Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bloodcollectiontubes
Bloodcollectiontubes
com
Received 28 June 2007; received in revised form 27 September 2007; accepted 14 October 2007
Available online 1 November 2007
Abstract
Smart textiles using fabric-based sensors to monitor gesture, posture or respiration have been exploited in many applications. Most of fabric-
based sensors were fabricated by either coating piezo-resistive materials on a fabric or directly knitting conductive fibers into fabrics. Obviously,
structures of textiles, including yarn structure and fabric structure, will affect the performances of sensors. However, researches on the effects of
the structures have not been explored yet. In this paper, yarn-based sensors were fabricated by using piezo-resistive fibers, elastic, and regular
polyester fibers. Single and double wrapping methods were employed to fabricate the yarn-based sensors. Performances of the designed yarn-based
sensors were evaluated by measuring their resistance changes under variable loading. It is shown that slippage occurs between the piezo-resistive
fibers and the core fibers. The relationship of the resistance versus the strain cannot be described as a linear function and should be modeled as a
second order equation. Due to the symmetric structure, the double wrapping yarn could resist the slippage and higher linearity in the resistance
curve can be provided. Thus it can be served as a better sensing element. The study also investigates the issue of the twist per meter (TPM) and
finds that there are no significant effects for using different TPM. Finally, experiments were conducted on a respiration monitoring system to prove
the feasibility of the yarn-based sensors and the results demonstrate that the yarn-based sensor can track the respiratory signals precisely.
© 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0924-4247/$ – see front matter © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.sna.2007.10.069
C.-T. Huang et al. / Sensors and Actuators A 141 (2008) 396–403 397
4.186x + 0.6415
the resistances. The samples were selected to be 6 cm long with
the preload equal to 20 g. The force and the resistance were mea-
Double
sured as the length of the sample was stretched per mm. The total
0.9882
0.9993
D450
450
stretched length was 14 mm and 15 points were taken. To evalu-
ate the uniformity of the yarn sensor, five samples were prepared
for each design listed in Table 1. The plots on the resistances
0.9917
0.9985
D275
fiber alone. For the resistance curve, the R squares for the first
275
curve.
Figs. 3 and 4 show the resistance and force curves for the
Double
0.9878
0.9981
150
the force curves in Figs. 2–4, the forces that the single and double
wrapping yarns can sustain under L/L equal to 23% (14 mm
stretched) were about 0.3, and 0.4 kg, respectively. Under the
55.628x2 + 4.263x + 1.719
same strain, the force that the CCF alone can sustain was only
0.09 kg. The wrapping of the CCF with the elastic and polyester
17.242x + 1.249
0.9993
Single
S450
The second is that the curves for different twists (TPM equal to
150, 275 and 450) have no significant effects on the character-
43.908x2 + 4.060x + 1.821
0.9992
core yarn. The resistance of the yarn under the strain between
Single
S275
275
small. At this stage, the stress is mostly taken by the core yarn.
As the elongation increases further, the CCF becomes straight
and it cannot resist the elongation by structural change. The
16.541x +1.212
CCF takes the strain directly and the resistance changes become
large at this stage. The observation indicates that the friction
0.9547
0.9997
Single
(constraint) force between the CCF and the core yarn in the sin-
S150
Type
150
R2
R2
lateral forces of the two CCFs are balanced with each other. The
C.-T. Huang et al. / Sensors and Actuators A 141 (2008) 396–403 399
core yarn remains in the center. There is no obvious structural value for every five samples at a specific elongation. It is shown
change as compared to the single wrapping yarn. Without the that the variations of the samples fabricated by the double wrap-
slippage, the double wrapping approach can provide higher lin- ping approach are smaller than those by the single wrapping
earity as shown in Fig. 4. Reflecting to the experimental results, approach.
the R square of the linear regression model of the double wrap- Although the double wrapping yarn can achieve higher lin-
ping yarn is higher than that of the single wrapping yarn. To earity, its sensitivity is lower than that of the CCF alone. Because
further illustrate the merits of the double wrapping approach, two CCFs were wrapped around the core yarn, the parallel con-
the coefficient of variations (CV) are listed in Table 2. The CV figuration of two conductive fibers makes the resistance to be
was calculated by the standard deviation divided by the mean approximate half of the CCF alone. The sensitivity (slope) of
Table 2
The coefficient of variations (CV) at some specific elongations
Sample Elongation
2 mm 5 mm 8 mm 11 mm 14 mm
Table 3
The experimental results for measuring the BPM using the yarn-based sensors
sample BPM The first notch time (s) The last notch time (s) Periods BPM Error (%)