Aborted Israeli Air Strike/Nuclear Strike On Iran/US/Iran/Iraq War

Contact

Front Page | Chemtrails | 911 | Convergence | Investigations | Photos | Books & Video | About Thomas |
Appearances

RSS FEED The world looks different from here

Convergence Weekly | Articles | About

Latest Update | See original article here

Wrestling With The Devil
Behind The Story Of Israel’s Aborted Nuclear Strike
By William Thomas | Jan 25th 2007

On January 8, 2007 I received a tip regarding a brief news item on an Israeli

air strike against Iran the previous day. The raid had been turned back over
Iraq by the American air force. But the FOX and CNN coverage was
incomplete. According to my well-connected informant, the Israeli Air Force
jets had been carrying nuclear bombs.

My heart skipped several beats. The story was potentially huge. But there was
no way I could report it without verification.

What else did the media have to say? The day after the abortive strike, the
London Sunday Times reported that Israel had “drawn up secret plans to
destroy Iran’s uranium enrichment facilities with tactical nuclear weapons.”

Helping habituate readers to the notion that dropping nuclear bombs is

somehow “safe”, reporters Uzi Mahnaimi and Sarah Baxter soothingly wrote
that each “bunker buster” would only “have a force equivalent to one-fifteenth
of the Hiroshima bomb.”

Mahnaimi and Baxter explained how conventional laser-guided bombs would

first blast open “tunnels” into Iran’s nuclear plant at Natanz, where thousands
of centrifuges are being installed for uranium enrichment—”and other
targets.”

Then, diminutive atomic bombs would somehow be guided into the blasted-
open shafts by Israeli pilots dodging heavy flak and swarms of anti-aircraft

http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Aborted_Israeli_Air_Strike.htm (1 of 11)2/13/2007 9:41:31 PM

 Aborted Israeli Air Strike/Nuclear Strike On Iran/US/Iran/Iraq War

missiles over one of the most heavily defended sites on Earth.

Selling the strike as a perfect quick fix to a nagging problem, the Sunday
Times quoted an Israeli source saying, “As soon as the green light is given, it
will be one mission, one strike and the Iranian nuclear project will be
demolished.”

But at least two other targets—a uranium conversion facility near Isfahan, and a heavy water reactor at
Arak—would also have to be taken out. It was the Iranians fault, because they had “strengthened their
nuclear facilities and air defences, making a conventional strike less likely to succeed,” the newspaper
stated, adding that the Isfahan site is “uncomfortably near a metropolis of 4.5 million people.”

The Daily Telegraph insisted that the Iranian nuclear program “is dispersed across more than a dozen
sites, some of which are hidden in tunnel systems built under mountains.” [Daily Telegraph Jan 8/07]

Both British newspapers failed to mention that Iran’s nuclear power program is as legitimate as those
enjoyed by Israel and the United States, who between them possess enough fusion warheads to wreck
this planet.

Despite repeated reassurances to the International Atomic Energy Agency that the Islamic Republic
sought only to develop legitimate nuclear energy, and would remain committed to the Non-Proliferation
Treaty, Israeli intelligence sources were reporting that Iran had recently tested a Shehab-3 missile
capable of reaching Israel with a dummy nuclear warhead. Fearful of Iran

unleashing a “second Holocaust” on Israel, deputy defence minister Ephraim Sneh concluded, “At the
end of the day it is always down to the Jews to deal with the problem.”

But Israel’s constantly expended arms come mostly from the USA, where a Bush White House eager for
God’s rapturous return was already moving to assist the nation. Retired Colonel Sam Gardiner, a former
National War College professor who has war gamed United States air attacks on Iran, believes that the
current deployment of three U.S. aircraft carriers, British minesweepers, a Canadian warship, and a
marine assault force off Iranian shores is a “huge deal. It is only necessary to do that if you are planning
to strike Iran.”

