IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering

Related content
- The minimization of the extraneous
Influence as a challenger to induction for near-field electromagnetic fields of an inductive
power transfer system
wireless power transfer James McLean and Robert Sutton

- Effects of combined apertures on the

magnitudes of electric coupling coefficients
To cite this article: H Bondar et al 2013 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 44 012007 of combline resonators
T M Pholele and J M Chuma

- Modelling of broadband 1-18 GHz

antipodal dual-polarized Vivaldi radiators
for antenna array
View the article online for updates and enhancements. Y V Yukhanov, A I Semenikhin, D V
Semenikhina et al.

This content was downloaded from IP address 190.143.27.61 on 15/06/2019 at 04:22

Radio and Antenna Days of the Indian Ocean (RADIO 2012) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 44 (2013) 012007 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/44/1/012007

Influence as a challenger to Induction for near-field wireless

power transfer

H Bondar1, S Oree2 and K Ichikawa3

1
TMMS Research Centre, Flic en Flac, Mauritius
2
Dept. of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Mauritius, Réduit, Mauritius
3
Murata Manufacturing Company Limited, Kyoto, Japan

E-mail: henribondar@yahoo.fr

Abstract. We introduce what we call “Influence” WPT technology, which can be perceived as
the dual of magnetic induction WPT. In Influence systems, two or more electric circuits are
coupled by electric fields whereas Induction systems involve magnetic field coupling. We
propose an unconventional approach to describe and study Influence, using coupling matrices,
in analogy with the treatment of Inductive coupling, albeit with a larger number of parameters.
In spite of their different natures, both technologies enable non-radiative near-field energy
transfer at mid-range, and display interesting and sometimes counter-intuitive behaviors.

1. Introduction
Energy transfer through short distances using moving magnets or electrically charged bodies [1] had
been accomplished centuries before Hertz’s discovery of electromagnetic waves. Here, we provide a
soft introduction to the idea of energy transfer through electric fields using the experimental
arrangements of figures 1(a) and (b). Figure 1(a) shows two electrically charged distant pendulums,
initially in equilibrium. If one pendulum is set into oscillatory motion, energy is coupled to the second
one due to their distant coulombic force interaction, hence producing oscillations in the latter. If one of
the pendulums is replaced by an elongated conductor as shown in figure 1(b), application of forced
oscillations to the pendulum can induce charge oscillations along the conductor. Such electrical charge
displacements caused by an external charge was historically referred to as “electrical influence” in
Europe [2]. Contemporarily, the term “electric induction” is more common, but may lead to confusion.

Induced charge oscillations

(a) inside a fixed conductive body
(b)
+Q1 -Q2 +Q
1

Forced oscillations Induced oscillations Forced oscillations

Figure 1. (a) Induced oscillations in coupled pendulums (b) Induced charge motion in a conductor.

Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1

Radio and Antenna Days of the Indian Ocean (RADIO 2012) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 44 (2013) 012007 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/44/1/012007

2. A modern form of Influence

The basic concepts presented above are at the heart of modern Influence WPT devices where energy is
transported between oscillating electric dipoles, just like magnetic induction WPT involves coupled
oscillating magnetic dipoles (figure 2). It is well-known that the coupling between dipoles is better if
they are aligned [3]. A specificity of the electrically coupled systems is that it is much easier to realize
asymmetric dipoles constituted by electrode pairs (figure 3). This may bring about an increase in the
coupling coefficient k, efficiency, range as well as other interesting and unrivalled characteristics [3].

Induced oscillations

B field E field

Forced oscillations

Figure 2. Magnetic (left) and electric (right) oscillating coupled dipoles in longitudinal configuration.

4
Load
2
3 3
G
High E-field
4
1 L
2
G Generator

Figure 3. Longitudinal asymmetric configuration. Figure 4. Equivalent Circuit representation.

Electric coupling can be represented through classical electrical circuits as in figure 4. However, in
this ten-capacitor representation, some circuit nodes are virtual and some branches are crossed by
virtual currents. In this work, we use an alternative representation shown in figure 5. In the circuit of
figure 5, only circuit branches carrying measurable material currents are shown. We call them “open-
ended representations”. They enable much clearer and more realistic portrayal of devices. In contrast
to Induction where only three coefficients are concerned, the full description of all the voltages
involved in capacitive coupling is contained in a 4x4 matrix with at most ten independent coefficients.
This gives more degrees of freedom and increased technical possibilities. For instance, using
asymmetry, it is possible to concentrate the electric field in a region between small facing electrodes.

 Q1   C1 -C 0 0  V1 
     Load
 Q2   - C C2 0 0  V2 
Q    0 0 C3 0  V3 
 3   
Q   0 C4  V4 
 4  0 0
Generator

Figure 5. A possible configuration of closely spaced electrodes and its open-ended representation.

