JURISDICTION Section 401. Vacancies.
- Should a vacancy occur in the lupon for any cause, the punong
Sec. 399-422 RA 7610
CHAPTER VII
Katarungang Pambarangay
Section 399. Lupong Tagapamayapa. -
(a) There is hereby created in each barangay a lupong tagapamayapa, hereinafter referred
to as the lupon, composed of the punong barangay, as chairman and ten (10) to twenty (20)
members. The lupon shall be constituted every three (3) years in the manner provided
herein.
(b) Any person actually residing or working, in the barangay, not otherwise expressly
disqualified by law, and possessing integrity, impartiality, independence of mind, sense of
fairness, and reputation for probity, may be appointed a member of the lupon.
(c) A notice to constitute the lupon, which shall include the names of proposed members
who have expressed their willingness to serve, shall be prepared by the punong barangay
within the first fifteen (15) days from the start of his term of office. Such notice shall be
posted in three (3) conspicuous places in the barangay continuously for a period of not less
than three (3) weeks;
(d) The punong barangay, taking into consideration any opposition to the proposed
appointment or any recommendations for appointment as may have been made within the
period of posting, shall within ten (10) days thereafter, appoint as members those whom he
determines to be suitable therefor. Appointments shall be in writing, signed by the punong
barangay, and attested to by the barangay secretary.
(e) The list of appointed members shall be posted in three (3) conspicuous places in the
barangay for the entire duration of their term of office; and
(f) In barangays where majority of the inhabitants are members of indigenous cultural
communities, local systems of settling disputes through their councils of datus or elders shall
be recognized without prejudice to the applicable provisions of this Code.
Section 400. Oath and Term of Office. - Upon appointment, each lupon member shall take an
oath of office before the punong barangay. He shall hold office until a new lupon is constituted
on the third year following his appointment unless sooner terminated by resignation, transfer of
residence or place of work, or withdrawal of appointment by the punong barangay with the
concurrence of the majority of all the members of the lupon.
barangay shall immediately appoint a qualified person who shall hold office only for the unexpired
portion of the term.
Section 402. Functions of the Lupon. - The lupon shall:
(a) Exercise administrative supervision over the conciliation panels provided herein;
(b) Meet regularly once a month to provide a forum for exchange of ideas among its
members and the public on matters relevant to the amicable settlement of disputes, and to
enable various conciliation panel members to share with one another their observations and
experiences in effecting speedy resolution of disputes; and
(c) Exercise such other powers and perform such other duties and functions as may be
prescribed by law or ordinance.
Section 403. Secretary of the Lupon. - The barangay secretary shall concurrently serve as the
secretary of the lupon. He shall record the results of mediation proceedings before the punong
barangay and shall submit a report thereon to the proper city or municipal courts. He shall also
receive and keep the records of proceedings submitted to him by the various conciliation panels.
Section 404. Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo. -
(a) There shall be constituted for each dispute brought before the lupon a conciliation panel
to be known as the pangkat ng tagapagkasundo, hereinafter referred to as the pangkat,
consisting of three (3) members who shall be chosen by the parties to the dispute from the
list of members of the lupon.
Should the parties fail to agree on the pangkat membership, the same shall be determined
by lots drawn by the lupon chairman.
(b) The three (3) members constituting the pangkat shall elect from among themselves the
chairman and the secretary. The secretary shall prepare the minutes of the pangkat
proceedings and submit a copy duly attested to by the chairman to the lupon secretary and
to the proper city or municipal court. He shall issue and cause to be served notices to the
parties concerned.
The lupon secretary shall issue certified true copies of any public record in his custody that
is not by law otherwise declared confidential.
Section 405. Vacancies in the Pangkat. - Any vacancy in the pangkat shall be chosen by the
parties to the dispute from among the other lupon members. Should the parties fail to agree on
a common choice, the vacancy shall be filled by lot to be drawn by the lupon chairman.
Section 406. Character of Office and Service of Lupon Members. -
(a) The lupon members, while in the performance of their official duties or on the occasion
thereof, shall be deemed as persons in authority, as defined in the Revised Penal Code.
