WHO should be SUMMONED to the

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT (ICC)

and/or the

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (ICJ)?

And,

WHAT ARE THESE COURTS?

By Rick Heizman, Oct 26, 2019

THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

The International Criminal Court (ICC) is an intergovernmental
organization and international tribunal that sits in The Hague,
Netherlands. The ICC has jurisdiction to prosecute individuals
for the international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity,
war crimes, and crimes of aggression. It is intended to complement
existing national judicial systems and it may therefore exercise its
jurisdiction only when certain conditions are met, such as when national
courts are unwilling or unable to prosecute criminals or when the United Nations Security
Council or individual states refer situations to the Court.

The ICC began functioning on July 1, 2002, the date that the Rome Statute entered into force.
The Rome Statute is a multilateral treaty that serves as the ICC's foundational and governing
document. States which become party to the Rome Statute become member states of the
ICC. As of November 2019, there are 123 ICC member states. 42 states are non-party, non-
signatory states.

CRITICISM OF THE ICC

The ICC has been accused of bias and as being a tool of Western imperialism, only punishing
leaders from small, weak states while ignoring crimes committed by richer and more powerful
states. This sentiment has been expressed particularly by African leaders due to an alleged
disproportionate focus of the Court on Africa, while it claims to have a global mandate; until
January 2016, all nine situations which the ICC had been investigating were in African
countries.

Currently, the ICC is engaged in a contentious and false media-driven case against Myanmar
- a smaller and weaker country - at the behest of the much greater size and power of the
Muslim world, particularly Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Iran, Pakistan, Indonesia, and Turkey, as well
as many blinded Western countries.

1
 THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
The International Court of Justice (ICJ), sometimes called the ‘World
Court’, is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations (whereas
the ICC is not a UN body, although seems like it is under the boot
of the UN). The ICJ's primary functions are to settle international
legal disputes submitted by countries and give advisory opinions
on legal issues referred to it by the UN. Through its opinions and
rulings, it serves as a source of international law. All members of
the UN are party to the ICJ Statute.

The ICJ comprises a panel of 15 judges elected by the

General Assembly and Security Council for nine-year terms.
The court is seated in the Peace Palace in The Hague,
Netherlands, making it the only principal U.N. organ not
located in New York City.

In contentious cases, the ICJ produces a binding ruling

between states that agree to submit to the ruling of the court. Only states may be parties in
contentious cases. Individuals, corporations, component parts of a federal state, NGOs, UN
organs and self-determination groups are excluded from direct participation in cases although
the court may receive information from public international organizations.

CRITICISM OF THE ICJ

The International Court of Justice has been criticized with respect to its rulings, its
procedures, and its authority. Major criticisms include the following: According to the
sovereignty principle of international law, no nation is superior or inferior against another.
[Note: this point alone is so stunningly ridiculous that Sudan, North Korea, and Saudi Arabia
can be seen as equal to Japan, Denmark, and Costa Rica!!!] Therefore, there is no entity that
could force the states into practice of the law or punish the states in case any violation of
international law occurs. Therefore, the absence of binding force means that the 193 member
states of the ICJ do not necessarily have to accept the jurisdiction. Moreover, membership in
the UN and ICJ does not give the court automatic jurisdiction over the member states, but it is
the consent of each state to follow the jurisdiction that matters. [Note: in other words the ICJ
is utterly and completely useless, spineless, and worthless].

GENERAL MIN AUNG HLAING

No matter what people may think about Commander-in-Chief of Defense Services Senior
General Min Aung Hlaing, I don’t think that General Min Aung Hlaing instructs his
commanders, and their troops to engage in mass rapes and massacres, and to burn and
destroy all Bengali Muslim villages. Why do I think that? Firstly, if the eradication of Bengali
Muslims was a goal the army could have achieved that long ago. Secondly, evidence is
needed. The ICC and ICJ are courts. Courts need evidence and proof. There actually is
plenty of evidence. That evidence clearly shows the Bengali Muslims as the perpetrators
planning and trying again and again to effect a genocidal jihad and ethnic cleansing.

