According to the Keynesian multiplier, an initial increase in investment leads to an increase in
income as well as employment. Also, multiplier theory states that higher the marginal propensity to consume (MPC), the higher is the rate of the multiplier. However, there is evident data that suggests that many developing countries like India, despite of having low marginal propensity to save, have a lower multiplier. Therefore, it is generally agreed that the logic of Keynesian multiplier cannot be applied to developing countries. The Great Depression affected mainly the developed countries and it was this time when Keynes had formulated his theories, this might be reason for such paradox, as stated in an article written by Dr. V.K.R.V. Rao. In the article it is stated that, an underdeveloped country is characterized by, a principal agricultural sector, a vast concealed unemployment, low capital equipment, lower level of technology as well as technical knowhow, a large non-monetized sector, and a large sector being produced for self-consumption. In developing nations there was minimal accumulation limit in the customer merchandise business. In this way, the supply of yield was inelastic. Thus, there is an infusion of investment which results principally in increase in cash wage and not expansion of genuine national wage. In developing countries, there is an immature economy which leads to intense shortage of crude based materials and other products putting extraordinary weaknesses for the working of the multiplier in genuine terms. It was also contended that in a developing country, disguised unemployment hides the state of unemployment. The shifting of these workers to industries from the agricultural sector is not easy for achieving the multiplier effect. In the end, it is also pointed out that any developing country has a predominant agricultural economy and the income elasticity of demand for food grains is very high in these economies. Considering this, rise in investment results in the rise in money incomes of the people that they mostly used to spend on the food grains. The supply of agricultural item is inelastic and thus, it is hard to increase the agricultural production due to the expansion which is sought after through the multiplier impact of increment in investment. For the above stated reasons, the multiplier theory cannot be applied to developing countries in the real terms although it works in monetary terms.