Professional Documents
Culture Documents
On 31 August 2018, Vodafone India merged with Idea Cellular, and was
renamed as Vodafone Idea Limited. However, the merged entity continues
using both the Idea and Vodafone brand. Currently, the Vodafone Group holds
a 45.1% stake in the combined entity, the Aditya Birla Group holds 26% and
the remaining shares will be held by the public. Kumar Mangalam Birla heads
the merged company as the Chairman, with Mr. Balesh Sharma as the CEO.
History
Type Public
Industry Telecommunications
Predecessor Vodafone India
Idea Cellular Limited
Founded 1995; 23 years ago
Key people Kumar Mangalam Birla
(Chairman)
Balesh Sharma
(Chief Executive Officer)
Akshaya Moondra
(Chief Financial Officer)
Ambrish Jain
(Chief Operations Officer)
The success of the mega merger between Idea Cellular Ltd and Vodafone India
Ltd depends largely on synergy benefits that can accrue by combining
operations. Not surprisingly, the two companies are factoring in huge gains on
this count.
Vodafone and Idea said in a statement that annual savings, both in terms of
operating costs as well as capital expenditure, will be around Rs14,000 crore
annually by the fourth full year of operations as a combined entity. About two-
thirds of this will be on account of savings in operating costs.
The net present value of total savings (opex and capex) is estimated at
Rs70,000 crore ($10.5 billion).
Opex and capex are short for operating expenditure and capital expenditure,
respectively.
Reliance Jio not main reason for merger of Idea Cellular, Vodafone: Vittorio
Colao
While merging companies are typically quite sanguine about synergy benefits,
most analysts agree that the Vodafone-Idea merger holds the potential for
significant cost savings. With a larger scale and elimination of duplicate costs,
margins can rise substantially. However, with the two companies announcing
that Vodafone and Idea will exist as separate brands, some analysts are
questioning the expected gains from synergies.
The combined entity will also be either the largest cellular services operator
in prominent circles, or a very strong No. 2. In a couple of circles, it will
upstage Bharti Airtel as the number one operator, while in some other ‘A’ and
‘B’ circles, it will graduate to a strong No. 2. It remains to be seen if the
combined entity will retain a half-hearted presence in the relatively smaller ‘C’
circles, or whether it will up the ante and aim for a strong pan-India focus.
Vodafone’s Indian escape act is heavy on the contortions
Nevertheless, a stronger market share in the majority of circles will also result
in better efficiency. One of the reasons margins are relatively lower at both
Idea and Vodafone is that these companies run EBITDA losses in some circles
where market share is sub-optimal.
The merger will also result in a sharp fall in leverage. Idea and Vodafone
expect the net debt/Ebitda for the combined entity to fall from around 4.4
times to around 3 times. This will be aided by asset sales—both companies
intend to sell their tower assets and reduce debt. Besides capex synergies will
contain debt to some extent in the future. In addition, opex synergies will
result in higher profits.
On a standalone basis, analysts at JM Financial Institutional Securities Ltd had
forecast Idea’s net Debt/Ebitda ratio to reach around 5.5 times by end March
2017. In contrast, the forecast 3 times net Debt/Ebitda ratio for the combined
entity is far lower.
Of course, the big caveat in all of these calculations is the usual disclaimer: “all
other things remaining the same”. Things are not only not expected to remain
the same, they are practically changing each passing day, with Reliance Jio
making rapid strides in the market. Profitability may well come down
substantially for both Airtel and the Vodafone-Idea combine, as tariffs
continue to decline and freebies continue to increase. Besides, it’s anybody’s
guess where market shares settle a few years from now.
Even so, the fact remains that Vodafone and Idea will be in a far better
position together than trying to navigate the gigantic challenges in the telecom
market on their own.
Mantravedi and Reddy Including all the diverse sectors of India, no significant variations
(2008) is found in respect to effect on operating performance
subsequentto mergers.
Kumar and Rajib (2007) Majority of the studies on Mergers and Acquisitions are done
taking accounting measures into considerations.
Aggarwal arid Jaffe (1996) Designed techniques to compute the return on shareholder’s
equity through Mergers and Acquisitions.
George (2007) No sufficient evidence is found regarding the time duration for
which the impact of mergers and acquisitions can be observed.
