Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
Chicago
I was not busy at work and not having seen the GSB opted to go to Chicago to interview. Spent the
day before interview in classes and with students. This is helpful if you can attend as it gives a good
feel for the school.
Interview took place at the Hyde Park campus with a second year student. Interview was laid back
and 'informal' at the interviewers request.
Interview initially took the same structure as most other interviewees have reported. These reports
and the Clear Admit interview guide were good preparation. Questions included:
1. Walk me through your CV (It cannot be overstated how important it is to have a good
answer for this. I don't think I did!)
2. Pick out highlights
3. Talk me through a leadership and team-working role.
4. Request for some details on academics
It was a very free-form interview with me leading and the student merely asking for a more detail or
weighing in with an opinion. However the bulk of the interview stayed focused on my non-
professional activities (charity work etc), which was prompted by the interviewer. I found this pretty
odd compared to most of the reports from previous interviewees.
The interviewer left 5-10 minutes at the end for questions, and again this was an informal back and
forth as opposed to a question and answer session. Interviewers and second year students seemed
clued up and ready to provide frank answers.
A classic adcoms interview, quite similar to the one I had with Kellogg. The interviewer posed
questions and never interrupted me, just gave me all the time in the world to finish before she
moved to the next one. (Quite unlike the alumni interviews). It was a forty-minute discussion.
Most of the questions I was asked were your typical/standard questions; some had a little twist or
variation. My interviewer seemed genuinely interested in learning about me and my ability to lead.
She also found it very interesting when I told her that I follow a rather tailored leadership style based
on who I'm working with and the working environment. She liked how I took a varied leadership
approach and agreed with me that a one-size-fits all leadership style may not work in a study team
setting since you'll have to work with varying personalities. I also noticed through her facial
expressions (nods or smiles) that she really liked when I used concrete examples and even tied some
of my experiences directly to a particular skill or strength and how that quality would enhance the
classroom setting or team setting at Chicago. I had a few questions for her, some about the
curriculum and career services. She did like the question about the positives of not having a strict
cohort system. It seemed like she was a fan of the fact that Chicago students are not tied to having
most of their first year classes with a cohort.
Overall the interview was pretty laid back. At first the interviewer appeared to be a rather serious
individual and the interview had a very professional tone at the beginning. But after I showed some
enthusiasm in my responses and shared some interesting anecdotes, she did seem much to open up
more and became more personal.
Round 1 / On-campus / Second-year Student / Status: Admitted (Published March 10th, 2008)
I interviewed on campus in mid-November for Round 1. This was my first time visiting the school.
The Harper Center was beautiful, and the admissions office is right inside the front door. A current
student was waiting in the interview room to help applicants relax. Another student relieved the first
one a few minutes after I arrived. Both were friendly, although perhaps a little geeky. I also met a
student in the foyer who was very nice but on the square side.
My student interviewer came out to greet me a few minutes late. She gave me a nice, warm smile
that persisted throughout the interview.
All interviews at Chicago are blind. The questions were standard, and I did not feel surprised by
anything asked.
• Why MBA?
• Why GSB?
• Why now?
• Questions pertaining to my career and extracurriculars shown on my resume.
After the first question, I weaved in a few points and the interviewer rolled with it. I was well
prepared so we blasted through the standard questions in about 15 minutes. She offered to answer
my questions and I had about 4 good ones specific to the program (e.g. Lab Courses) and my
interests. She could not answer 1 or 2 specifically, but she commented that my in-depth questions
showed a deep knowledge of the program. My questions lasted about 10-15 minutes, so the entire
interview took 25-30 minutes. The interviewer was easy to talk to and I felt comfortable throughout
our conversation.
I was later admitted to the GSB and strongly weighed the offer. However, I decided to attend
Columbia instead due to the allure of its value-investing program.
1. Why Chicago?
2. Why now?
3. Why moa?
4. What classes would you want to take?
5. What contribution will you make on campus?
6. Walk me through your resume.
• Tell me about yourself (with a few follow up questions based on my walk through of my
resume)
• Why MBA?
• Why Chicago?
• What do you plan to do post-graduation?
• What other schools did you apply to?
The interview was very friendly and if the culture is anything like what I experienced during my
interview, then I'm looking forward to Chicago GSB. Above all, make sure you know why Chicago
is the school for you.
Round 2/On Campus Interview/ 2nd Yr Student (Published February 28th, 2008)
I had an on campus interview on Feb 27th 2008 with a 2nd year student. It was a pretty standard
conversational interview. The interviewer began with congratulating me on making it to this stage of
the process. Then, she explained how the process works and how the interview fits into the process.
She introduced herself and talked a little about her background and her plans post MBA. Then she
jumped into my resume.
1. Walk me through my resume? (With 2-3 follow questions)
2. What are your long term and short-term goals?
3. How does an MBA or an MBA at Chicago GSB fits in?
4. A question about one of the community related extra curricular activity I had mentioned on
my resume.
5. Do you have any questions? I had couple.
• Tell me about how you got to this point? You seem to have had an interesting journey (grad
school, biotech startup, ops/strategy consulting)
• Tell me about how you resolved a difficult situation with clients?
• How did you make the transition from a startup to consulting? What skills did you need and
how did you go about acquiring them?
• How did you gain the skills you needed to gain so much responsibility within your first
consulting role over 3 years?
• Short Term/Long Term Goals?
• Non-profit involvement - how this ties with long-term social enterprise goals?
• Why MBA?
• Why Chicago?
• Any questions? I had one
Lots of small questions/clarifications from her side - I left with the feeling that my personality and
real self came out in the interview.
1. If you could compare GSB to a top company, which one would it be and why?
2. Here's a marker. There's the board. Go and teach me about something for the next 2
minutes.
3. What undergraduate course that you took changed the way that you think? Talk about a
course that is not related to your profession.
4. Give me a list of websites that you read regularly.
5. Give me an instance of something where you put in a lot of effort and things did not work
out.
6. What course would you definitely want to take at the GSB and why?
• Why an MBA? (I walked through my resume and gave examples of what lead me to my
decision to apply to a MBA program.)
• Why GSB?
• Why did you choose your most recent position?
• What was the most important skill you gained/knowledge you learned in your career to date?
• What will you contribute to the GSB?
• What can other GSB students gain from your career leadership experience?
Surprisingly, there were no questions about my career plans after the GSB, but I incorporated them
into my answers to "Why MBA".
She then turned it over to me for a few questions where I asked about her GSB experience, how
good the international recruiting was, career services, etc.
Interview was low threat and a pleasant experience - very much in line with all my other experiences
with the GSB admissions process. Interview was approximately 40 minutes total.
1. Which book did you read recently that particularly interested you?
2. Why do you want to quit your job? (I am shareholder in small start-up and aiming to enter
VC industry)
3. Tell me about a situation when you had to advocate for a position in your professional or
educational experience.
4. Chicago is known for faculty, high ranking, finance, what else do you value of Chicago?
Alum, Round 1, November 16, 2006. Juggler (Published February 26, 2007)
I had my Chicago interview with an alum this morning and it was nothing like what I had expected
out of an admissions interview! The usual Why MBA, Why now and Why Chicago were there. But
there were lots of other delightful conversational elements to the interview. We discussed things like
my fears, my way of handling uncertainty in life, pros and cons of being an only child (which I am),
why I became an engineer, why I work where I work, what do I do. I had to profess my
commitment to my goals and why I think they are practical, how will I embrace and adapt to change,
which one will I go to if I have to choose between the schools I'm applying to.
Then our conversation took a tangential turn towards Chennai (where I grew up, he's from there
too), the good old music scene in Chennai and how it has become lack-luster due to all the
westernization, my school, his school, Tamil Brahmin outlook and upbringing, Indian roots and
values etc. etc. (My apologies to my non-Indian readers, for giving such an India-centric discourse).
We also spoke about creative writing and books. We discussed our views on objectivity, capitalism,
life, the universe and everything :-). On a more serious note, it was a relaxed candid conversation,
which brought out the person in me.
He assured me that his feedback would be positive. However he also mentioned that he cannot
influence the admission decision, which will be based on the rest of my application too and the only
thing that may deter me from getting in is lack of work experience. His comments were "You are a
young woman with a lot of dreams, I like your energy and don't worry you will make a magnificent
B-School grad"! It was music to my ears: D
He urged me keep him posted and approach him for anything that I might want. He was a very
approachable and extremely dynamic person. I'm really glad we had so much in common to talk
about. PS: Although I have covered everything that we spoke about, this was not the exact
chronological flow of the conversation.
Columbia
Regular Decision / Off-campus / Alumni / Status: Admitted (Published March 10th, 2008)
I applied Regular Decision to CBS but submitted my application in the fall. There was only one
alumni interviewer near me. I contacted him and he responded quickly. He had to reschedule but
apologized and met me at a location that was closer to me.
On the interviewer's suggestion, we met at a restaurant. I wasn't thrilled about this but thought it
was wise to happily agree. My first impression of my interviewer in person was that he was very busy
and was eager to get the interview started and completed quickly, but once we sat down at the table
he became more focused on listening to my case. He asked me:
The interviewer was frank and down-to-earth. He paid for the meal (it wasn't expensive), even
though I offered to cover my part. He gave me an opportunity to ask him questions at the end. His
answers were detailed and included examples from his own experience. I was granted admission
approximately 2 weeks after my interviewer submitted feedback to Columbia. I was also admitted to
other top 10 schools, but I will enroll at Columbia because there are features of its curriculum and
location that are not available elsewhere (value investing/NY). I would encourage admitted
applicants to visit Columbia's Open House, which was well organized. While the buildings students
take classes in are not as new as at some other programs, the central part of Columbia's campus is as
beautiful as any place I've seen.
• What are 5 adjectives that describe your interpersonal skills and communication style?
• Short term/long term goals (when I told him my long term goal was to start a company he
asked why I wanted to own a company)
• Give me an example of teamwork (I gave him my well prepared example and he asked how
long I had practiced my answer. I asked why he was asking that...did I seem rehearsed? He
said a bit, but that wasn't a bad thing...PHEW dodged that bullet).
• Why MBA? Why now?
• Why Columbia (When he saw I had gone to Harvard undergrad, he asked why I would take
a step down to go to Columbia...which was kind of an awkward question but I answered that
it's not only about ranking/prestige, also about the relevance of the program to your specific
goals).
• When did I encounter an ethical dilemma and how did I respond (when I told him about an
example I had from my current job in the fashion industry, he asked how I reconciled my
ethical nature with my choice of employer, since my company had received negative press
for using discriminatory slogans on their clothing. I answered that while I didn't agree with
all of my company's strategies, I was working there for the experience and did not regret the
decision. He asked me if I would work for a company that sells cigarettes. I said no,
cigarettes have been proven to kill people and clothes have not...:)
• What others schools am I applying to
• Are there any red flags you think the adcoms will find in your candidacy?
• What makes you unique?
He asked a lot about the details of my business (I'm an entrepreneur). We discussed the details of his
organization, his business model and his clients.
This interview was very different than any of my previous interviews. I believe there is a lot more
variation in the types of interviews for Columbia because they are conducted by alumni. I
recommend not only being prepared with your standard interview material, but also have at least a
basic knowledge of the interviewer's company or industry.
I got the admit three weeks later. I'm actually scheduled to present to his company in the coming
weeks about opportunities for our organizations to work together. Good luck to all.
Early Decision / Alum (Published November 9, 2007) Most questions were pretty standard:
1. Practice but don't over rehearse, as then your responses won't sound genuine.
2. Think of plenty of examples in advance.
• Why Columbia?
• Why now?
• How have you selected MBA programs?
• Something about yourself that others would be surprised to know (I had not prepared for
this so I was surprised to hear this question :-))
• Your leadership style?
• An example of ethical dilemma.
• What makes you unique as compared to other applicants?
• Anything else you would want the adcoms to know that you didn't get to mention in your
application?
• Any questions for the alum?
Overall the questions were easy. However, since Columbia was the only business school I had
applied to, I was very nervous and I think I messed up a bit because of that. I did not highlight my
extra curricular activities, which were actually unique and I felt would have given me an advantage.
However, one week later I got a call from Columbia that I have been admitted. My advice for fellow
applicants would be to give the complete application their best shot. When the adcoms says that
they value the complete application and not just a single piece of the application process, they mean
it. Best of Luck.
Columbia Interview. (Published September 10th, 2007)
The questions are pretty straightforward; the interviewer follows a template that is given to him/her
by the school:
My advice/tips:
1. Prepare, prepare, prepare. This is an important piece of your application, as important as all
the other pieces like GMAT or letters of reference. Do mock-up interviews with a coach, a
friend, and your wife/husband, whoever but the more you know the answers to these
questions, the more you will be successful on D-Day.
2. Keep your answers short and up to the point, while at the same time conveying passion and
enthusiasm. You should have three to four distinctive reasons for choosing Columbia, no
more, and they should be stated in order of importance to you.
3. Pick one example that describes your argument, this will make it stronger. Most of the stuff
is already in your written application, so you can state again the entrepreneurship example
for the teamwork question, so on and so forth.
4. Be natural, come like a confident person who still has a lot to learn: you're curious, open-
minded, tolerant.
5. Reach out to 3 or 4 potential interviewers at the same time, as some may not answer back on
time. Or not at all. It increases your chances on getting an answer quickly & get done with it.
The interview should last between 45 minutes to an hour.
I realize now that most alumni conducting MBA interviews are probably very much in love with
their schools, so the "any questions" bit at the end is an excellent way to end off on a high and
positive note. When many b-school alumni start talking about their school days you can definitely
feel a rush of excitement in their voices ... It's a great way to establish rapport.
• Walk me through your background and how you got to where you are
• Explain to me what you do at work
• Tell me about a leadership or team experience
• What are your career goals?
• Why Columbia?
• What do you like to do for fun?
After the questions were done we spent some time chatting about his experience. The alum
explained that finding an apt could be a pain and so can commuting to the school.
Tuck
Tuck Interview Early Action / Second Year Student / On-campus / Admitted! (Published January
31st, 2008)
Wonderful experience, Tuck's strategy of bringing everyone in definitely ensures that students know
the environment they will be in should they choose to go there. The interviewer was extremely
friendly, I got the impression he had never done any interviewing before, whether for school or
professionally.
• Started off focusing on my educational background, specifically my minor and why I chose
that - talked about this much longer than I would have expected
• Why MBA
• Why Tuck
• Career plans
• Then we went into extracurriculars, which was another lengthy sidetrack. Was concerned
that I was spending too much time here, but he and I had some similar and genuine
interests.
Then we switched, so I got to ask about what he enjoyed most about Tuck, and specifically his
experience coming with a partner as I was in the same boat.
Tuck Interview Early Action. Student interview. On campus. (Published November 14, 2007)
I interviewed on campus of Tuck. First of all I would applause the helping nature of the people at
Dartmouth College. Everyone over there is very helping in nature and you as a prospective
candidate are also expected to be so. If you are not the helping kind forget about Tuck. It is a small
school with a very vibrant community. If you are thinking to go to Tuck then think of it as another
family and talk accordingly. I liked the school and the people very much as expected since I had
been in touch with a few alums for a while.
