You are on page 1of 8

Journal of Food Biosciences and Technology,

Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, 2, 27-34, 2012

Rheological Properties of Low Fat Mayonnaise with Different Levels


of Modified Wheat Bran
M. Aslanzadeh a, M. Mizani b*, M. Alimi c, A. Gerami d

.ir
a
M. Sc. Graduate of Food Science and Technology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University,
Tehran, Iran.
b
Associate Professor of the College of Food Science and Technology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic
Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

ac
c
Academic Member of the Department of Food Science and Technology, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad
University, Iran.
d
Associate Professor of Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.

Received 4 September 2011; Accepted 12 December 2011


ABSTRACT: Mayonnaise is probably one of the most widely used sauces worldwide. The oil content of
traditionally mayonnaise is more than 65%. Fat has a role in creating viscosity, color and texture but might cause
u.
many diseases and disorders in human. In this study the influence of modified wheat bran as a fat replacer on the
rheological properties of low fat mayonnaise was studied and compared to a blank sample containing starch.
Low fat mayonnaise samples containing different amount of modified wheat bran (1, 2 and 3%) and blank were
produced. The rheological analysis comprising the evaluation of flow properties and oscillatory tests were
carried out by Rheometer. The results of flow curves showed that all the mayonnaise samples exhibited
ia
nonnewtonian, pseudoplastic behavior which fitted by Herschel-bulkley model and the factors related to this
model were specified in the samples and blank. Storage and loss modulus obtained by the frequency sweep
measurement classified mayonnaise samples into weak gels. The results showed that flow properties of
mayonnaise samples depended on shear rate. The results indicated that separation between two phases of
rb

emulsion didn’t occurred and all the samples were stable. The sample containing 1% modified wheat bran was
behaving most similar to the blank and due to the best appropriate ratio between cellulose and starch was
selected as the superior sample.
Keywords: Flow Properties, Low Fat Mayonnaise, Modified Wheat Bran, Oscillatory Tests.

Introduction1 the combined perception of mouth feel,


t.s

Mayonnaise is some one of the most taste, and aroma. Fat also contributes to
widely used sauces in the world. This creaminess, appearance, palatability, texture,
product is a mixture of egg, vinegar, oil and and lubricity of foods and increases the
some other ingredients. Mayonnaise is a feeling of satiety during meals (Akoh, 1998).
kind of semi-solid oil-in-water emulsion However fats and oils can cause a lot of
jfb

despite containing 70-80% fat (Depree & diseases. High intake of total dietary fat is
Savage, 2001). Fats are one of the essential associated with increased risk for obesity,
components of the diet. Dietary fat provides some type of cancer and possibly gallbladder
essential fatty acids, precursors for disease. Epidemiologic, clinical and animal
prostaglandins and aids in the absorption of studies provide strong and consistent
fat soluble vitamins (ADA, 2005). evidence for the relationship between
In addition to nutrition, fat contributes saturated fat intake, high blood cholesterol
key rheological properties and sensory and increased risk for coronary heart disease
characteristics. Fat contributes to flavor or (calorie control council, 2006). Current
dietary guidelines recommended limiting the
*
Corresponding Author: mizani1_2000@yahoo.com
M. Aslanzadeh et al.

total fat intake to < 30% of calories and magnitude of elastic modulus and complex
saturated fats to <10% of total energy intake viscosity increased with the increase of oil
for the population as a whole (Ognean et al., or xanthan gum concentrations (Barbosa-
2006). Canovas & Ma, 1995).
Due to the risks of consuming too much In 2002, the rheological properties of
oils and fats, people tend to reduce the mayonnaise containing alginates were
amount of fat in their diet. Therefore studied. The results showed that Alginate
replacing part of the fat with some other concentration and molecular weight
components which might play the role of fat influenced mayonnaise functional properties

