Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FIGURE 8-2
Basic construction of pv cell with performance enhancing features (current collecting mesh,
anti-reflective coating and cover glass protection).
Figure 8-2 shows the basic cell construction.1 For collecting the photocur-
rent, the metallic contacts are provided on both sides of the junction to collect
electrical current induced by the impinging photons on one side. Conducting
foil (solder) contact is provided over the bottom (dark) surface and on one
edge of the top (illuminated) surface. Thin conducting mesh on the remain-
ing top surface collects the current and lets the light through. The spacing
of the conducting fibers in the mesh is a matter of compromise between
maximizing the electrical conductance and minimizing the blockage of the
light. In addition to the basic elements, several enhancement features are
also included in the construction. For example, the front face of the cell has
anti-reflective coating to absorb as much light as possible by minimizing the
reflection. The mechanical protection is provided by the coverglass applied
with a transparent adhesive.
FIGURE 8-6
Equivalent electrical circuit of pv module, showing the diode and ground leakage currents.
QVoc
I d = ID − 1 (8-2)
AKT
QVoc Voc
I = I L − ID e AKT − 1 − (8-3)
Rsh
The last term, the ground-leakage current, in practical cells is small com-
pared to IL and ID , and can be ignored. The diode-saturation current can,
therefore, be determined experimentally by applying voltage Voc in the dark
and measuring the current going into the cell. This current is often called
the dark current or the reverse diode-saturation current.
AKT I
Voc = Logn L + 1 (8-4)
Q ID
FIGURE 8-8
Power versus voltage (p-v) character-
istics of the pv module in sunlight.
Obviously, the higher the efficiency, the higher the output power we get
under a given illumination.
FIGURE 8-11
Photoconversion efficiency versus solar radiation. The efficiency is practically constant over a
wide range of radiation.
intensity as shown in Figure 8-10. On a cloudy day, therefore, the short circuit
current decreases significantly. The reduction in the open-circuit voltage,
however, is small.
The photoconversion efficiency of the cell is insensitive to the solar radi-
ation in the practical working range. For example, Figure 8-11 shows that
the efficiency is practically the same at 500 watts/m2 and 1,000 watts/m2.
This means that the conversion efficiency is the same on a bright sunny day
and a cloudy day. We get lower power output on a cloudy day only because
of the lower solar energy impinging the cell.
TABLE 8-1
The Kelley Cosine Values of the Photocurrent
in Silicon Cells
Sun Angle Mathematical Kelly
Degrees Cosine Value Cosine Value
30 0.866 0.866
50 0.643 0.635
60 0.500 0.450
80 0.174 0.100
85 0.087 0
Beyond 50°, the electrical output deviates significantly from the cosine law,
and the cell generates no power beyond 85°, although the mathematical cosine
law predicts 7.5 percent power generation. The actual power-angle curve of
the pv cell is called Kelly cosine, and is shown in Figure 8-12 and Table 8-1.
FIGURE 8-14
Bypass diode in pv string minimizes the power loss under heavy shadow.
gets below operating voltage of the string, making the string current fall to
zero, losing all power of the string.
The commonly used method to eliminate the loss of string due to shadow
effect is to subdivide the circuit length in several segments with bypass
diodes (Figure 8-14). The diode across the shadowed segment bypasses only
that segment of the string. This causes a proportionate loss of the string
voltage and current, without losing the whole string power. Some modern
pv modules come with such internally embedded bypass diodes.
Since the operating current and the voltage change approximately in the
same proportion as the short-circuit current and open-circuit voltage, respec-
tively, the new power is as follows:
[
P = Po ⋅ 1 + (α − β) ⋅ ∆T ] (8-8)
For typical single crystal silicon cells, α is 500 µu per °C and β is 5 mu per
°C. The power is therefore:
[ ]
P = Po ⋅ 1 + (500µu − 5mu) ⋅ ∆T or Po ⋅ [1 − .0045∆T] (8-9)
This expression indicates that for every °C rise in the operating tempera-
ture above the reference temperature, the silicon cell power output decreases
by 0.45 percent. Since the increase in the current is much less than the
decrease in the voltage, the net effect is the decrease in power at high
operating temperatures.