My interview was in the late after noon and I was the last candidate to be interviewed for the day.
Avoid being the last candidate it doesn’t help in anyway. You would have lost stamina by the end of
the day and the same would have happened to your interviewer. And be very careful if it is a student
interview it is not easy as general myth prevails. It is very conversational but the students are a tough
game. The school visit included a class on Decision-making and a tour by a 2nd year student. You
also get a chance to get your doubts clarified by the admissions staff regarding the admissions
process. Now here are the questions
1. Why MBA and Why now and Why Tuck. (Easy one I guess if you have done your
application)
2. How was your day at Tuck? What class did you attend? Who was the teacher? And how was
the experience. (Now do remember the teacher’s name. I couldn’t recall the name at all.
Thanks to my trip due, which I had not slept for 36 hours and brain would not respond at
all. On my way back from Hanover just after 2 hours of interview I even forgot that I was
driving a car on a highway. :-) Luckily I survived to share this weird experience)
3. Did you have a tour? Who was the student? (Gosh! Again I am stuck with the name. I knew
everything he talked about from the mail room to the party place and even his interests and
his future plans since I asked him loads of questions, in fact I was the only one asking
questions but damn I don’t remember his name)
4. Did you have a meeting with the admissions staff? How was it? (Good she didn’t ask me the
name this time. Because the only name I remembered was Dawna Clarke, the admissions
director and she wasn't the one I met. I was wondering I hope she doesn’t ask me her name
since I didn't remember that as well. At the end of the interview she gave me her business
card and I got to know her name and was able to say goodbye along with the name. I am
very good at remembering people and names but it just wasn’t my day.)
5. Did you ever receive a feedback? (This led to a conversation, which was also one of my
essays. I stupidly said that I don’t give feedback though I meant to say something else but
realized the mistake very late. Lack of sleep can drive you insane)
6. Are you able to work in teams? Tell me something about an experience you had while
working in teams. Because at tuck we work in small teams. And how helpful are you. (This
led to my another essay question discussion and wasn't difficult to handle.)
7. What will you bring to the Tuck community? (Easy one to handle since it was again an essay
question)
8. Do you have any questions about Tuck? (I had already asked so many since morning that I
wasn't left with many. But still I managed to get a few good ones. But my biggest mistake
was that I asked her why would you recommend Tuck to me. I wanted to ask how was your
Tuck experience but phrased it in a wrong way. She seemed a bit pissed off at this since the
question, as itself would make her market Tuck which she didn’t like.)
I really don't know how much weightage interview has because on reflection mine seems to be
screwed up. And also I don't really understand the purpose of the questions I was asked because
they were the same one's of the application. They didn’t really give them any more info about me.
My resume and hobbies could have opened up a plethora of interesting stories, which were not there
in the application. But it seems it just wasn't my day or to look at it positively I avoided a few more
insane answers.
But I would personally recommend Tuck to everyone because it is a good school for people who
need help at tasks and are not one man army. The community is very good but they really need
people who are vocal enough.
Best Of luck. And do get a good sleep before interview else you might end up like me.
Tuck Representative, Off-Campus, Jan Round (waitlisted). (Published March 14, 2007)
My Tuck interview took place in Delhi sometime back.
Here's what I was asked:
If I were not to see your resume, what one thing would you take along if I send you to the moon or
Mars? Then some discussion on what I answered.
On-campus student interview, Early Decision Round for Fall 2007 (Published January 28, 2007)
My interview was with a second year student who was friendly and professional. The interview was
relaxed and comfortable. The interviewer had a copy of my resume and was familiar with it.
However, he was unfamiliar with my field, which meant I had to briefly explain my industry’s
landscape and my position in it during the initial “walk me through your resume” question.
Additional questions:
The interview was brief approximately 35-40. Overall the interviewer was professional, warm and
relaxed – a good experience. One caveat: virtually every student I spoke with at Tuck mentioned (in
one way or another) that because of the workload and the small community’s emphasis on extra-
curricular participation, first-years tend to get only 5-6 hours of sleep per night.
Early Action Round (Class of 2009): Adcoms Interview (Published January 2007)
My interview was scheduled at 9:00 AM at the School. I was interviewed by an Adcoms member and
a trainee 2nd year student. The interviewers made me feel very comfortable. I was also helped by the
fact that I approached it as a conversation rather than an interview. It was resume based and along
the standard lines of "Walk me through the resume”, "Why Tuck" etc. We talked a bit about my
extra-curricular activities too. I was asked a couple of questions on how my peers viewed me as a
person. After that answer I was asked how did my friends view me as a person? The interviewers
also tried to find out how I had researched Tuck, whether through alumni contacts/websites etc. [I
had mainly researched the website]. The Post-MBA questions were very direct and I did everything
short of naming the company I wanted to work for post MBA [or maybe I did name the company]
It was a short interview. Barely stretched 20 minutes. But I was surprised at myself regarding the
amount of information I was able to convey in that time :) I made sure that I got across concrete
examples of all my qualities, activities and work experiences. It didn’t really make that much of a
difference that the interview was prior to the class visits.
Just make sure that you know exactly why you want to be at Tuck. Be sure of your career goals and
be honest. It helps!
1. Go over your resume and talk about team experience you have
2. Did you have experience dealing with a touch/uncooperative team member?
3. How did you motivate people?
4. What outdoor activities do you enjoy?
5. How I am going to deal with the current startup if into the MBA?
6. Q & A
I feel like Tuck emphasized a lot of teamwork but did not ask any leadership stories. So I told a
teamwork story of my outdoor activity. Basically, I gave out four teamwork stories, cannot imagine I
had that many in my mind. I think the interviewer did a good job relaxing me because I felt pretty
good going over those stories.
Other experience at Tuck:
1. Took the business communication (writing) class, which is an interesting class. Lots of
interactions and students even invited us to express our ideas for group discussion.
2. Talked with first year students during lunch and they like the place very much and the
faculties and the classes. Seems the only issue is how to balance the lives of family members.
Not many places to go and far from other cities. Especially the location in the mountains,
which makes it difficulty to drive in the foggy winter season.
3. Tour of the campus was ok and what impressed was the dorm like places where it is easy to
organize parties!
• He asked my why I would like to leave a job like I have (In a great organization) and do an
MBA? (Why MBA question) and why I cant do that doing what I currently do.
• He asked me questions on what I answered and he really kept me engaged the whole time.
But he did it in a very casual manner.
• Then he asked me about my long-term vision and had questions on its feasibility since he
was involved in similar pursuits but in a different area. I did defend my vision but we agreed
midpoint. Then he asked me a question on how exactly I have planned my short-term goal
in a way it will help my long term? (Short-term goals).
• He asked me if I am okay with the cruel Tuck winter and the snow. He also asked me if the
rural setting was okay for my wife and me?
• Finally he asked me if I had any questions. I had and he was very informative and really
answered my questions in details.
During the whole time he was taking some notes and though I knew that is the usual procedure, in
the end he apologized for doing so, which I thought was very sincere. He walked me back to the
Admissions office and gave me his card and asked me to call or email him with any questions.
16 Dec 2005 / Phone Interview with 2nd year student / Dec 6th round / International candidate /
(Report filed on 26 Feb 2006)
It was a phone interview. The interviewer gave me the option to choose the date and time. There
weren’t any unexpected questions. I was asked to start with a walkthrough of my resume, then the
regular why MBA? And why Tuck? I probably touched everything within these three questions
because I wasn't asked much else. It was very informal, conversation like. The interviewer made me
comfortable.
He asked me if I had any questions and I asked him something related to the curriculum at Tuck. I
think I rambled on a bit about my resume and that’s probably what took the interview to 45 minutes
instead of the planned 30 minutes (And, in retrospect, maybe that’s what killed my app too! But
that’s just an optimistic guess... It could have well been my essays or the need for further diversity
on the campus.)
Student
My early morning interview was fairly short – 20 minutes – the interviewer had to be somewhere
else. She was a 2nd year and seemed to have a list of generic questions that she went through. The
interview was totally blind, as I hadn’t even submitted my application at the time. The first was
“This is your first visit to Tuck and you haven’t had a chance to sit in on a class or take a school
tour. How do you know that Tuck is the right place for you?” The remaining were:
At the end, she clearly asked me if I wanted to cover anything else that she hadn’t already asked, and
I took the opportunity to highlight a couple of things that hadn’t already been covered. Given the
length of your interview, your answers have to be very crisp.
There were only 2-3 minutes to ask questions at the end because she had to run off somewhere else.
She actually said that living in the dorms could leave you with little privacy – I hadn’t expected her
to say anything negative about the Tuck experience.
Student, on-campus
My Tuck interview was the first one I did - probably not the best idea since it's pretty high on my list
of choices. I had been to the Dartmouth campus a few times during undergrad, so I was familiar
with the environment. There were about 15 others visiting the same day as I, and I realized quickly
how tight the timeliness were for completing an interview.
As everyone else does, I interviewed with a 2nd year student. I was a bit nervous, but I think that's
par for the course. Some of the good things:
• Asking TOO MANY questions.... at the end of the interview, I said I could go on forever
asking questions. We were rushed leaving the room, and it felt a bit awkward. She almost
forgot to give me a card. I thought a 30 minute slot was too short...I guess the author of
Blink might disagree and say first impressions are the most important.
• Mentioning that I'm excited to get out of the corporate "jungle" for a couple of years. Just a
bad statement altogether. Not sure if that one will bite me.
• Spending too much time on my resume. I realized about halfway through that I was giving
too much detail...I tried to recover, but fear I glossed over some important recent
achievements too quickly, while spending more time on my first position out of undergrad.
In summary, I don't think the interview is going to set me apart in any way, but I don't think it was a
disaster. Probably a 6 on a scale of 1 to 10.
Tuck interview was pretty straight forward, as mentioned on this site :) The questions included:
I asked him how did they manage to get good professors given the remote location and the absence
of a PhD program and I asked him what percent of spouses/ partners lived in Boston and how does
that work for them.
One of undergrad friends is at Tuck and he answered most of my other concerns.
One interesting thing at Tuck was that the interviewer was from my city and had spent 7 years in the
Venture Capital industry - makes me wonder if this was more than just a coincidence.
1/11/06: December round phone interview with second year student on 1/4/06.
The call came on time at 8:45pm and the interview took about 35 minutes (my interviewer had an
8:30am class, 9:30pm my time). Questions asked:
It was a straightforward interview without any questions designed to trip me up. Despite that, I
didn't quite execute as well as I should have due to a bad case of nerves. At the end I asked the
interviewer about his experiences with his first year project and international field study. You have
to really know your Why MBA and Why Tuck stories to do well in the interview. And practice!! This
was my first interview and I didn't do any mock interviews before, so that really hurt.
Simple enough right?? It should have been. But I think my nerves got the better of me. The first
question kinda threw me offguard, and my answer was so so. I was nervous, and it definitely
showed. I completely froze halfway through the Why MBA question. My mind just went blank and I
couldn't say anything for a good 20 seconds. What went wrong??? I have no idea - this is the story
that I know like the back of my hand. I mean , I've written about it in 3 essays. No excuse for
screwing up a career goals question. I sounded ridiculous.
I answered the next question with a "Why Tuck" response. Over here I guess I was ok, but with one
glaring mistake - I forgot to mention the close-knit, collaborative community!!! That is what Tuck is
all about and I was rambling all about academics, proximity to nature, but nothing about the
community. Strike 2.
My answers to the next two questions were alright, I guess. I talked about a couple of clubs and
discussed a work experience. I got more comfortable as the interview progressed, but my delivery
was far from articulate and smooth. At the end I asked the interviewer about his experiences with
his first year project and international field study.
On a scale of 1 to 10, I would probably give myself a 5. In hindsight, I now know why people have
mock interviews. What really drives me crazy is that the questions were easy and I had prepared
them. My answers just didn't come out right. I just hope that it wasn't bad enough to keep me out.
I've heard how a good interview won't bump someone up from a ding to an admit, but that a bad
interview can certainly hurt.
Early action round (For Fall 2006) - Phone interview with a 2nd year student on 01/Nov/05.
I was never comfortable during the interview. I figure I am better in a face-to-face interview than in
a phone setup. The questions: -
The interview lasted about 20 minutes. It did not help at all that it was Diwali night in India with
loud firecracker noises in the background. It was a very average interview for me and it showed in
the final result, I was dinged. I guess Tuck's interview is more of a fit interview and you must know a
great deal about Tuck to be able to convincingly demonstrate why Tuck?
1. Walkthrough of resume. (He interrupted me to ask me about some specific details of certain
international experiences and what I'd learnt from them).
2. Why MBA? Why now? This was the standard long term/short term goals question.
3. Why Tuck? I spoke about some experiences I'd had speaking to Tuck students and alumni.
He happened to know my student contact so we spent sometime chatting about that.
4. What was your greatest accomplishment?
5. Example of a great leader, and what do you think made him great?
6. After your first year how would your teammates at Tuck describe you?
7. Finally he asked about a detail from the extra-curricular section of my resume.
We ended on a light note chatting about what his MBA experience had been like, about Tuck and
Dartmouth in general.
Overall tips - know your resume, know why you want to go to Tuck specifically. Also be very clear
about why you want to leave your city X and move to Hanover.
1. She can't find me resume on the computer. Thus resorted to asking me to walk her thru my
resume. It was a bit difficult as she was not a technical person.
2. Why do you need an MBA and particularly why Tuck and why now?
3. What can you contribute to Tuck?
4. Have you experienced an ethical dilemma? What did you do?
5. Any questions for the interviewer. Which I did. I asked her what she liked most about Tuck?
And how Tuck improved her leadership skills?
I was told likeability is important factor that goes into your interview evaluation. Thus make sure
you are in good mood.
Alumnus
Here is my experience:
• Location: Brazil
• Could you choose the interview's location? No.
• How long was the interview? 40 min
• Who was the interviewer? / Position (if alumni, class of): CEO/ T91’
• How did you prepare? Mock, Reading essays
• Did you receive any feedback at the end? No.
• What was your opinion of the Alumni/Office Personnel? Friendly.
• Did anything change your opinion of the school? No.
• Was there something you wish you had known ahead of time: No.
Questions:
Another info:
Hope it helps.
Duke
I received the Duke's telephonic interview invite unexpectedly, much after I lost all my hopes. I
scheduled my interview with a second year student.
Preparation Material: My application, Duke's website, Accepted and Clear admit Interview database,
and How to interview like a top MBA.
Interview Experience: A lady picked up the phone and quickly called the interviewer. He started by
introducing himself, his activities and his goals. After the friendly greetings, a deluge of questions
followed. He listened my responses well, kept acknowledging my responses and asked many follow
up questions. The main questions were-
This question surprised me. I thought I had already answered this while answering Why Fuqua.
However, this question gave me an opportunity to highlight my knowledge of Fuqua and its culture.
He sounded satisfied with my response. He even gave few examples from his own experience.