FRAMED
Were the people of Iran being set up? In a companion piece, reporters Mahnaimi and Baxter humorously
described how air force commander Major General Eliezer Shkedi would “orchestrate” a nuclear strike on
Iran from a bunker near the Philharmonic Orchestra concert hall in Tel Aviv. On a plasma screen
relaying real-time satellite data, the Israeli general could pretend that dropping nuclear bombs on
people not unlike his own was just an elaborate video game.

“If the nuclear device explodes deep underground there will be no radioactive fallout,” assured Dr.
Ephraim Asculai, a member of Israel’s own “nuclear program” for more than 40 years. So the use of
mellower “mini-nukes” presumably made their use okay.

But was this true? Reporters failing to exercise due diligence either overlooked or censored the Union of
Concerned Scientists, who warned two years ago, “This commonly held fallacy… is not the case.”

The uranium enrichment halls at Natanz are buried under 70 feet of hardened concrete. But the deepest
penetration achieved by the biggest conventional bomb against a similarly hardened target is less than
30 feet. Dropped on its own, a one-kiloton nuclear “bunker buster” burrows only “10-20 feet” before
detonating.

http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Aborted_Israeli_Air_Strike.htm (2 of 11)2/13/2007 9:41:31 PM

 Aborted Israeli Air Strike/Nuclear Strike On Iran/US/Iran/Iraq War

Yet in actual practice at the Nevada Test Site, “the minimum burial depth to ensure containment” of the
ensuing radioactive fallout is more than 300 feet.

The anxious atomic scientists went on to note that depending on wind conditions and the size of a
downwind population extending into neighboring countries—indeed, around the globe—the number of
deaths from a single “low yield” nuclear bunker buster “could exceed a million, and the number of
people with increased cancer risks could exceed 10 million.” [www.ucsusa.org May/05]

C0HAIN REACTION
The same day that their secret three-plane nuclear strike was being turned back over Iraq, angry
officials at the Israeli prime minister’s office, foreign ministry and defence ministry “flatly denied” that
Israel would ever use nuclear bombs against a country the Institute for National Strategic Studies at Tel
Aviv University was calling Israel’s “most serious threat.” [AFP Jan 7/07]

Institute board member, retired Brigadier General Giora Eiland told the Israeli press that no military
strike would take place against Iran without a full “strategic and military” understanding with the U.S.
Even if Israeli jets carried out an attack, he said, “it might be perceived—and rightly so—as an
understanding between the United States and Israel.

“Because there are no free rides and our existence isn’t guaranteed,” retired Brigadier General Oded Tira
chimed in, “We must prepare an independent military strike by coordinating flights in Iraqi airspace with
the U.S.” [Ha’aretz Jan 2/07]

Iran’s foreign ministry spokesman responded the following day. Dismissing Israel’s attempted air strike
as a “bluff” intended to scare Iran away from developing peaceful nuclear power, Mohammad Ali
Hosseini warned that any “aggressor would regret the action very quickly.” He
pointedly added, “This comes after the confession of the Israel prime minister who acknowledged that
the Israeli regime possesses a nuclear weapon.”

CAN YOU CONFIRM?

On Tuesday, January 9, I passed through a telephone security screen to reach my deepest and most
trusted source, a combat veteran whose “chops” included exceptional “boots on the ground” connections
within the military, government and intelligence agencies of the United States and, as he put it, “non-U.
S.” countries. “The people with dusty shoes,” he’d once told me, “need to be the ones being listened to.”

Having broken major stories together over many years, I knew my source to be precise and accurate in
his statements. This soldier told it straight, without exaggeration. And he always cooperated with the
“men in black” who paid him regular visits after his carefully considered revelations went to press for the
good of the public and his former comrades.

We had not spoken in months. After exchanging high-fives over the phone I told him that I had been
tipped to an Israel nuclear strike against Iran on January 7. Could he confirm?

“Yes,” he said without hesitation.

After a stunned silence, I asked, “Would you care to expand on that?”