2
Radio and Antenna Days of the Indian Ocean (RADIO 2012) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 44 (2013) 012007 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/44/1/012007

As a result, reactive energy and high voltages are concentrated between these two “active” electrodes.
Furthermore the casing of the original devices can be used as the large “passive” electrodes, allowing
seamless integration of the technology in existing products. The specific geometries possible for
electric coupling between electrodes also lead to a higher degree of flexibility in lateral positioning
compared to magnetic coupling between coils (figure 6). In particular, there is no lateral misalignment
that can nullify the coupling, in contrast to coupled coils. It should be pointed out that only the active
electrodes of the Influence coupled devices are shown with the passive ones assumed to be far away.
Positive flux

Magnetic coupling case Negative flux

coil separation
Leakage flux
Maximum coupling Coupling is smaller Coupling is zero

Electric coupling case

active electrode separation

Maximum coupling Very small change small decrease Large decrease

Figure 6. Efficiency fall with lateral misalignment - inductive and capacitive coupling [5].

3. Power limitations
If we base our reasoning on the everyday experience that magnetic forces between magnets can be
much larger than electrostatic forces, we might hastily conclude that Influence is fundamentally
limited to much lower power transfer applications than Induction. Both technologies involve large
amounts of reactive energy stored in the vicinity or inside the devices. Only a very small part of this
energy is typically transferred at mid-range; however the transfer occurs many times per second
according to the generator frequency, and can equate to quite high levels of transmitted power.
Using the classical expression for the energy density within a region of electric field, we may
define a power density according to the formula: 𝑃𝑑 = 𝜔𝜀𝐸²/2. At 1 MHz, in dry air, we obtain a
maximum reactive power level of 250 kVA/dm3. This leaves room for large power applications even if
a minute part of this reactive power is transferred as real power. Practical limitations (just like for
induction systems), are associated to dissipation and efficiency rather than to electrical breakdown.
For applications requiring high power or long range, EMI regulations can also introduce limitations.

4. Use of resonances
For both technologies, resonances can be used to improve efficiency [4, 5]. The main idea (exploited
by Tesla himself) being to recycle the untransferred energy instead of losing it at each alternation by
integrating the coupling elements within a high Q-factor RLC circuit driven at its resonance
frequency. This recycling can be done on both generator and load sides (it is more efficient to recycle
the nearby energy on both sides). The effect of resonance is summarized in table 1. Another important
factor is that capacitors generally have higher component Q-factors than inductors, resulting in a
higher efficiency or range potential for Influence systems over Induction systems.

3
Radio and Antenna Days of the Indian Ocean (RADIO 2012) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 44 (2013) 012007 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/44/1/012007

Table 1. Summary of the effect of resonance on effective coupling.

Implementation No resonance Single resonance Double resonance
Effective coupling k 𝑘 𝑄 𝑘 Q𝐺 Q𝐿

5. Impedance considerations
Exact solutions of Maxwell’s equations for fields produced by elementary electric or magnetic dipoles
(current loop) are available. The term “elementary” means that dipole size is small compared both to
the wavelength λ (non relativistic movements) and to the measurement distance d. Generally the
electric and magnetic field vectors have both a phase angle and a geometric orientation in space; their
ratio cannot be characterized by a single number. However along an axis perpendicular to the dipole,
electric and magnetic fields are at right angles allowing the definition of a complex impedance
𝑍 = 𝐸/𝐻 which conveys information on both the amplitude ratio and the phase difference between the
fields. The magnitudes of Z for electric and magnetic dipoles are given in figure 7.

100000 Z=|E/H| Electric dipole E

10000 d H
Impedance (Ω)

1000
Z0=377Ω
100
Magnetic dipole
10 d H
E
1 x=2πd/λ
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

Figure 7. Impedance in the near and far fields of elementary electric and magnetic dipoles.

We note that the electric dipole’s near field displays high impedance, while that of the magnetic
dipole displays low impedance. As expected, they converge to the value of the wave impedance of
TEM waves in the far-field. Finally, the decisive factor for Influence technologies is their high
impedance character. As for high-voltage distribution lines, they need, for the same power handling,
far less conductive materials than their low-voltage competitors. Moreover, the use of copper
electrodes is not mandatory for Influence: they can be made of transparent conductive plastic sheets.

6. Conclusions
Power can be transferred efficiently between two distant oscillating electrical dipoles coupled through
their electric fields. Electric coupling between circuits is more difficult to grasp and represent than its
magnetic counterpart because virtual currents exist outside the devices. In schematics, we propose to
restrict the use of the classical capacitor symbol to cases of total influence and to adopt “open-ended”
circuits for more general cases. Compared to Induction systems, Influence is more tolerant to
positioning and provides other flexibilities. This high impedance technology is currently being used in
consumer electronics [5]. Prospection for automotive applications has started [6]. Natural extensions
to large low-cost arrays of switched electrodes to cover long distances or wide surfaces are expected.

7. References
[1] Malin S and Barraclough D 2000 Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union 21 233
[2] Gray J 1890 Electrical Influence Machines (London: Whittaker and Company)
[3] Bondar H French Patent 2875649 (2004)
[4] Tesla N U.S. Patent 645576 (1900)
[5] Goma S 2011 Asia Electronics Industry 182 35-37
[6] http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20120706/227082/, accessed 15 Oct. 2012