• How will your friends you? What three adjectives will they use, and why?
• Tell a weakness that you will address at Fuqua?
I went a step ahead explaining how I will overcome my weakness in Fuqua.
• Tell an example of a team conflict that you had, and how did you get through?
• What are you most proud of? My response was followed by two follow up questions.
• Why you are so interested in [My short and long term goals]? Is the interest from childhood
or you have developed this recently? Which Incidents led you towards this goal?
• Name any three persons that you would like to pick for a team? Why will you pick them?
• What were your Undergraduate extracurricular activities?
• Which is the course you liked most in Undergraduate studies?
• Tell me about a living person whom you admire. Why?
• Any other question you would like to ask.
Phew! It might seem unrealistic, but all this was within 30 minutes. After the interview, I send him a
thank you email. Result: Admitted!
• Walk-me-through your resume question that lasted, back and forth for about 15 minutes the
interview was blind so I was able to highlight similar things that I did in my Fuqua essays
and lead into the Why MBA questions.
• Why Duke question which was much easier having had the Weekend - I felt comfortable
with the idea of fitting in, especially having just run into that other girl. This lasted another
10 minutes.
• What clubs would you join
• Tell me what your boss would say about you if you were not in the room?
• What about your family? These were much harder to answer than the other questions and, to
be honest; I don't think I gave her the level of 'personal' that she might have been looking
for.
By this point, 40 minutes had passed! It was very conversational and fast. I asked her how the Duke
experience differed from our shared undergrad experience and then it was over.
I sent a follow up thank you email to the interviewer and she responded by wishing me luck and
encouraged me to contact her with any questions. A month later, I received the offer and on that
very afternoon the interviewer called me to congratulate me. It was as surprising as the party invite
over interview weekend. The hospitality is omnipresent at Fuqua and I encourage you to visit and
take full advantage of the Weekend for Women and the interview.
Alumni, Off-Campus, Round 1 (interviewed after waitlist) (Published March 06, 2007)
Interviewed with a Fuqua Alumnus in Bangalore a couple of weeks back. My interviewer gave me a
good picture of life at Duke. It was nice to meet someone so passionate about his alma mater.
The interview was pretty much on expected lines. We went on to discuss almost everything I could
pack in my application. Some questions I remember were:
The best part of the interview was when he told me enthusiastically about his own experience at
Duke. How they used to camp outside for days to get tickets for Duke Basketball matches. How
everyone is so friendly and involved, and how education at Duke has really made a difference to his
outlook.
Considering that I have been waitlisted by Duke, I feel that the interview should do me no harm.
Second Year Student, On-Campus, Round 2 (Published February 26, 2007)
I interviewed on-campus with a 2nd-year student. My day started early as I attended a class on
accounting which started at 8 in the morning! The class was interesting, but students definitely
seemed less engaged than they had been at HBS. However, this probably can be attributed both to
the fact that it was 8 in the morning and that we're talking about accounting here. Fuqua is
undergoing construction (which they really don't need since the building is already big and nice - ah,
the cost of Real Estate in North Carolina), which won't be done until Fall 2008. After the class I sat
and chilled in the lounge with other applicants until my interview. My interview came and picked me
up from the lounge and took me upstairs to a conference room (I think in the Career Management
Center). The interview questions (that I can remember):
Then I asked him some questions about Fuqua and that was it. All in all it was about 35 minutes,
which he commented was "one of the shortest interviews he's ever done!” Of course, this made me
very nervous and uneasy, and so I asked him if this is a negative point and he said "no no, not at all.
It's good because I can tell that you've practiced and/or interviewed before because you got across
the pertinent information without rambling". So I think it went well.
After that I had lunch with students and a tour of the building. All in all a good visit and a quick
turnaround (Decisions will be out March 8th!)
On-campus student interview Round 1 for Fall 2007(Published January 2007)
A second year candidate who was fairly reserved and discerning conducted the interview. Because of
this the interview seemed more formal than some of the others I have had. The interviewer was in a
class I visited earlier in the day, so he asked me what I thought of it. He had a copy of my resume.
The first question was the standard “walk me through your resume”.
Additional questions:
1. If you were going to assemble an ideal team, who would you choose for it and why?
2. What is the difference between a leader and a manager?
3. Describe a time when you led a team.
4. How do you solve conflicts?
5. Why do you want to attend Duke?
6. Q&A.
The interview was long, about an hour. A number of times the interviewer keyed off one of my
answers, and asked additional questions. (Why did you do that? What makes you say x?) I had heard
from current students that the interviews at Duke are more of a formality and that the school mostly
wants to find out whether you are interested in Fuqua and would be a good fit. However, because of
its length and the types of questions asked, this interview seemed very thorough.
Team Questions
5 Characteristics of a good team. What role would you play on this team? A time when I had a
difficult person on my team and what did I do? A difficult choice I had to make and what did I learn
from it.
Personal.
How would your friends describe you? What do you do in your free time?
Any additional information that I would like to communicate to the admission committee
Do I have any Question’s?
Met at a cafe. It was very noisy and we both had some difficulty hearing each other at times.
The interview was supposed to be for 1/2 hour but it lasted almost one hour. I was able to establish
rapport very quickly because the adcoms member had previously resided very close to where I live
(blocks away).
As you can see, they are very team-oriented a Fuqua. My interviewer said it was a big part of the
culture, but not to think it was everything at Duke. She said people's impressions of the school
before they attend probably overstate the teamwork aspect, and there are still plenty of things you
have to do on your own.
Round 1 for Fall 2006. I interviewed with’03 Alum in Mumbai on 12/Nov/05. (Published
November 2005)
It was a very conversational and friendly kind of interview and lasted for about 1 hour. He made it
clear that it was just another data point for admissions and not a make-or-break item. The questions
included the following: -
1. Why MBA/Duke/Now?
2. Short/Long term career goals and how can Duke help you?
3. How would your friends describe you?
4. Your strengths and weaknesses.
5. How do you deal with difficult colleagues/situations?
6. What courses do you intend to take at Duke and names of any faculty?
7. Team experiences.
8. Any questions for the interviewer.
It was a very stress free and pleasant experience. Towards the end he gave me his business card to
get in touch if I had any questions for him later.
Later I learned that interviewer had same profile as mine before MBA and he was very much a
career changer. My questions were around those career changing and study-co-curricular activity at
Duke. Interviewer gave very convincing answers for those. Since I hadn’t visited Durham before, he
also gave me fair bit of idea on the city. Overall quite satisfactory
Harvard
I was very well prepared for the questions on this site and in the interview guide. I also did three
mock interviews with a Clear Admit consultant. While this preparation was limited in its helpfulness
to the actual questions I received, it did give me the utmost of confidence, which is the key!
The female adcoms member, who was joined by another woman who was "in training to conduct
interviews," focused her questions on a leadership experience and my career vision that I presented
in the application.
A LOT about my career interest. She even quoted a sentence from my career interest essay and tried
to put me on the defensive (don't ever become defensive!):
On campus interview / Adcoms / Feb 2008 / R2 / Admitted! (Published April 30th, 2008)
The best advice I can give is to read through this site and prepare mock answers for most of the
questions that appear. During the actual interview, the most important thing is to sound
conversational. Overall, the questions I was asked tended to be more general than specific to my
application. Some of the one’s I remember are below:
Hub Interview /Adcoms /Dec 2007 /R1 (Published January 18, 2008) B-School Bound
On campus interview / Nov 2007 / R1 (Published December 9, 2007) Questions that I remember:
• Why I decided to switch jobs; what was different between the two companies.
1. Tell me what's the link between your last job and your current one? How are they
similar/different?
2. Expand on your current role. (I told her I just got promoted so she asked what that meant in
terms of responsibilities)
3. Well...you're going to have a graduate degree this year. So, why another one? Why an MBA?
4. You tell me you're a planner with 5 yr, 10 yr plans for yourself...so was the MBA planned, or
a random thought?
5. Why "industry X" in particular? Why is that your career vision? Explain the reasons to me.
6. Seeing that you're a marketer do you have the interest and the capability to handle the non-
marketing, very quantitative coursework of an HBS MBA?
7. Give me a recent example of a quantitative project.
8. What industry do you NOT see yourself in?
9. How has your leadership style evolved?
10. Why do people accept your leadership?
11. How do you want your HBS classmates to remember you as?
12. We don't have any time for questions. Any last thing you want to tell us? Something you
couldn't cover in your application?
Adcoms / On-campus / R1 / November 2007 (Published November 6, 2007)
Interviewer was member of admissions board. She informed me that she had several questions and
would be taking notes.
1. Did you take a taxi here? (After I answered yes, and visited a class...)
2. How did you find the class experience?
3. How did you choose Leerink?
4. Tell me about your company and a typical day at work (physical office, team size, day-to-day
tasks, etc.)
5. What does your company look for in a candidate?
6. Tell me about a xxxx business you admire? (xxx was specific to my career goals)
7. How do you handle conflict?
8. What else would you like us to know about you?
Adcoms / On-campus / R2 / Admitted (Published April 28, 2007) I really found all the posts in this
site really helpful so I will share my experience.
I showed up 20 minutes before the interview hour as requested. I was interviewed by a very kind a
polite lady form the Admissions Office. As we walked up the stairs to her office we broke the ice
and I told her about my LONG trip to Boston (I live in South America). We sat down and she
explained to me the logistics of the interview (the time allotted, the fact that she was going to take
notes, etc) and then the official interview began:
The interview started with a short walk through my experience at work. She asked me describe her,
at a high level, each experience.
Then she asked me to tell her what I learned at my job. After I talked about the sills I developed she
asked me to explain more on the specific things I learned about the business.
The next question was on a recent leadership experience.
She then made up a case and asked me to address it and propose different solutions to it.
The next question was on who I am besides professional and academic background. She also asked
me what book I was reading or what movie I had seen recently.
Finally she asked me if there was something I was expecting to talk about but was not asked.
I tried to remember as much as I could so it is useful for anybody reading this site.
Adcoms @ the Palo Alto HBS site, R1, admitted! (Published March 23, 2007)
Here's a recount of the questions that were asked (although many were experience-specific), and my
thoughts as it was happening.
1. We had some friendly conversation as we sat down in her office. (We are sitting, we have talked,
and I didn't shake her hand OR ask her name!!) "Sorry, I don't think I caught your name...?" (Ahh,
nice recovery!) Then she told me she thought my app was interesting and unique - yay!
2. She asked a specific question about one of my accomplishments. I started to answer, and then
promptly forgot exactly what she asked. I actually still can't remember, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't
what I answered...oops! Oh well - still 25 min left to recover!
3. It's obvious you've done a lot of research. What concerns do you have about Harvard?
(Hmmmmmmm. Didn’t prepare this one, but thought of 2 quickly, both of which she responded
thoroughly)
4. Why HBS? (Um, do I lose points if I say the same thing I wrote in my essay? Luckily I had the
class visit to talk about!!)
5. What do you want to do in your internship, right after business school? How did you get there?
(Think this came out ok! Managed to throw in a few "here are my strengths so of course I want to
do XYZ")
6. What are the challenges in your current role? How do you handle them? (Hmmm - what is the
nicest way to say the group I support is insane, and they are sometimes kind of meant to me b/c I'm
in finance without sounding like I'm about 5 years old?)
7. Then, out of left field, "What book are you reading right now?" (Hahaha - as if any of us
applicants have time to read? is this a trick question? Anyway, I had actually prepared this one -
there is a large potential it sounded rehearsed, but better than trying to remember back in the
summer when I had this activity formerly known as "free time.")
8. Do you have any questions? (Well sure, I did, but we have already addressed them in the
"concerns" portion of this interview. Why don't you want to talk about me any more?)
We ended after 30 minutes pretty much on the dot. The interviewer took notes almost the whole
time, but she was very warm & friendly, and made me feel comfortable right away.
So, overall I felt good walking out, although that status does get worse by the hour (damn you,
overanalyzing mind!) I was surprised she didn't ask more about my international experience or my
community service. I was thrilled she didn't ask the dreaded question: "Why should we choose you?"
Most importantly, the voice in my head kept thinking "wow - these answers are actually coming out
sounding pretty ok. GO YOU!" So happy to be done!!! Let the waiting games begin :)
There was no time to ask him any questions about Harvard. Overall the interview was about 30
minutes and I left with a decent feeling, but who knows? After that I had lunch with students, which
was helpful and attended a class with a friend of a friend. The class was Strategy and was interesting,
but I did feel like the time allotted was not enough to adequately cover all the aspects of the case.
Then again, who am I to say? Overall, of course the facilities are impressive and it's interesting that
there is a full campus instead of just a single building like at some other places
Kellogg
Kellogg gave me one month to schedule the interview with an alumni working in a big consulting
firm. He was very easy going and approachable - in line with the Kellogg spirit of teamwork. We
scheduled the interview at his office.
Preparation Material: My application, Kellogg's website, Accepted and Clear Admit Interview
databases, Clear Admit School Guide - Kellogg and How to interview like a top MBA
Interview Experience: I reached his office fifteen minutes early. We had some general talks. He told
me that he’d keep the interview conversational.
• Walk me through your resume elaborating the path that has led you to plan for an MBA?
He kept asking me follow up questions in between -- How did you manage that? What difficulties
did you face? Etc. The conversation went long, more than 20 minutes.
• What do you want to do after MBA and in the long term? (3 minutes)
• Tell any obstacle that your team faced? How did you overcome? (3 minutes)
• What will your manager comment about your managerial potential during appraisal? Why? (5
minutes)
• Why Kellogg? (5min)
• How will you enhance the diversity of the Kellogg class? (5 min)
• What element of your application do you fear most about? ( 2 min)
• Any questions for me? (10min)
The interview lasted an hour. The last 20 minutes was a conversation on the Kellogg experience. My
advice is to be prepared for the obvious questions. I think Kellogg interviewers do not get to see
your essays, so they tend to ask basic questions to learn more about you. Just be prepared and you
will be fine. Good luck.
Then we probably talked about his experience in Kellogg for 20 minutes or so. I think he's very nice
& laid back. No surprises in the interview. He's willing to introduce me to several alums or students
who are in the same industry with me.
Overall, it was good. Just hoped that the adcoms will see that my overall application is good enough
to get an acceptance. Really like the school so far!
Then it was time to switch. Adcoms fiancé was a 1Y, so we discussed the JV program; also discussed
the current capital campaign for a new building - unfortunately, won't happen soon enough for me.
When it came time to ask her questions at the end we ended up chatting for about 10 minutes about
Kellogg. Discussed the Kellogg culture and what makes Kellogg unique.
Overall, a pretty standard interview. Just be prepared to talk about everything on your resume
because they will ask specific question about individual items on your resume. Kellogg is a friendly
place and the adcoms reflected that.
I got the admit day after the decision deadline.
• Why did you choose engineering as your undergraduate degree? (I was caught by surprise by
this question)
• Why MBA? Why Kellogg?
• What would your teammates say is your biggest weakness and strength?
• Which clubs do you see yourself joining in Kellogg? (Named two clubs).
