You are on page 1of 2

Reading

A fossil skeleton of a dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx, preserved in volcanic ash, was discovered in
Liaoning, China, in 1996. Interestingly, the fossil included a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal
bones. Some paleontologists interpret the lines as evidence that Sinosauropteryx was a feathered dinosaur,
citing several reasons.

First, the critics point out that the fine lines may not even represent functional structures of a living
dinosaur, but rather structures that were formed after the animal’s death. After the animal died and was
buried in volcanic ash, its skin may have decomposed into fibers. The skin fibers then became preserved
as lines in fossils; the lines were misinterpreted as evidence of feathers.

Second, even if the fine lines are remains of real structures of a Sinosauropteryx, scientists cannot tell
with certainty what part of the dinosaur’s anatomy the structures were. Many dinosaurs had frills,
ornamental fan-shaped structures growing out of some parts of their bodies. Some of the critics argue that
the lines surrounding the skeleton are much more likely to be fossilized remains of frills than remains of
feathers.

A third objection is based on the fact that the usual functions of feathers are to help animals fly or regulate
their internal temperature. However, the structures represented by the lines in the Sinosauropteryx fossil
were mostly located along the backbone and the tail of the animal. This would have made the structures
quite useless for flight and of very limited use in thermoregulation. This suggests that the lines do not
represent feathers.

Listening:

Now listen to part of a lecture on the topic you just read about.
The evidence that the lines in the Sinosauropteryx fossil represent feathers is very strong. The arguments
of the critics are unconvincing.
First, it is unlikely that the lines are a result of the decomposition of the dinosaur’s skin, because we don’t
see any such decomposition in the fossils of other animals buried at the same site. In fact, the fossils of
many other animals buried at the site show evidence that their functional skin structures have been
beautifully preserved in volcanic ash. The well-preserved condition of the other fossils makes it likely that
the Sinosauropteryx’s lines are also well-preserved functional structures, possibly feathers, and that they
are not fibers caused by decomposition.
Second, the idea that the lines represent frills… well, there is an important chemical difference between
feathers and frills. Feathers contain a great deal of a protein called Beta-keratin. Frills, on the other hand,
do not contain beta-keratin. Our chemical analyses suggest that the Sinosauropteryx structures did contain
beta-keratin. So that indicates that the structures were feathers, not frills.
Third, feathers can be used for other functions than flight and thermoregulation. Think of a bird, like
peacock, for example. The peacock has long, colorful feathers in its tail. And it displays its tail in order to
attract a mate. That’s a distinct function of feathers called the display function. Recently, we have been
able to do analyses on the Sinosauropteryx structures that show us that the structures were colorful. They
were orange and white. The fact that they were colorful strongly supports the idea that they were feathers
that this dinosaur use for display.

Question:Summarize the points made in the lecture. Be sure to explain how they cast doubt on the
specific methods proposed in the reading passage.

You might also like