He wouldn’t. It took a three-and-a-half hour conversation to elicit details describing how a trio of
minimally marked Israeli F-16s from a “no name” IAF detachment had flown a regulation “racetrack”
pattern over Iraq. With their pilots hidden behind polarized canopies, the nondescript Israeli jets had
“tanked up” from an American KC-135 tanker, before suddenly diverting “downtown” towards the
Iranian border. Intercepted by American fighters, the Israeli high command had once again ordered

http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Aborted_Israeli_Air_Strike.htm (3 of 11)2/13/2007 9:41:31 PM

 Aborted Israeli Air Strike/Nuclear Strike On Iran/US/Iran/Iraq War

them to return to base.

Once again?

ARMAGEDDON DOUBLE-HITTER
This was the third attempted Israeli nuclear strike on Iran, my source told me. Though he would not
provide the earlier dates, he said that each raid had been launched after public statements by Iranian
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad were interpreted as clear or coded signals for imminent war on Israel.

In mid-May 2006, for example, an eight-page letter to George Bush from the Iranian president had been
widely interpreted as a peaceful overture by the European press. The closing phrase, “Vasalam Ala Man
Ataba’al hoda” means “Peace only unto those who follow the true path.”

But according to the Jerusalem Newswire, this historical phrase harkened back to the prophet
Mohammad’s same salutation to two infidel emperors in the late 620’s, inviting them to convert to Islam
—or be forcefully persuaded. Incendiary footage aired by the Christian Broadcast Network of an April
2006 speech by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad showed the Iranian president declaring, “The Zionist regime of
Israel is like a rotten, dried tree that will be annihilated by one storm.”

Even though biblically hard-line “Zionist” does not equate with modern “Israel”, it seemed nuts for
modern mullahs in Teheran to allow their secular puppet to provoke a preemptive war that could turn
Iran into radioactive glass—ending 4,000 years of Persian civilization within an hour.

But the Iranian regime’s religious beliefs were troubling. As investigative reporter George Thomas told
CBN, “Ahmadinejad believes that he has been chosen; he has a ‘divine mission’ to usher in the 12th
Imam, the Mahdi. He believes that in order for this Mahdi to return, the entire world should be filled with
chaos; there should be a battle between good and evil; in his mind between the east and the west.”

Mirroring the Christian fundamentalist vision espoused by the White House, CBN and millions of
righteous American viewers, the Mahdi—like their own vengeful Christ—would soon return to somehow
“establish peace and justice” out of worldwide suffering and calamity.

In the meantime, with Iran sending rockets through Syria to resupply an aggrieved Hezbollah restock
behind UN troops, a small surrounded state kept proving its worst fears right by following an ancient
imperative: Do unto others, before they do it to you. “There are a few things Israel cannot allow to
occur, my source reiterated. “One is to allow a Middle Eastern power to become an acknowledged and
capable nuclear power.”

WIPE OUT
“ Framing” is everything in the “news”, where the spin and slant of what’s reported is often determined
by the details omitted. As Agence France Presse widely stated on the day of Israel’s air strike, “Israel
considers Iran its arch-foe because of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s repeated calls for the Jewish
state to be wiped off the map.” [AFP Jan 7/07]

The “wipe out” quote has become a mantra among militant Zionists and their supporters. But was Iran
being “framed” by a war-loving corporate media using the same falsehoods to market weapons and
threats that had led to such massive death and destruction in Iraq?

Farsi-language expert Juan Cole translated the Iranian president’s remarks as, “This regime that is
occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time.” According to Cole, Ahmadinejad was being
“prophetic not threatening.”

http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Aborted_Israeli_Air_Strike.htm (4 of 11)2/13/2007 9:41:31 PM

 Aborted Israeli Air Strike/Nuclear Strike On Iran/US/Iran/Iraq War

Was there a dangerous disconnect between the apocalyptic Ahmadinejad’s boilerplate belligerence, and
the aspirations of his constituents, most of whom are under the age of 30? As one blogger pointed out in
the London Telegraph: “Iran has never attacked any neighbouring country, and the lives of ordinary
Iranians are lived in modernity and a relative and increasing freedom compared to its four neighbours—
chaotic Afghanistan, violent and disintegrated Iraq, fascist Turkmenistan, mediaevally oppressive Saudi
Arabia—all of whom have American presence, [or whose governments] are pro-American.