• What unique qualities do you bring to Kellogg? (Strongest part of the interview)
• In your job interview post MBA how will you substantiate a career switch?
I began to wonder if the interviewer asked me this question because she felt my goals weren't strong enough. I felt this
was the weakest part of my interview. I was trapped because I said that my MBA would prepare me for such a switch
in the future. She probably wanted to know what prompted me to think along the lines of such a career, who I spoke
with in the recent past, or what kind of experiences I had at work that pushed me in such a direction. My answer was
more about how I would bridge gaps to qualify for such a position and how an MBA would get me there. Can't really
say I misfired, but just an after thought.
My interviewer finished and asked if I had any questions. I asked her "Why she chose Kellogg"? (In
a sincere attempt to understand more about the school and student body). But she was not a current
student and apologized for not having introduced herself completely. She wrapped up the interview.
It lasted for half hour.
• Tell me about your undergrad experience. Include why you chose your major and the
extracurricular activities you were involved in.
• Tell me about your work experience and major activities. Include why you moved from
Company A to Company B.
• What are you short and long term career goals? What is your ideal position post-MBA?
• Why Kellogg?
• Tell me about a time in your work or extracurricular activities that you led a team.
• In your latest performance review, what strengths were highlighted and what weaknesses was
it recommended that you work on?
• How would your team members at work describe what you are like to work with?
• What unique aspects would you bring to Kellogg? What kind of team member do you think
you will be to your fellow students?
• Tell me about an ethical dilemma you have faced.
At the end he said we only had 10 minutes left so I could ask my questions. I asked some basic
questions and he took the chance to provide more details of his experiences at Kellogg.
He asked if I knew what the next step was and I told him I thought they would review my
application once he submitted his report, which he said he would do very soon. He offered to help
me any way he could in the future.
That was about it.
My insight/advise - I prepared extensively from the questions listed below but found it mostly a
confidence builder. I felt comfortable with my story and prepared for any likely question but I
mostly just ended up having a discussion with my interviewer about Kellogg and trying to fit in my
strong points as much as I could. Obviously, every alumni interviewer will be different but most
Kellogg alumni I have met have been very down to earth and that seems to translate into the
interview experiences (as long as you are prepared and can show interest in and knowledge about
Kellogg). This just confirms the Kellogg reputation as a place with friendly, collegial people.
Hope this helps since all the other accounts helped me!
October 30, 2007 / Off-Campus Alumni Interview / R1 (Published October 31, 2007)
The interviewer opened by asking me to spend a few minutes taking him step by step from the time
I started college until today. When we reached the point at which I was to discuss my work
experience, he began asking specific questions, asking about my biggest challenge at work, how my
superiors perceive my leadership skills and the degree to which my responsibilities involve
teamwork. With the exception of the aforementioned, the interviewer did not really ask many
pointed questions (in contrast to some of the interviewers described below), as the structure was far
more along the lines of a conversation than an interview. Through this format, I was able to discuss
some points I thought he would ask about (career goals, interest in Kellogg, etc.) in a casual and
natural fashion.
The interview seemed to run its course after about 20 minutes (as, by that point, he felt he got a
good enough feel for my qualities and enough to evaluate me on), and the last 10 minutes were
largely spent discussing some of the interviewer's Kellogg-related experiences, as well as his advice
for me. I do not know how representative my interview was, but I hope my commentary is at least
somewhat insightful.
I know this seems like a laundry list of questions, but the interview just seemed to flow very well.
For any of you that haven't interviewed yet, I'd definitely recommend doing your interview at
Kellogg. It seems like the alumni interviews can be a lot harder than the on-campus interviews.
Jan 15, 2007 / Alum interview / R2 (Published March 30, 2007) My interviewer was a recent
Kellogg graduate who worked in PE pre- and post-MBA. He was very open and friendly. He asked
me to switch to English (we started off in Dutch, our native language), and asked me a variant of
"Walk me through your resume".
I gave him my 2-minute story on why I had chosen my undergraduate school, what was unique
about the program, what I had learned, and how I made the move into my professional life. I think
the common essay advice is just as valid here: don't limit yourself to the 'what', but also mention the
'why'.
As I talked about my first promotion at work, he interrupted me and asked me to elaborate on a
specific detail. This was clearly an attempt to see how I would respond to a question that I could not
have prepared for. For these kind of situational questions, you should train yourself to use
frameworks. For leadership questions you can make sure to include 1) communicating a vision, 2)
defining roles/responsibilities, 3) measuring/monitoring progress, 4) success. The question I got was
how I had persuaded my management to do something. I told him what required improving, why it
required improving (with quantifiable reasons), what my solution was, why that solution would work
(quantifiable), how I explained this to my management, and how this left no doubt with them to
agree with me. He seemed happy with my response.
He then told me we could easily switch back to Dutch, as my English was clearly up to snuff. I saw
an opening to engage in dialogue and told him that, even though I had 99th percentile GMAT
verbal and TOEFL scores, and had generally no trouble expressing myself, in hard-pressed business
discussions or negotiations I sometimes saw this as a weakness, and whether he recognized it. We
chatted a bit about it, and even though I was a bit nervous for having blurted out a weakness
without him asking for one, I felt the ensuing dialogue was very valuable for 'bonding' with him, and
was comforted by his comment that my English was good enough not to think of it as a 'weakness'.
He then went on to ask "Why MBA". I had prepared more for a "Why Kellogg" question, so I tried
to spin my answer around what I was looking for in a business education, and why Kellogg was a
great match. Because your long-term and short-term goals should be a major factor in "Why MBA"
I suggested I touch on those a bit first, which he said was OK.
He subsequently never asked me again about "Why Kellogg", even though I had not exhausted my
reasons for going to Kellogg yet. Fortunately, I managed to slip those into later questions and into
our discussions on what he liked so much about Kellogg. Finding the right balance between
sounding sincere and sounding like a car salesman is tough. You should have good reasons for going
to Kellogg or any other school for that matter, but you don't want to be sucking up to the school
either.
His next question was "What do you consider the weaker areas in your application". I had prepared
somewhat for this question, but not much. I told him I do not have spectacular extracurricular, and,
amazingly, he had had the same problem in his application. We exchanged views on the merits of
extracurricular and community service and how Europeans are often surprised to see the weight
attached to this. I told him I saw this as a cultural difference between the US and Europe, and he
agreed. He even offered me a new insight I had never come across -- in the US, inequality is larger
than in Europe, so 'giving back' is more important than it is in Europe. In all my research for good
excuses, I had never seen this mentioned before, and I even think it is not an excuse -- it is very true.
(Although I wouldn't recommend stating to any adcoms that community service in Europe is not
important)
Next was teamwork, which was probably the most surprising part of the interview. He told me he
was not going to ask me about teamwork, because he believed everyone can sell himself as a good
team player, so why would that give him any indication as to my abilities. He said he attached more
value to seeing my interpersonal skills, and since we had been more engaged in dialogue than in a
question-answer interrogation, he said he had a positive impression of how it would be to work
together with me. I could have argued that this is why behavioral interviewing techniques had been
invented, but I figured my teamwork points had already been scored, and I could only make things
worse (even though I had a couple of anecdotes ready.)
In total, we talked for about an hour or maybe more, and it was very easy to make the interview
conversational.
I can give the following advice. You know (roughly) which questions you will be asked. Prepare your
answers in bullet-point format, and rehearse with a bathroom mirror or a friend, and, by all means,
time and record your responses to see if you can answer all questions in 2-5 minutes without
sounding boring, monotonous, or overly scripted. Try to engage your interviewer by acting as one
professional talking to another professional. Make it interesting for them, and don't come off as a
drone who can only fire rehearsed answers at rehearsed questions. Status: Admitted
1. Walk me through your resume, starting with undergrad. She kept asking probing questions -
why what major, why so and so project during my work ex, what was the typical team like,
how many, which functions. A bulk of the time was spent in this conversation.
2. Why MBA?
3. Why Kellogg?
4. What else do I enjoy outside work?
5. How am I involved in community?
6. What will my team members say about my strengths & development needs?
We can 10 minutes over the scheduled time of 30 minutes, and I was not given an opportunity to
ask her any questions. Though standard questions (and I don't think my interviewer had read my
application), it would be advisable to go over essays and narrate the same story (one more time!)
Good luck!
Michigan Ross
Round 2 / Adcoms / Off-campus / Originally shared at Life is so Beautiful (March 23rd, 2008)
After submitting my Ross application, I knew I had submitted my best essays so far, the essays,
which took more than eight weeks of my dedicated efforts! I knew the admissions committee would
like to hear me after reading them.
As expected, the invite came in mid-February. So prepared for Ross I was that I scheduled the
interview just after two days.
Preparation Material: My application, Ross' website, Accepted and Clear Admit Interview databases,
Clear Admit School Guide - Ross, notes of discussions with Ross students and How to interview
like a top MBA.
Interview Experience: Apart from a surprise, the interview was very smooth. I anticipated a second
year to pick up the phone. To my surprise, a very senior member of the admissions committee
answered the phone. He introduced himself, informed me that the interview will continue about 20
minutes during which he'll ask me few questions, and then he'll give me a chance to ask one or two
questions.
The questions were -
• Walk me through your resume starting from the time you completed under graduation. Also
tell me what you want to do post MBA. ( 3 minutes)
• How does an MBA fit’s in there? (2 minutes)
• Why do you want to attend Ross? (6 minutes)
• What are your unique aspects that would add to our class (5 minutes)
That's it! After this, I asked him two questions. He commented, "that's a great question," then
answered me with interest and enthusiasm.
Total Time: ~ 23 minutes.
Five minutes after the interview, I sent an email thanking him on Ross general email id. He replied
twice within next two minutes, first from the general id, and then from his personal id. I knew I had
done well. It was Friday 10:00 pm in India. I quickly ran out to catch the 10:35 pm show at nearby
PVR. Result: Admitted and Matriculating!
I thought the interview went really well. The interviewer was very personable and down-to-earth. I
was caught off-guard by the personality question, stumbled a bit but I eventually was able to
describe my personality truthfully. The interview was supposed to last thirty minutes but the
interviewer said it is hard to get to know someone in that amount of time. The interview lasted
almost an hour, which was fine with me. Other than that, the interview was straightforward. I was
impressed with the interviewer and the experience in general.
Telephone Interview, R1 Class of 2010, w/ 2nd yr student. (Published January 31, 2008)
I was originally scheduled for an off-campus alumni interview, but due to high demand, was
switched to a phone interview without my consent. Student was friendly and engaging, he set good
expectations for the call.
I had time to ask about the MAP's and about the student culture. We went about 35 minutes.
• Could you give me a recent example of a contribution you made to your work or team?
• When you presented your idea did you get any pushback from the management?
• How did you get the resources/data you needed for the project you proposed?
• Why do you want to do an MBA now?
• What are the things at ROSS that interest you?
• What’s your community involvement outside of work?
• Technical questions about my sporting activity
• Which are the clubs that interest you at ROSS?
• Any thoughts about doing courses outside the MBA framework at ROSS?
• How do you handle a situation where a team-member of yours is not performing upto the
expected level?
• Did you face such an incident recently?
• Do you have any questions for me?
I asked only one question knowing that the person interviewing me was from the adcoms and
running short of time. Also I already had a pretty good idea of ROSS given my Alumni contacts.
I asked a lot of questions about the alumnus's experience and I tried to be an active listener (using
the alumnus's comments to ask more questions).
• Why MBA?
• What hope to achieve during MBA, what specifically at Ross?
• What other schools applying? How does Ross compare to those schools (I hate this
question).
The interviewer was quite pleasant and friendly and took copious notes. There was no branching out
into other subjects, so if you're looking to get some other information in, you may want to find a
way to shoehorn it into one of the questions above. In my case, I used the "clubs and activities"
question to touch upon one of my hobbies.
In short, if you have the basics down, you shouldn't have too much trouble with the Michigan
adcoms interview.
It was pretty much it. It went fine and the interview was very professional
All the best to prospective students
• Why MBA?
• Why Now?
• Why Ross?
• Interests outside work?
• Describe a situation where you translated theory into action.
• Describe a situation where you met with resistance from your team member, and what did
you do about it?
• What will you bring to the Ross community, and what will you take back from the
community (besides the good education)?
• Some questions to clarify career goals?
The interview was pretty standard, and can be aced through thorough preparation.
Interviewed with an Alumni in late Oct 2005 for round 1. (Published October 2005)
It was a 30-40 minutes interview and I met my interviewer in a local Starbucks. The alumnae
graduated from Ross in 2003. She was very helpful, down to earth and the interview was very casual,
though she took lots of notes. The interview questions were:
Overall, the interview was pretty standard. She gave me 10 minutes to ask questions and any
concerns I had.
MIT Sloan
Round 2 / Adcoms Consultant / On-Campus / March 2008 (Published April 9th, 2008)
My interviewer was very warm and friendly and made a concerted effort to make sure I was relaxed
and comfortable. She had clearly read my application thoroughly and after some small talk, she told
me she had prepared 3 questions that I should answer with new stories in the STAR format.
She then allowed me to ask several questions about the program. We ran a little over 45 minutes.
I prepared for my interview by making 1 note card for each of 5 good stories that were deep enough
to answer a wide variety of questions and diverse enough to show characteristics of me that weren't
emphasized in my application. My note cards were in the STAR format that MIT recommends - 1
bullet for each point. Finally, I looked at this wiki to see the range of questions and thought through
whether or not my stories addressed most of them. I also did a mock interview.
Her line of questioning as we explored each story was very logical and she did not throw any major
curve balls. I felt that I was stumbling through #3 at times, but she helped me stay on track. I was
admitted in R2.
• What exactly do you do? What have you been doing in your position recently?
• Tell me about a time when you were overwhelmed and asked others for help
• Tell me about a time when you mentored someone
• Tell me about a time when you butted heads with a co-worker/client/employee
• Tell me about a time when you were part of a team that had poor dynamics/didn't get along
well (say what you did, of course)
• Tell me about a time when you had to deal with someone who wasn't pulling his/her weight
• Why an MBA, why Sloan (although only briefly and at the end)?
I was then asked if I had any questions. You'll really only have time for one, so make it a good
question that shows you've done your homework and will help you evaluate the school. I asked
about how hard it was to get into classes, as this has come back as the most universal complaint I've
heard from current top b-school students (Wharton especially).
My advice (along with others who have posted here) is to review the list of Sloan questions we've all
posted and think of two or three stories that could work. If you do that, you'll have a good 30-40
stories that could be applicable for any question the interviewer might ask.
Adcoms Consultant, On-Campus, Round 1, December 2007 (Published January 15, 2008)
I interviewed on-campus with a consultant that worked with the admissions committee. She was not
a full-time member of adcoms, but apparently worked with them during admissions season. At first
glance, she appeared like she wasn't going to be very friendly, but I pushed the small talk and we
developed some good rapport early on. Like you probably know if you're reading this MIT interview
is non-blind, they have read all of your material. At the beginning of the interview, she reiterated
everything MIT provides in the interview guide about the behavioral interview. She wanted specific
anecdotes and she didn't want to hear the same stories I had used in my application.
