Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Emma Kim
English 110
10/26/19
A Misunderstood Breed
When you think of a pit-bull, what is the first thing that comes to your mind? For some
people, the word pit-bull is a synonym for things like violence, fighting, and gangs. For other
people, they think of loyal, loveable, and cute dogs. Whatever your view on pit-bulls is, these
dogs have become the new definition of a dangerous dog. 12 countries in the world, including
Brazil, Canada, France, etc., have banned pit bulls. Many other states and counties have
restrictions on these dogs. (Hg.org, para. 3) However, there is a huge misconception with these
dogs, people need to inform themselves about this breed and then make a decision for themselves
on whether or not they want to own one. But at the end of the debate, pit-bulls are not inherently
Barbara Kay is a columnist for the Canadian newspaper, National Post. In 2019 she wrote
and published an article about pit-bulls. It’s called, “If you can only love a pit-bull, you’re not a
dog lover.” Kay has written multiple pieces on pit-bulls and she is a strong advocate and believer
in breed-specific legislation or BSL. BSL are the laws and requirements of specific breeds. These
rules include the use of muzzles, specific areas a breed is allowed, and even banning a breed
completely. In her article, Kay states that pit-bulls, “inflict greater damage in assaults than other
breeds, partly out of innate pleasure, but as well because of its distinctive kill-bite.” (Kay para. 6)
To establish hers, as well as other pro-BSL people, credibility, she states that they are attack
survivors, epidemiologists, and medical professionals. Kay also cites numerous sources and
Kim 2
studies such as Dr. Billmore, a professor and plastic surgeon, who has had to do surgery on
multiple pit-bull attack survivors, and the Toronto Star, a Canadian newspaper. She includes
statistics such as licensed pit-bulls compared to pit-bull attacks. In 2004 before the BSL in
Canada, there were 984 licensed pit-bulls in Toronto with 168 reported attacks. However, in
2013 after BSL, there were only 501 licensed pit-bulls and 13 reported attacks. (Kay, para. 2)
Kay claims that pit-bulls are a product that people own, and it’s the government’s job to ensure
Simon Worrall is an author, journalist, and traveler. In 2016, he published an article for
National Geographic about the pit-bull debate and his interview with Bronwen Dickey, author of
Pit-Bull: The Battle Over an American Icon. Dickey’s book is meant to show the negative views
of pit-bulls and misunderstandings and stereotypes. In this interview, Worrall asks Dickey
questions about pit-bulls, her belief on certain subjects about pit-bulls, and advice for the people
reading his article. Throughout the interview, Dickey cites multiple sources and statistics. For
example, she mentions a study done by Jeffrey Sacks at the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention. His study shows that when it comes to fatalities caused by pit-bulls, the majority of
these dog attacks aren’t pit-bulls and were misidentified. (Worrall, para. 3) For instance, there
was a case in Idaho where a police officer shot a dog that barked at him and claimed it was a pit-
bull. However, it was registered as a black Labrador. The misconception is that many people
believe that pit-bull is one breed. Pit-bull refers to four to five different breeds of dogs – all of
them have large heads and short coats. Worrall also includes the history behind pit-bulls. He
mentions that although the original breed, the American pit-bull terrier, was bred to fight animals
like bears and bulls, pit-bulls used to be America’s favorite dog breeds. An example he brings up
Kim 3
is Petey, the famous pit-bull from the 1928 comedy series Our Gang and later on in Little
After reading these two articles, I am more in favor of Simon Worrall’s article. Not only
is National Geographic a more credible source than the Canadian National Post, but also because
of the content in the articles. Barbara Kay’s article doesn’t really mention the opposing side of
her views, and although it mentions a few statistics and studies, most of them only apply to
Toronto, Canada, and it’s purely her opinion. On the other hand, Worrall is in favor of pit-bulls
because he chose to interview a pit-bull advocate and lover. But the article did mention the other
side of the story. For example, Worrall and Dickey talked about the 5-year-old child who was
attacked by a pit-bull. They showed sympathy for the child and disagreed with how the media
supported the dog more than the child. Although the article is an opinion, the author believes in
an individual’s choice of whether or not they want a pit-bull as a pet. Kay believes that all pit-
bulls should be banned, and if not, then they should have restrictions.
Personally, for me, I am a huge pit-bull lover. My very first dogs were pit-bull mixes. They
were from the same litter, and they were bred into a dogfighting environment. Dogfighting is
illegal and a federal crime, but people still do it. They were kept outside on the concrete
pavement, chained to a metal pole in the middle of the property. My dogs were two years old
when they were rescued and brought home to me. At first, my mom was worried that because of
their history, they wouldn’t be good for a 9-year-old (aka me.) But as soon as they were released
into our yard, they played with me and even let my niece, who was five at the time, climb all
over them. Now that I’m older, I realize that although they were supposed to be used for
violence, they were good dogs that wanted love. Time has passed and I just recently had to put
my last dog down because of old age. However, my family was devastated, so I went out and
Kim 4
adopted three pit-bull mixed puppies. Now, my dad takes the puppies to work and jokes around
that he’s going to start Hawaii’s Federal Probation Officer K-9 unit with them. I do admit that
they can be aggressive and territorial, but all dogs can be. And just like all other dogs, pit-bulls
can be insanely loyal and social dogs when raised properly. I truly do believe that pit-bulls can
be good dogs. Although they were originally bred to fight, they can be just as silly, loveable, and
cuddly as a golden retriever or a poodle. But even more than that, I believe that people have a
right to live where they want to, own the dog breed that they want, and for those dogs to be able
to be treated like any other breed. If someone doesn’t want a pit-bull, then they don’t need to get
In conclusion, pit-bulls are not inherently dangerous dogs and they should not be banned.
The dangers of these dogs don’t stem from their DNA and inherent behaviors. Environmental
factors heavily impact their behaviors. As people, we shouldn’t discriminate against these dogs
and we should take it upon ourselves to learn more about them to either avoid situations or to
eventually accept them. Just like Dickey believes, people need to “focus on the individual dog in
front of you. I wouldn’t get a dog just because it’s a pit-bull, just as I wouldn’t reject a dog just
Works Cited
Hyman, Ethan, et al. “The Most Feared Dogs May Also Be the Most
www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2016/07/pit-bull-ban-aggressive-dog-breed-
bronwen-dickey/#close.
Kay, Barbara. “Barbara Kay: If You Can Only Love a Pit Bull, You're Not a Dog
can-only-love-a-pit-bull-youre-not-a-dog-lover.