You are on page 1of 8

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Enlargement

in the Lateral Projection of the Chest'


RICHARD B. HOFFMAN, M.D., and LEO G. RIGLER, M.D.

T EFT VENTRICULAR enlargement is prob-


L ably the most frequent chamber en-
largement in the adult heart, yet its detec-
tion is often difficult. According to
Parkinson (3) the enlargement is more
posterior than lateral in most patients. In
all probability the left ventricle is en-
larged in both directions in the majority of
cases, but there are so many exceptions
that roentgen studies in both postero-
anterior and lateral views are commonly
used. Eyler and his associates in 1959 (1)
made an original and ingenious suggestion
for the determination of left ventricular
enlargement in the lateral view. They
described an abnormal change in the rela- Fig. 1. Cross section of the heart at the level of the
junction of the inferior vena cava and posterior wall
tionship of the left ventricle to the inferior of the right atrium. Note that if the left ventricle
vena cava and the left leaf of the dia- enlarges posteriorly (broken line), its posterior margin
will be displaced behind the inferior vena cava. LV =
phragm. They noted that if the left left ventricle; RV = right ventricle; RA = right
ventricle extended posteriorly beyond the atrium; lVC = inferior vena cava.
upper end of the vena cava more than 1.5
em, it probably was a sign of left ventricu- It is the purpose of this paper to define
lar enlargement. It has been our ex- two measurements easily obtained from
perience, however, that the junction of the the lateral chest film and to determine
inferior vena cava and the right atrium is their degree of efficacy in evaluating left
poorly defined in a great many cases. ventricular size.
More recently, the incorporation of the
METHODS AND MATERIALS
shadow of the inferior vena cava into that
of the left ventricle in the lateral view has Figure 1 is a diagrammatic cross section
been recommended as a sign of left ven- of the heart at the level of the junction
tricular enlargement, specifically for the of the inferior vena cava and the posterior
differentiation of interatrial from inter- wall of the right atrium. It is apparent
ventricular septal defects (2). that enlargement of the left ventricle
The determination of left ventricular posteriorly will displace its posterior mar-
enlargement is likewise of great importance gin behind the inferior vena cava. If the
in the differentiation of mitral stenosis right atrium enlarges posteriorly the
from mitral insufficiency and for the es- inferior vena cava will move with it. The
timation of the degree of aortic insuffi- normal relationships of the inferior vena
ciency associated with aortic stenosis. cava, left ventricle, and left leaf of the
In a few cases the demonstration of en- diaphragm on lateral view are shown in
largement of the left ventricle may be the Figure 2. Injection of contrast material
most important diagnostic sign of cardiac into the inferior vena cava (Fig. 3) demon-
disease. strates that the linear shadow seen on the
1 From the Department of Radiology, University of California, the Center for the Health Sciences, Los Angeles,
Calif. Accepted for publication in February 1965.
93
94 RICHARD B. HOFFMAN AND LEO G. RIGLER July 1965

TABLE I: DATA ON SUBJECTS SELECTED FOR STUDY

Group No. Diagnosis Established by Age Range


(yr. ) Male Female

l. Normal students 100 College routine entrance 18-36 50 50


chest roentgenogram
2. Normals at autopsy 22 Heart showed no dilatation at 16-90 9 13
autopsy, weighed less than
270 g for females and 330 g
for males, and left ventricu-
lar wall less than 1.5 em
thick.
3. Aortic stenosis 75 Surgically proved 14-73 52 23
4. Aortic insufficiency 18 Surgically or angiographically 17-54 12 6
proved
5. Mitral stenosis 25 Surgically proved 22-65 3 22
6. Mitral insufficiency 18 Surgically proved 17-55 9 9
7. Moderate- to-severe 12 Clinically proved 20-73 8 4
hypertension