The effect of varying temperature on the power output is shown in the
power versus voltage characteristics at two operating temperatures in
Figure 8-16. The figure shows that the maximum power available at lower
temperature is higher than that at higher temperature. Thus, cold tempera-
ture is actually better for the pv cell, as it generates more power. However,
the two Pmax points are not at the same voltage. In order to extract maximum
power at all temperatures, the pv system must be designed such that the
module output voltage can increase to V2 for capturing Pmax2 at lower tem-
perature and can decrease to V1 for capturing Pmax1 at higher temperature.
shown in Figure 8-17 (a) is supplying the power to the resistive load R1, it
will operate at point A1 . If the load resistance increases to R2 or R3 , the
operating point moves to A2 or A3 , respectively. The maximum power is
extracted from the module when the load resistance is R2 (Figure 8-17b).
Such load matching with the source is always necessary for maximum power
extraction from the pv module.
The operation with constant power loads is shown in Figure 8-17(c) and
(d). The constant power load line has two points of intersection with the
source line, denoted by B1 and B2 . Only point B2 is stable, as any perturbation
from it will generate a restoring power to take the operation back to B2 .
Therefore, the system will operate at B2.
The necessary condition for the electrical operating stability of the solar
array is as follows:
dP dP
dV > dV (8-10)
load source
Some loads such as heaters have constant resistance, with power varying
with the voltage squared. On the other hand, some loads such as induction
motors behave more like constant power loads, drawing more current at
lower voltage. In most large systems with mix loads, the power varies
approximately in linear proportion with voltage.
• one-axis tracker, which follows the sun from east to west during
the day.
• two-axis tracker tracks the sun from east to west during the day,
and from north to south during the seasons of the year (Figure 8-18).
A sun tracking design can increase the energy yield up to 40 percent
over the year compared to the fixed-array design. The dual-axis
tracking is done by two linear actuator motors, which aim the sun
within one degree of accuracy (Figure 8-19). During the day, it tracks
the sun east to west. At night it turns east to position itself for the
next morning sun. Old trackers did this after the sunset using a
small nickel-cadmium battery. The new designs eliminate the bat-
tery requirement by doing it in the weak light of the dusk and/or
dawn. The Kelley cosine presented in Table 8-1 is useful to assess,
accurately, the power available from sun at the evening angles.
FIGURE 8-20
Sun tracking actuator principle. The two differentially connected sensors at 45° generate signal
proportional to the pointing error.
When the sun is obscured by a dark cloud, the tracker may aim at the next
brightest object, which is generally the edge of the cloud. When the cloud
is gone, the tracker aims at the sun once again. Such sun-hunting is elimi-
nated in newer suntracker design.
One method of designing the suntracker is to use two pv cells mounted
on two 45° wedges (Figure 8-20), and connecting them differentially in series
through an actuator motor. When the sun is perfectly normal, the current
on both cells are equal to Io · cos 45°. Since they are connected in series
opposition, the net current in the motor is zero, and the array stays put. On
I m = I1 − I 2 = Io cos ( 45 + δ ) − Io cos ( 45 − δ )
h2
f ( x + h ) = f ( x ) + h ⋅ f ′( x ) + f ′′( x) + L
2!
I 2 = Io cos 45 − Io δ sin 45
= 2 Io δ if δ is in radian
∆P = ∆V ⋅ I + ∆I ⋅ V (8-13)
dV V
=− (8-14)
dI I
We take note here that dV/dI is the dynamic impedance of the source, and
V/I is the static impedance.
There are three electrical methods of extracting the peak power from the
module, as described below:
(1) In the first method, a small signal current is periodically injected into
the array bus and the dynamic bus impedance Zd = dV/dI and the static bus
impedance Zs = V/I are measured. The operating voltage is then increased
or decreased until Zd = – Zs . At this point, the maximum power is extracted
from the source.
(2) In another electrical method, the operating voltage is increased as long
as dP/dV is positive. That is, the voltage is increased as long as we get more
power. If dP/dV is sensed negative, the operating voltage is decreased. The
voltage is kept put if the dP/dV is near zero within a preset dead band.
(3) The third method makes use of the fact that for most pv cells, the ratio
of the voltage at the maximum power point to the open circuit voltage (i.e.,
Vmp /Voc ) is approximately constant, say K. For example, for high-quality
crystalline silicon cells K = 0.72. An unloaded cell is installed on the array
and kept in the same environment as the power-producing module, and its
open circuit voltage is continuously measured. The operating voltage of the
power-producing array is then set at K·Voc , which will produce the maximum
power.