Krishnamurti and There is a need to develop practical measures for analysing the
Vishwanath, (2010) performance of a merged company as the frequency, Value,
Numbers of Mergers & Acquisitions in India are increasing
continuously.
Dasgupta (2004) Reforms mainly economic reforms is the most important factor in
the growth of mergers in India as most of the mergers are results
of economic reforms initiated since 1990s.
Kale and Singh (2005) Observed that MNCs acquirer during 1998-2002 have earned
considerably larger return in equity market compared to their
local Indian counterparts.
Rani et al. (2010) Found that the main objective of mergers in India during
2003–2008 was to take benefit of synergies including expansion,
diversification, enhanced geographical reach, increased
profitability, better technology etc.
The merger will leave Bharti Airtel off its hook from being the number one
from past 15 years. There are several aspects that are to be looked into while
developing an understanding about the features associated with merger and
the impact it would make on the consumers and the telecom industry as a
whole.
Key Highlights of Vodafone-Idea Merger
The merger will give a higher stake to the promoters of Idea as compared to
Vodafone India so that in the long run both the companies are able to gain
access to equal hold
1. The first step for AB group would be the acquisition of 4.9 percent of shares
from Vodafone. This would amount to a total of Rs. 3874 crore wherein each
share is worth Rs. 108. This would be helpful in increasing the share holding
capacity of Idea to 26 percent
2. While Vodafone holds 45.1 percent of the shares in the merger, Idea would
be allowed to buy another 9.6 percent but at a cost of Rs. 130 per share in the
period spread over next four years. However, if Idea is unable to come up
equal to the shareholding percentage of Vodafone, it can go forward and buy
the number of shares required further but at the price prevailing in the
market
3. The chairman of the new combined entity would be Kumar Mangalam Birla
while Vodafone would appoint the chief financial officer. The CEO of the new
entity would be named jointly by both the companies under a joint agreement
4. The merger also gives the promoters of both the entities with a right to
nominate 3 members each for the board. There would be a total of 12
members on the board of which 6 would be independent
Significance of the Merger for Consumers
The merger holds significance for the consumers also, as a rapid change can
be expected in the market organisation and the telecom industry
development.
1. The Indian telecom industry would see the domination of three telecom
giants of which Vodafone-Idea would be the largest. Additionally, Bharti Airtel
and Jio have been found as the dominating counterparts in the telecom
industry.
1. Firstly, there can be initiatives based on the renewal of price discipline for
the disruptive entry by Jio has caused some serious misbalance
2. Secondly, the poor financial health of the telecom sector can be observed
and through such mergers there will be infusion of health and life since India
is the fastest growing market in terms of the subscriber base.
3. Through the merger, Vodafone and Idea will overcome their debts and large
sum of credit will be infused in the system
4. The deal has also saved both the telecom companies from selling off their
business, as was being planned by them initially and this would directly
impact the quality of services being provided by different players in the
industry
The merger will surely boost the pace of the telecom sector. It has also been
found that the savings, synergies and also the spectrum will have substantial
impact on the escalating growth. There will be saving of over 60 percent of the
operations cost and this will aid in improving the quality and performance of
the service through investments from the saved money. Enhancement
in network infrastructure will be observed while the operational efficiencies
have a chance to reach excellence. Moreover, the revenue market share is
expected to rise for all the locations and the spectrum of the entity would
exceed the initial caps.
With the entry of Reliance JioInfocomm Ltd. in the telecom sector with
an investment of about Rs 1.5 trillion in the month of September 2016 the
Indian mobile industry observed a turbulent phase. Launching of Reliance Jio
with its facility of free voice call and free data service created stress on the
existing players like Vodafone, Idea, BSNL and the market leader Airtel. This
has hindered the growth prospects of the leading telecom service providers.
Though these telecom operators have launched various plans in the form of
unlimited calling and bundled data still their revenue is declining. Keeping the
long term strategic goal in mind and to improve its market share and
subscriber’s share the major players i.e. Idea-Vodafone and Airtel-Telenor are
planning to gain through Mergers and acquisitions. It is expected that this
action will change the dynamics of the telecom Industry.