TABLE II: PERCENTAGE OF SUBJECTS IN WHOM CROSSING OF THE INFERIOR VENA CAVA AND LEFT
VENTRICLE COULD BE IDENTIFIED

Group No. Cases No. Cases in Which Percentage of


Reviewed Crossing Was Seen Identified Crossings
l. Normal students 100 83 83
2. Normals at autopsy 22 19 87
3. Aortic stenosis 75 56 75
4. Aortic insufficiency 18 10 55
5. Mitral stenosis (pure) 25 17 68
6. Mitral insufficiency
(predominantly) 18 11 61
7. Hypertension 12 9 75

lateral chest roentgenogram is in fact the TABLE III: MEAN VALUES FOR MEASUREMENTS
A AND B
posterior margin of the inferior vena cava.
Measurement A is defined as the distance Mean Mean
Group Measurement Measurement
which the left ventricle extends posteriorly A (cm) B (ern)
to the posterior border of the inferior 1. Normal students 1.12 2.51
vena cava at a point 2 em cephalad to the 2. Normals at autopsy 1.25 1.7
3. Normals, groups 1
crossing of the cava and the left ventricle. and 2 1.15 2.35
This measurement is made on a plane 4. Aortic stenosis 2.16 0.2
5. Aortic insufficiency 2.29 0.3
extending posteriorly which parallels the 6. Mitral stenosis (pure) 1.29 1.8
horizontal plane of the vertebral bodies. 7. Mitral insufficiency
(predominantly) 2.33 0
Measurement B is the distance of the 8. Hypertension 1. 75 0.45
crossing, referred to above, caudad to the 9. Abnormals, Groups
4,5,7,8 2.19 0.21
left leaf of the diaphragm (Fig. 2,B).
Seven groups of patients were studied, a
total of 270. Only those with true lateral cent. This is broken down into each of
chest films who were over fourteen years of the groups in Table II. In the other 24
age were included. A 6-foot target-film per cent several reasons may be responsi-
distance and either left or right lateral ble: Barium in the esophagus obscured
positions were used. The method of the crossing in many instances; pleural
selection of the subjects, age ranges, and fluid or parenchymal disease overlying the
sex are shown in Table I. lower lung fields accounted for some;
and underpenetrated films proved to be
RESULTS the third major cause.
Of the 270 cases studied we were able to It is significant that in only 55 per cent
see the crossing of the inferior vena cava of the cases of aortic and 61 per cent of
and left ventricle in 205 subjects or 76 per mitral insufficiency were the films satis-
Vol. 85 EVALUATION OF LEFT VENTRICULAR ENLARGEMENT 95

LD

Fig. 2. Right lateral projection of a normal heart. A. Radiograph with dots designating limits of measure-
ments A and B.
B. Diagram of the posterior inferior cardiac border of the same case with measurements A and B designated.
LV = left ventricle; IVC = inferior vena cava; RD = right diaphragm; LD = left diaphragm.

Fig. 3. Right lateral projection of the posterior inferior cardiac border. A. Film obtained before the injec-
tion of contrast material shows linear shadow presumed to represent the inferior vena cava.
B. Same patient after contrast medium has been injected into the inferior vena cava, This film proves that
the linear shadow is, in fact, the posterior margin of the inferior vena cava.

factory for this type of measurement. The measurements A and B for the 7 groups
fact that the examinations were not made defined above. Of note is the value of
with this method in mind accounts in large measurement A for the normal students
part for the high percentage of unsatis- and the autopsy-proved normals, 1.12 and
factory films. 1.25 em respectively. In Figure 4 both
Table III illustrates the mean values for normal groups were combined and plotted
96 RICHARD B. HOFFMAN AND LEO G. RIGLER July 1965

MEASUREMENT A

14
:3 12
'" 1

r;;: 10 NORMAL
ol-l
:. 8
: 6
III

~ 4
~
,.Q
§
z
0
2
I
2 4 6
1/
8
I I I
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40
mm. of Overlap
14
'D
00
.....
12
<!l
ol-l 10 LESIONS CAUSING
0
f-<
LEFT VENTRICULAR
8 ENLARGEMENT
6
4
2
0
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40

14
.....
..... 12
.....
III
ol-l 10 MITRAL STENOSIS
0
f-t
8
6
4
2
0

Fig. 4.