• Her first question was about a story I used in one of my essays. She basically asked me about
the challenges in managing this project and specific difficulties.
• I have an office overseas, which I manage remotely; she spent a lot of the interview asking
specific questions about the challenges in managing the offshore staff. She wanted specific
examples of issues I've faced and how I handled them. She wanted specific examples.
• Tell me about a time when you had to decide multiple options. Drilled into my answer.
• She didn't ask my Why Sloan? - Why an MBA? - Goals? Or any of the other standard
interview questions.
• Questions for her? This really was my only opportunity to show that I've done my research
on Sloan. I mentioned specific courses, professors, treks, and clubs in the context of my
questions.
• At the bottom of my resume, I had some "other interests" listed. She even asked me about a
couple of those.
• Do you have your official transcripts? I didn't have the official transcripts, so I handed her
the photocopies I made.
She would drill down into every question. One question she asked multiple times because my
anecdote didn't directly address her question. Overall, be prepared to discuss stories from your app
materials and have several new stories ready. They want details. I recommend using names and
specifics. Story should be detailed as if you were telling a colleague. This was very different from
your standard interview. Focus your efforts on preparing some good stories. Don't worry too much
about the standard interview questions like why Sloan. Also, don't save your good stories for the
end. Use your best anecdotes early because you will only have the opportunity to go through a few
because of the time the interviewer spends drilling down. I think I did well, but I am certainly glad
that this was one of my last interviews. If you interview on-campus, I recommend participating in
"lunch with a student". Eased the tension and gave me some good information about the program.
• Do you have your transcripts? (He opened the envelopes and looked them over)
• Tell me about a time when you had to sell an idea to an individual or a group.
• Tell me about a time when you had to decide between many different routes or options.
• What's a personal goal you've set for yourself within the last 2 years?
• How does Sloan rank compared to the other schools you are applying to?
• Why Sloan?
He did not grill me too much. Just asked the questions and sometimes asked me to elaborate on
certain points of my response.
• What great experience have you had on your job within the last one-year ?
• What expectation have you had recently that was not met?
• Why MBA?
• Why Sloan?
I haven't heard yet either way, but after being in the interview here's my advice:
My advice:
1. Be prepared to have at least two examples for each possible question! Alternatively, have
examples that are very versatile (one that can answer both leadership questions and impact
questions for example).
2. Be especially aware if you have a tendency to ramble on. Because the interviewer was taking
copious notes, there were times of extended silence, which I initially filled by reiterating my
points. I had to make a conscious effort to stop.
3. If you're interviewing in the NYC hub location, allow extra time to figure out the elevator
system (seriously!). There are several banks of elevators and some only go to certain floors.
It took me literally 10 minutes of walking around, perplexed, to get to the office.
Interview w/ Adcoms in Bay Area; Round 2 - Interviewed: March 2, 2006 (Published: March 4,
2006)
The MIT adcoms I interviewed with was extremely friendly and loved to talk. :-) The interview
lasted about 45 minutes and was very conversational.
Started off with her reading my transcripts and mentioning, "Oh, you went to [this] high school?"
Didn't realize that was on my transcripts! "Why did you go to [this university] for one summer
session?"
Then came the *behavioral* portion of the interview. During our chat, the bells rang loud and clear
that she knew my application very well. Often when I said something about my background or
experience she would reinforce it with, "Oh yes! I remember you mentioning [blah] on your app!"
Of course I tried to come up with other examples for the questions asked below.
• "Tell me about a project at work that you co-managed... How did you feel? What would you
say the impact was to the client? How did they react?"
• "Tell me about a project at work within the last year that you're proud of... What did you
specifically learn from it?"
• "What's a personal goal you've set for yourself within the last 2 years?"
• "Why Sloan?"
• "I read about [this] in your app and loved the story behind it. Can you tell me more about it?
How did the members feel about that? Why did you fail at that point? How do you feel
about the outcome?"
• "Why do you want to go to the east coast? Are you sure you wouldn't mind moving east?" (I
live in California.)
Remember: Be yourself. They know your app, so they want to reaffirm: 1) who you've displayed
yourself to be on your app, 2) your reasons for "why Sloan," and 3) your personality and your fit for
Sloan. The easiest way is to treat the adcoms like your peer. Imagine you're working on a team
project and the Sloan adcoms is a team member. How would you interact with your team member?
Show this.
Stanford
Class of 2010 / Round 2 / Alumni Interview - Admitted! (Published April 15th, 2008)
The interviewer was very friendly and relaxed and made sure to mention to me at the beginning that
the interview was more about getting to know each other and learn about the alumni's experience
Stanford, than it was to judge the merits of this applicant. I had emailed him a copy of my resume,
and when I arrived at his office he printed it out.
He began with a brief introduction of his background, and then said he wanted to ask a few
questions and then have me ask him a few questions.
The last 15 minutes of the interview involved discussion of his experiences at the Stanford GSB and
how they shaped his career choices. In closing the interview, I was surprised that he was very direct
and complimentary about my background and said he thought my candidacy was unique and would
be a good fit for the GSB.
To my surprise again, he asked me almost all the possible questions but he was very friendly and
looked genuinely interested in my answers.
When asked about his Stanford exp. he told that the thing he liked most about Stan was networking,
partying and touring. :)
Overall it was an enjoyable experience and by the time I was out of his office, I had spent almost 2
hrs there.
All told, interview went about 75 minutes, which I think was more a function of the interviewer than
any amazing answers I was giving.
• Why an MBA, and why Stanford? (This lead into talking about my long term goal)
• Tell me about a time —maybe the most recent example— when you lead a team
• Tell me about a time when you failed within a team
• Give me an example of constructive criticism you've received, and tell me how you reacted
• Tell me about a good or bad leader you've worked with
• Give me an example of a time when you had to choose between two equally attractive
options
• Have you ever stood to defend a position that wasn't popular or easily accepted?
• What are your extra-curricular activities?
• What are you reading at the moment, if anything?
• You've done a lot of traveling - tell me about that
He mentioned at that point that the formal part of the interview was over, and that I could ask him
whatever I wanted about Stanford. I think it's important to realize that you're still 'on the record' at
this stage. I'd read up on what he had done since high school and was intrigued to hear the details,
so I simply asked him to take me through it, pre-, at and post-Stanford. As an accomplished
entrepreneur, he was an excellent advertisement for the program. To re-iterate what is inferred in all
these posts, the interview was ostensibly an assessment of my interpersonal skills and general
demeanor rather than a mental test or grilling over my accomplishments. It was the most pleasant
and inspiring interview I've had.
After the interview, I asked my interviewer a few questions about his experiences. After the
interview, he sent me an e-mail telling me that he had submitted his report to Stanford.
After the interview finished, my interviewer wished me good luck and told me that I will hear from
the admissions committee on 18th January
• 10 minutes of icebreakers/small-talk.
• When did you realize you needed an MBA?
• Time when you saw poor leadership at work?
• Time when you did something that impacted people (in work or outside of it).
• Why Stanford?
• Favorite course at school, and why?
Overall, it was a very pleasant conversation. My interviewer was several years out of school, yet very
active on the alumni circuit. He did make it clear that the interview was only one part of the process,
and that Career/Grades/GMAT/recommendations/Essays are equally important. He also raved
about how exceptional people are at Stanford, and commented on how important fit is while
deciding where to go. He gave me time to ask questions, and went into great detail to describe his
experiences at Stanford.
My advice to people is to relax, keep some frameworks in mind about the things you want to talk
about, and be yourself. I don’t think there's much you can do wrong with that.
Then she asked if I had any questions about Stanford and I asked her a couple of questions
regarding her personal experience and the most valuable things she learned at Stanford. I also asked
about her decision making process when she had to chose among schools. She then told me that the
45 minutes were up and she told that she would love to continue the conversation but wanted to
stick to the format.
1. You have already quite a list of academic achievements. Why do you need MBA then? When
did you realize you needed one?
2. And why Stanford?
3. Explain to me how you lead in your work or in some other context? I want to understand
how exactly you do.
4. What has been your greatest accomplishment?
5. Criticism you received: example and how did you react? What did you think of your
supervisor then?
6. Tell me about a non-business book you read?
7. Tell me how you influence your peers [given that you're working mainly with peers]? I want
a precise example of how you achieve this influence/leadership. There, it was clear he
wanted an episode / very precise set of actions.
8. Tell me about an occasion when you were under bad leadership. What did you learn?
Then it was his turn to talk. I asked him about his background and progression and how Stanford
played a role in it. Then we discussed about how Stanford most helped him become more
entrepreneurial and he gave some useful tips as to how best use the faculty. Then his wife called and
he apologized he had to leave!
R2: Alumni Interview – Bay Area - Interviewed: Feb 25, 2006 (Published Mar 1, 2006)
I met with the alum at a coffee shop. She was very personable and began by giving me her
background pre- and post- GSB. We talked for about an hour, probably 40 minutes on interview
questions and the last 20 or so on me asking her questions and talking about her experience. Some
of the questions I received:
The alum was very likeable and down-to-earth. The interview seemed to go well, but who knows
how it'll end up- fingers crossed. Good luck to everyone – the best advice really is to relax and be
yourself.
Alum Interview in the Bay Area, Round 2 - Interviewed: February 21, 2006 (Feb. 24, 2006)
Met with the alumni at her company in a meeting room. The interview lasted 45 minutes. This was
definitely a very conversational interview, which allowed me to speak to my experiences in my
professional, academic, extracurricular, and especially my personal life. I can only describe this as
one of the most enlightening and down-to-earth interviews I've had thus far. We went through her
list of "Stanford recommended" questions:
1. What was the point/situation that made you realize you wanted an MBA?
2. Why Stanford?
3. Tell me about a challenging time for you.
4. Tell me a time where you failed as a leader. What was the reaction of those under you?
5. What do you believe to be your greatest achievement?
6. Tell me about a great leader you had and what you learned from this person.
7. What was the best college course you took?
8. Why aren't you applying to schools X and Y?
9. What is the best constructive criticism you've received?
10. What is a non-business book you've read and what did you learn from it?
Then, I was given 5 minutes to ask her questions. During the interview we conversed on women in
business, swapped book recommendations and community service orgs to look into, and both spoke
about our passion for "why Stanford." We discussed Stanford's culture, class dynamics, location,
which classes to take, professors and their research, and hands-down, how the GSB offers the best
leadership development and growth through its general management program. We also discussed
opportunities in the social sector - though I had clearly emphasized my interest in marketing. Since I
had been to campus several times for the 1) Info Session, 2) GSB Tour, 3) Lunch w/ Student, and
4) In-Class Visit, I was also able to speak about the GSB on a personal level to reinforce the "why
Stanford" for me.
He also indicated that he had visited my company's website and asked me to comment on the
organization's current leadership transition (from a management perspective). In between asking
these questions we went off on tangents about travel, visiting the Stanford campus, and various
books we'd read. He then asked me if I had any questions for him. Leaving the interview, I was
worried that he had not asked me why I wanted an MBA and what my career goals were. The
following morning I received a phone call from him and he apologized for not having asked those
questions during the interview and then posed them to me. I was glad that he followed up rather
than submitting his review to Stanford without that key info!
Stanford R2 Interview with alum, coffee shop in East Asia. (Published February 3 2006)
After having several interviews with alum, students and adcoms, I found this one unique. Although I
had previously had an alum interview, I did not find it to be as comfortable/casual as this one.
Having said that, the interviewer still managed to maintain a respectable level of formality,
seriousness, etc. I.e. the tone was relaxed but the context what quite serious and he nonverbally
made it clear that "we are here to do business." I was thus very impressed with the ability of the
interviewer to make me feel so comfortable while at the same time sticking to the agenda. The
interview was scheduled for 45 minutes and he explicitly stated before the interview that we would
keep to that schedule (he actually set his stopwatch!).
The interviewer first asked me to explain how I ended up in my current job. I took this as a cue to
give him a quick rundown of my background (education, etc.) and gave a brief walkthrough of my
resume up to the point of joining my current employer.
He then asked me directly why I want an MBA and why now and WHY STANFORD. I think I told
him more than he needed to hear about Stanford, so after a while he broke off into new topics:
leadership and management.
My interviewer said he wanted to know some things about my leadership, teamwork, and
management experience and said that he would ask me some questions. Here they are:
• What has been one of your greatest management challenges at work (that has resulted in a
less than favorable outcome) and how did you handle it, learn from it, etc.
• Tell me about your leadership experiences/accomplishments/challenges/outside of work
and what you learned from them.
My responses to these questions evolved into a discussion about management and the importance of
finding a balance between "hard" and "soft" management skills. He then mentioned that Stanford
does a good job in teaching this balance.
Here are some of the questions that came next:
At this point we were at about the 40-minute mark (5 minutes to go) and he asked me if I had
questions for him. I said that I really didn't have specific questions about the Stanford program but
that I am interested to learn about his personal experience, how Stanford helped boost him to his
current position in Asia, and his management experiences in Asia. For the next ten minutes, he
happily shared his experiences and I was happy to listen. We shook hands and wished each other the
best.
Summary: fabulous experience. I was most impressed with the personality of the interviewer -
extremely humble and down-to-earth while at the same time a very powerful and successful
businessperson. The interview was about 50 minutes.
Like I said, there really weren't any tricky questions. I was a little surprised by the "how do you find
the time to do all of the things you do...?" question, but I took it as a compliment that he was
impressed with my accomplishments.
Regarding overall feedback, my interviewer gave me lots of advice around what I "shouldn't miss
while at Stanford" and things that he regrets not doing so that I wouldn't make the same mistakes
(as if I were already accepted)...I also took this as a good sign, but I'm assuming almost everyone's
interview goes well so I won't read too much into it lest I'm one of the 60%+ that's rejected after
interview.
The one thing that was solidified was how great the alumni are. I really feel like Stanford values
character before accomplishments, while I think HBS may be a bit the other way around (though
I'm sure character is also high on their list). My interviewer was certainly accomplished (Mckinsey,
etc.) but he reminded me to pursue my dreams no matter where I go in life. Certainly much more
inspirational than any other business school interview I've had thus far and far less
accomplishments-focused.
So just be yourself and let your personality shine through...I'm fairly sure you have one if you've
made it to the interview. I felt I was being treated like I was a friend-of-a-friend at first and less as an
interviewee. Overall, it seemed like much more of a fit interview than evaluative. Hope this helps.
Best of luck to all future interviewees and to those of you anxiously awaiting an invite!
I had an admissions interview with Craig Heckert in February 2008. It was a standard interview with
the normal MBA question:
He did ask me one question that threw me a bit "why do we need another CPA?"
Other questions:
After Craig asked all the prepared questions; he asked if I had any questions. We talked for several
minutes about some topics I had prepared through my research. Overall, Craig was nice and friendly
and made the interview feel relaxed.
The only question that threw me off, and I can’t remember exactly how it was worded concerned
Martha Stewart and Enron.