(b) The lupon or pangkat members shall serve without compensation, except as provided
for in Section 393 and without prejudice to incentives as provided for in this Section and in
Book IV of this Code. The Department of the Interior and Local Government shall provide
for a system of granting economic or other incentives to the lupon or pangkat members who
adequately demonstrate the ability to judiciously and expeditiously resolve cases referred
to them. While in the performance of their duties, the lupon or pangkat members, whether
in public or private employment, shall be deemed to be on official time, and shall not suffer
from any diminution in compensation or allowance from said employment by reason thereof.
Section 407. Legal Advice on Matters Involving Questions of Law. - The provincial, city legal
officer or prosecutor or the municipal legal officer shall render legal advice on matters involving
questions of law to the punong barangay or any lupon or pangkat member whenever necessary
in the exercise of his functions in the administration of the katarungang pambarangay.
Section 408. Subject Matter for Amicable Settlement; Exception Thereto. - The lupon of each
barangay shall have authority to bring together the parties actually residing in the same city or
municipality for amicable settlement of all disputes except:
(a) Where one party is the government, or any subdivision or instrumentality thereof;
(b) Where one party is a public officer or employee, and the dispute relates to the
performance of his official functions;
(c) Offenses punishable by imprisonment exceeding one (1) year or a fine exceeding Five
thousand pesos (P5,000.00);
(d) Offenses where there is no private offended party;
(e) Where the dispute involves real properties located in different cities or municipalities
unless the parties thereto agree to submit their differences to amicable settlement by an
appropriate lupon;
(f) Disputes involving parties who actually reside in barangays of different cities or
municipalities, except where such barangay units adjoin each other and the parties thereto
agree to submit their differences to amicable settlement by an appropriate lupon;
(g) Such other classes of disputes which the President may determine in the interest of
Justice or upon the recommendation of the Secretary of Justice.
The court in which non-criminal cases not falling within the authority of the lupon under this
Code are filed may, at any time before trial motu propio refer the case to the lupon concerned
for amicable settlement.
Section 409. Venue. -
(a) Disputes between persons actually residing in the same barangay shall be brought for
amicable settlement before the lupon of said barangay.
(b) Those involving actual residents of different barangays within the same city or
municipality shall be brought in the barangay where the respondent or any of the
respondents actually resides, at the election of the complaint.
(c) All disputes involving real property or any interest therein shall be brought in the
barangay where the real property or the larger portion thereof is situated.
(d) Those arising at the workplace where the contending parties are employed or at the
institution where such parties are enrolled for study, shall be brought in the barangay where
such workplace or institution is located.
Objections to venue shall be raised in the mediation proceedings before the punong
barangay; otherwise, the same shall be deemed waived. Any legal question which may
confront the punong barangay in resolving objections to venue herein referred to may be
submitted to the Secretary of Justice, or his duly designated representative, whose ruling
thereon shall be binding.
Section 410. Procedure for Amicable Settlement. -
(a) Who may initiate proceeding - Upon payment of the appropriate filing fee, any individual
who has a cause of action against another individual involving any matter within the authority
of the lupon may complain, orally or in writing, to the lupon chairman of the barangay.
(b) Mediation by lupon chairman - Upon receipt of the complaint, the lupon chairman shall
within the next working day summon the respondent(s), with notice to the complainant(s)
for them and their witnesses to appear before him for a mediation of their conflicting
interests. If he fails in his mediation effort within fifteen (15) days from the first meeting of
the parties before him, he shall forthwith set a date for the constitution of the pangkat in
accordance with the provisions of this Chapter.
(c) Suspension of prescriptive period of offenses - While the dispute is under mediation,
conciliation, or arbitration, the prescriptive periods for offenses and cause of action under
existing laws shall be interrupted upon filing the complaint with the punong barangay. The
prescriptive periods shall resume upon receipt by the complainant of the complainant or the
certificate of repudiation or of the certification to file action issued by the lupon or pangkat
 secretary: Provided, however, That such interruption shall not exceed sixty (60) days from
the filing of the complaint with the punong barangay.
