You are on page 1of 9

CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY

Volume 60, Number 1, 206–214


Copyright r 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Chronic Hypertension
in Pregnancy:
Diagnosis,
Management, and
Outcomes
NANA-AMA E. ANKUMAH, MD, and BAHA M. SIBAI, MD
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics,
Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical
School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston,
Houston, Texas

Abstract: Chronic hypertension affects up to 5% of


pregnancies. Women can be stratified into low-risk or Introduction
high-risk chronic hypertension based on baseline Chronic hypertension currently affects
laboratory and diagnostic work-up, comorbid con- up to 5% of pregnancies depending on
ditions, and outcomes in prior pregnancies. Pregnan- the population studied,1 and its preva-
cies complicated by chronic hypertension are at risk
for increased adverse maternal and neonatal out- lence has risen over the past decade due
comes including superimposed preeclampsia, fetal to many factors: delayed childbearing
growth restriction, placental abruption, and perinatal (B20% of chronic hypertensives); in-
death. Mainstays of management include blood creasing prevalence of obesity (B30%
pressure control, close monitoring for development to 35% of chronic hypertensives); and
of superimposed preeclampsia, serial ultrasound as-
sessment of fetal growth, and antenatal testing after increasing number of pregnancies with
32 weeks. significant medical comorbidities such as
Key words: chronic hypertension in pregnancy, super- pregestational diabetes, lupus, and renal
imposed preeclampsia, antihypertensives disease.2,3 It disproportionally affects the
non-Hispanic, black population4; in the
Correspondence: Nana-Ama E. Ankumah, MD, Divi-
United States in 2013, 3.1% of non-
sion of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Ob- Hispanic blacks were affected compared
stetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, with 1.4% of non-Hispanic whites and
Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Texas Health 0.9% of Hispanics.5 Chronic hyperten-
Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical
School, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 3.262, Houston, sion is a major risk factor for preeclamp-
TX 77030. E-mail: nana.ama.e.ankumah@uth.tmc.edu sia and adverse perinatal outcomes. This
The authors declare that they have nothing to disclose. chapter will focus on the diagnosis and

CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY / VOLUME 60 / NUMBER 1 / MARCH 2017

206 | www.clinicalobgyn.com
Copyright r 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy 207

FIGURE 1. Diagnostic criteria of superimposed preeclampsia.

management of chronic hypertension BPs in pregnancy are characterized as


during pregnancy, associated adverse either mild (systolic BP, 140 to 159 mm
perinatal outcomes, and risks in future Hg and/or diastolic BP, 90 to 109 mm
pregnancies. Hg) or severe (systolic BPZ160 and/or
diastolic BPZ110).1 Women with chro-
nic hypertension, but specifically women
with severely elevated BPs, are at in-
creased risk of developing superimposed
Definitions and Diagnosis preeclampsia, which can be difficult to
Chronic hypertension in pregnancy is differentiate from their primary dis-
defined as systolic blood pressure (BP) ease.2,6,7 Superimposed preeclampsia on
Z140 mm Hg and/or diastolic BPZ90 chronic hypertension should be consid-
mm Hg documented either before preg- ered with any of the criteria displayed
nancy or before the 20th week of gesta- in Figure 1, as pregnancy management
tion on at least 2 separate occasions at and timing of delivery vastly differs from
least 4 hours apart.1 The diagnosis of that of uncomplicated chronic hyper-
chronic hypertension may prove difficult tension.
during pregnancy, as women of child-
bearing age may not seek regular health
care until pregnancy; thus a chronic Preconception and Early
hypertensive presenting for care in the
second trimester may present with nor- Pregnancy Evaluation of
mal BPs given the physiologic decrease in Chronic Hypertension
BP. In these cases, subsequent hyper- Ideally, women with chronic hyperten-
tension in the late second trimester or sion should be evaluated before concep-
third trimester is classified as gestational tion with emphasis on determining the
hypertension, and the diagnosis of etiology of hypertension, achieving good
chronic hypertension may not be con- BP control, and also achieving control of
firmed until at least 12 weeks postpar- comorbid conditions.2,3 The most com-
tum.2 mon form of chronic hypertension is

www.clinicalobgyn.com
Copyright r 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
208 Ankumah and Sibai

FIGURE 2. Secondary causes of chronic hypertension.