“Another neighbour, unstable, strife-torn Pakistan, has confirmed nukes and was responsible for
spreading nuclear secrets to other rogue states. Nearly all the 9-11 hijackers were Saudi. And no action
against any of these countries—so why do you propose action against the Mid-East’s relative oasis of
stability and modernity and peace?

“Iran is not a perfect society, but give them time, and let them develop towards democracy
uninterrupted by the totally counterproductive interference the U.S. specialises in. Life has got much
better since the revolution. [Outsiders] should be sympathetic of a society that changes slowly,
organically for the better, as Iran is; slow change is the only change that endures.”
[Daily Telegraph Jan 8/07]

How big were each of the three bombs carried by the Israeli F-16s, I asked my source.

His reply was immediate: “Twenty kilotons.”

“Twenty kilotons!”

In the crazy calculus of paranoia and projection, it almost made sense: Using a single big atomic bomb
to “decapitate” Iran’s secular and religious leadership would allow the aggressors to bypass many
heavily defended targets—while the ensuing electromagnetic pulse would burn out all electronics in the
country, rendering both defense and retaliation impossible.

At least that was the plan. Teheran’s grid is underground.

KEIKO
This was no video game! Ask Keiko Ogura. The eight-year-old had stayed home from school the day the
Americans dropped a 13-kiloton atomic bomb on the city where she still resides.

“That morning I was on the road near the house and all of a sudden I saw a flash of bluish white light—
magnesium-like flash and soon after a big sound with dust, and I was blown away and fell on the
ground,” Ogura recently told the BBC. “I found myself lying on the ground near the house. I thought the
house was just in front of me, but I couldn’t see it because everything had become so dark and many
pieces of wood and roof tiles and rubbish were falling on my head. There was black rain falling... It
smelled bad and there were many spots on my white blouse.”

A wind sprang up like a typhoon. Houses were burning. “I saw long lines of refugees, just quiet. I don’t
know why they were so quiet. There were long lines, like ghosts. Most of them were stretching out their
arms because the skin was peeling off from the tips of their fingers. I could clearly see the hanging skin,
peeling skin, and the wet red flesh and their hair was burned and smelled, the burnt hair smelled a lot.
Almost all the people were just asking ‘water’, and ‘help me’.”

The curious little girl climbed a hill overlooking Hiroshima... “I was so astonished—all the city was
flattened and demolished. In the morning people were moving, brushing away flies from their skin. My
house was full of injured people. The next day some of the buildings were still burning, and the next
day, and the next day…” [BBC News Aug 5/05]

http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Aborted_Israeli_Air_Strike.htm (5 of 11)2/13/2007 9:41:31 PM

 Aborted Israeli Air Strike/Nuclear Strike On Iran/US/Iran/Iraq War

NOW WHAT?
It was late when I put down the phone. Alone in darkness as total as my own, I tried to calm my
whirling thoughts. What should I do with this information? Why don’t we learn from the past? If this
story was true, how could anyone even consider another Hiroshima?

In 40 years of reporting, from the tumultuous streets of ‘60’s protest, to bitter logging blockades, the oil-
fired hell of Kuwait, Washington’s covert “chemtrails” climate control campaign, and White House
complicity in 9/11—I had never been handed a story as explosive as this. Unable to sleep, I continued to
grapple with the journalist’s most nightmarish quandary: To run with it or not, that was the only
question.

Writing the story was as nerve-wracking as walking through Kuwait’s minefields looking to save oiled
birds. Weighing my responsibilities between “crying wolf” and being severely bitten, against potentially
millions of unsuspecting lives—I finished it on the 12th.

