You are on page 1of 20
chapter > pissOLUTION AND WINDING Up lution of @ partnership sn ofthe partners Caused associated in tl from the winding partners cease to carry on the the demise of a partnership. he process of settling the business or poinin time when all partn und up and finally sett Partnership life. ART. 1829. On dissojut re a the partnership is Up of partnership attarn nus until the wi iP affairs is completed. (n) Partnership not termi (al ‘erminated by dissolution, 2% OLUTION AND WINDING UP The principal significance of dissol no new partnership business shoul partne Fas, dissolution refers to the change in partnership relation ‘and not the actual cessation of the partnership business. solution of a partnership must also be distinguished from a mere suspension in the conduct of its business oF operations. (68 CJS. 842.) ART. 1830. Dissolution is caused: (1) Without violation of the agreement be- tween the partners: (a) By the termination of the definite term or particular undertaking specified in the agreement; {b) By the express will of any partner, who must act in good faith, when no definite 4 term or particular undertaking is specified; rece psi or pain ant 1890 [DISSOLUTION AND WINDING U? dul for orner sti be carried on, (4) It will also be observed that the causes provided the business of cary tn in partnership; in Article 1890 repli the automatic dissolution of the ‘e mem neal partnership. This is not the case under Arti 31 whic! or for te ego whee eee Pamerates the grounds for the judicial dissolution of the (4) When 2 SP ripute to the partnership, eect S sad tess ONE in any case by Be” i ‘Note that once a partnership is dissolved, the same part- he partner when the P wha ners may form a new partnership to continue the business thing, the loss of the carved the ownershi it having "25 Pp der the same terms. conte i haeaered 1 the partnership a enjoyment a ea is) tha th Dissolution effected without violation partnership shall not Be ee artn erat ‘of partnership agreement. ig when it occur ” ‘There are four ways by which a partnership may be dissolved without violation of the partnership agreement: (1) Termination ofthe definite term or particular undertaking __ A partnership may be constituted for a fixed term oF it may have for its object a specific undertaking, (Arts. (6) By thedeath of any partner; 1 (6) By teinsovency of any partner or of the partnership; 1785, 1783.) (7) By the gh interdition of any partner; undertaking, ip i i is (6) By decree of court under the following without Eee in or ed Pe article. (1700a and 1701a) Causes of dissolution, les 1830 and 1 ‘ causes of soles Sl inf) provide for the statu ll be thou stone hey that dissolution std agreement (No.2). » Any sab patmership wi pts ated, however, that » eeagned thelr interes are laid down in Article ‘The legal effects of this dissoh a 1837, par. 2, Nos. 1,2, and 3. Business becomes unlawful. ; hence, faith, and a ened by the agreement be J the pa may be vested in one part ‘A partnershi inbad faith (therefore, (see Art. 1770.) ership agreement) can claim dam. y iton together ‘ip must have a lawful obj or purpose. EXAMPLE Aisa partner in alaw firm. Later on, Ai of the Regional Trial Court. Under the law, tional Trial Court is prohibited from engaging in the practice ef law. In this case, it would be unlawful for A to continue as 4 partner in the law firm. His appointment dissolves the part= nership of which he is a member. ointed Judge 2 for any cause or reason. — Any dissolution of the partnership at Loss of specific thing. This provision of Article 1830 refers only to specific = sentredinto fora definite term or particular fj ‘ings. When the thing to be contributed is not sp ertaking. isolation fica partnership is, howevea fe Atiles 1786 (par Land I the agreement. d ul ness va Art 1831 DISSOLUTION AND WINDING UP actically amounts to @ capacity of the partners. A the accessory penalty of ly give consent roby. (Art. 38.) (Art. 1327.) as his ca Under the law, ci the time of his ner. Death of any Pat tobe associated in the esto be 2880 & ee ee sr dissolution of the paring 3 business He ng partners have No auth xcept so far as iS necessary y 2 partnership agreement, ho he death, withdrawal, or admis ion, Under such stipul tthe deceased isnot liable for obligation extent of his capit yy act or any Code), ie., to conveyance i take effect di ART. 1831. On aj ion by or for a partner, a dissolution whenever: aN at 5 abate becomes in any other way inca: ‘pale of performing his part of the partnership ‘contract; | s 107%) aartner as tend to affect prejudicial the the business; & (4) A partner wilfully or breach of the partnership ag wise so conducts himself in the partnership business that rs in the event that partnershi Partner has no author 7 (see Art, 1816,) An insolvett P othe 7 ct