essential or primary hypertension. How- recommended, as there is concern about


ever, in young individuals, women with the safety profile of statins.2 A detailed
BPs that are difficult to control, or history and physical should be elicited
women requiring multiple antihyperten- with special attention to current antihy-
sive agents to achieve BP control, a more pertensive therapies, prior surgery, and
thorough investigation should be carried outcomes in prior pregnancies.
out to determine potential secondary
causes of hypertension (Fig. 2).2,3 If a
secondary cause is found, the underlying Maternal and Perinatal
condition should be treated.
Basic evaluation for pregnant women Outcomes Associated With
with chronic hypertension includes labo- Chronic Hypertension
ratory studies to assess for comorbidities Results of the preliminary work-up can
and for end-organ damage. A hemoglo- aid the clinician in classifying hyperten-
bin A1c should be collected to assess for sive women into low-risk and high-risk.
pregestational diabetes. A baseline elec- Although low-risk women tend to have
trocardiogram should be obtained with excellent pregnancy outcomes, high-risk
attention to the presence of left ventricu- women are at increased risk for poor
lar hypertrophy. In women with long- maternal and neonatal outcomes. High-
standing chronic hypertension (Z5 y), an risk women should be counseled for
echocardiogram should be performed to increased frequency of outpatient visits
assess global heart function as well as left for BP monitoring and high probability
ventricular function.2 Serum creatinine for hospitalizations during the preg-
and proteinuria assessment, either with nancy.2
a spot urine protein/creatinine ratio or 24 Women with chronic hypertension
hour urine, should be collected to assess have increased risk of adverse maternal
for renal disease and to serve as a baseline outcomes compared with the general
for comparison later in pregnancy as an obstetric population. Superimposed pre-
aid in the diagnosis of superimposed eclampsia develops in B15% in low-risk
preeclampsia.1,2 The collection of a lipid women and upwards of 30% in high-risk
profile can also be used to further assess women.2,8 The risk of developing super-
health risk, though treatment of dyslipi- imposed preeclampsia increases with the
demia during pregnancy is currently not presence of baseline proteinuria9 and

www.clinicalobgyn.com
Copyright r 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy 209

TABLE 1. Rate of Adverse Maternal and growth restriction is also increased in this
Perinatal Outcomes by Risk cohort.2,6 The etiology of fetal growth
Group restriction is multifactorial: aggressive
Low-Risk High-Risk treatment of hypertension may lead to
CHTN CHTN decreased uteroplacental perfusion,13
Adverse Outcome (rate %) (rate %) while also severe hypertension can
Superimposed 10-15 25-50 lead to vasoconstriction and decreased
preeclampsia uteroplacental perfusion apart from
Development of severe 7-10 20-30 treatment.14 Also, women with severe
hypertension hypertension are more likely to require
Preterm delivery 7-10 20-50 aggressive antihypertensive treatment,
Placental abruption 1-2 15-30
Perinatal death <1 3-15 which may potentiate the increased risk
Renal failure/dialysis <1 1-2 of fetal growth restriction. Chronic hy-
Retinal injury/stroke <1 <1 pertensives are also most likely to require
an indicated preterm delivery, expos-
CHTN indicates chronic hypertension.
ing the neonate to the morbidity of
prematurity.6 Table 1 compares the risk
BPsZ140 mm Hg and systolic and of adverse maternal and perinatal out-
Z90 mm Hg diastolic, specifically with comes between women with low-risk
5 mm Hg increases in diastolic BPs, be- chronic hypertension versus those who
fore 20 weeks gestation.6 The risk of are high-risk.
placental abruption is also increased
among women with chronic hyperten-
sion, especially when in association with
uncontrolled hypertension and fetal Treatment of Elevated Blood
growth restriction.1,2,8 Placental abrupt- Pressures in Pregnancy
ion in the general obstetric population Treatment of hypertension in the general
occurs at a rate of 1%4,8 and at B1.5% in adult population is based on the premise
women with mildly elevated BPs.4,6,8 that long-standing hypertension is asso-
However, in the setting of superimposed ciated with adverse health outcomes such
preeclampsia, the rate of placental as renal disease, myocardial infarction,
abruption increases to 3%.10 In addition and stroke.15 Long-term BP control has
to preeclampsia and abruption, women been shown to decrease these risks.15
with mild hypertension are at increased However, pregnancy is a relatively short
risk for progression to severe hyperten- interval, and therefore, treatment in this
sion with the potential for infrequent life- small window may expose the fetus to
threatening maternal complications such risk without conferring much benefit to
as pulmonary edema, acute renal failure, the mother.2 There is general consensus
and stroke.2 that women with severe elevations in BP
Aside from the mother, chronic hyper- should be treated with antihypertensive
tension also adversely affects the fetus therapy, as severe BPs put the mother at
and neonate. A recent meta-analysis of 22 risk for hemorrhagic stroke and other
trials of women with chronic hyperten- end-organ damage.1 However, there was
sion demonstrated a 4% incidence of no consensus on thresholds for treatment
perinatal death, which translates to a of mildly elevated BPs in pregnancy.1,2
4-fold increase.11 This risk is further The Control of Hypertension in Preg-
increased in the presence of comorbid nancy Study (CHIPS) is the largest
conditions, especially collagen vascular randomized trial comparing tight control
disorders and renal disease.12 Fetal (<85 mm Hg diastolic) versus less-tight

