Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MOVEMENTS
BEFORE MARTIAL LAW
PHILIPPINE SOCIAL
MOVEMENTS
WHAT IS SOCIAL MOVEMENT?
➢A sustained and purposeful collective mobilized by an
identifiable, self-organized group in confrontration
with specific power structures and in the pursuit of
socioeconomic political change
➢A social movement must have the capacity to
mobilize constituency or membership and second,
such mobilization must be sustainable over a period of
time
2 Frameworks of Social Movements
•1. Political Opportunity Structure
➢ Include opening up of “access to power
shifts in ruling alignments brought about
by cleavages within and among elites, and
the availability of influential allies
2. Collective - Action Frames
• It did not help the Huks at all that the Americans were hostile towards
them because of their leftist and Marxist learnings.
• In 1955 the Bell Trade Act was replaced with a new treaty, the Laurel-
Langley Agreement. This agreement removed some of the more blatant
infringements on Philippine sovereignty and introduced a meticulous
reciprocity, but in fact extended the protection accorded to US capital.
• During this period, was the retention of US military bases in the country. In
return the United States provided the Philippines elite with military aid
needed to reassert its authority over the radicalized peasants of Central
Luzon.
Electoral Politics and Huk Movement
• Despite the Weakening of the Huk movement, it still provided the
resistance the government had to contend with. Because they were no
longer a strong force, the Huks concentrated on nonviolent political tactics
immediately after the war. One major venue was electoral politics.
• In July 1954, the Huks, the PKP labor arm (the Congress of Labor
Organizations), and the party's peasant union helped form a new political
party, the Democratic Alliance. The Alliance put up a score of candidates
for Congress and decided to support Sergio Osmeña for president in his
unsuccessful bid against Manuel Roxas, who was accused as a Japanese
"collaborator".
Government Strategies to address the Huk
rebellion
• Despite the Huks' absence in electoral politics the elites could not
ignore them. The elites knew that the issues raised by the Huks were
concerns that the masses could identify with, particularly the tenants
in the haciendas. The government thus embarked on a series of
strategies to address the Huk rebellion.
• The government, however, also knew that these efforts were not enough
to totally obliterate the Huks movement or to prevent a similar movement
from reemerging. A long-range objective, therefore, was to implement a
land reform program. In this, they failed dismally.
• -It did not take too long for a radical nationalist movement to rise from the
ashes of the Huks movement demanding an end to neocolonialism and the
domination of Philippine society.
• The fight against neocolonialism was optimized by the Vietnam War in the
1960s, which was opposed by majority f American people themselves.
Thus there was the presence of an external political opportunity structure
which was seized upon by this nationalist movement.
• Such situation gave the PKP the political opportunity to reconsolidate,
taking into consideration "the upsurge of activism on both on the
student and labor fronts.
• This signaled the attempt of the PKP leadership "to revive itself"
through fresh recruits from the students who had developed their
ideology underoinning their autonomy from the Party.
Philippine Social Movements
during Martial Law
Background
• Martial Law was declared via
Proclamation no. 1081, to put a
temporary stop on the ongoing student
activism.
• Marcos reasoned that he declared martial
law because of a conspiracy between the
leftists and the oligarchs to destabilize the
state.
Social Movement’s Arrest
• Marcos is determined to crush any opposition of his rule.
• The hardest hit was the mass organizations like the Communist Party
of the Philippines (CPP), known as the National Democratic
Movement.
• Anti-Marcos politicians, who have private armies that has been
dismantled by Marcos
• Military offense was launched against bourgeois politicians and their
private armies.
• Bloody methods like salvaging, hamletting, and torture were used to
gather and punish political prisoners.
MNLF – Strong resistance from the regime
• Muslim groups formed the Moro National Liberation
Front to show opposition against the Marcos Regime.
• It acted as a political and religious organization
• Even with external support from Arabic states, it did
not match the military forces of the Marcos
government.