fe a ee ee toact forhim (A ee patna nor aoty practicable to carry on the B property in eta of fe peace nership with him; a ershi OF partnership ciel Ptesableter ne asa <8) The busin ofthe tons resulting in Ta ‘carried on at aloss; der a dissolut irene ren ution her he purchaser of ie 1813 or 1814: q f the specific term of tl ination oF r undertakings : the partnership was onthe interest Was assigneg order was issued. (N) (1) afte or particule (2) At a artnership a Sr when the chargind Grounds for diss' decree of court. E May constitus| 2 partnership but which ay to make a judici) ary ‘era hearing on application either’ cases mentioned in paragraph 1, Nos. 1 ofa partner’s interest under Incapacity — pa incapacity must be one whit Partner to perform his duties 254 501 and persistent brea re istent breach aa Brounds for judi and materially affer “4 Partnership, — fect and og Partnership aj lution, for they eles uct the purpose of the jon equite partnership affai sale of all real proper! ‘work the dissolution of the firm which w yecause the real property it originally had bs not organized to exploit the lots buying and selling real estate, and agency, and brokerage busines: 108 Phil. 984 [1960].) ld purchaser of a partner's interest may apply for judicial EXAMPLES: ‘with no reasonable prospects of success Lichauco, 33 Phil. 350.) or it can be carried ss. general real e ” (Goquiolay vs. Sycip, (c 1ces— Examples of circumstances able are abandonment ementof the business ler accounting of fas held that the ership did not but to engage @. ‘A B, and C formed a partnership to continue for 2 term of five (6) years. On the third year, esttoD sold his entire inter- [DISSOLUTION AND WINDING ding up or completing cd. terminatesthe actual, jew business for the The Sozegaing, however mm set forth, authority ofany P: a sntract is immediately terminated when the dissolution so not by the act, insolvency, or death of a partner. (A 1832) When the dissolution is by such act, insolvency, or death, the termination of authority depends upon oF other or not the partner had knowledge or notice of the dissolution as provided in Article 1835. (b) With respect to third persons (Art. 1834), the be neces. 1832. Except 50 Fa 36 may a sanyo wind up parnersil affair® OF to com: pl gun but not then finished, erceelution terminates all authority of any part- ner to act for the partnership: (1) With respect tothe partners, (a) When the dissolution is not by the act, insolvency or death of a partner; or (b) When the dissolution is by such act, or death of a partner, in cases le 1833 so requires; although the author acting, partner as it affects his co-partners is already deemed terminated under ‘Articles 1832 and 1833. In such. a case, however, the innocent partners can always recover from the acing partner. Ee jot partners, aS EXAMPLE: : 'A.B, and C were partners in X & C Effect of dissolution ona cence of the partnership as fixed in of partner. uthority expired ‘yesterday. solution was caused (1) General rute, — P: t a xeRsH "a pat and C ar i arate 1004 Band Care ni ution is causeg partner, each being by act of any part. (1) earner acting for Ne partnership had ner, ti Mer fon being by the death or vrtner, the partner acting for a partnership had knowledge of notice Of the death or insolvency. he dissolution Right of partner to contribution from co-partners. The above article speaks of dissolution caused by the act, insolvency, or death of a partner. Where a partner enters into a new contract with a thitd person after dissolution, the new contract generally will perme ae 1), and each of thém is of any liability created by the acting +f thepaeship had not been dissolved. Authority of partners, as a to act for the partners mong themselves, hip. 19 The cause of the dissolutions the death or insolvency sr had knowledge or notice No. 1 is designed to protect the remaining partner or partners who might continue to act for the part joing concern, not having actual knowledge of The rule in No. 2 discards the fiction that presumed to have knowledge of death or in- When a partner has knowledge or notice of a fact. ‘The Uniform Partnership»Actdefines the two terms as follows “ Aperson has knowledge of afact within the meaning of this Act not only when he has actual knowledge thereof, Dut also when he has knowledge of such other facts asin the circumstances show bad. faith.” “ dopersonvhas notie”of a faet within the meaning of this Act when the person who claims the benefit of the notice: {@) States the fact to such person, oF (b) Delivers through the mail or by communication, a written ste person or to a proper pers residence.” (Sec. 3, U.P. apr, 18%, afer assolution, @ partner can ‘partnership, except as provided in the third paragraph of this article: (1) By an act appropriate for winding up part- nership