost reduction, typical scope and
average duration of improvement project, average annual dollar value contribution expected
for the productivity approach, average dollar amount of a business unit’s revenue saved
through productivity initiatives annually, the function that primarily benefits from
productivity approaches by percentage and a self-rating of how effective productivity
approaches were across various functions.
To best plan and execute a productivity project or program, executives search for examples,
best practices and advice on which approach to use and how it's best structured and
executed. This study is a must starting point as it offers an outline of the experiences of 30
companies that recently performed improvement projects using lean, six sigma or TQM,
complete with benchmark metrics, actual results and a description of lessons learned.
Augmenting these case studies are results from a survey of 84 companies. These results
show the most popular types of productivity approaches used, depending on the
improvement sought, how the approaches are carried out, including project scope, revenue
target and staffing level, and the types of results to expect.
Back to Top
Bank of America
Bank of America’s three-point plan called for the company to focus its efforts, enable high
quality and generate results. To execute its plan, the Bank took the following steps:
Focused the company on the customer by organizing around customer segments and
aligned the company top to bottom, linking performance plans to strategic goals.
Developed business process excellence by applying voice of the customer to identify
and engineer the critical few business processes.
Built a capable workforce by hiring more than 225 external Six Sigma master Black
Belts and Black Belts, using Six Sigma across businesses, eliminating waste and
variation/errors in core processes, and driving revenue growth by expanding Six
Sigma into sales environments.
In its first two years, Bank of America’s quality system has achieved the following results:
The CEO and executive team contributed $75 million in Six Sigma annualized
productivity benefits.
Customer delight was improved by 20%, and the Bank added 2.3 million customer
households.
1.3 million fewer customer households experienced problems – down 29%.
Stock value increased by 52%.
Bank of America has had ten quarters of increasing earnings per share – up 29%
since 2002.
2002: Bank of America named Best Bank in the US and Euromoney’s World’s Most
Improved Bank.