Fridays are a news black hole. Nobody anticipating the weekend would pay any attention to an
apocalypse that was not Hollywood entertainment. I held it back.

For another 48 hours I continued weighing my decision to launch. If the story I had been told was
untrue and I released it online, I would unnecessarily terrify untold numbers of people. And destroy a
lifetime’s journalistic credibility.

There was no way to document a secret as closely held as this. Over six days of intensive online
research I still could not find any source reporting the nuclear aspect of the Israeli strike.

This made Monday’s decision even more hellish. But two credible informants had confirmed it, fulfilling
the minimum reportorial requirement of two independent sources.

If I went with my best and long-trusted source—if one nation was about to get away with attempting to
drop a nuclear bomb on another—should I still refrain from feeding into “Internet hysteria” by
withholding the most inflammatory information I’d ever been given?

As a veteran reporter, I knew that some truths are best withheld for release at a later time. But the
clock was ticking. If I kept silent, would a fourth Israeli strike succeed, changing forever the world as we
and our children would know it?

Despite encouragement by a willfully ignorant and craven press, onboard a wounded blue space colony
could the use of any nuclear weapon by any country be tolerated? Given the inevitable recirculation of
revenge and atmosphere, what goes around comes around.

What does killing children make us? Once the nuclear genie was uncorked, where would escalation end?

Didn’t everyone deserve to know the risks being run by a handful of men? As a professional pledged to
tell the truth, wasn’t I obliged to honor your right to informed choice by warning of the most dangerous
gambit undertaken by any nation since my own country of birth had sent the Enola Gay downtown?

Concern for my own life could not determine how I would proceed. But my source’s safety was another
matter. He had wrestled with his own demons to impart a few convincing details. And even after
deciding to come forward, I knew that he would be immediately identified by U.S. intelligence agents,
whose next visit could result in the use of handcuffs. Or worse.

In the end, with no other news outlet picking up this story, I realized that I had to report it.

http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Aborted_Israeli_Air_Strike.htm (6 of 11)2/13/2007 9:41:31 PM

 Aborted Israeli Air Strike/Nuclear Strike On Iran/US/Iran/Iraq War

GO
“ Israeli Nuclear Strike On Iran Turned Back” was posted on January 16. Within the first hour, my
webmaster reported 60 news groups picking it up. By the second hour, 140 military, financial and
academic news groups were discussing it. Many of the web’s busiest ‘sites were already reposting it on
their front-pages, and countless networks were distributing it on their email lists.

The power of the world’s second great Superpower to respond was breathtaking. In the blink of a
cursor, 40 persons every second began clicking onto willthomas.net. Within 24 hours, nearly 40,000
people had read my story there. Easily ten-times that number had seen it from other sources. The
blowback I’d risked never materialized as strangers vigorously defended my professional record and
integrity.

Those who unknowingly go on about their lives owe everything to everyone who participated in the
distribution and defense of this breaking story. By focusing the intense light of scrutiny into the blackest
of black ops, Armageddon has once again been postponed.

MEN IN BLACK
Within four hours of my story being posted online, the operatives who keep tabs on my primary source
were knocking on his door.

“These are serious guys,” he informed me when I reached him for a follow-up. But this time they were
acting as “point people” sent to deliver a message from a list of governments and intelligence agencies
that took 45 seconds to recite.

“I timed them,” he said.

Explaining that he had not gotten into “quote unquote ‘trouble’,” my source said the agents were not as
cranky as their previous chats. Maybe they’d gotten some sleep since Rumsfeld’s ordered ground assault
on Iran had been derailed in the spring of ‘06. After making strong noises about “security” and
mentioning me by name, the “Bobbsy Twins” told my contact that we had “stepped on some toes”—and
“tweaked a nose” belonging to Israeli President Ehud Olmert, who suddenly had some questions to
answer.