(d) Issuance of summons; hearing; grounds for disqualification - The pangkat shall convene
not later than three (3) days from its constitution, on the day and hour set by the lupon
chairman, to hear both parties and their witnesses, simplify issues, and explore all
possibilities for amicable settlement. For this purpose, the pangkat may issue summons for
the personal appearance of parties and witnesses before it. In the event that a party moves
to disqualify any member of the pangkat by reason of relationship, bias, interest, or any
other similar grounds discovered after the constitution of the pangkat, the matter shall be
resolved by the affirmative vote of the majority of the pangkat whose decision shall be final.
Should disqualification be decided upon, the resulting vacancy shall be filled as herein
provided for.
(e) Period to arrive at a settlement - The pangkat shall arrive at a settlement or resolution of
the dispute within fifteen (15) days from the day it convenes in accordance with this section.
This period shall, at the discretion of the pangkat, be extendible for another period which
shall not exceed fifteen (15) days, except in clearly meritorious cases.
Section 411. Form of settlement. - All amicable settlements shall be in writing, in a language or
dialect known to the parties, signed by them, and attested to by the lupon chairman or the
pangkat chairman, as the case may be. When the parties to the dispute do not use the same
language or dialect, the settlement shall be written in the language known to them.
Section 412. Conciliation. -
(a) Pre-condition to Filing of Complaint in Court. - No complaint, petition, action, or
proceeding involving any matter within the authority of the lupon shall be filed or instituted
directly in court or any other government office for adjudication, unless there has been a
confrontation between the parties before the lupon chairman or the pangkat, and that no
conciliation or settlement has been reached as certified by the lupon secretary or pangkat
secretary as attested to by the lupon or pangkat chairman or unless the settlement has been
repudiated by the parties thereto.
(b) Where Parties May Go Directly to Court. - The parties may go directly to court in the
following instances:
(1) Where the accused is under detention;
(2) Where a person has otherwise been deprived of personal liberty calling for habeas
corpus proceedings;
(3) Where actions are coupled with provisional remedies such as preliminary injunction,
attachment, delivery of personal property and support pendente lite; and
(4) Where the action may otherwise be barred by the statute of limitations.
(c) Conciliation among members of indigenous cultural communities. - The customs and
traditions of indigenous cultural communities shall be applied in settling disputes between
members of the cultural communities.
Section 413. Arbitration. -
(a) The parties may, at any stage of the proceedings, agree in writing that they shall abide
by the arbitration award of the lupon chairman or the pangkat. Such agreement to arbitrate
may be repudiated within five (5) days from the date thereof for the same grounds and in
accordance with the procedure hereinafter prescribed. The arbitration award shall be made
after the lapse of the period for repudiation and within ten (10) days thereafter.
(b) The arbitration award shall be in writing in a language or dialect known to the parties.
When the parties to the dispute do not use the same language or dialect, the award shall
be written in the language or dialect known to them.
Section 414. Proceedings Open to the Public; Exception. - All proceedings for settlement shall
be public and informal: Provided, however, That the lupon chairman or the pangkat chairman, as
the case may be, may motu proprio or upon request of a party, exclude the public from the
proceedings in the interest of privacy, decency, or public morals.
Section 415. Appearance of Parties in Person. - In all katarungang pambarangay proceedings,
the parties must appear in person without the assistance of counsel or representative, except for
minors and incompetents who may be assisted by their next-of-kin who are not lawyers.
Section 416. Effect of Amicable Settlement and Arbitration Award. - The amicable settlement
and arbitration award shall have the force and effect of a final judgment of a court upon the
expiration of ten (10) days from the date thereof, unless repudiation of the settlement has been
made or a petition to nullify the award has been filed before the proper city or municipal court.
However, this provision shall not apply to court cases settled by the lupon under the last
paragraph of Section 408 of this Code, in which case the compromise or the pangkat chairman
shall be submitted to the court and upon approval thereof, have the force and effect of a judgment
of said court.