2
NUMBER ONE for the ICC and ICJ: ATTA ULLAH
The number one person that should be summoned to
the ICC, to face charges of War Crimes, is Atta Ullah,
also know as: Ata Ullah, Abu Amar Jununi, Hafis Tohar,
Havistoohar, Amir Abu Amor, Hafez Atta Ullah, or
simply Atta Ullah - the last one being his Pakistani
passport identity. From here on, I will use the passport
name: Atta Ullah.

It must be realized that if Atta Ullah had not organized, planned, and trained to launch the
massive simultaneous Jihad attacks against 30 police and army posts, as well as, around 60
villages on August 25, 2017, there would have been NO army reprisals! Therefore, there
would have been NO columns of refugees streaming into Bangladesh!

The subsequent actions that followed the massive attacks by the Bengali Muslims
(“Rohingya’) happened AS A RESULT of the massive attacks BY the Muslims, and any
country on earth would have to respond aggressively to terrorist attacks of that magnitude.

As well, the Islamic terrorist group - Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) - had made
similar coordinated (but smaller number of) attacks ONLY TEN MONTHS previously! That
shows that whatever you think about the army response to the October 2016 attacks -
harsh, disproportionate, adequate, necessary - the army failed miserably to eliminate and
neutralize the terrorist forces, resulting in much more massive attacks only 10 months later,
on August 25, 2017.

COMPARISON: ATTA ULLAH vs MIN AUNG HLAING

Min Aung Hlaing: Had to respond to a severe, major, overwhelming terrorist attack, as any
commander in chief of any country worldwide would have to do.

Atta Ullah: Launched a systematically prepared Jihad against police and army targets, as
well as non-Muslim villages resulting in thousands of casualties and tens of thousands of
displaced villagers fleeing in terror.

Min Aung Hlaing: There is no evidence or proof of orders from the top resulting in ‘war
crimes’ against Bengali Muslims.

Atta Ullah: Plenty of evidence, from intercepted phone calls, whatsapp messages, ARSA-
made videos, confessions of captured militants, the tapped phone of Atta Ullah instructing
his commanders and their militants to slaughter all Buddhists, Hindus, and ethnic minorities.

Min Aung Hlaing: The army is recklessly charged by Muslims and their lobbyists with
committing genocide, however, there are no aspects of the military response that fit any
objective definition of genocide.

Atta Ullah: It is clear, and there is evidence and proof that Atta Ullah, other commanders, and
the Mawlawis (Imams) systematically planned and taught the villagers that when the time came
to attack, that trained ARSA members would lead the attacks and all the villagers must gather
their weapons and participate (or have their heads cut off if they don’t) and that their goal was a
wanton genocidal ethnic cleansing of all non-Muslims from the land, and then they would
declare the land an autonomous (and apartheid) Islamic State for Muslims only.

3
THE ICC and ICJ: A SICK JOKE
The fact that neither the ICC or the ICJ cannot even fathom looking at the conflict with any
kind of fairness and objectivity is very very disturbing. It would be like this scenario:

Imagine that a massive multi-targeted Islamic terrorist act happened in Paris, and was
continuing, with massive participation of the Muslim communities in France. The army and
the police were having many gun battles a day with the terrorists, and many of the Muslims
were fleeing across borders. After somewhat settling down the ICC and ICJ demanded the
French Commander in Chief, and the country of France, be charged with Genocide and War
Crimes.

That is how stupid and useless the ICC and the ICJ are.

AFTER ATTA ULLAH THERE ARE PLENTY MORE to SUMMON to the ICC and ICJ
After Atta Ullah the following people should be charged and summoned to the ICC for their
participation in various War Crimes.