www.clinicalobgyn.com
Copyright r 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
210 Ankumah and Sibai

TABLE 2. Antihypertensive Agents Used in Pregnancy


Mechanism of
Name Action Dosing Side Effects
Maintenance antihypertensive agents
Labetalol* Nonselective 200-2400 mg orally Bronchospasm
b-blocker divided into Do not use in congestive heart failure
2-3 times/day
dosing
Nifedipine- Calcium 30-120 mg orally Headache
extended channel daily Flushing
release* blocker Reflex tachycardia
Lower extremity edema
Methyldopa a-2 receptor 500-3000 mg orally Transient increase in liver enzymes
agonist divided into
2-3 times/day
dosing
Thiazides Diuretic Depends on agent None known
Metoprolol b-blocker 50-200 mg orally Bronchospasm
extended release daily Do not use in congestive heart failure
Hydralazine Peripheral 40-300 mg orally Palpitations
vasodilator divided into Reflex tachycardia
3-4 times/day
dosing
Furosemide Loop diuretic 20-80 mg orally Electrolyte imbalance
divided into
1-2 times/day
dosing
Acute antihypertensive agents
Labetalol Nonselective 20 mg IV, then Bronchospasm
b-blocker 40 mg IV, then Do not use in congestive heart failure
80 mg IV every
10 min, max
dose 300 mg IV
Hydralazine Peripheral 5-10 mg IV every Caution—multiple doses may cause
vasodilator 20-30 min profound delayed hypotension
Nifedipine Calcium 10-20 mg orally Headache
immediate channel every 20 min Flushing
release blocker for 3 doses Reflex tachycardia

*First-line maintenance antihypertensive agents in pregnancy.


IV indicates intravenous.

control (<100 mm Hg systolic) of women either the primary outcome (30.7% vs.
with both chronic and gestational hyper- 31.4%) or preeclampsia (27% vs. 30%).
tension.16 Outcomes investigated were Among the subgroup of 736 women with
the development of a composite primary chronic hypertension (371 randomized to
outcome of pregnancy loss or high-level less-tight group and 365 to tight-control
neonatal care during the first 28 days group), there was no significant differ-
of neonatal life, and secondary outcomes ence between groups in rate of either the
included superimposed preeclampsia, primary outcome (28.9% vs. 30.6%) or in
fetal growth restriction, placental abrupt- the rates of secondary maternal outcome
ion, preterm birth, and antenatal hospi- (2.2% vs. 2.7%), although the rate of
talization. There was no significant progression to severe hypertension was
difference between groups in rate of significantly higher in the less-tight

www.clinicalobgyn.com
Copyright r 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy 211

FIGURE 3. Algorithm for care of women with chronic hypertension.

control group (43.1% vs. 26.4%; odds prenatal care with BPs less than or at
ratio, 0.47, 95% confidence interval, the lower end of goal ranges, it is reason-
0.34-0.65). As there is no current evidence able to discontinue antihypertensive ther-
that tight control of BPs during preg- apy and monitor BPs, restarting if BPs
nancy improve maternal or perinatal out- exceed the aforementioned thresholds.1,2
comes, goals for antihypertensive therapy For women requiring antihypertensive
in low-risk chronic hypertensives is 120 to in pregnancy, first-line oral agents in-
160 mm Hg systolic and 80 to 105 mm Hg clude labetalol, a nonselective b-blocker
diastolic.1 We call for caution in high-risk and nifedipine, a calcium channel block-
women with evidence of end-organ dam- er.1 (Table 2). Labetalol should be used
age for tighter control of BPs, with goals with caution in asthmatics as it can cause
<140 mm Hg systolic and <90 mm Hg bronchospasm, and should be avoided in
diastolic. For women already on antihy- patients with congestive heart failure.1–3
pertensive therapy at the initiation of Nifedipine, a calcium channel blocker

www.clinicalobgyn.com
Copyright r 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
212 Ankumah and Sibai