Strategic analysis of Idea –Vodafone Merger
The talks of all share merger of Vodafone India and Aditya Birla’s Idea
Cellular got confirmed in the month of January 2017.However, it excludes
Vodafone's 42 percent stake in Indus Towers. As per COAI's data (December
2016), Vodafone was the second biggest telecom service provider with 204.69
million users and Idea Cellular the third largest cellular with190.52 million. If
these entities combine it will result into the largest telecom operator 395.21
million subscribers. COAI data also revealed that market share of Vodafone as
on December was 25.27 percent and Idea 23.52 percent share and the
consolidated market share of nearly 49 percent.
During last quarter, Idea reported a loss of Rs 385.6 Crore and decline
in the revenue by 3.79%. Vodafone also posted operating loss of Rs 37,382
Crore in the first half of September. But this merger will result in increase in
operating profit by 3 percentage and the revenues of the combined entity will
be in the range 77,500- 80,000 crore range and the net profit margin before
tax will be around 28 per cent. The operating margins of the merged company
will also improve because of the synergy in cost leading to reduction in
operating cost .It will eradicate the duplication in costs arising from spectrum
capacity and structural requirements. It is estimated that the combined entity
will shed off its excess band in five circles under 900MHz band, one circle
under the 1,800MHz band and two circles under the 2,500MHz.
What they will also watch out for is control of the company. To begin
with, the Aditya Birla group will own 26 per cent of it, while Vodafone will get
45.1 per cent. In four years, the Indian partner has the option to buy shares
from Vodafone with a view to equalise shareholdings.
The agreement provides equal representation for the two on the merged
company's board.
The fact is that the days of equal partnership are long over. It will need deft
interpersonal skills on the part of both to keep the show going.
And it will have two brands at its disposal: Vodafone and Idea.
There is some speculation that both the brands will be kept alive -- Vodafone
for the urban market and Idea for the rural market. That may be unwise.
Two brands will lead to extra expenditure and mixed messaging. If the whole
idea behind the merger is to achieve synergies and cut costs, there is no
reason why both the brands should continue.
At one time, Bharti Airtel had two brands: Touchtel for landline telephony and
Airtel for mobile. It soon realised the folly and decided on Airtel for all
services: Landline, mobile, DTH, payments bank.
In the past, several brands, including national ones like Hutch and regional
ones like Spice and Escotel, have vanished without causing a ripple in the
market. Their subscribers without a murmur of protest moved on to the brand
of the acquirer.
Of course, there will be sizeable synergies when the operations are merged,
though the announcement that the full benefits will accrue from only the
fourth year has somewhat dampened sentiments.
Vodafone and Idea Cellular have about 300 MHz of spectrum each for voice
calls. Of this, 400 MHz is good enough to handle the voice traffic from the
merged entity's 400 million subscribers -- the remaining 200 MHz it can
deploy for data. The subscribers are going to love it.
The merged entity will have on its books debt of over 1 lakh crore, but it will
come down after the tower assets get sold.
Reliance Jio's offer of free data ends on Friday. It will be interesting to see how
many of its 100 million subscribers convert to its tariff plan.
Called Prime, the plan is really attractive: 30 GB of data every month for 303,
plus an annual membership fee of 99 (voice calls, of course, are free).
However, most networks have come out with similar plans.
By all accounts, most Reliance Jio subscribers are also on another network;
given the uniformity in tariffs, it is possible that all may not choose to go for
Prime.
Also, there won't be too many takers for spectrum in the days to come. Bharti
Airtel is well stocked for at least a couple of years. The Vodafone-Idea combine
has no shortage of airwaves.
Besides, the industry is groaning under a debt of over ₹3 lakh crore. The banks
are worried about their exposure to the sector.
With their revenues under squeeze, it is difficult to figure out from where the
networks will find the money to take part in spectrum auctions.
Maybe the government will wake up to the crisis in telecom once its revenues
get hit.
The prime minister has clearly slipped into election mode, and his
government will need money to create a favourable impression on voters in
the next couple of years.
To ensure that the flow of money from telecom keeps going, the government
must ensure that the sector stays healthy. Several suggestions have been
made to provide relief to the networks, but none of those so far has been
taken up by the government.