.ir
in the foods but have fewer calories is (Mancini et al., 2002).
essential. Dolz et al investigated the effect of
Carbohydrate based replacers that are substituting part of modified starch with
called fat mimetics are the largest and oldest xanthan gum or locust bean gum in low fat

ac
group of fat replacers (Nancy, 1997). One of mayonnaise, upon flow and thixotropic
the carbohydrate based fat mimetics that can behavior. They reported that starch
be used in the mayonnaise and other sauces substitution with gums led to an increase in
is dietary fiber obtained from hulls and bran emulsions thixotropy (Dolz et al., 2006).
of cereals. In this paper the effect of different levels

dressings. Some fat mimetics such as


u.
Up to now a lot of researches have done
for producing low fat mayonnaise and salad

modified starch (Murphy, 1999; Mun et al.,


of modified wheat bran as a fat replacer on
the rheological characteristics of mayonnaise
(Flow properties and Oscillatory tests) were
studied and compared to the blank sample
2009), inulin (James, 1998), pectin which contains starch.
ia
(Pedersen & Christian, 1997) and
microcrystalline cellulose (Chouard, 2005; Materials and Methods
Grodzka et al., 2005), carrageenan (Trueck, -Preparation of Mayonnaise
1997), some thickeners (Wendin et al.,
rb

The type and amount of ingredients used


1997), whey protein isolate and low- in mayonnaise samples were formulated
methoxy pectin-based fat mimetics (Liu et according to Behrooz Food Company
al., 2006), konjac flour (Choonhahirun, (Aslanzadeh et al., 2010). Before preparing
2008), oat dextrin (Shen et al., 2010) were samples of mayonnaise, concentrations of 1,
t.s

generally used to stabilize the emulsion and 2 and 3% of modified wheat bran were
to increase the viscosity of light mayonnaise. hydrated in the water 48 hours individually
Mayonnaise is nonnewtonian fluid and and aqueous solution was pasteurized.
shows a yield stress, a pseudoplastic, a Materials were used according to the
thixotropic behavior and time dependent conventional method for producing
characteristics (Barbosa-canovas & Ma,
jfb

mayonnaise (Aslanzadeh et al., 2010).


1995; Goshawk & Binding, 1998; Mancini Mayonnaise samples containing different
et al., 2002). amounts of modified wheat bran and starch
Various studies investigated the were coded in Table 1.
rheological characteristics of mayonnaise
Table 1. Coding mayonnaise samples containing
including flow properties and viscoelastisity
different concentrations of dietary fiber and starch
of the product. Sample Code Dietary fiber (%) Starch (%)
Barbosa-Canovas and Ma studied the F.M.1 1 2.3
flow and viscoelastic properties of F.M.2 2 2.0
mayonnaise at different oil and xanthan gum F.M.3 3 1.7
concentrations. They stated that the Blank 0 2.6

28
J. FBT, IAU, 2, 27-34, 2012

- Rheological Analysis flow equation parameters of different


Flow properties and oscillatory tests were mayonnaise samples including k, the
performed in a rheometer (Anton Paar consistency coefficient (Pa. sn) and n, the
Physica MCR300) to assess the effect of flow behavior index was determined (Table
different concentrations of produced dietary 2). After obtaining the regression equation
fiber from wheat bran on the rheological according to this table it is specified that
characteristics of samples and compared correlation coefficient (r2) ranges from 0.94
with the blank. to 0.98 indicating the results for this model.
The mayonnaise was analyzed using a

.ir
parallel stainless steel plate having a - Oscillatory Tests
diameter of 25 mm and a gap of 1 mm. All Diagram of amplitude sweep and
measurements were conducted at 25°C. rheological factors obtained from this test
Special care was taken to minimize emulsion (G'0 and γ LVE) are shown in Figure 2 and

ac
softening when the sample was initially Table 3 respectively.
loaded on the plate. Excess sample The results of the frequency test for all
protruding from the edge of the sensor was samples are presented individually in Figure
trimmed off carefully with a thin blade. 3.
The mayonnaise flow properties were According to Figure 1, changes in

The shear stress, viscosity, flow behavior


index and thixotropy data were obtained by
using the Herschel–Bulkley equation model
u.
evaluated in shear rate range of 10-4-10 1/s. viscosity to shear rate of samples are similar
and viscosity decreases with increasing
shear rate from 10-4 - 10 (1/s). Therefore all
mayonnaise samples show pseudoplastic
as follows: behavior that was reported earlier by
ia
researches (Barbosa-canovas & Ma, 1995;
τ= τy+ k ×γ°n Juszczak et al., 2003; Worrasinchai et al.,
2006).
Where τ is the shear stress (Pa), τy the In concentrated emulsions, the droplets
rb

