Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lossky, W - Introduction To Apophatic Theology PDF
Lossky, W - Introduction To Apophatic Theology PDF
godaftergod.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/introduction-to-apophatic-theology-vladimir-lossky-pt-1
January 25,
2012
How can we speak of God, in its essence (its what-ness) and energies (its actions)? Is it
even possible? Can we say anything meaningful about God? Or, are our human
languages so inadequate at speaking about transcendence that we must remain silent in
the face of the abyss between God and humanity? If this be the case, what then is the
point in doing theology or of even participating in a religious way of life?
Vladimir Lossky, author of The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church wrote a short
chapter on these very questions that can provide us with an introduction to the basic
contours of two ways of speaking about God: the kataphatic (literally, “towards speech”)
and apophatic (literally, “away from speech”). It will be manifest to readers that Lossky
doesn’t think that these two ways of speaking about God are the territory of the
academic theologian, a territory that anyone without a theology degree cannot enter.
While there is a no doubt a learning curve and one will have to be initiated into these
sorts of theological ways, the purpose of these ways is not so that academics can talk
abstractly about God in the safety of their offices. No. These ways of speaking about God
have very relevant, personal, and daily ramifications on the way we speak about God.
After all, if one is religious (in a theistic tradition), speaking about God is nearly
unavoidable: from the pious statements of encouragement to other believers to even
how one ‘speaks’ of God in their mind (how one thinks about God).
It is by unknowing (agnosia) that one may know Him who is above every possible object
of knowledge. Proceeding by negations one ascends from the inferior degrees of being to
the highest, by progressively setting aside all that can be known, in order to draw near to
the Unknown in the darkness of absolute ignorance. (25)
“One must abandon all that is impure and even all that is pure. One must then scale the
most sublime heights of sanctity leaving behind one all the divine luminaries, all the
heavenly sounds and words. It is only thus that one may penetrate to the darkness wherein
He who is beyond all created things makes his dwelling.” (27)
2/2
The Way of Not Knowing and Purification
The apophatic way, according to Dionysius and Lossky is the, begins with an
acknowledgement of God’s incomprehensibility. It is “the one definition proper to God–if
we make speak here of definitions.” (31) It is God’s incomprehensibility that is the ground
on which every other apophatic contemplation rests. It is at once the beginning and the
ending of the apophatic way. From there one must begin to purify their intellect and
words of conceptions of God which in order to reach a more perfect knowledge of God’s
unknowableness. This perfect knowledge, or rather, this perfect ignorance, is only
possible by grace. To even take the first step, a step of awareness of God’s utter
incomprehensibility, is a step requiring the intervention of the divine gift. “This
awareness of the incomprehensibility of the divine nature thus corresponds to an
experience: to a meeting with the personal God of revelation.” (34) Coming to the un-
knowledge of God, the ignorance of God’s true nature, is again, not the privilege and
prerogative of the highly trained theologian with bundles of letters after their name.
Beginning the ascent to union with the God of love is an act solely brought on by the
initiative of God itself. Without grace, knowledge, no-knowledge, is not even possible.
Grace is not reserved for the few, but poured out for the many. And in this gift of grace,
one encounters God.
Our spiritual ascent does but reveal to us, ever more and more clearly, the absolute
incomprehensibility of the divine nature. Filled with an ever-increasing desire the soul
grows without ceasing, goes forth from itself, reaches out beyond itself, and, in so doing,
is filled with yet greater longing. Thus the ascent becomes infinite and the desire
insatiable. This is the love of the bride in the Song of Songs: she stretches out her hands
towards the lock, she seeks Him who cannot be grasped, she calls Him to whom she
cannot attain…she attains to Him in the perception that the union is endless, the ascent
without limit. (35)
The apophatic way is above all, Lossky says, an attitude which rejects the temptation to
create ideas, language, and concepts about God. The pursuit of theology, for intellectual
enjoyment or mere knowledge is the opposite of this attitude. Moreover, the apophatic
way is not a theology that remains in the head, but it is deeply rooted in the heart, in the
encounter with God, an encounter which calls for metanoia, a changing of the whole
human person into a new human being. Thus, theology is also experiential, not in a
1/3
shallow pursuit of ‘spiritual experiences’ or ‘getting high on God’ (the apophatic way does
not exclude the possibility of experiencing the deep absence of the spiritual desert, the
dark night of the soul). These experiences are not always joyful consolations, the feel-
good moments. After all, the whole purpose of the apophatic way is purification, and
purification often comes only in the intensity of fire.
Thus the apophatic way appears to walk a careful charted course between the
intellectual pursuit of theology for its own sake and the shallow unreflective
experientialism of an unreflective faith. Intellectual speculation, using concepts and
language to try to talk about God, is abstract and sails much too close to the shoals of
idolatry. Experientialism is equally problematic in that it rarely identifies itself with an
acknowledgement of the utter transcendence of God, settling instead for an immanence
that is all too often co-opted for the sake of personal benefit.
Apophaticism is above all contemplative: “raising the mind to those realities which pass
all understanding.” (43).
That is why, despite all their philosophical learning and natural bent towards speculation,
the Fathers of the eastern tradition in remaining faithful to the apophatic principle of
theology, never allowed their thought to cross the threshold of mystery, or to substitute
idols of God for God Himself. (42)
Union with God is impossible if one is speaking and thinking of God with concepts and
words that are not appropriate for God or ideas that reflect more of us than of God: the
danger is to create God in our own image. Apophaticism is the guard against idolatry, the
preserver of Divine Other-ness, the road of communion with the Unknowable.
Lossky, strangely enough, doesn’t go into much detail on this issue in this chapter. But he
does mention that Dionysius contends that in Jesus’ humanity, God manifested itself
while maintaining its hiddenness and incomprehensibility.
2/3
Suffice it to say, that so far, I understand that there is a distinction made between
essence and energies. God’s essence is God’s nature, which is unknowable. God’s
energies are God’s actions in the world. Energies are what come after God has passed
by. Thus we can speak, to a limited degree I think, about God’s energies, however those
energies do not reveal God’s essence, God’s inner nature. Thus, Jesus would be seen as
an Incarnation of God’s energy, but, an energy which participates in the essence of God.
3/3