can also be used in its extended release first trimester with anatomy ultrasound
form for BP control.1–3 Methyldopa, an to screen for fetal anomalies in the second
a-2 receptor agonist, has a long safety trimester around 18 to 22 weeks. Serial
profile in pregnancy, but may be less growth ultrasounds should commence at
effective than labetalol and nifedipine in 34 weeks, and earlier if there are sus-
preventing severe hypertension.7 Thia- pected growth abnormalities from the
zides are considered second-line agents anatomy ultrasound or from in-office
in the treatment of chronic hypertension fundal heights. If fetal growth restriction
in pregnancy.1,2 Angiotensin-converting is identified, weekly antenatal testing and
enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II umbilical artery Doppler should be per-
receptor blockers are contraindicated in formed starting at the time of diagnosis.
pregnancy given their association with If there are growth abnormalities or other
adverse fetal renal and craniofacial de- indications for antenatal testing, weekly
fects.1–3 For acute, severe exacerbations antenatal testing in the form of biophys-
in BPs exceeding 160 mm Hg systolic or ical profile or nonstress test should begin
110 mm Hg diastolic, first-line agents at 34 weeks, and women should be
include intravenous labetalol, intrave- educated on daily kick counts given
nous hydralazine, or immediate release increased risk of intrauterine fetal de-
oral nifedipine1,2 (Table 2). mise. Delivery should occur at 38 to 39
weeks if there are no other indications for
delivery arise (Fig. 3).
Management of Low-Risk
Chronic Hypertension
After the initial baseline work-up detailed Management of High-Risk
earlier, priorities during pregnancy are Chronic Hypertension
BP control (<160 mm Hg systolic and Management of high-risk chronic hyper-
<105 mm Hg diastolic) and monitoring tension involves more intensive follow-up
for signs and symptoms of superimposed given the increased risk in adverse mater-
preeclampsia. Women should be coun- nal and perinatal outcomes and risk of
seled to report symptoms of preeclampsia further organ deterioration. In-patient
promptly and advised to avoid tobacco initial evaluation may prove safest and
and alcohol use, as this can exacerbate expedite the completion of all necessary
risks for fetal growth restriction and preliminary evaluations. BPs should be
placental abruption. Women may be maintained <140 mm Hg and <90 mm
prescribed BP cuffs and made to perform Hg diastolic for organ protection. Wom-
BPs logs daily. Depending on BP control, en should be offered aneuploidy screen-
clinic visits may occur every 3 weeks until ing in the first trimester and anatomy
28 to 30 weeks, every 2 weeks until 36 ultrasound in the second trimester, as
weeks, and then weekly thereafter, with well as early 1 hour glucose challenge test
more frequent visits if BPs are not well to be repeated in the second trimester if
controlled. One may consider an early 1 passed. These women should have fre-
hour glucose challenge test, especially in quent antenatal evaluation and also be
the setting of obesity, as recent investiga- educated on the symptoms of superim-
tions have shown increased rates of gesta- posed preeclampsia. Multidisciplinary
tional diabetes among women with coordination may be necessary given
chronic hypertension.17 coexisting medical conditions.
On the fetal side, women should be More rigorous fetal evaluation is nec-
offered screening for aneuploidy in the essary for this cohort, with serial growth

www.clinicalobgyn.com
Copyright r 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy 213

ultrasounds starting at 28 weeks every 3 velopment of serious complications such


weeks, and sooner if concerns for growth as pulmonary edema, congestive heart
restriction. Weekly antenatal testing in failure, and renal failure. Women are at
the form of biophysical profile or non- even higher risk for development of these
stress test should commence at 28-30 complications if they developed super-
weeks gestation until delivery, which imposed preeclampsia, placental abrupt-
should occur by 37 weeks gestation. ion, or already have end-organ damage.
Clinicians should have a low threshold BP control is of utmost importance in
for hospitalization in these women given these women to avoid more serious se-
their higher risk of adverse outcomes and quelae.
organ deterioration.