Section 417. Execution. - The amicable settlement or arbitration award may be enforced by
execution by the lupon within six (6) months from the date of the settlement. After the lapse of
such time, the settlement may be enforced by action in the appropriate city or municipal court.
Section 418. Repudiation. - Any party to the dispute may, within ten (10) days from the date of
the settlement, repudiate the same by filing with the lupon chairman a statement to that effect
sworn to before him, where the consent is vitiated by fraud, violence, or intimidation. Such
repudiation shall be sufficient basis for the issuance of the certification for filing a complaint as
hereinabove provided.
Section 419. Transmittal of Settlement and Arbitration. - Award to the Court. - The secretary of
the lupon shall transmit the settlement or the arbitration award to the appropriate city or municipal
court within five (5) days from the date of the award or from the lapse of the ten-day period
repudiating the settlement and shall furnish copies thereof to each of the parties to the settlement
and the lupon chairman.
Section 420. Power to Administer Oaths. - The punong barangay, as chairman of the lupong
tagapamayapa, and the members of the pangkat are hereby authorized to administer oaths in
connection with any matter relating to all proceedings in the implementation of the katarungang
pambarangay.
Section 421. Administration; Rules and Regulations. - The city or municipal mayor, as the case
may be, shall see to the efficient and effective implementation and administration of the
katarungang pambarangay. The Secretary of Justice shall promulgate the rules and regulations
necessary to implement this Chapter.
Section 422. Appropriations. - Such amount as may be necessary for the effective
implementation of the katarungang pambarangay shall be provided for in the annual budget of
the city or municipality concerned.
CIRCULAR NO. 14-93 July 15, 1993
TO: ALL REGIONAL TRIAL COURTS, METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURTS, MUNICIPAL
TRIAL COURTS AND MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURTS
SUBJECT: GUIDELINES ON THE KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY CONCILIATION
PROCEDURE TO PREVENT CIRCUMVENTION OF THE REVISED KATARUNGANG
PAMBARANGAY LAW (SECTIONS 399-422, CHAPTER VII, TITLE I, BOOK III, R.A.
7160. OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE OF 1991).
The Revised Katarungang Pambarangay Law under R.A. 7160, otherwise known as the local
Government Code of 1991, effective on January 1, 1992, and which repealed P.D. 1508,
introduced substantial changes not only in the authority granted to the Lupong Tagapamayapa
but also in the procedure to be observed in the settlement of disputes within the authority of the
Lupon.
In order that the laudable purpose of the law may not be subverted and its effectiveness
undermined by indiscriminate, improper and/or premature issuance of certifications to file actions
in court by the Lupon or Pangkat Secretaries, attested by the Lupon/Pangkat Chairmen,
respectively, the following guidelines are hereby issued for the information of trial court judges in
cases brought before them coming from the Barangays:
I. All disputes are subject to Barangay conciliation pursuant to the Revised Katarungang
Pambarangay Law (formerly P.D. 1508, repealed and now replaced by Secs. 399-422, Chapter
VII, Title I, Book III, and Sec. 515, Title I, Book IV, R.A. 7160, otherwise known as the Local
Government Code of 1991), and prior recourse thereto is a pre-condition before filing a complaint
in court or any government offices, except in the following disputes:
1. Where one party is the government, or any subdivision or instrumentality thereof;
2. Where one party is a public officer or employee, and the dispute relates to the
performance of his official functions;
3. Where the dispute involves real properties located in different cities and
municipalities, unless the parties thereto agree to submit their difference to amicable
settlement by an appropriate Lupon;
4. Any complaint by or against corporations, partnership or juridical entities, since only
individuals shall be parties to Barangay conciliation proceedings either as complainants
or respondents (Sec. 1, Rule VI, Katarungang Pambarangay Rules);
5. Disputes involving parties who actually reside in barangays of different cities or
municipalities, except where such barangay units adjoin each other and the parties
thereto agree to submit their differences to amicable settlement by an appropriate
Lupon;
6. Offenses for which the law prescribes a maximum penalty of imprisonment
exceeding one (1) year or a fine over five thousand pesos (P5,000.00);
7. Offenses where there is no private offended party;
8. Disputes where urgent legal action is necessary to prevent injustice from being
committed or further continued, specifically the following:
a. Criminal cases where accused is under police custody or detention (see
Sec. 412 (b) (1), Revised Katarungang Pambarangay Law);
b. Petitions for habeas corpus by a person illegally deprived of his rightful
custody over another or a person illegally deprived or on acting in his behalf;
c. Actions coupled with provisional remedies such as preliminary injunction,
attachment, delivery of personal property and support during the pendency
of the action; and
 d. Actions which may be barred by the Statute of Limitations.