The interview lasted about 40 minutes. Around 12:15 we were taken to the cafeteria with 4 current
students and just talked. The students were very open and candid. The cafeteria was pretty loud, as it
appeared everyone was there. Lunch was a box lunch provided by Panera Bread. Two current
students gave us a tour of the building after lunch. They also answered any other questions we had.
By that time though, there weren’t that many questions though. I was back on the road by 2:00.
Virginia Darden
Round 1 / On-campus / Adcoms / Admitted & Matriculating! (Published April 15th, 2008)
Darden's interview is meant for you to succeed. With an invite only format, the adcoms stresses that
they like what they have seen and the interview is nothing, but a conversation. They have one
question, tell me about yourself. You'll likely be able to talk straight for 10-15 minutes before they
interject with questions. They may push, but in my opinion, they're trying to see if you'll crack. The
course is case study after all. If you don't feel yourself getting your point across, take a deep breath
and try and approach it from a different angle. Also, relate what you say to your personal
experiences. Quote from my interviewer: "I could have read that in the Wall Street Journal".
Obviously, I needed to change my tactics. Finally, know why MBA, why now and why DARDEN!
Darden stresses 3 points almost everywhere you look and if you are truly interested, the latter part of
this question should be easy.
Follow up questions are largely dictated based on what you say, so it's hard to tell you what they will
be. Just be prepared for someone to delve deep into any and all statements you make.
Round 2 / On-campus / Second-year Student (Published March 10th, 2008)
On Monday I took a tour of the Darden Grounds with a second-year and was surprised when one
of the people in my tour group, having just completed his interview, told me "have your monologue
ready because that's what they want to hear." On Tuesday I had my interview with a second-year. To
start out, he impressed upon me that he wanted it to be informal, conversational, laid-back, etc.,
which was also supported by his unexpectedly casual attire. He told me the interview was blind and
that he knew nothing about me. Although I can't remember the exact wording of any particular
question, here's basically how it went.
He first asked "tell me about yourself." Because of the other interviewee's "monologue" comment
the day prior, I asked, "would you like me to give you a brief overview and let you ask more
questions, or would you like me to give a 30 minute monologue?" As you can imagine, I was floored
when he said, "a thirty minute monologue sounds great." I probably spoke for approximately 10-15
minutes regarding my background and gave a number of specifics. I then felt like it was a good time
to let him ask some questions, since I wasn't entirely sure what he wanted to hear.
He then asked "why MBA, why now?" When I mentioned the social/extracurricular part of the
MBA as a reason, he raised his eyebrows and said, "I don't think anyone has ever said that before,
but that's a great point because it's a big part of the MBA." After I finished my response he asked
"why Darden?" which wasn't a surprise. We then talked about my goals. After, he asked, "assume it's
the first day of class and I'm in your group, why should I be excited? Also assume it's a month later
and I'm complaining to my wife about you, what would I be saying? This is not a strengths and
weaknesses question." In all honesty, I'm not entirely sure what he was getting at by saying "this isn't
a strengths and weaknesses question" but I thought I responded well enough.
He then asked, "What concerns do you have about Darden?" which I also thought was a difficult
question. I responded by saying "I think my concern was addressed during the tour I took
yesterday" and went on to explain that I wanted to make sure that Darden's rankings, while
impressive in my opinion, were viewed as such by all recruiters, since some companies focus
exclusively on rankings. The answer I received during the tour was that Darden's professors are so
focused on teaching that they don't have as much published research as other schools, which tends
to drag down their rankings. The way I positioned my response to the interviewer's "Darden
concerns" question was I said something like "some companies focus exclusively on rankings and
only hire, for example, top ten programs...but I've learned that's not a problem for Darden." By
describing my "concern" that way I was trying to avoid sounding like I personally cared about the
rankings, but rather, that I just wanted to confirm that Darden, indeed, would allow me to reach my
career goals. I don't think I raised any red flags because I tried to be very cautious in how I
responded and he seemed pleased that I had already proactively addressed my "concern" the
previous day and could speak insightfully regarding Darden's rankings. In fact, I said that my
"concern" really had become another Darden strength (having teaching-focused professors) and he
wholeheartedly supported my response and went on to confirm and reiterate almost everything I
said. He said Darden is placing more emphasis on publishing research to try to boost their rankings,
so apparently it's something they are well aware of and are working to correct. For that reason I
don't think I came across as unfair, or petty since the two second-year's almost identical responses
seemed to indicate it's a subject that is discussed openly at Darden. Maybe I shot myself in the foot,
but he appeared impressed that I could give the same favorable response that is likely widely used at
Darden.
After that, he closed by asking me if I had some questions for him. The fact that he is going into
consulting with Bain allowed me to slip in a consulting question, which I followed up with a quick
one about life in Charlottesville. In retrospect there are some things I wish I had said differently, but
I thought it went well. I have no way of knowing how my interview compared to other interviews so
I guess we'll have to wait and see what they say at the end of the month. Based on the questions he
asked after I spoke about my background for 10-15 minutes, I assume he was looking for basically a
recitation of my first essay. I think that would have been the ideal way to give the 30-minute
monologue he asked for initially. Essentially, background, why MBA, why now, why Darden, short-
term goals, long-term goals.
Alum. Round 1. (Published January 25, 2008) Here goes my Darden Interview process experience.
13th December: I got a mail about status change of my Darden Application. It was an Alum
Interview call.
22nd December: I was contacted by Office manager at Darden Admission Office about the busy
state of Alum and possibility of Telephonic interview. Disappointment it was as I wanted to have a
face-to-face interview. When I asked a current student, he also told me that I should try my best for
Alum interview.
9th January: Another mail from office manager stating alum should be contacting me any day and if
he doesn't contact by Friday, we'll have the telephonic interview scheduled.
12th January: Alumnus called me. He told me how busy he was and didn't have any plans to come
down to Bangalore. I said I was open to travel to Mumbai. He said we could have it on Saturday the
19th and he'll confirm by Monday/Tuesday.
Tuesday: I called him up and he said yes lets have it on Saturday but he'll confirm me time by
Thursday. Thursday: I called and we fixed the interview for Saturday at his place in Mumbai.
I have posted these details as I found lots of people cribbing on the Internet questioning Darden's
responsiveness. I would say I was kept pretty much informed about all that was going to happen.
Alums are usually very busy and we must understand it.
Anyways, I had this interview on Saturday 19th Jan at Alum's apartment in Mumbai. I booked my
tickets on Thursday for Friday evening flight and returned to Bangalore on Monday morning (My
brother stays in Navi Mumbai).
I reached at 2:50pm (3:00pm was the time). I roamed around the corridor for 5 minutes looking at
the sea from the 12th floor just to calm myself down and pressed the doorbell at 2:55pm
Then he talked about himself, his native place, undergrad, job, Darden and job after MBA. Then
started questions.
• "Tell me about your job"
I answered which took form of a discussion and he gave his inputs and kept on acknowledging what
I said.
• "Why Darden"
• "What was the different thing you found in your undergraduate college" discussions. He
listened to me presented his views, I elaborated on my views and we agreed.
• "Career Goals"
Then it was my turn to ask questions. His answers also took shape of discussions and lasted till he
had explained me everything. After 45 minutes we wrapped up.
Few words on face2face interview vis-a-vis telephonic interviews while I was preparing to leave.
And I left by 3:50pm.
Adcoms Round 2(Early Dec). Offered Admission Mid-Feb (Published March 26, 2007)
It was a blind interview conducted by an adcoms representative. The interviewer knew nothing
about me other than my name. After brief introduction, she asked me, "Tell me your story from the
cradle to this chair. Along the way, make sure to shed some light on the important decisions you
made and the reasons behind those decisions." The interview lasted exactly 45 minutes. It was more
conversational than anything.
1. Introduction
2. Resume walk-through
3. Why an MBA?
4. Why Darden?
5. How did you first begin investigating Darden?
6. Describe how you experiences will help make a contribution to the Darden community.
7. Are there any questions about Darden that you wish to ask?
Wharton
Equally as important as preparing for the interview is choosing your interviewer. I chose a more
seasoned alumni who worked in an industry very different from me, because I wanted to meet with
someone who would have a very different perspective and who had been out of school long enough
to offer a longer term view on the value of a Wharton degree. As a result, I was able to formulate
questions that were really relevant to my interests, and we ended up having a very rich dialogue
(almost 2 hours).
The manner of the interviewer's questions were opened ended rather than specific, and allowed me a
lot of flexibility in my answers. I tried to follow this lead by treating this more as a conversation than
a structured interview, which helped both of us become more at east with each other and discuss
issues in greater detail than if it was simply a Q&A format.
Round 2 / On-campus / Second-Year Student (Published March 25th, 2008)
Most of the questions I received were the same as outlined by others but two in particular were
different:
Questions:
• If you were the CEO of the company that you work for now what would you change?
• Anything you are concerned about in your application?
I echo others who've said that Wharton was like a job interview. My interviewer was a second year
student interested in entrepreneurship but more focused on getting through her checklist of
questions.
• What are three of the most important decisions you have made that have brought you to
where you are today?
• Two-Part Question: I see you have an undergraduate business degree, why then an MBA?
Why don't you stay in your current employment and develop business skills through a
business development rotational program or other training?
• What other b-schools have you applied to? Why did you choose these schools?
• What would be your weaknesses as perceived by the Wharton Admissions Committee?
(Toughest question)
• What has been your most substantial professional accomplishment?
• Describe a situation where you were part of a group that failed. What did you learn from it?
• What do you do outside of work? What do you care about? If I bumped into you after work,
where would it be and why?
• What do you see yourself doing in 10 years and why?
The interviewer asked a lot of deep personality questions, which kind of surprised me. He seemed
less interested in my career goals and more interested in my decision-making and in who I am. At
first he asked a lot of follow-up questions which drove at my thought process on certain matters. He
barely jotted down anything, which seemed odd since we talked for a long time. The toughest
question I got was the weaknesses question. I actually rehearsed my response to the question with a
current Wharton student, but the interviewer actually didn't agree with most of my response. He said
more than once that what I perceived to be a weakness was not actually an obvious weakness or at
least not a weakness that the Wharton Admissions office would readily identify. After two go-at-its
to that question I finally gave him one weakness he agreed on. I did though defend the prior
weaknesses I gave him and mentioned how the weakness could come to bear in a team setting. For
example I mentioned that one of my general weaknesses is what my lack of professional exposure to
a lot of qualitative assignments, particularly work outside of finance/accounting, and projects
dealing with business operations and strategy. He didn't think that was a weakness that Wharton
Admissions could spot but I defended the statement, which I believe mitigated the concern he had
over the response.
The interview last about an hour and half. My interviewer appeared to really enjoy talking to me. At
the end of the interview he told me that he has a tendency to argue (I guess he does that a lot in his
sales job) and not to read too much into it. Overall I did not get a positive feeling of the interview
but I think he will at least remember me because I was very convincing in my responses and
explained everything to the T. My advice would be to make sure you rehearse the weaknesses in
your application question and be confident. I cannot emphasize that enough. Other people I have
spoken to who had interviews at Wharton told me the interviewer asked them at least one off-the
wall question and their responses may not have been perfect but at least they articulated their
explanation and did not hesitate in their responses.
• Why MBA?
• Why Wharton?
• Why now?
• Goals?
• He also asked about my leadership style.
• I stumbled for a moment on one question about a team situation when I encountered
difficulty. While I recovered, my answer to this question was not fluid and marked the low
point of my interview.
In hindsight, I regretted not preparing more answers regarding teamwork, which is not a large
component of my current job. It's obvious from reading about Wharton and past interviews that
they value teamwork and often ask questions on the subject.
During the first half of the interview, if the interviewer wasn't asking questions, he was looking
down at his notepad and quickly writing my responses. This contrasted with my Chicago interview,
when the student interviewer made eye contact much of the time. The Wharton interview felt more
like a job interview, while the Chicago interview felt more like a natural conversation (but I'm sure
this depends on which student you are assigned).
After 25 minutes or so, the interviewer said it was time for me to ask questions. I asked about 3 solid
questions, and the interviewer answered each of them in-depth. His answers averaged almost 10
minutes apiece. At this point, he did most of the talking, but when I could, I chimed in to bolster my
case. He remarked that my questions (regarding the bidding process) demonstrated that I'd done my
homework on the program. I thanked him at the end of the interview (55-60 minutes total) for the
extra time he spent with me. He told me that I was his last interview for a while, so he was happy to
spend additional time talking about the program. I took his willingness to invest more time with me
as a positive signal.
Despite my perception that the interview went well, I was denied admission to Wharton. My "stats"
are strong and I thought my essays were interesting, but I belong to an over represented applicant
group. My poor answer to the teamwork question also probably hurt my case.
The interview lasted about 40 minutes. I didn't feel the time, and I felt I answered the questions well.
If I were to go back and change something, it would have been the "Anything to add to your
application" question. I mentioned something about the community work I'd done but I felt I
should have talked more about what I would contribute to the Wharton community since we didn't
talk much about that.
• "Give me three adjectives to describe your leadership style." This threw me a little back I had
prepared anecdotes and descriptions, but had trouble trying to come up with one-word
adjectives. So I started w a two-word description and then proceeded right into my anecdote
to describe and then ended the story with single adjectives to summarize.
• She asked me about how I have dealt with a difficult team member on my current project,
and this was by far my weakest response. I didn't like where my anecdote was going so I
quickly ended and then she asked me two follow up questions. I wasn't really able to end
strong, so I tried to hurry the topic along.
• Then she asked me one adjective to describe a weakness. This was also tough for me
because my response wanted to be four words. So I asked her if I could give her 2 words,
and again went straight to my example, and ended with a one word adjective summary.
I think there was one more question next, but I can't remember. But she stopped 5 minutes before
our 30 minutes to allow me to ask questions. We talked for about 10 more minutes. I had one strong
question for her, which she spend a lot of time answering. Then I tried to ask more personal
questions like "do you plan to return to the Bay Area?" I wished I had had more than 1 killer
question in my back pocket because I realized what a great opportunity it was to tell her anything
else important about me that we missed.
Overall the interview was successful in me being able to tell her my story, and I do feel that I was
able to paint the picture about myself that I had wanted.
I would do two things differently: 1) better difficult team member example and 2) more questions to
ask her at the end.
• Resume walkthrough
• LT/ST goals
• Why MBA at this point of time
• Why Wharton
• Example of leadership
• Significant achievement in my current role
• Resume walkthrough
• LT/ST goals
• Why MBA
• Why Wharton
• Why you
• Adcoms concerns
• Team situation
• Any questions for interviewer
Overall pleasant, and the staff was helpful as well. Wharton had first-years sitting in the waiting area
with the interviewees answering questions and calming nerves: I thought that was a neat idea.
I received a couple of feedback points during and after the interview, which were good. At the end
of the interview, I have an even more positive feeling and respect for Wharton.
Advice: Be yourself, be ready to articulate your reasons for MBA at Wharton, understand what
Wharton is looking for in an applicant and organize/present your responses accordingly (consistent
with positioning/theme of essays).