affairs or completing transactions unfin- ished at dissolut apyany transaction which would bind the partner dissolution had not taken place, provided the other party to the transaction: (2) Had extended credit to th adexten partnershi prior to dissolution and had no. inrowica je af notice of the dissolution; or 2 (b) Though he had not so extended credit, had neverthe ar nevertheless kx es ome Prior to dissolutic nown of the nowledge or not ion, and, having fact of dissolution nag jot dissolution, the in a news; rp ad ot ti paper een advertised place (orm eage tea circulation in the e if Ship Were than one) at which th on. © Parte regularly carried DISSOLUTION AND WINE The liability of a partner under the first pars- graph, No. 2, shall be satisfied out of partnership assets alone when such partner had been prior to dissolution: (1) Unknown as a partner to the person with whom the contract is made; and (2) So far unknown: and inactive in partner- ship affairs that the usiness reputation of the partnership could not be said to have been in any degree due to his connection with it. The partnershi no case bound by any act of a partner after dissolution: (1) Where the partnership is dissolved be- cause it is unlawful to carry on the businesS, caioss the act is appropriate for winding UP Part- nership affairs; oF (2) Where the partner has become insolvent; or (3) Where the partnerhad noauthoritytowind up partnership affairs; except by & transaction with one who — : (a) Had extended credit to the P prior to dissolution and had no kno notice of his want of f 5 ‘a act 1884 DISSOLUTION AND WINDING UP ents to an for cons ne ner I partnersiet tution fing i 3, business: co to act on behalf of the partnership, reper cao ‘pia, Band Cy able 5p. 262-263) Notice of dissolution to creditors. (a) As to persons who extended credit to partnership P70" issolution. — Customers of the partnership or Peto who ditended credit to the partnership prior to its dissolution onist have knowledge or notice of the dissolution ‘o relieve the partnership from liability. (2) As to persons who had known of partnership Pe erone sho had not so extended eredit POY Ee dissolution, but who had known of its exisienc®, the fact i he dissolution had been published in the news OPT tha id be sufficient (pat. 1, No. 2, bh; see Singsont Vabela Sawmill, 88 SCRA 623, Feb. 28, 19791), even if they did not actually read the advertisement, (3) Where acting partner has no authority t0 wind MP part hip afars. — Under the third paragraph, nove of dis- wefation is unnecessary except in case No. 3 whete the part erty; Sch ee aH a (4) When alll the p s tives assign their rights to one or more third persons wh th and who | person becoming ip continuing the busi, fo the creditors of the pall be satisfied out of unless there is g this a! sarnesnip hall dssnersip property ON? stipulation to the ‘contrary: ; When the business of 2 partnership after dis. ne oninued under any conditions set solution is co, the creditors of the dissolved as against the separate creditors Pathe ratring or deceased partner or the repre- of the deceased partner, have a prior right to any claim of the retired partner or the representative of the deceased partner against the person or partnership continuing the busi- ness, on account of the retired or deceased part- ner’s interest in the dissolved partnership or on account of any consideration promised for such for his right in partnership property.” Nothing in this a Fi ees shall be held to modify on the ground of fraud, ‘set aside any assignment DISSOLUTION AND WINDING UP. Dissolution of a partnership by change in membership. ‘The change in the relation of the partners resull dissolution of the partnership. It may take pl new partner is admitted; or when a partner ot withdraws or is expelled from the partner: the other partners assign their rights to the sole remaining, partner (Bemardo vs. Pascual, 109 Phil. 936.) or when all the partners assign their rights in partnership property t third persons. “Any change in membership dissolves a partnership and creates a new partnership. Rights of creditors of dissolved partnership which is continued. Article 1840 deals with the rights of creditors when the partnership is dissolved by a change of membership and its business is continued (Art. 1337(2],) by a former partner, cither alone or with new partners, without liquidation of partnership affairs. In such case, the law makes the creditors of the dissolved partnership, also creditors of the persons or partnership continuing the business. In other words, both Classes of creditors, the old and the new, are treated alike, being given equal rights in partnership property: The purpose of the law is to maintain the rights of the old creditors to the partr P against the separate creditors of the partners. ip Act