yield stress (Pa), γ° the shear rate (1/s), k the are close enough together to interact with
consistency index (Pa sn) and n the flow each other which may lead to the formation
index. of a three-dimensional network of
In amplitude sweep test frequency was aggregated droplets. As the shear rate is
considered 1 Hz and applied strain rate was
t.s

increased, the hydrodynamic forces cause


0.01-100%. Linear viscoelastic region aggregates to become deformed and
(γLVE) and G'0 were determined. Frequency eventually disrupted which results in a
sweep was performed in a frequency range reduction in the viscosity (McClements,
of 0.01-100 Hz, using strain values 1999).
comprised in the linear viscoelastic region It can be seen F.M.3 sample has the
jfb

for each sample (0.3%). The recorded data lowest viscosity in many applied shear rates
included the components of shear modulus and viscosity of F.M.1 and F.M.2 are similar
G' (storage modulus), viscous component G'' to the blank. In order to study this in detail,
(loss modulus). parameters obtained from Herschel–Bulkley
model will be discussed.
Results and Discussion It is clear from Table 2 that consistency
-Flow Properties coefficient (k) which is related to viscosity
Changes in shear stress (τ) and viscosity has the highest and closest score for F.M.1
(η) to shear rate (γ°) of mayonnaise samples sample with respect to the blank, but F.M.3
are presented in Figure 1. The model-fitting has the lowest value.

29
M. Aslanzadeh et al.

F.M.1 (Green)
F.M.2 (Yellow)
F.M.3 (Red)
Blank (Blue)

.ir
ac
u.
ia
Fig. 1. Flow behaviour for the mayonnaise samples
rb

Table 2. Model-fitting flow equation parameters of mayonnaise samples

Sample K (Pa. sn) n r2


F.M.1 79.56 0.243 0.94
t.s

F.M.2 74.73 0.188 0.97


F.M.3 55.84 0.213 0.96
Blank 76.26 0.161 0.98

Table 3. Rheological factors obtained from amplitude sweep test


jfb

sample G'0 γ LVE (%)


F.M.1 1070 0.785
F.M.2 637 0.298
F.M.3 423 0.483
Blank 240 1.27

30
J. FBT, IAU, 2, 27-34, 2012

F.M.1 (Green)
F.M.2 (Yellow)
F.M.3 (Red)
Blank (Blue)

.ir
ac
Fig. 2. Amplitude sweep for the mayonnaise samples

u.
ia
rb

A B
t.s
jfb

C D
Fig. 3. Frequency sweep for the mayonnaise samples, A (F.M.1), B (F.M.2), C (F.M.3) and D (Blank)

31
M. Aslanzadeh et al.

Miyamoto et al. in 2009 studied concentration of modified wheat bran and


interaction between cellulose and starch. starch. The results from the oscillatory shear
They stated that the best appropriate ratio of tests were expressed in terms of the elastic
the cellulose to the starch is 30-40%. modulus (G') and loss modulus (G''). If
Increasing the amount of fiber has negative G'>G'', the material exhibits a solid like
impact on the viscosity and consistency behavior; however, if G'' > G', the material
(Miyamoto et al., 2009). Therefore, in this behaves like a liquid. Fig. 2 represent the
research just F.M.1 sample ratio is suitable dynamic mechanical spectra of the
(43%) and among all samples has the mayonnaise samples obtained by the

.ir
greatest consistency. The ratio of F.M.2 and frequency sweep measurement classified
F.M.3 samples isn’t ideal and k value into that of weak gels because G' was larger
decrease with increasing amounts of fiber. than G''. Thus it could be suggested that low
In terms of flow behavior index (n) fat mayonnaises are weak and gel-like, as is

ac
mayonnaises behaved as shear thinning typical of dressings and emulsions.
fluids and n values were less than 1. These Previous studies have also reported that
findings are in agreement with the results of mayonnaise samples exhibited weak gel-like
other researchers (Barbosa-canovas & Ma, characteristics in the frequency range of 0.1-
1995; Juszczak et al., 2003; Worrasinchai et 10 Hz (Mancini et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2007;