9. Any class of disputes which the President may determine in the interest of justice or
upon the recommendation of the Secretary of Justice;
10. Where the dispute arises from the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law (CARL)
(Sec. 46 & 47, R.A. 6657);
11. Labor disputes or controversies arising from employer-employee relations
(Montoya vs. Escayo, et al., 171 SCRA 442; Art. 226, Labor Code, as amended, which
grants original and exclusive jurisdiction over conciliation and mediation of disputes,
grievances or problems to certain offices of the Department of Labor and Employment);
12. Actions to annul judgment upon a compromise which may be filed directly in court
(See Sanchez vs. Tupaz, 158 SCRA 459).
II. Under the provisions of R.A. 7160 on Katarungang Pambarangay conciliation, as implemented
by the Katarungang Pambarangay Rules and Regulations promulgated by the Secretary of
Justice, the certification for filing a complaint in court or any government office shall be issued
by Barangay authorities only upon compliance with the following requirements:
1. Issued by the Lupon Secretary and attested by the Lupon Chairman (Punong
Barangay), certifying that a confrontation of the parties has taken place and that a
conciliation settlement has been reached, but the same has been subsequently
repudiated (Sec. 412, Revised Katarungang Pambarangay Law; Sec. 2[h], Rule III,
Katarungang Pambarangay Rules);
2. Issued by the Pangkat Secretary and attested by the Pangkat Chairman, certifying
that:
a. a confrontation of the parties took place but no conciliation/settlement has
been reached (Sec. 4[f], Rule III, Katarungang Pambarangay Rules; or
b. that no personal confrontation took place before the Pangkat through no
fault of the complainant (Sec. 4[f], Rule III, Katarungang Pambarangay
Rules).
3. Issued by the Punong Barangay, as requested by the proper party on the ground of
failure of settlement where the dispute involves members of the same indigenous
cultural community, which shall be settled in accordance with the customs and
traditions of that particular cultural community, or where one or more of the parties to
the aforesaid dispute belong to the minority and the parties mutually agreed to submit
their dispute to the indigenous system of amicable settlement, and there has been no
settlement as certified by the datu or tribal leader or elder to the Punong Barangay of
place of settlement (Secs. 1,4 & 5, Rule IX, Katarungang Pambarangay Rules); and
4. If mediation or conciliation efforts before the Punong Barangay proved unsuccessful,
there having been no agreement to arbitrate (Sec. 410 [b], Revised Katarungang
Pambarangay Law; Sec. 1, c. (1), Rule III, Katarungang Pambarangay Rules), or where
the respondent fails to appear at the mediation proceeding before the Punong
Barangay (3rd par. Sec. 8, a, Rule VI, Katarungang Pambarangay Rules), the Punong
Barangay shall not cause the issuance at this stage of a certification to file action,
because it is now mandatory for him to constitute the Pangkat before whom mediation,
conciliation, or arbitration proceedings shall be held.
III. All complaints and/or informations filed or raffled to your sala/branch of the Regional Trial
Court shall be carefully read and scrutinized to determine if there has been compliance with prior
Barangay conciliation procedure under the Revised Katarungang Pambarangay Law and its
Implementing Rules and Regulations, as a pre-condition to judicial action, particularly whether
the certification to file action attached to the records of the case comply with the requirements
hereinabove enumerated in par. II;
IV. A case filed in court without compliance with prior Barangay conciliation which is a pre-
condition for formal adjudication (Sec. 412 [a] of the Revised Katarungang Pambarangay Law)
may be dismissed upon motion of defendant/s, not for lack of jurisdiction of the court but for
failure to state a cause of action or prematurity (Royales vs. IAC, 127 SCRA 470; Gonzales vs.