“Always good to know that you can get on the agenda of the Knesset,” my source chuckled.

But playing hard ball with a story as touchy as Semtex was no joke, we both knew. Driven by their
concern over an out-of-control “king Georgie”, his informants in turn had risked severe personal
penalties for “transgressing the capitol ‘T’ word” in revealing the racetrack diversion.

That’s “T” as in “treason”.

Though eventually identified by U.S. intelligence services, these insiders faced no reprisals, my guy was
assured.

“In the end, they thanked me,” he said. Opting for the side of angels, a host of political, military and
intelligence heavies had drawn a line and “approved the information getting out, because they didn’t like
the direction things were going.”

As the leakers themselves had put it, they did not want to be “spectators in Armageddon.”

While not exactly thrilled by our disclosure, all sides were satisfied: Israel had delivered the message

http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Aborted_Israeli_Air_Strike.htm (7 of 11)2/13/2007 9:41:31 PM

 Aborted Israeli Air Strike/Nuclear Strike On Iran/US/Iran/Iraq War

they wanted to send. And those concerned with averting a catastrophe had in turn delivered a message
to Jerusalem: “You are being watched. And people are no longer afraid to talk.”

This was big, my source stated, “because normally to get out this level of his information, the agent is
either on his deathbed, or quitting and going to Morocco—where he will be on his deathbed soon.” He
laughed again.

Who else’s eyebrows had our story raised?

“You had huge financial people coming in,” my source replied. “You could see the hiccup go though the
pipeline.”

“We tracked that, too,” I assured him. “Even the UN came by to read it.”

“Shake the trees and see who jumps out,” my friend agreed. Other major parties picking up our story
included some of the Balkan states, as well as the Italian financial markets.

Why Italy? I didn’t get it.

“The Vatican,” he retorted. “I shit you not. As one of the key points—the lynch points—the Vatican paid
attention to this.”

BUS DRIVERS
Suddenly, our connection was broken. Instead of being replaced by a dial tone, my source and I each
heard a “busy” signal. We both got the message.

“Tell me more about the Vatican,” I said for the benefit of our listening audience after reestablishing
contact with my source.

“They closed off two-stories of the Catacombs within hours of the story,” he resumed.

Why the Catacombs?

“That’s where some of the information of what’s to come is kept,” I was informed. When a leak this big
sounds alarms in the Vatican, he continued, as a careful Jesuit intent on global power
plays, “You go back to your playbook and make sure it’s where you left it, and that it’s still open to the
page you were on. Then you get on the phone and ask [your compadrés] to look at theirs.”

Everyone has an agenda. But unlike everyone else in the business of religion, “the Jesuits have the
longest scale mentality,” my source continued. “They know what the end is supposed to look like, and
they have the mentality to put all the people and pieces together to get there.

“The bus is still moving forward. The Jesuits are the bus driver, and the Vatican is putting gas in the
tank. You can do whatever you want—look out the window, kill the person next to you, go into the
bathroom and have sex—but you’re still on the bus.”

Power politics revolves around cash, he continued: “Who has the money, who wants the money, and
who says they can do business? You never really have all three in the same place. Except in the
Vatican.” With its own army, and de facto UN representation through the Italian government, “they are
a country unto themselves.”

Yet in reality, he added, “There are no borders. There are financial districts, spheres of financial

http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Aborted_Israeli_Air_Strike.htm (8 of 11)2/13/2007 9:41:31 PM

 Aborted Israeli Air Strike/Nuclear Strike On Iran/US/Iran/Iraq War

influence.”

Those with the most gold make the most rules, I supplied. In addition to the Church’s vast accumulated
treasures, the folks who own the most land on Earth are…

“The Vatican. The Jesuits. They’re the deciding factor,” my source finished. “They put people in places of
power, then they go back to the money people”—and direct how funds reach those at pivotal levels.

Of course the Vatican would be interested, I mused. “The use of atomics changes everything; changes
the board game.”

