Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Facts:
Comelec reassigned petitioners to other stations pursuant to Section 44 of the Voter’s registration act. The
act prohibits election officers from holding office in a particular city or municipality for more than 4 years. Petitioners
claim that the act violated the equal protection clause because not all election officials were covered by the
prohibition.
Petitioners contend that RA 8189 Section 44 is unconstitutional as it violates the equal protection clause
enshrined in the constitution; that it violates constitutional guarantee on security of civil servants; that it undermines
the constitutional independence of comelec and comelec’s constitutional authority; that it contravenes the basic
constitutional precept; that it is void for its failure to be read on 3 separate readings
Issue:
Ruling:
No, RA 8189 Sec 44 is not unconstitutional. It has not violated the equal protection clause. It is intended to ensure the
impartiality of election officials by preventing them from developing familiarity with the people of their place of
assignment. Large-scale anomalies in the registration of voters cannot be carried out without the complicity of
election officers, who are the highest representatives of Comelec in a city or municipality.