CA, 151 SCRA 289), or the court may suspend proceedings upon petition of any party under
Sec. 1, Rule 21 of the Rules of Court; and refer the case motu proprio to the appropriate
Barangay authority, applying by analogy Sec. 408 [g], 2nd par., of the Revised Katarungang
Pambarangay Law which reads as follows:
The court in which non-criminal cases not falling within the authority of the Lupon under
this Code are filed may at any time before trial, motu proprio refer case to the Lupon
concerned for amicable settlement.
Strict observance of these guidelines is enjoined. This Administrative Circular shall be effective
immediately.
Manila, Philippines. July 15, 1993.
(Sgd.) ANDRES R. NARVASA
Chief Justice
Republic Act No. 7691 March 25, 1994
AN ACT EXPANDING THE JURISDICTION OF THE METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURTS,
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURTS, AND MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURTS, AMENDING FOR
THE PURPOSE BATAS PAMBANSA, BLG. 129, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE
"JUDICIARY REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1980"
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Philippines in Congress
assembled::
Section 1. Section 19 of Batas Pambansa Blg. 129, otherwise known as the "Judiciary
Reorganization Act of 1980", is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Sec. 19. Jurisdiction in civil cases. – Regional Trial Courts shall exercise exclusive original
jurisdiction.
"(1) In all civil actions in which the subject of the litigation is incapable of pecuniary
estimation;
"(2) In all civil actions which involve the title to, or possession of, real property, or any
interest therein, where the assessed value of the property involved exceeds Twenty
thousand pesos (P20,000,00) or, for civil actions in Metro Manila, where such value
exceeds Fifty thousand pesos (P50,000.00) except actions for forcible entry into and
unlawful detainer of lands or buildings, original jurisdiction over which is conferred upon
the Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts, and Municipal Circuit Trial Courts;
"(3) In all actions in admiralty and maritime jurisdiction where the demand or claim
exceeds One hundred thousand pesos (P100,000.00) or, in Metro Manila, where such
demand or claim exceeds Two hundred thousand pesos (P200,000.00);
"(4) In all matters of probate, both testate and intestate, where the gross value of the
estate exceeds One hundred thousand pesos (P100,000.00) or, in probate matters in
Metro Manila, where such gross value exceeds Two Hundred thousand pesos
(P200,000.00);
"(5) In all actions involving the contract of marriage and marital relations;
"(6) In all cases not within the exclusive jurisdiction of any court, tribunal, person or
body exercising jurisdiction of any court, tribunal, person or body exercising judicial or
quasi-judicial functions;
"(7) In all civil actions and special proceedings falling within the exclusive original
jurisdiction of a Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court and of the Court of Agrarian
Relations as now provided by law; and
"(8) In all other cases in which the demand, exclusive of interest, damages of whatever
kind, attorney's fees, litigation expenses, and costs or the value of the property in
controversy exceeds One hundred thousand pesos (P100,000.00) or, in such other
cases in Metro Manila, where the demand exclusive of the abovementioned items
exceeds Two Hundred thousand pesos (P200,000.00)."
Section 2. Section 32 of the same law is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Sec. 32. Jurisdiction of Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts and Municipal
Circuit Trial Courts in Criminal Cases. – Except in cases falling within the exclusive original
jurisdiction of Regional Trial Courts and of the Sandiganbayan, the Metropolitan Trial Courts,
Municipal Trial Courts, and Municipal Circuit Trial Courts shall exercise:
"(1) Exclusive original jurisdiction over all violations of city or municipal ordinances
committed within their respective territorial jurisdiction; and
"(2) Exclusive original jurisdiction over all offenses punishable with imprisonment not
exceeding six (6) years irrespective of the amount of fine, and regardless of other
imposable accessory or other penalties, including the civil liability arising from such
offenses or predicated thereon, irrespective of kind, nature, value or amount thereof:
Provided, however, That in offenses involving damage to property through criminal
negligence, they shall have exclusive original jurisdiction thereof."