Perpetuation of Underdevelopment
• Certain policies were pacified to some civil unrest to
match the military control implemented by Marcos
• Economic reforms had to be coupled with political and
military oppression.
Failure of the Agrarian Reform Program
Marcos’ Policy Issues Effects
• Limited to rice and corn fields,
• A small number of the
leaving other estates to the
eligible farmers were only
scope of the program
awarded with titles.
• 396,000 out of the 7 million
The Agrarian • 30% decline of wages to
farmers are only eligible to
Reform Program farmers for the last 25
become land owners
years.
• Small land lords slowed down
• Land was used to
the process of the Agrarian
cultivate export crops
Reform Program
Perpetuation of Underdevelopment
• The challenge for the social movement was how to take advantage of
the political opportunity structures available under a new political
dispensation, taking into consideration the resources at their
disposal.
Redefining the Role of Social Movements under an
“Elite Democracy”
• An immediate challenge for the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP)
in the advent of the Aquino administration was how to frame its issue of
engagement with the popular government that has restored formal
democratic institutions in the country.
• Although the CPP viewed the Aquino government as elitist, it also realized
that going against the highly popular Aquino government would be unwise.
• The majority believed that the 1986 People Power Revolution was
authentic in the sense that it was an extraconstitutional process whereby
“the masses played the decisive role and the change of ruler opened up a
vast ‘democratic space’ for the continuing of struggles for fundamental
changes in society.
Redefining the Role of Social Movements under an
“Elite Democracy”
• Philippine redemocratization witnessed the vast expansion of many
groups aligned with the Left. The “Left” thus came to refer to a broad
and varied spectrum of factions from progressive pro-Aquino group to
the communist National Democratic Front (NDF).
• Left - relating to a person or group favoring liberal, socialist, or radical views.
• This amalgamation of leftist forces that were not part of the CPP-NPA-
NDF came to be referred to as the “independent left.”
Redefining the Role of Social Movements under an
“Elite Democracy”
• The popular democrats were generally wary of the Aquino
government and opted for “critical collaboration.” In this sense, the
popdems shared the views of the national democrats of the new
leadership as an unstable coalition of “liberals” and “fascists” and
adopted a policy of “vigilant and “principled support” of the new
government being able to politically dominate the rightists.
• The Left participated for the first time since 1946 in the May 1987
congressional elections.
• In the economic sphere , the PnB framed its issues within class
politics: it called for general and comprehensive agrarian reform and
workers’ rights. These have been concerns of social movements since
pre-Martial Law days.
Electoral politics as the arena of struggle
• Unlike the traditional political parties, which draw their strength from
the political and economic elite and their ward leaders, the PnB relied
on members of the cause-oriented groups and community
organization that have brought together people on the basis of issues.
The members are generally workers, peasants, the urban poor, and
middle-class professionals.
Peace talks and national reconciliation
• The Left also viewed the Aquino government’s reconciliation program
as a political opportunity to pursue the democratization process.
After the release of a number of its leaders such as Buscayno and CPP
founder and leader Jose Ma. Sison, the NDF opened itself to a
dialogue with the Aquino government and a possible cease-fire with
the AFP and the NPA.
• At the same time, however, the Party also felt that it could not spurn
Aquino’s offer of reconciliation particularly since it also wanted to
take advantage of the “democratic space” in Philippine politics.
• Moreover, peace talks, the CPP believed, would help “legitimize” the
Party and provide the opportunity by which it could explain to the
Filipino people what the communist movement was all about.
Problems Confronting the Social Movements after
Martial Law
• Two years after the February 1986 uprising, the “democratic space”
which the Filipino people enjoyed began to shrink. The elite
continued to dominate politics. As the socialist group Bukluran sa
Ikauunlad ng Isip at Gawa or BISIG pointed out, although the
replacement of Marcos by Aquino was most welcome.
