investigators combed the area where the murderer said he had left his daughter and his lover, but it was not said if the investigators searched for the bodies, where common sense indicated: in the well of a column-foundation in some building under construction, where the murderer was able to place a concrete truck beforehand and go to find his lover and daughter, throw them into the well and unload the concrete on them.
It was known that the killer works in the distribution
of construction materials; that the victims left half- prepared food in the dwelling they occupied; that they disappeared a non-working day; How was it that the press did not say that the investigators searched where they had recently cast concrete? Everything seems to indicate that the murderer, advised by the press in several previous cases, knew that “without bodies there is no crime” and premeditatedly he created the plan for the disappearance of women.
Clearly, the cause of the conflict was that, his lover
wanted the right thing for her and the daughter of both: to achieve a stable life with residence in the United States. But the killer did not want to pay alimony neither all the complications, what implied giving his daughter a better life with her mother. So he had to get to the house, where his lover lived with their daughter, and carrying good news for them; they left what they were doing and get in the killer's vehicle towards their death.