You are on page 1of 1

Likewise, under "nine years and one day," the "first stage of intercourse" of a boy with the

mother, or any grown woman, is harmless, Talmudically. Shammai, to seem more "strict," lowers
the age to eight years in some cases. (See Exhibit 82 from Sanhedrin 69b of the Talmud)

A long harangue about the amount of the Kethubah (payment if divorced) a woman gets if her
virginity was removed by a young boy, fills Kethuboth I lb of the Talmud. And here, the foul
mother may be reckoned "pure," depending on the age of the child. Such degrading use of
children was typical of paganism throughout the ancient world.

"When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than
this -- that is, less than three years old -- it is as if one puts the finger into the eye -- tears come
to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years." (See
Exhibit 136, Kethuboth 11b of the Talmud)

Both Zionism and Nazism strove to build a ‘state’ that would be ‘redeemed’ through violent
purification (in the case of Nazi Germany) and ‘an Iron wall’ (in the case of Zionist Israel).

In both instances, ethnic cleansing was the main tool used to obliterate the ‘inferiors,’ in order
to create ‘German-only’ settlements in Europe and ‘Jewish-only’ settlements in Palestine. You
can’t really ignore the absolute similarity between the Zionist ethnic conquest of Palestine and
the implanting therein of ‘Jewish settlers’ at the expense of the native Palestinian Muslims and
Christians, and the Nazi drive for ‘Lebensraum’ in Poland and the importation of ‘Aryans’ at the
expense of the indigenous population.

When you look at the arguments in support of the Aryan and Jewish People they are identical.
The Nazis sought to steal the Sudetenland and in Palestine, the Zionists are stealing the West
Bank. The arguments are the same, the lies are the same and the means are nearly identical.

Were the Nazis ‘Nazi’ only because they created and used gas chambers to incinerate their
victims? Would the Nazis have been less evil and therefore ‘less Nazi’ if they had annihilated
their victims by other ways instead of ovens, or by making life unbearable as Israel has been
doing to the Palestinians? At what point should we start calling Israel ‘Nazi’? When the number
of its victims reaches one million? Two million? Or perhaps six million? Or when 90% of
Palestinians are packed into detention camps, surrounded by 8-meter high concrete walls fitted
with watchtowers that are manned by trigger-happy Zionist Gestapo.

You might also like