Postpartum Management of Prognosis in Future


Chronic Hypertension Pregnancies
Prognosis in future pregnancies is good
BP control is important with both low-
for low-risk chronic hypertensives. Even
risk and high-risk chronic hypertension.
with the development of preeclampsia in
As there are not current trials on post-
a prior pregnancy, the risk of developing
partum BP goals in women with chronic
superimposed preeclampsia in a future
hypertension, the current recommen-
pregnancy may not be increased, though
dation is <150 mm Hg systolic and
the risk of an indicated preterm delivery
<100 mm Hg diastolic.1 When oral ther-
is increased.19 Advancing maternal age
apy is needed to control BPs, women may
(Z40 y) and adverse pregnancy outcome
be able to resume BP medications before
occurring <34 weeks gestation in the
pregnancy. Diabetics or women with
previous pregnancy does increase risk of
cardiomyopathy may benefit from use
adverse pregnancy outcomes in future
of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhib-
pregnancies. In women with high-risk
itors. If an angiotensin-converting en-
chronic hypertension, their risk in future
zyme inhibitor is to be used captopril
pregnancies is largely dependent on con-
and enalapril has been studied most in
trol of BP as well as status of their
pregnancy and is compatible with breast-
comorbid conditions.
feeding.1,18 There is little information on
the safety profile of angiotensin II recep-
tor blockers in breastfeeding, and their
use in breastfeeding should currently be References
avoided.18 When b-blockers are used, 1. Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy.
labetalol and propranolol have lower Chapter 7: Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy
concentrations in the breast-milk than and Superimposed Preeclampsia Hypertension in
metoprolol and atenolol.18 Diuretics are Pregnancy. Washington, DC: American College
in low concentration in the breast-milk of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2013:
51–61.
and probably safe based on limited data, 2. Sibai B. Chronic hypertension in pregnancy.
but potentially may decrease milk sup- Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:369–377.
ply.18 Nifedipine is compatible with 3. Seely EW, Ecker J. Chronic Hypertension in
breastfeeding,18 and is an excellent drug Pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2001;265:439–446.
for women with superimposed pree- 4. Ananth CV, Peltier MR, Kinzler WL, et al.
Chronic hypertension and risk of placental
clampsia given its protective renal effects. abruption: is the association modified by ischemic
Women with high-risk hypertension placental disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:
should be monitored closely for the de- 273. e1-273e7.

www.clinicalobgyn.com
Copyright r 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
214 Ankumah and Sibai

5. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, et al. admission. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:134.
Births: final data for 2013, supplemental tables. e1-8.
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64:1–1. 13. von Dadelszen P, Ornstein MP, Bull SB, et al.
6. Ankumah NA, Cantu J, Jauk V, et al. Risk of Fall in mean arterial pressure and fetal growth
adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with mild restriction: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2000;355:
chronic hypertension before 20 weeks gestation. 87–92.
Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:966–972. 14. Orbach H, Matok I, Gorodischer R, et al. Hyper-
7. Abalos E, Duly L, Steyn DW, et al. Antihyper- tension and antihypertensive drugs in pregnancy
tensive drug therapy for mild to moderate hyper- and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
tension during pregnancy. Cochrane Database 2013;208:301. e1-6.
Syst Rev. 2007;1:CD002252. Art No. DOI: 15. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, et al. 2014
10.1002/14051858.CD002252.pub2. Evidence-Based Guideline for the Management
8. Sibai BM, Abdella TN, Anderson GD. Preg- of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Report From
nancy outcomes in 211 patients with mild chronic the Panel Members Appointed to the Eighth
hypertension. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;61:571–576. Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA.
9. Sibai BM, Lindheimer M, Hauth J, et al. Risk 2014;311:507–520.
factors for preeclampsia, abruption placentae, 16. Magee LA, von Dadelszen P, Rey E, et al. Less-
and adverse neonatal outcomes among women tight versus tight control of hypertension in
with chronic hypertension. New Engl J Med. pregnancy. New Engl J Med. 2015;372:407–417.
1999;339:667–671. 17. Leon M, Moussa HN, Longo M, et al. Rate of
10. Caritis S, Sibai B, Hauth J, et al. Low-dose gestational diabetes mellitus and pregnancy out-
aspirin to prevent preeclampsia in women at high comes in patients with chronic hypertension. Am
risk. New Engl J Med. 1998;338:701–705. J Perinatol. 2016;33:745–750.
11. Bramham K, Parnell B, Nelson-Piercey C, et al. 18. Hale TW, Rowe HE. Medications and & Mothers’
Chronic hypertension and pregnancy outcomes: Milk. Plano, TX: Hale Publishing, LP; 2014:826.
systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014; 19. Sibai BM, Koch MA, Freire S, et al. The impact
348:g2301. of prior preeclampsia on the risk of superimposed
12. Bateman BT, Bansil P, Hernandez-Diaz S, et al. preeclampsia and other adverse pregnancy out-
Prevalence, trends, and outcomes of chronic comes in patients with chronic hypertension. Am
hypertension: a nationwide sample of delivery J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:345. e1-6.

www.clinicalobgyn.com
Copyright r 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

You might also like