6. Limitations of the study
But with leverage at the two companies going out of whack since,
and constraints on capex already impacting market share, perhaps a rethink is
in order. The deal’s current structure puts limits on funding for these
companies. A tweak in the merger terms can improve liquidity and leverage
ratios considerably, and help in effectively staving off threats from
competitors Bharti Airtel Ltd and Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. The catch,
however, is that this may entail Vodafone ending up as a controlling
shareholder.
To bring about equal shareholding, Idea’s promoters had agreed to buy shares
worth Rs3,874 crore from Vodafone at the time the deal closes. It also has the
option of buying shares worth another Rs9,000 crore within a four-year time
frame.
As such, the deal is structured in a way where large amounts are expected to
change hands between the joint venture partners. Besides, while Vodafone
may soon be flush with funds after the Indus Towers sale, none of this might
find its way to the merged entity, lest it upsets the agreed shareholding
pattern.
This isn’t a problem in itself. But it is certainly odd if the merged entity is
constrained for funds at the same time. Already, Idea and Vodafone’s capex is
trailing that of Airtel and Jio by miles, and it’s showing in subscriber addition
numbers and revenue market share. Between March and October, Idea and
Vodafone’s active subscriber count has declined by around 4 million, while
that of Airtel and Jio has expanded by 14 million and 40 million, respectively.
Data collated by IIFL Institutional Equities shows that Idea and Vodafone’s
combined capex this year is expected to be half that of Airtel and less than a
fourth of what Jio is spending. In the preceding two years, their capex had
matched Airtel’s spends.
It’s true that liquidity at the two companies has improved in the past few
months, after the sale of their respective stand-alone tower businesses, as well
as an equity issuance by Idea. It will improve further when Idea disposes of its
11.15% stake in Indus Towers. But while liquidity might improve in the
interim, leverage ratios will remain elevated, simply because the tower sale
results in an almost equal reduction in Ebitda. Besides, the newly raised cash
will help in the near term, but constraints on capex will continue once the
funds are exhausted. Ebitda stands for earnings before interest, tax,
depreciation and amortization.
“High leverage would mean that Vodafone and Idea would be forced to cut
capex at a time when Bharti and Jio remain in high-capex mode,” IIFL’s
analysts said in a 5 January note to clients.
As this column pointed out last week, the merged entity might end up with a
net debt to Ebitda ratio of around seven times by the time the deal closes, in a
best-case scenario. This is higher than the agreed maximum leverage of six
times the companies need to ensure by September this year.
IIFL’s analysts estimate the merged entity needs an equity fund infusion of
Rs27,500 crore for ending up with a net debt to Ebitda ratio of six times.
Idea’s announced fund-raise of Rs6,750 crore, in their books, falls woefully
short.
Leverage ratios have gone out of whack thanks to the relentless onslaught by
Reliance Jio. By forcing competitors to keep tariffs low, Jio has caused profit
margins to plunge and cash burn to increase significantly. Idea is already
running large losses, and things deteriorated further in the December quarter,
thanks to the cut in interconnection usage charges and down-trading by
customers.
And just when investors had assumed there was stability on the tariff front, Jio
cut tariffs at the start of the new year . In short, there’s no relief in sight as far
as profitability goes. While the merged entity will extract large savings post-
merger, these are expected to be back-ended, and it will be a while before
profit margins start rising.
At the same time, by encouraging large data usage plans, Jio is effectively
forcing its competition to upgrade their capacity. In short, capex needs are
estimated to be higher than what was earlier envisaged.
A significant cash infusion into the merged entity seems like a good solution to
address these problems. If the equal shareholding constraint is off the table,
Idea’s promoters can use its funds to capitalize the company further, rather
than buy Vodafone’s shares. And even Vodafone can make a large infusion
using proceeds from the sale of its Indus stake.
While this may upset the agreed shareholding pattern, both partners will
ensure they are investing in a far more robust entity with a strong balance
sheet. As such, they can get more bang for their buck when the dust settles.
https://en.wikipedia.org
https://www.livemint.com
https://www.jagranjosh.com
https://www.ideacellular.com
https://www.vodafone.com
http://www.yieldopedia.com
http://www.trai.gov.in/sites
http://www.livemint.com/Industry
https://telecomtalk.info/india-spectrum-data-sheet/134245/