Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GPG IPCL IP Philippines PDF
GPG IPCL IP Philippines PDF
2011
PHILIPPINES
Romulo Mabanta Buenaventura Sayoc & De Los Angeles
CONTACT INFORMATION
Romulo Mabanta Buenaventura Sayoc & De Los Angeles
30th Floor, Citibank Tower
8741 Paseo de Roxas
Makati City, Philippines 1260
632.848.0114
www.romulo.com
4. Regulation of Price No, provisions pursuant to which the licensor reserves the right to affect the
sale or resale prices of products manufactured on the basis of the licence are
deemed prima facie to have an adverse effect on competition and trade (IP
Code Section 87.2).
1
© Copyright Lex Mundi Ltd. 2011
5. Limitation of Production No, provisions that contain restrictions regarding volume and structure of
production shall be deemed prima facie to have an adverse effect on
competition and trade (IP Code Section 87.3).
6. Tie-in Clauses No, provisions which impose upon the licensee the obligation to acquire
from a specific source capital goods, intermediate products, raw materials
and other technologies or of permanently employing personnel indicated by
the licensor, shall be deemed prima facie to have an adverse effect on
competition and trade (IP Code Section 87.1).
8. Active/Passive Sales Restrictions on active sales to territories which are justified to protect the
Restrictions legitimate interests of the licensor (e.g. where an exclusive licence has been
granted by the licensor) are excepted from the prohibition (section 87.8 of
the IP Code) on agreements that restrict a licensee from exporting licensed
products. Conversely restriction on active or passive sales to non-
exclusively licensed territories will be prohibited.
2
© Copyright Lex Mundi Ltd. 2011
11. Challenge to IPR No. Note: a licensor cannot include a provision in an agreement preventing a
licensee from challenging the validity of a patent right.
Part B - Distribution
Agreements
5. Non-compete provisions Yes. There are no specific prohibitions restricting inclusion of non-compete
provisions during and after the term of an agreement, however, case-law
indicates that non-compete clauses should not be allowed to continue beyond
2 years from the date of expiration of the agreement.
6. Restrictions on competing There are no statutory provisions prohibiting restriction of a reseller from
products selling competing products.