• Being new in the game, the Left failed to dent the 1987 electoral
process. None of the Alliance of New Politics, the popular movement
supporting the Partido ng Bayan, made it to the Senate, and only two
out of the seventy-one House candidates won.
Problems Confronting the Social Movements after
Martial Law
• Peace talks with the leftist rebels also collapsed. This is because the
Left also had to contend with a military machinery that pressured the
Aquino government to forcefully carry out an anti-insurgency
campaign.
• The AFP under Gen. Fidel Ramos had never been comfortable with
the government’s peace talks with the communists and instead
pushed for a strategic counterinsurgency plan called “Mamamayan”
(People), which combined the goals of national reconciliation with
security and development.
Problems Confronting the Social Movements after
Martial Law
• Aquino did not need much persuasion. She supported the emergence
of paramilitary formations, i.e., anti-communist vigilante groups as
well as death squads in early 1986.
• One of the more infamous ones was the Alsa Masa (Masses Arise), which
arbitrarily killed suspected communists or NPA members in 1987.
• The CPP’s July 1986 official publication, Ang Bayan, stated that “the
unarmed means of struggle… assume[s] greater importance, although
members were reminded that the armed struggle remains central.”
• The popular democrats, however, did not agree with this and found allies
with a faction of the Party known as the “insurrectionists” who also saw
the strategic value of united front and the shifting of the struggle from the
rural to the urban area.
Creating a broad coalition front through the legal Left
• The popular democrats argued in particular for the need to take
advantage of the current political dispensation to expand the
“democratic space” which people earned after the 1986 People
Power Revolution.
• Spearheading this new movement were the popular forces that have
emerged during the post-Aquino assassination and had prevailed in the
advent of the new administration.
• Another political opportunity structure that paved the way for other
strategies than the armed struggle during this period was that the
NPA support from its network of solidarity groups in North America
and Western Europe had been limited to propaganda and symbolic
material support.
The decline of the CPP-NPA-NDF
• Political opportunity structure outside of the armed struggle also opened
up because of the decline of the NDF. This could be attributed to the
following factors:
• First, in 1989, the Party’s united front coalition that was still struggling to consolidate
its forces had been losing ground since the 1986 People Power Revolution.
• Second, the legal movement lost prominent businessmen and professionals to the
Aquino government or had been disillusioned with the NDF.
• Third was the capture of ranking members and staff of the CPP’s United Front
Commission, which crippled urban protest in 1988.
• Fourth, the student movement, which the Party had spearheaded during the Marcos
regime, also experienced a decline.
• Fifth, bloody internal purges occurred in Mindanao and Southern Tagalog as a result
of the paranoia of “deep penetration agents”
• Sixth, the debate within the CPP on “democratic centralism,” which stresses the
supremacy of the Party, further debilitated the NDF.
The decline of the CPP-NPA-NDF
• The ultimate political opportunity that would further give impetus to
the exploration of other venues for change apart from the armed
struggle was the split in the CPP. This was announced on December
10, 1992, when a newspaper bannered the headline “CPP Split
Confirmed.”
Philippine Social Movements
after Martial Law
Development work through NGOs and POs
Development work through NGOs and POs
One of the more popular avenues for change which the social
movements pursued was development work through NGOs (Non-
government Organizations) and POs (People’s Organizations).
- The political opportunity for advocacy work was given impetus by the
enlargement of political space not only informally, but formally.
- The framers of this constitution perceived people’s organizations as
being the enabler of people “to pursue and protect, within the
democratic framework, their legitimate and collective interests and
aspirations through peaceful and lawful means.”
- Given that role, they were supported by some constitutional
provisions such as Section 16 of Article 13 that were complemented
by other legal instruments.
Other areas of social movements’
engagement of the state
Other areas of social movements’ engagement of
the state
- The other areas whereby social movements have exploited political
opportunity structures by which to engage the state are the following:
• Electoral Politics
- pursued since 1986
- given impetus by the party-list system as embodied in the 1987 Constitution.