Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Conrad v. Navarro Adm. Case No. 2033 PDF

    Uploaded by

    jibrail dianang
    120 views1 page
    Respondent's transfer certificates of title were declared null and void by a 1970 court decision. The issue is whether respondent is still entitled to suspension of his license. The court held yes, respondent shall be suspended. Case law provides that "good moral character" includes common honesty, and respondent failed to deny the material allegations in the complaint, so he does not possess good moral character.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Conrad v. Navarro Adm. Case No. 2033.pdf

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Respondent's transfer certificates of title were declared null and void by a 1970 court decision. The issue is whether respondent is still entitled to suspension of his license. The court held yes, respondent shall be suspended. Case law provides that "good moral character" includes common honesty, and respondent failed to deny the material allegations in the complaint, so he does not possess good moral character.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    120 views1 page

    Conrad v. Navarro Adm. Case No. 2033 PDF

    Uploaded by

    jibrail dianang
    Respondent's transfer certificates of title were declared null and void by a 1970 court decision. The issue is whether respondent is still entitled to suspension of his license. The court held yes, respondent shall be suspended. Case law provides that "good moral character" includes common honesty, and respondent failed to deny the material allegations in the complaint, so he does not possess good moral character.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Conrad v.

    Navarro
    Adm. Case No. 2033
    Facts:
    Respondent reiterated in his answer that the transfer certificates of title of Ortigas
    & Company, Limited Partnership and Florentina Nuguid Vda. de Haberer were declared
    null and void in the decision dated March 31, 1970 of the Court of First Instance of
    Rizal, Branch XV
    Issue:
    Is the respondent still entitled to suspension of license?
    Held:
    Yes, the respondent shall be suspended.
    Case law provides the term "good moral character" admits of broad dimensions,
    it has been defined as "including at least common honesty" Royong v. Oblena.
    In this case Navarro failed to deny the material allegations in the complaint of the
    spouses E. Conrad and Virginia B. Geeslin.

    You might also like