Section 3. Section 33 of the same law is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Sec. 33. Jurisdiction of Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts and Municipal
Circuit Trial Courts in Civil Cases. – Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts, and
Municipal Circuit Trial Courts shall exercise:
"(1) Exclusive original jurisdiction over civil actions and probate proceedings, testate
and intestate, including the grant of provisional remedies in proper cases, where the
value of the personal property, estate, or amount of the demand does not exceed One
hundred thousand pesos (P100,000.00) or, in Metro Manila where such personal
property, estate, or amount of the demand does not exceed Two hundred thousand
pesos (P200,000.00), exclusive of interest, damages of whatever kind, attorney's fees,
litigation expenses, and costs, the amount of which must be specifically alleged:
Provided, That interest, damages of whatever kind, attorney's fees, litigation expenses,
and costs shall be included in the determination of the filing fees: Provided, further,
That where there are several claims or causes of actions between the same or different
parties, embodied in the same complaint, the amount of the demand shall be the totality
of the claims in all the causes of action, irrespective of whether the causes of action
arose out of the same or different transactions;
"(2) Exclusive original jurisdiction over cases of forcible entry and unlawful detainer:
Provided, That when, in such cases, the defendant raises the questions of ownership
 in his pleadings and the question of possession cannot be resolved without deciding Approved: March 25, 1994
the issue of ownership, the issue of ownership shall be resolved only to determine the
issue of possession; and

"(3) Exclusive original jurisdiction in all civil actions which involve title to, or possession
of, real property, or any interest therein where the assessed value of the property or
interest therein does not exceed Twenty thousand pesos (P20,000.00) or, in civil
actions in Metro Manila, where such assessed value does not exceed Fifty thousand
pesos (P50,000.00) exclusive of interest, damages of whatever kind, attorney's fees,
litigation expenses and costs: Provided, That in cases of land not declared for taxation
purposes, the value of such property shall be determined by the assessed value of the
adjacent lots."

Section 4. Section 34 of the same law is hereby amended to read as follows:

"Sec. 34. Delegated Jurisdiction in Cadastral and Land Registration Cases. – Metropolitan
Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts, and Municipal Circuit Trial Courts may be assigned by
the Supreme Court to hear and determine cadastral or land registration cases covering lots
where there is no controversy or opposition, or contested lots where the value of which does
not exceed One hundred thousand pesos (P100,000.00), such value to be ascertained by
the affidavit of the claimant or by agreement of the respective claimants if there are more
than one, or from the corresponding tax declaration of the real property. Their decisions in
these cases shall be appealable in the same manner as decisions of the Regional Trial
Courts."

Section 5. After five (5) years from the effectivity of this Act, the jurisdictional amounts mentioned
in Sec. 19(3), (4), and (8); and Sec. 33(1) of Batas Pambansa Blg. 129 as amended by this Act,
shall be adjusted to Two hundred thousand pesos (P200,000.00). Five (5) years thereafter, such
jurisdictional amounts shall be adjusted further to Three hundred thousand pesos (P300,000.00):
Provided, however, That in the case of Metro Manila, the abovementioned jurisdictional amounts
shall be adjusted after five (5) years from the effectivity of this Act to Four hundred thousand
pesos (P400,000.00).

Section 6. All laws, decrees, and orders inconsistent with the provisions of this Act shall be
considered amended or modified accordingly.

Section 7. The provisions of this Act shall apply to all civil cases that have not yet reached the
pre-trial stage. However, by agreement of all the parties, civil cases cognizable by municipal and
metropolitan courts by the provisions of this Act may be transferred from the Regional Trial Courts
to the latter. The executive judge of the appropriate Regional Trial Courts shall define the
administrative procedure of transferring the cases affected by the redefinition of jurisdiction to
the Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts, and Municipal Circuit Trial Courts.

Section 8. This Act shall take effect fifteen (15) days following its publication in the Official
Gazette or in two (2) national newspapers of general circulation.