1) The many commanders and sub-commanders under Atta Ullah, especially those
responsible for the Kha Maung Seik executions of 100 Hindu villagers.

2) The 20, or so, members of the committee of elders in Saudi Arabia who are the
‘executive planners and financiers’ of the Bengali Muslims (‘Rohingya’). These people
include: Maulana Abul Kalam Haideri, Maulana Abul Hasan Haidari, Hafez Salim Ullah,
Sheik Abu Anas, key leaders of GRC (Global Rohingya Center) - in Saudi Arabia, and
more.

3) Pakistani Military Officer Brigadier Ashfaq of Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) Pakistan’s

premier intelligence agency. He and Atta Ullah are in intercepted phone calls discussing
and planning the massive attacks of Aug 25, 2019.

4) Maulana/Mufti Abu Zar Azzam, (also known as Abu Dhar al-Burmi) - in Pakistan, born in
Buthidaung, Rakhine State, Myanmar, hence ‘al-Burmi’, related to the family of Osama
bin Laden. A top, well-trained, battle-hardened dangerous figure in this conflict.

4
5) ‘Rohingya’ front men in Western countries: Tun Khin - of BROUK (Burmese Rohingya
Organisation UK), in the U.K.; Htay Lwin Oo - in USA and Japan, a slick liar with a smile,
deep connections with Saudi Arabia, funded by Saudi Arabia; Ibrahim Mohamed - in
Germany.

6) ‘Rohingya’ frontmen, weapons buyers, human-smugglers, in Thailand: Muhammed

Anwar Ruwagom - in Sukhumvit, Bangkok, (high position and influence, currently trying
to buy a huge amount of weapons from Thailand’s weapons black market to ship through
Bangladesh to ARSA / Mujahid terrorists); Hafez Abdu Khalek - in Bangkok, (a hit man /
assassin for Anwar); Alam - from Hat Yai and now in Bangkok, (special guard of Anwar
and his group); Boshi Ullah - in Southern Thailand (spy for Anwar’s group); Mohammed –
in Southern Thailand (spy for Anwar’s group); Ismail - in Malaysia (spy for Anwar’s group);
Nur Islam - in Bangkok; Mamun - in Bangkok; Hafez Nur Mohammed – in Bangkok; Abu
Dorda - in Bangkok; Shwe Hla - in Surat Thani; Rajuee - in Surat Thani; Husain - in Surat
Thani; Hafez Elias - in Nakhon Si Tamarat; Amin - in Nakhon Si Tamarat; Amin Sayed - in
Hat Yai; Foyas - in Kong Kaen; Khalu (aka) Yhaya - in Yangon.

by Rick Heizman, October 26, 2019

THE BEST AND MOST ACCURATE FILM ABOUT THE CONFLICT IN RAKHINE STATE, MYANMAR:

ARAKAN - ANCIENT BUDDHIST KINGDOM, ENDANGERED BY JIHAD - 4 Parts:

https://arakan-reality.smugmug.com/ARAKAN-the-CONFLICT-VIDEOS/MY-EXCELLENT-MOVIE/i-9PF8GTp/A

https://arakan-reality.smugmug.com/ARAKAN-the-CONFLICT-VIDEOS/MY-EXCELLENT-MOVIE/i-dg8SfKc/A

https://arakan-reality.smugmug.com/ARAKAN-the-CONFLICT-VIDEOS/MY-EXCELLENT-MOVIE/i-M2pkg2V/A

https://arakan-reality.smugmug.com/ARAKAN-the-CONFLICT-VIDEOS/MY-EXCELLENT-MOVIE/i-pbVdXqx/A

Photos and Videos of Arakan at: arakan-reality.smugmug.com - go to Conflict videos

Photos and Videos of all of Myanmar at: rickheizman.smugmug.com

Papers at scribd.com/rheizman

Facebook: Rick Harmony

Twitter: @RickHarmony

Email: rickmusic4@gmail.com

burmafriend88@gmail.com