So, then after the interview ends, he actually gave me feedback about how I did in my interview. He
said, "Good, obviously you speak fluent English", but then he gave me 3 things that he thought I
could improve. Wow, I didn't expect this at all. He actually said, this might help you with your other
school interviews. I thanked him for the feedback and the interview.
• Thanks for coming, sorry for the delay. How are you? How's work?
• So you're ready for B-school, Wharton is a great place, I had a wonderful experience and I
highly recommend it.
• Give me a few minutes to glance over your resume (note: definitely go to the interview with
a resume just in case)
• Why don't you walk me through your resume, starting anywhere you'd like?
• Why an MBA, why now?
• What are your career goals?
• How has your current job and previous experience helped you prepare for your long/short
term career goals?
• Why Wharton?
• What do you do outside work?
• Apart from community service what else do you enjoy doing?
• How many countries have you traveled to/lived in? (This is probably more specific to my
international background)
• Do you have any questions for me?
We then had lunch which the alum ordered to his office (very nice) and from there the discussion
was very casual and related to the current situation in financial markets, venture capital/P.E. (he
works in P.E.), his experience at his firm, some great classes to take at Wharton, travel opportunities
at Wharton, my commute to work etc.
I'll only urge you to be yourself, ask questions about your interviewer to put them at ease and show
some interest in the person in front of you, ask questions about their experience at Wharton to get
them talking and hopefully share some laughs etc. Know your resume well, your story and why
Wharton versus any other school. Also ask some meaningful questions, I went with about 5-10
specific questions relating to his pre-MBA and post-MBA experience. My interviewer was awesome
and only confirmed why I was interested in Wharton in the first place. We plan to keep in touch and
he offered to connect me with some of his classmates who had similar career interests. Overall a
very positive experience.
The alum was extremely friendly, put me immediately at ease and offered further help, if needed,
with any further MBA questions down the road.
Round 1 / Adcoms (Published February 12, 2008)
With a member of the admissions committee:
The whole thing lasted 45 minutes. It ended 15 minutes before the scheduled start (they asked us to
arrive 15 minutes early, and I did) and ended 15 minutes early too.
I asked what surprised her most, and she commented on Wharton's strength outside of Finance,
including non-profit. Also suggested that students were incredibly collaborative even when
competing for the same jobs.
My second interview was with an alumnus in his office. He had seen the resume that I sent him, but
didn't have a copy with him, so I just gave him one. He asked me some routine questions about my
career path/goal, why MBA, why Wharton, etc. which every applicant is definitely familiar with and
prepared for. But, he then started to ask behavioral questions for the next 30 minutes. The questions
were getting harder and deeper and every time he was not completely satisfied with my response, he
probed more. Experts say you should be ready for anything in an alum interview, which is I believe a
precious piece of advice. Having read so many interview reports, I do not remember anyone facing
so many behavioral questions. I'm not even sure if I can call those questions “behavioral”, because I
had to imagine myself as a student at Wharton when answering these questions. For example, I
wasn't asked, "How did you handle a conflict?" I was asked "How would you handle a conflict in
your Learning Team at Wharton?"
These are some of the questions I remember:
- What would you do if one of the members of your Learning Team didn't pull his/her weight on a
project? What would you do if you understand that (s)he didn't help due to the lack of interest in the
project/course?
- How would you participate in class discussion at the school?
- What would you do if you saw an irrelevant discussion is taking the class time?
- How would you help your teammate who needed help? What would you do if you were extremely
busy with your own work?
- What would you do if you saw an unethical practice at the school?
- How would you prioritize your time at Wharton? What would be the most and the least important
things for you as a student?
At the end I asked him two questions and when he was answering them I realized that I had done a
good job in my interview. He explained his experience at Wharton and how it helped him with his
current job. He even gave me advice on what I should do in Philly and what options are available for
my wife there. I thought he wouldn't have bothered to go into those details if he hadn't found me a
good match for Wharton. My interview, which lasted 75 minutes, was tough, but I felt good about it.
My interviewer looked really smart and sophisticated, which was interesting for me because it was
the first time I had the opportunity to meet in person a Wharton's alumnus.
Outcome: Admitted
It just rushed by! There were a lot more things I could have communicated to her, but alas! Overall,
she seemed very positive about my performance, and I thought the interview went off well.
I think other than 12, I responded well in other questions. I was not able to recall what all things I
wanted to ask her. In all it was a good experience. Lets see what happens on 20th December.
1. Resume debriefing
2. Why MBA
3. Why now
4. Why Wharton?
5. How will your classmates remember you?
6. What do you expect out of your classmates at Wharton?
7. What's your leadership style?
8. What would your managers say about your 2 strengths and weaknesses?
9. What do you do for fun?
10. Any weaknesses
On-Campus Interview, R1, Second Year Student (Published November 27, 2007)
Interview was with a second-year student. She was nice, but all business. I felt it a bit difficult to
connect with her, which made the interview feel a little more one-sided than I would have liked (and
made me nervous). However, I don't feel that any of her questions were particularly difficult or
meant to trip me up in any way. One piece of advice: listen to the entire question before you start
formulating your answer. Many of her questions were multi-part or asked for something different
than what I expected after I heard the beginning of the question.
Here is what I remember of her questions:
• What are your goals for your time at Wharton and what will be your goals for the time
immediately following and into the future?
• How have your achievements and work experience shaped your goals?
• What do you think will be the most difficult part of your time at Wharton?
• What in your background shows that you'd be prepared for the quantitative work at
Wharton?
• Are there any parts of your application that you are concerned that the Adcoms might view
as a weakness?
There were no tough philosophical questions, like "who is a leader you admire" or anything like that.
The only time it went into that zone was when I took it that direction by discussing my specific
long-term goals, and she probed into my opinions about my industry. Also, the student tended to
ask follow-up questions to my answers like "can you give me an example" or "how did you go about
implementing that idea", etc., so be prepared to be asked for specifics.
• Walk me through where you’ve been and why you’ve been there, what brings you here, and
what you’re looking to do in the future.
• Tell me about a failure you experienced
• Why Wharton?
• How after two years would you like your learning teammates to describe you?
• What are your strengths?
• What are your weaknesses?
• If I were to ask one of your colleagues, what would they say about you?
• What activities would you get involved in at Wharton?
• Tell me about a difficulty you had with a colleague.
• Tell me about a leader you admire.
R2, Alumni Interview (International) (Published March 3, 2007)
I had my Wharton interview today and was a little nervous, but overall felt I established good
rapport with the interviewer. There was a LOT of "why Wharton" sprinkled throughout the
interview. It lasted 40 minutes.
• Which schools have you applied to and what is the status of these schools?
• Walk me through your Resume (spent about 20 minutes on it, with very detailed questions)
• Career goals (spent another 15 minutes on it)
• Why Wharton (this is where it was grilling, lots of Why questions and counter arguments
that its not the right school for me) (15 minutes)
• Leadership example
• Questions for interviewer
Total about 70 minutes. If you want a more straightforward route, take the phone/hub option :).
Although I must say that the interviewer has made me rethink long and hard about W and if it’s the
right school for me and she had some valuable advise for me.
Overall I left thinking that I definitely could have done much better.
Wharton Interview Breakdown by Juggler, February 19, 2007. (Published February 26, 2007)
I hope this post helps people doing their Wharton interviews...
The Wharton interview is...
Conversational. I do not mean to say you can ramble away. I mean that it is not a stress interview
and is meant just get to know you as a person. The idea to judge your communication skills and to
figure out if you fit into the Wharton community. There are a few standard questions, beyond that
the interview can take any turn depending upon your experience, your persona and your
conversational ability. It is possible to guide the interview so as to bring out the best aspects of your
past if you are a glib talker.
Another thing which I feel will work to your advantage in the interview is your body language. If
you have met Wharton students, you will agree with me that many of them ooze confidence. The
interviewer will probably look for confidence in a prospective Wharton student too. Your body
language says a lot about your confidence and maturity.
The interview report should ultimately indicate that the same person wrote the essays too :-)
Blind. The interviewer sees only your resume. In my case the interviewer took a couple of minutes
to read the resume at the start of the interview. So I'm not sure if she even read it beforehand and
come prepared with questions. This means that you can reiterate the examples used in your essays.
But if you have important stuff that you could not mention in the essays due to lack of space, the
interview is a good place to bring it up. An advantage of having examples different from the essays
is that they will supplement what you have already mentioned and give a fuller picture of you to the
adcoms. Promotions, salary hikes and other recognition, which came by after you submitted your
application, can also be stated during the interview.
Not decisive. The interview is just a part of the process and is not the sole elimination criteria. The
Wharton interview is not "a make or break". You could get in because of a good interview; you
could get in despite a bad interview. There is no reason to be nervous at all. Look at the interview as
just a tete-a-tete and talk like you would to someone who has met you for the first time and is
getting to know you. There is no right answer for the questions, it is HOW you answer them that
matters.
Tips to get more airtime. Quoting examples as part of your answers will not only get you more
airtime but will also make for convincing answers. Examples are also a way to elicit pertinent follow
up questions which is a great way to delve deeper into your experiences and viewpoints. Deep
discussion in fewer aspects is better than superficial answers for a large number of questions. It is
better not to sound too studied. In fact I would recommend minimal preparation . It is more than
enough to know the facts and let your answers flow with the conversation. Going with rehearsed
answers for the standard questions might make you sound boring and less confident. However,
extempore may not work for everyone, it's a personal choice ultimately. The interview (specially at
hubs and on-campus) is supposed to last for 30 minutes, but I'm sure there are many people
(including me) whose interviews stretched for 10-15 minutes longer. Longer interviews are an
advantage most of the time.
Alumni vs. Hub vs. On Campus. The choice of the type of interview is usually a combination of
your schedule and what you expect out of the interview. If convenience and lower cost is the chief
concern, then alumni interview is the natural choice. If you want to return to your home country
immediately after MBA then you might want to know more about the opportunities and the
network available in your country. An alumnus will be in a better position to give you valuable
information, which will help you to make an informed decision if you have to choose between
multiple schools later.
If you want to visit the school before you decide to attend, then the interview is a good reason to
make the trip. Also the on-campus interviews are conducted by second year students who will be
able to shed light on the life at school. You can also get a feel of the atmosphere and the culture of
the school, which is an important factor, which can sway your decision to or against the school.
People who live reasonably close to Philly should not miss this opportunity. I say this because I
know how difficult it was for me to compare the cultures of different schools using what I read and
the few people I could talk to.
Choosing the hub interview means traveling within your country, unless the hub is your city itself.
This definitely is not as convenient as the alumni option. The hubs are conducted by members of
the adcoms and they may not be able to answer some of the questions you might have about the
curriculum, job opportunities etc. The flip side is that there will be someone in the adcoms who has
met you and spoken to you and might support you in case he/she really liked you. This is something
you cannot achieve through an alumni interview where you rely solely on the report mailed in by the
alumnus. At least during the interview, adcoms members tend to be neutral to the industry you
belong to/aspire to enter. This could be an advantage and a disadvantage: An advantage because you
have a fair chance to showcase your achievements as opposed to talking to a person who belongs
to/knows a lot about your industry and hence might undermine your credentials. A disadvantage
because you may have specific questions about a particular industry and a veteran in that field or
someone who has friends in that field might be able to answer you better.
All the Best for your interview!
Disclaimer: This post is a summary of my opinions formed from my own interview experience and
those that I have read so far. This is by no means a generalization of all Wharton interviews and I
maintain that there is no such thing as "a typical Wharton interview"
London Business School
I put in a last minute round 4 application to the London Business School and somehow landed an
interview. I honestly didn’t expect to get an interview as the application was literally me deciding to
bring my MBA plans forward after a frustrating week at work. But I thought on re-reading my essays
that it was pretty solid, with a good GMAT and good career progression, so I got an interview.
The interviewer contacted me on a Friday and arranged for the interview on the Sunday so I really
didn’t have all that much time to prepare for it. I looked up some blogs and discovered there would
be a presentation, which made me a bit worried.
The interview also felt a bit strange as it was arranged at the interviewer’s house and on a weekend.
As it was only a few kilometers from my house, I decided to ride my bike there, but half way I had a
flat tyre and had to ditch the bike and call a cab, which was a problem because I had forgotten to
bring my phone. And of course it just happened to be just when a major football game had finished
and all the cabs were busy. Anyway, it all made me about fifteen minutes late (and pretty flustered),
which I don’t think impressed my interviewer; he made a comment about needing to be organized
to do an MBA. As it was a weekend, I wore jeans and a fine woolen knit over a casual shirt with a
casual coat for outside, my interviewer wore a pair of casual pants and a long sleeved shirt, so I
thought I at least got the wardrobe organized right. But not a good start by any means.
We began the interview in his dining area; LBS had provided him with a list of around 30 questions,
which we went through, skipping a few here and there. The order of the questions was a bit random,
and they covered a wide range of things for example
• “What do you think are the major challenges facing today’s business leaders” or
• “How assertive are you? How assertive would your friends say you are?”
A mixture of personal reflection and external awareness I guess, along with some which were getting
at my motivations for doing an MBA and choosing LBS – not unexpected. He took meticulous
notes and asked intelligent follow up questions indicating he was listening closely.
I work in the public sector, and fortunately, so did my interviewer. This made some things easier, I
could use acronyms he understood and could quickly outline situations, which would have required
much more explanation to someone outside government. It also meant I couldn’t bluff or
exaggerate – not that I would have anyway of course – and that he knew senior executives in my
organization.
The presentation was unexpectedly easy. He chose a topic from a list of about five from LBS, gave
me five minutes to prepare then let me talk for a few minutes. The topic was something like “what
will be the next great human advances” or along those lines - something suitably broad which was a
test of structured communication rather than knowledge. Lucky I am good at structured
communication, I don't have any experience debating, but I think my off the cuff answer was pretty
well put together. In the end it was quite a simple exercise, it was fun actually and certainly nothing
to get worried about.
Before the interview began my interviewer said it would take about an hour, but we took much
longer than that, the formal questions and the presentation easily took and hour and a half, and then
we chatted for a while afterwards about London, the MBA, what he did after his LBS MBA. All up
it must have been two and a half or three hours.
After the interview, he didn’t give me any feedback and his impressions of me were difficult to read
although he did offer to give me any further advice should I need it.
Anyway, a couple of weeks later, I got an email letting me know I had a place on the LBS MBA to
graduate in 2010. The interviewer called me to follow up and congratulate me.
Overall, I actually enjoyed the interview and got along well with the interviewer, despite the poor
start and even though I had to leave his place in gathering darkness and figure out what to do with
my bike…
The presentation topic was around corporate social responsibility. (He had a list of five, and asked
me to do that topic.)
After all that was done, he had one last question (something minor), and then he put the papers
away and just chatted about the school. He started out by telling me some of the things he wish he
had asked his interviewer back when, and then it was just a Q&A session with me asking the
questions.