on a distribution curve. This shows a or borderline. Yet the lateral projection


mean for measurement A of 1.15 cm and a with measurement of diameter A gives
standard deviation of 0.47 ern. A typical the unequivocal finding of left ventricular
normal heart with a small overlap measure- enlargement which was borne out by the
ment is demonstrated in Figure 2. surgical findings.
The cases with aortic valvular lesions, When the cases of mitral stenosis are
mitral insufficiency, and hypertension show plotted, as shown in Figure 4, the mean for
mean measurements from 1.75 to 2.33 cm measurement A is 1.29 em, which is what
(Table III). These were grouped together would be expected since there is no sig-
as cases clinically showing left ventricular nificant left ventricular enlargement in
enlargement and also plotted on a distribu- cases of pure mitral stenosis. This normal
tion curve in Figure 4. The mean for figure also indicates that enlargement of
measurement A was 2.19 em with a the left atrium or right ventricle does not
standard deviation of 0.50 em. A typical invalidate the measurement. An illustra-
example of the large posterior overlap tion of this point is exhibited in Figure 6,
seen in left ventricular enlargement is a case of mitral stenosis without insuffi-
illustrated in Figure 5. It is notable that ciency in which no posterior enlargement of
the postero-anterior view shows relatively the left ventricle is disclosed.
little mediolateral enlargement. In fact, By similarly plotting the data from
if viewed without knowledge of the clinical measurement B (Fig. 7), the combined
findings, it might well be considered normal normals show a mean of 2.35 em distance
Vol. 85 EVALUATION OF LEFT VENTRICULAR ENLARGEMENT 97

c
Fig. 5. Aortic insufficiency. A. Normal appearing heart in postero-anterior projection. B. Right lateral
view demonstrates large measurement A. C. Diagram illustrating measurements.

from the left leaf of the diaphragm cepha- There was no significant difference be-
lad to the crossing of the inferior vena tween males and females for either meas-
cava and left ventricle. The groups in urement in any of the 7 groups.
which left ventricular enlargement is ex-
pected display a mean measurement of DISCUSSION

0.21 em. The cases of mitral stenosis We feel that if measurement A is 1.8
show a mean of 1.80 em for the B measure- cm or above, there is a strong probability
ment, a slight variance from the normals that the left ventricle is enlarged. With
which might be accounted for by some this value, 11 out of 102 normals or 11 per
downward displacement of the left atrium cent would be false positives and 17 of our
on the left ventricle. 86 patients or 19 per cent who should have
98 RICHARD B. HOFFMAN AND LEO G. RIGLER July 1965

Fig. 6. Pure mitral stenosis. A. Postero-anterior view demonstrates large "mitral" heart, but significant
insufficiency with a large left ventricle cannot be excluded.
B. Left lateral view reveals small measurement A despite enlarged left atrium and right ventricle. Dots indicate
points for measurement.
C. Diagram illustrating measurements. Small left ventricle helps to rule out mitral insufficiency.

had large left ventricles would be false of the 86 patients with left ventricular
negatives. Two of the 11 cases of mitral enlargement would have been considered
stenosis or 13 per cent would have been normal, a false negative rate of 32 per cent.
wrongly reported as left ventricular en- Seven of the 17 cases of mitral stenosis, or
largement. The data indicate the value 41 per cent, would have been falsely re-
and reliability of this simple measurement ported as left ventricular enlargement.
for estimating left ventricular enlarge- This figure most likely reflects the en-
ment. largement of the left atrium and right
If a good inspiratory film is obtained ventricle and shows the ineffectiveness of
and measurement B is 0.75 em or less, one this measurement when there is other
must consider left ventricular enlarge- chamber enlargement.
ment. With this figure for measurement The degree of correlation between lateral
B we would have reported left ventricular enlargement of the heart and the posterior
enlargement in 6 out of 102 normals or measurement is important. Of the 124
6 per cent false positives. Twenty-eight cases with conclusive evidence of left
Vol. 85 EVALUATION OF LEFT VENTRICULAR ENLARGEMENT 99

ventricular enlargement, 11 showed what


appeared to be a normal heart in the
postero-anterior view, while in the same
cases the A measurement was well over 1.5
em. In the same group there were 4 cases
in which the A measurement was normal
while the postero-anterior view showed
clear-cut evidence of left ventricular en-
largement.
MEASUREMENT B

N 30
;; 27
-; 24 NORMAL
~ 21
~ 18
<:l 15
] 12
~ 9
6 Fig. 8. Right lateral projection shows how barium in
3 the esophagus obscures measurements A and B.
o L-~~~~---}--+-~=---*--+:--~'=-+:::-+::-~