provides: on first by A, ) Under the second paragraph, thi ity of the ney’ coming pariners shall be satisfied out of partnership only unless there is a stipulation to the contrary 2) Paragraph 1, No. 4, applies only when the third per promises to pay the debts of the partnership; otherwise cc rs of the dissolved partnership have no claim ot Partnership continuing the business or its property ute ss the assignment y Partnership of A, B, af it, pp. 265-266.) Art 1841 DISSOLUTION AND WIND ART. 1841. When any partner retires or dies, and the business is continued under any of the conditions set forth in the preceding article, or in article 1837, second paragraph, No. 2, without any settlement of accounts as between him or his estate and the person or partnership contin- uing the business, unless otherwise agreed, he or his legal representative as against such per- son or partnership may have the value of his in- terest at the date of dissolution ascertained, and shall receive as an ordinary creditor an amount equal to the value of his interest in the dissolved partnership with interest, or, at his option or at the option of his legal representative, in lieu of interest, the profits attributable to the use of his ht in the property of the dissolved partner- ship; provided that the creditors of the dissolved partnership as against the separate creditors, or the representative of the retired or deceased partner, shall have priority on any claim arising under this article, provided by article 1840, third paragraph. (n) Rights of retiring or of legal representative of deceased partner when business is continued. When any partner retires or dies and the settlement of accounts, the (1) Tohave the value 0 {partner the dissolution ig the partnership bug partner’s estate decease’ a debts and jor" Mwerable fOr al and ate aiipe deceased Partner but oni a jecedent’sshare it the partnerships a EXAMPLE: A.B,and Care partn te amount of P50 00000 essinX & Co. which is indebted gp Later on, X & Co. was dissoly by reason ofthe withdrawal (oF death) of C. The business ya bye by Aand B without any settlement of account centr and B, onthe one hand, and C, on the other. or his legal representative, has the right to have ty value of bis interes in the partnership ascertained and pai to him, Assuming tat the interest of C has been ascertain to be P30,00000,D has priority over the claim of C, his leg representative or his separate creditor. ae aCe The right to an account of his ii | accrue to any partner, or his I | representative as against the winding up ae be the surviving partners or the person a uing the business, at the date the absence of any ag Partner's right of his rte account (Accrual ofr ight —Theri , ightto demand ana LUTION AND WINDING UP ‘agreement to the contrary. le fo render an account, — The right of a partnership af- f the interest, may be exercised as against (a) The winding up partner; (b) The surviving partner; or (c) The person or partnership continui ness. When liquidation not required. ‘As a general rule, when a partnership is dissolved, a partner of his legal representative is entitled to the payment bf what may be due after a liquidation. But no liquidation is necessary when there is already a settlement or an agree- ment as to what he shall receive. STUDY GUIDE I. Definitions Define or give the meaning of the 1. dissolution; Give at east four grounds for the jug (separate creditor) — P10,000. dissolution of partnership. Separate property of Y and Z each amounts only to P20,000 and P10,000, respectively; and advance by X IL, Problems to partnership — P30,000. DISSOLUTION AND WINDING UP ci (b)_ What right, if any, is given to Y and 2? 4, Same partnership. The partnership was dissolved. Assume the following information: Partnership assets — P320,000; Advances by X to partnership — 20,000; Capital contribution of each partner — P30,000 Liability of partnership — to M — 150,000. 5. Same example. Suppose the liability of the partnership to W is P335,000; Y is indebted to C (separate creditor — P15,000; Z is indebted to D Her partnership wey jolation of par’ rights of an injured partner nd or annulled on the n committed against hin | -xpain or ate beefy the rule OF Teas0m for ya answers. 1X, ¥and Z are partners in a ps which was dissolved by the withdrawal of X. was notified by Z of X’s withdrawal, entered into ng transaction with W in the name of the partnership. | (a) Isthe partnership liable to W? (b) AreXand Z liable to Y for their s the lability? __ 2. Same partnership. X, acting for the chip boghtacar tom Wctacheataa b by C. ¥ acquired knowledge of the claim of W nor Y informed X of the dla er the i laim. C was able 00 3. Sane the partnershipoim; tap. The term of exis into a contrac, ib pes Thisnotwiths @) inthe name of the Is “epatership tab

You might also like