As for Israel attempting to explode a nuclear device over Iran, my source returned, “Them doing it is not
a surprise; the timing is not a surprise. People talking—that’s a surprise. No longer can the Israelis
expect to do something in broad daylight and get away with it.”

Now that we were playing with prelates who would not hesitate to arrange “accidents” for those who
jeopardized their plans, did my wise friend have any concluding words of advice?

“Eyes open,” came his reply. “These are the first two words and the last two words of the session I went
through with those guys.”

Denial is no longer an option. When fear and superstition rule, “Seeing what actually is, as opposed to
what we were told, is to see it differently,” my source was instructed. Otherwise… “You’re being
controlled by them.”

“Them” meant my former mentors.

BLACK ROBES
“ I’m so proud to have broken this story,” I said
smiling. “And I hope the Jesuits are proud of me.”

Having been taught by the black robes at

Marquette University, I would be forever grateful
for the training and encouragement I’d received
during my formative years as a reporter and
activist. But though I respected their rigorous
minds, I could not always condone the methods
used by the Society of Jesus.

There are compelling reasons why “Jesuitical” has

come to mean “devious” in several languages.
Morphed from a military company to battle 15th
century Moslems, the largest Catholic order later
ran their machinations in feudal Europe, China
and Japan—before becoming renowned for their
courage and manipulations in the Americas.
Accused of murdering presidents and popes, instigating wars and toppling governments, the extreme
oath of allegiance taken by advanced S.J. members to their Superior General in Rome is said to
legitimize any act or infiltration in the name of God’s “greater good”. [www.answers.com; www.
newadvent.org]

Where have we seen that before?

http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Aborted_Israeli_Air_Strike.htm (9 of 11)2/13/2007 9:41:31 PM

 Aborted Israeli Air Strike/Nuclear Strike On Iran/US/Iran/Iraq War

With their top general supposedly running the Vatican, I would not care to be on the poop list of these
highly disciplined and intrigue-infatuated priests.

“Fortune favors the bold,” my source reassured me “And so do the Jesuits. If you show yourself to be a
worthy opponent, they can respect you. And through that respect you gain longevity.”

In that case…

“There is something I left out of my article,” I assayed.

“I noticed,” he said.

I would have to finish it soon.

Jan 24th 2007

A New Book By William Thomas

ORDER NOW
There are many books on 9/11. But only one like this. William
Thomas, author of All Fall Down: The Politics Of Terror And Mass
Persuasion has written a stunning sequel to his first expose of
September 11 and the events surrounding that day.

This completely new book draws on five additional years of

investigation to completely chronicle a deliberate Day Of Deception.
No matter what you know—or think you know—concerning the
events of Black Tuesday, this gripping minute-by-minute story will
take you inside the cockpits of the airliners and fighters involved, as
well as radar rooms, military command centers, the World Trade
Center—and other places long hidden from public view.

How close did the president come to being assassinated in Florida?

Why were so many warnings ignored? When were the first fighters
launched? How fast did they fly? Did an airliner really hit the
Pentagon? Was Flight 93 shot down? Were there bombs in the
buildings? Who benefited from these attacks? Where does the
money trail lead? For meticulously documented answers to these
questions—and a few other surprises, as well—be sure not to miss
the most complete account available of America’s Day of Deception.

ORDER NOW - 548 Pages Including References

$19.95
Total book price including shipping $25.95 U.S.A., international
$29.95

http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Aborted_Israeli_Air_Strike.htm (10 of 11)2/13/2007 9:41:31 PM

 Aborted Israeli Air Strike/Nuclear Strike On Iran/US/Iran/Iraq War

ISBN: 978-1-893157-18-7

U.S.A.

International

Search

willthomas.
Web net

Site Designed and Managed by JJ Web Services © Copyright 1995 - 2005 | WillThomas.net | Privacy Policy

http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Aborted_Israeli_Air_Strike.htm (11 of 11)2/13/2007 9:41:31 PM