'" 30
barium swallow so often obscures the
: 27 relationships of the inferior vena cava, left
~ 24 LESIONS CAUSING
I-t 21 LEFT VENTRICULAIl
ENLARGEMENT
ventricle, and left leaf of the diaphragm,
18 as in Figure 8, that another lateral projec-
15
12
tion without barium should be obtained
9 with each cardiac series.
6
3
We have also found that the measure-
ments lose their reliability in cases of
severe pectus deformity of the chest,
r-. 30
; 27
marked kyphosis, and anomalies involving
C; 24
... 21
MITRAL STENOSIS cardiac rotation.
18
The presence of abnormalities of the
15 lungs, pleurae, and diaphragms may in-
12
9
validate the procedure since increased
density or secondary changes in cardiac
position may obscure the shadow of the
inferior vena cava. In a small number of
Fig. 7. apparently normal subjects the contrast
factors are such that the inferior vena cava
The average measurement A in cases
is not clearly visible.
of mitral insufficiency is greater than in
The two measurements discussed above
aortic insufficiency. This result was sur-
are useful adjuncts in the diagnosis of
prising and not clearly understood.
cardiac chamber enlargement and should
COMMENTS be used in conjunction with postero-
anterior and oblique chest projections.
Several requirements in the technic of
the lateral chest film must be fulfilled be- SUMMARY
fore measurements A and B can be applied. Two easily obtained measurements for
The film must be a true lateral projection, determining left ventricular enlargement
in deep inspiration, and penetrated suffi- from the lateral chest roentgenogram have
ciently to see the retrocardiac space clearly. been presented and their efficacy tested.
The lateral projection of the heart with When the posterior border of the left
100 RICHARD B. HOFFMAN AND LEO G. RIGLER July 1965

ventricle extends posteriorly to the poste- The addition of these two measurements
rior border of the inferior vena cava more to the conventional methods of assessing
than 1.8 cm at a level 2 ern cephalad to cardiac chamber size will materially assist
their crossing, on a lateral projection of the in the determination of the presence or
chest in the adult, one can postulate left absence of left ventricular enlargement
ventricular enlargement with a consider- before the use of catheterization or angio-
able degree of certainty. cardiography.
When the distance from the crossing of The Center for the Health Sciences
the inferior vena cava with the left ventricle Dniversity of California
Los Angeles, Calif. 90024
to the left leaf of the diaphragm is less than
0.75 ern, one can suspect left ventricular
REFERENCES
enlargement, but must be aware of other
chamber enlargement which can alter the 1. EYLER, W. R., WAYNE, D. L., AND RHODEN-
BAUGH, J. E.: The Importance of the Lateral View in
normal relationships of these structures. the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Enlargement in
Since the relationships in these measure- Rheumatic Heart Disease. Radiology 73: 56-61,
July 1959.
ments are often obscured by a barium- 2. KEATS, T. E., RUDHE, D., AND Foo, G. W.:
filled esophagus, it is suggested that a fifth Inferior Vena Caval Position in the Differential Diag-
nosis of Atrial and Ventricular Septal Defects. Radi-
view be added to the standard four views ology 83: 616-621, October 1964.
of the heart, the lateral projection of the 3. PARKINSON, J.: The Radiology of Rheumatic
Heart Disease. (Carey Coombs Memorial Lecture).
chest without barium. Lancet~1 : :896-902, May 28, 1949.

SUMMARIO IN INTERLINGUA
Evalutation de Allargamento Sinistro-Ventricular in Ie Projection Lateral del Thorace

Es presentate duo facilemente obtenibile troventricular sed debe esser conscie del
mesurationes al uso in determinar al- facto que altere allargamentos cameral
largamento sinistro-ventricular a base de pote alterar le relationes normal de iste
lateral roentgenogrammas thoracic. Le structuras. Viste que le relationes del
efficacia del mesurationes ha essite testate. mesurationes in question es frequente-
Quando le margine posterior del ventriculo mente obscurate per un esophago replenate
sinistre se extende in direction posterior de barium, i1 es recommendate que
verso le margine posterior del vena cave un quinte projection sia addite al serie
inferior per plus que 1,8 ern a un nivello standard de quatro projectiones del
2 em distante in direction cephalic ab corde, e que iste quinte projection sia un
lor cruciamento in un projection lateral projection lateral del thorace sin le uso de
del thorace de un patiente adulte, i1 es barium.
possible postular le presentia de allar- Le addition del mentionate duo mesura-
gamento sinistro-ventricular con un grado tiones al methodos conventional pro evalu-
considerabile de assecurantia. Quando le tar le dimensiones del cameras cardiac
distantia ab le cruciamento del vena cave va esser de assistentia in le determination
inferior con le ventriculo sinistre usque al del presentia 0 absentia de allargamento
labio sinistre del diaphragma es minus que sinistro-ventricular ante le uso de cathete-
0,75 ern on pote suspicer allargamento sinis- rismo 0 de angiocardiographia.

You might also like