It was clear that the admissions office had done a very thorough evaluation, and my interviewer had
clearly studied my application closely, as well. He was very poker-faced throughout, so it was tough
to get a read on how I was doing. I find out in just a few weeks!
• Very friendly. It was more like a chat than an interview. We spent more time talking about
the LBS experience than "interviewing".
• The interviewer had read the application thoroughly. He only had 4-5 questions he wanted
to ask.
• He started the interview by walking me through some crucial facts about LBS (Shadowing
Project, Second Year Project, and etc.) and we spent a lot of time discussing about them.
• Some of the few questions I recalled were "What do I think about the school's marketing
program and why do I think an MBA is right for me".
• After 45 minutes, he told me to get ready for the impromptu, which was a little surprising
because I didn't feel like I went through any serious interview yet.
• The impromptu was about CSR, which happens to be what I have a lot of experience in. But
even without my experience, I felt that anybody could be able to handle it.
• After the impromptu, we spent another 30 minutes talking about the schools. Its pros and
cons.
• The interview lasted about 2 hours. I would say LBS interview is totally different from that
of other schools. It's more like exchanging thoughts with an alumni and learning more about
the school.
• I haven't received any decision yet. I'll update this entry as soon as I'm informed.
• He walked me through his own resume first, and then said, now it is you turn, tell me about
yourself. After my answer came the following questions:
• Would you prefer your old job or current? Why? (One is very quant based, the other one a
brand management position)
• Why LBS? (I said, general management + international business focus of the programme,
student diversity, London advantage and reputation of the school)
• What would you do with and without an MBA in 5 years? (2 different scenarios)
• Why do you want to join firm X or Y (I had mentioned them in my goals essay as companies
I would like to work in upon graduation; it was easy to answer because I had solid reasons)
• How did you gain the respect of your team? (I am 4-5 years younger than my reports)
As you can see, surprisingly, there was no impromptu presentation. I think that is at the discretion of
the interviewer; he didn’t think it was necessary.
At the end of 45 minutes, he said: I am going to say Yes and will recommend you.
• Your short-term and long-term goals. How LBS curriculum will help you fulfilling them?
What skills do you think you need?
• How did you like your visit to school and what was your take-away from the lectures you
visited?
• What project would you choose with your study group at LBS if you were at the point of
choosing? What role in the group would you play?
• How would you choose between different schools if you were in such situation? (what
would be the base for your decision?)
• What it the difference between firms at which you are targeting?
• Tell me about your current industry, its main players. How do you see the perspectives of
this industry?
• What would you do if not admitted?
• How you plan to finance your studies if admitted?
• How do you lead? Describe a recent experience. Any lessons learned from it?
• Your three good traits from your colleagues’ point of view? Three bad traits? (that was a
tough one)
We got into the details of some of my essays. Talked about my work, current project and
international experience. At the end the interviewer gave me a presentation topic. It was close to my
heart so I hope I was able to handle it well. The interview was very friendly and lasted more than 2
hours. Result: Admitted!
• You have only 2 years of work experience... can you tell me about your leadership
experience?
• When you were leading a team, did you ever face resistance from them? How did you solve
it?
• What do you want to learn during the MBA? What are the skills you need and what do you
need them for?
• What do you want to do after the MBA?
• How are you going to choose your school if you get multiple offers?
Then he also asked some very specific questions about my CV, such as "tell me about your
internship in X or your year abroad in Y" etc. b) Presentation: The presentation is nothing to worry
about. You are given a topic (just like in debating) and have 5min to take a position and prepare a
presentation. Since we were in a public cafe surrounded by people I remained seated, so it was more
like giving a short compelling speech. I think they look at structured thinking, communication skills
and at how convincing (logically) and compelling (emotionally) your presentation is. Just be creative
and say something, it doesn't matter if the fact base is shaky. The topics are all completely random
so you can pick any side. Overall, it's nothing to worry about. I think once you're invited for an
interview chances are very good, and you'll hear about the decisions about a week or two after the
interview (and these days of waiting are very painful!). Good luck!
Industry Specific questions: I think one of the key difference between my interview for US schools
and LBS was that my interviewer also had few questions on the industry I work in, general trends:
• What is the biggest opportunity and challenge facing your industry? (I mentioned
globalization as both an opportunity and challenge)
• What would you change in the way your organization works?
• What are your learning’s from your entrepreneurial venture?
• Why do you want to go back to your current industry?
Case Study:
It wasn't really a case study. He had a list of 10-15 topics from school and he selected one and asked
me to express my thoughts on it. I was given 3 minutes for preparation and 5 minutes for
presentation. I made a few points in support of the topic (one can decide to argue against it as well)
with examples and just recited them to him in about 3 minutes. It was fairly simple; I think you
should definitely take a stand rather than just expressing both sides of the topic.
Lastly, he opened the floor for any questions to him. Overall I think it was about an hour. At times
intense but fun.
• Location: Brazil
• Name of School: LBS
• Type: required or by invitation? Invitation
• Could you choose the interview's location? No.
• How long were the interviews? 60 min
• Who was the interviewer? Alumni Class of T’02
• How did you prepare? Mock, Reading essays
• Did you receive any feedback at the end? No.
• What was your opinion of the Alumni/Office Personnel? Friendly.
• Did anything change your opinion of the school? No.
• Was there something you wish you had known ahead of time: No.
Questions:
Brief introduction about how the interview would be conducted.
• Why MBA?
• Why LBS?
• Tell me your experience as a leader.
• Tell about how people in ‘Company’ view you as a leader.
• When someone was not putting effort enough in the team, how you reacted?
• How people in ‘Company’ view you in 2 words?
• What was your greater achievement?
• Which were your biggest changes? Professionally and personally.
• You were an instructor in a ‘Company’s course in USA. What did you learn from this
experience? What did you do to keep the public attention?
• Case Presentation: Fish stock are going down in oceans, do you think we should stop eating
fish? Would this impact in fisherman economy?
Hope it helps.
CEIBS
After receipt of a complete application package, the MBA Admissions Office will review all
information provided and will short list some applicants for an interview. Applicants can normally
have choice of their interview location except for special cases. The interview panel will be
comprised of CEIBS faculty, department directors, alumni and admissions managers. In most cases,
applicants will be interviewed by two interviewers. Each interview is approximately 30 minutes
conducted in English.
A face-to-face interview is required for all applicants who are residing in mainland China. However,
for those applicants who are working or studying outside of mainland China, the School may permit
interviews through other arrangements such as videoconference or telephone.
Typical Questions-
Why MBA
Why Ceibs?
Why China?
What is your plan post-MBA?/ What are your short-term and long-term goals?
What do you hope to gain from Ceibs in and outside the classroom?
Give me a professional team example. When did you lead a team? When did you have to develop
someone on a team?
Tell me about a professional failure.
If you couldn't do your chosen profession, what else would you do?
Describe something from your college or work experience that you would have handled differently.
Please walk me through your career path with your company and describe your role in each position.
What do you consider to be the most pressing issue in Global Business today?
How easy or difficult is it to set a new venture in China? Anything specific to the Chinese business
norms?
Walk me through the decision-making and solution process in one of the initiatives you led within
your firm.
If I have to describe you to the Ceibs Class of 2018, what should I say about you?
INSEAD
A Talk with INSEAD's Associate Admissions Director, Johanna Hellborg
Q: Are all applicants required to go through two rounds of interview?
A: Most of our applicants get two interviews with two different alumni. In countries where we don't
have a lot of alumni, it will only be one interview. It's an opportunity for applicants to ask [alumni]
more about the school.
Prior to the meeting, the candidate will be asked to provide the interviewer with their six-page
profile from their online application -- there's nothing really creative in this. We're looking for what
types of jobs they've had, what they've studied, etc. The alumni interviewers look for the same things
in each of the interviews.
Associate Admissions Director Johanna Hellborg on the qualities the B-school seeks in students and
its international brand recognition
Every year, INSEAD, No. 3 on Business Week’s 2004 list of top non-U.S. MBA programs, enrolls
close to 900 MBAs from 65 to 75 different countries across its two campuses -- one in
Fontainebleau, France, and the other in Singapore. While INSEAD recently slipped from No. 1 in
BW's biennial listing, it's still difficult to get into the B-school. Johanna Hellborg, associate director
of MBA admissions at INSEAD, screens the thousands of applications that arrive in Fontainebleau
each year.
She recently fielded questions during a live chat from audience members and BusinessWeek Online's
Mica Schneider and Jack Dierdorff. Here's an edited transcript of the event:
Q: How should INSEAD applicants interpret the school's recent dip to the No. 3 spot in
BusinessWeek's non-U.S. rating?
A: It's good that we have feedback on things that we can improve. We're already addressing any
weaknesses we know of on the service side. For example, we've changed our food provider.
In terms of recruiting, it's always difficult to compare us with other business schools because [our
students get placed in jobs] around the world, and it's not specific to some big cities. And we've
nearly doubled our career-services management team to provide better service.
Q: What's the average percentage of students that are employed three months after
graduation?
A: The detailed statistics are available on our Web site. We were up to 79% with offers before the
end of the year.
Q: Do you see any trends in the applicant volume following your first-round deadline for the
September 2005 intake?
A: It will probably be a slow start, but we have several colleagues on the road now, and we clearly
see a rise in interest in our MBA program.
Q: Are there any parts of the application that you weigh more than others?
A: No. We look at everything. Ideally, we would like to have all parts be strong.
Q: With a GMAT score of 650 (verbal 72%, quantitative: 78%), do I still have a chance to get
accepted at INSEAD, or should I consider retaking the exam?
A: If you think you can do better, take the GMAT again. I cannot decide if you should take the
GMAT again or not.
Q: Classes are taught in English, but what language skills are required for an INSEAD
applicant?
A: English is required. You have to have another language -- it could be your mother tongue or
another language that you've learned. And you need working knowledge, not fluency, of a third
language upon graduation.
Q: I'm just over 40 years old, have more than 15 years of international professional
experience, and am fluent in German and English. Would my application be screened out
due to my age?
A: Unfortunately, it wouldn't fit our full-time MBA program. It would be a very interesting profile
for our executive MBA.
Q: Does INSEAD have an age and work-experience limit for full-time MBA applicants?
A: It's very rare that we have people above the age of 35. In terms of years of professional
experience, it's difficult to say. This is because a consultant may have three years and a medical
doctor could have 12 years of experience.
Q: I'm the founder and president of my own consulting firm and have over 16 years of
management experience. However, I lack an undergraduate degree. Would INSEAD
consider me?
A: On a very exceptional basis. We take one or two candidates per year who don't have an
undergraduate degree. They come with outstanding professional or international experience.
Q: Is it true that the greater the work experience the better?
A: It's not a matter of quantity, [but] quality. We're looking at people who were on the fast career
track.
Q: Does INSEAD give any preference to the type of job (engineer, consultant, etc.) a person
had?
A: No. We don't prefer any profile. We want each and every candidate to contribute to our class.
Q: The school has nearly doubled its intake. Has that affected the average class size? Is
more growth possible?
A: We take in 900 [MBAs] per year now, vs. 600 five years ago. The reason is because we opened the
campus in Singapore. We're stabilizing now, but as we're a very entrepreneurial school, we'll see
what the future holds for us. Within the classroom, there's absolutely no change. We work with
sections, and each section is about 70 to 75 people.
Prior to the meeting, the candidate will be asked to provide the interviewer with their six-page
profile from their online application -- there's nothing really creative in this. We're looking for what
types of jobs they've had, what they've studied, etc. The alumni interviewers look for the same things
in each of the interviews.
Q: Any recommendations for recommendation letters?
A: We want to identify how you interact in a professional setting. Professional recommendations are
the most useful.
Q: Are applicants from some countries -- for instance, India or China -- up against more
competition than those from less-represented nations?
A: We don't have quotas on countries. We select the best [applicants] from each country. If it's a
country with a lot of applicants, you clearly have to demonstrate other outstanding traits to get
admitted. If you come from a country where there aren't many applicants, you still have to have the
outstanding INSEAD profile. But coming from that country would be an advantage.
Q: What percent of students go on exchange to Wharton, and how are those MBAs selected?
A: Forty people per class go on exchange to Wharton at the end of the year. [Selection] is the same
system as for the electives -- it's based on bidding (e.g., you get 100 points to bid on electives and
the exchange with Wharton, and you put points on something depending upon how badly you want
that option).
Q: Is the 10-month MBA program suited for middle or senior managers seeking a career
change?
A: More middle than senior. Usually people have an average of five years' work experience. More
than looking for a career change, it's for people who are looking for more options -- up the ladder or
lateral changes.
Q: Half of INSEAD students are career changers. How does the school help them refine
their career goals?
A: The career-management service will be in contact with them from day one. The beginning of the
year is focused on self-assessment, then on setting objectives. After that, we focus on market
research. The last four months is focused on interviews, company presentations, and negotiations.
Q: What are the job opportunities in India if one does an MBA in France?
A: INSEAD is a reputable school in India. Last year, 6.25% of the class went to work in India.
Q: BusinessWeek quoted a student as saying that consulting grads were snapped up really
quickly, while students from other disciplines were disappointed. Is there truth in this
claim? Is anything being done to improve this?
A: It depends on what kinds of jobs you're looking for. More than 50% of our students do a career
switch. So in that sense, you have to work a little bit to find the job of your dreams. I haven't heard
specifically that everyone but the consultants are having a hard time.
Q: Is there a chance that INSEAD may have a loan program for participants of the January,
2005, intake?
A: No, we won't have a global loan program, but we're trying to develop more regional loans,
depending upon the countries people are from. Go to our Web site to see what's available to you.
Location of Inteview: A down-town pub (for the VP) and his office meeting room (for the CEO).
Atmosphere: The first alumni has over twenty years of experience in Management Consulting and is
very sharp in questionings his interview canidates. The CEO was very friendly and interesting. He
was kind of tired (after a long day of work) though.
The first name I was given was that of a senior executive at a major French insurance company. We
fixed an appointment at his office toward the beginning of December.
The interview was held partly in English and partly in French. It lasted about one hour and the
questions revolved around my background and future plans.
The interviewer was well acquainted with my essays, which I had sent him prior to the interview.
The atmosphere was pleasant and friendly. The interviewers also offered to answer my questions
and shared with me his much appreciated suggestions. At the end of the interview he was very kind
and told me that his feedback on my application would be positive. So the first interview was a
smooth and pleasant experience.
Scheduling the second interview was a bit more challenging. I was provided with a couple of
contacts who never answered my emails. It was only after I called INSEAD directly that I was finally
able to schedule the second interview.
It was held in Sophia Antipolis, where my home office is based, by a young executive of a major IT
company. The interview took place at the premises of his company and was similar in nature a
length to the first one. This time the languages employed were Italian and English – it looks like
INSEAD tries to gauge whether the linguistical skills reported in the application are truthful. Also in
this case the interviewer, of exquisite kindness, provided me immediately with a positive feedback.
The feedback from INSEAD was quite fast. I received an email and a telephone call about a month
after my second interview. This is remarkably fast given that Christmas and New Year's eve fell in
between my second interview and the admission from the school.