that F.M.1 has maximum n value and the


least pseudoplastic behavior.
u.
al., 2006; Liu et al., 2007). Results showed

According to the results obtained from


Mun et al., 2009). A high storage modulus
implies that higher stresses are necessary
before the emulsion can flow. On the other
hand, it also means that emulsion stability is
amplitude sweep test, it is clear that G'0 enhanced in low stress situations. As a
ia
values describing the network strength of result, the possibility of any structural
mayonnaise samples is in the range of 240- changes taking place during storage is
1070 (Pa). Greater values of G'0 lead to more reduced by using modified wheat bran.
consistency of the product. Therefore, it Also in the frequency range tested,
rb

becomes clear that among all the samples, confluence between the G' and G'' streams
F.M.1 has the maximum consistency. From isn’t observed. This result indicated that
F.M.1 to F.M.3 samples with increasing separation between two phases of emulsion
modified wheat bran in the formulation G'0 didn’t occurred and mayonnaise samples
t.s

has decreased. An explanation for this trend containing dietary fiber like to control were
is the appropriate ratio of fiber to the starch. stable. Confluence between the G' and G''
Another important point is that blank has the might have happened in control sample.
lowest G'0 and the weakest network. It can Therefore, in frequencies less than 0.01,
be concluded that adding dietary fiber to separation of two phases may be observed
mayonnaise samples improves their strength just in control.
jfb

structures.
γ LVE is the maximum strain that samples Conclusion
can tolerate in the linear viscoelastic region. From the results of this work, it can be
Therefore, frequency test should be concluded that flow properties of
performed in the frequency range which is mayonnaise samples depended on shear rate.
less than minimum γ LVE obtained from F.M.1 sample containing 1% modified
amplitude sweep. wheat bran was behaving most similar to the
Dynamic oscillatory shear tests were used blank. Due to the high amounts of fiber,
to characterize the viscoelastic properties of some samples had a negative influence on
the mayonnaise samples containing different the rheological characteristics. Therefore

32
J. FBT, IAU, 2, 27-34, 2012

this sample was selected as the superior Dolz, M., Hernandez, M. J. & Delegido,
sample. J. (2006). Oscillatory Measurements for
Salad Dressings Stabilized with Modified
Acknowledgements Starch, Xanthan Gum and Locust Bean
The author would like to thank R & D Gum. Journal of Applied Polymer Science,
center and management of Behrouz Food 102(1), 897-903.
Company for the help and support of and Goshawk, J. A. & Binding, D. M. (1998).
Polymer Research Institute for showing Rheological Phenomena Occurring During
interest in this research work and for their the Shearing Flow Mayonnaise. Journal of

.ir
collaboration. Rheology, 42(6), 1537-1553.
Grodzka, K., Maciejec, A. & Krygier, K.
References (2005). Attempts to Apply Microcrystalline
Anonymous. (2005). Position of Cellulose as a Fat Replacer in Low Fat

ac
American Dietetic Association: Fat Mayonnaise Emulsions. Zywnosc, 12, 52–
Replacers. A.D.A Reports. Journal of the 61.
American Dietetic Associations, 105(2), James, S. M. (1998). Method for
266-275. Producing Fat-Free and Low-Fat Viscous
Anonymous. (2006-2007). Fat replacers: Dressings Using Inulin, U. S Patent

control council.
Akoh, C. (1998). Fat Replaces. Food
Technology, 52(3).
u.
Food Ingredients for Healthy Eating. Calorie 5721004.
Juszczak, L., Fortuna, T. & Kosla, A.
(2003). Sensory and Rheological Properties
of Polish Commercial Mayonnaise.
Aslanzadeh, M., Mizani, M., Gerami A. Nahrung/food, 47(4), 232-235.
ia
& Alimi, M. (2010). Study on the Liu, H., Xu, X. M. & Guo, Sh. D. (2007).
Production Process of a Dietary Fiber from Rheological, Texture and Sensory Properties
Wheat Bran and Its Functionality as a Fat of Low Fat Mayonnaise with Different Fat
Replacer in Mayonnaise. Master of Science Mimetics. Journal of LWT, 40(6), 946-954.
rb

Thesis, Science and Research Branch, Mancini, F., Montanari, L., Peressini, D.
Islamic Azad University, Tehran. & Fantozzi, P. (2002). Influence of Alginate
Barbosa-Canovas, G. V. & Ma, L. (1995). Concentration and Molecular Weight on
Rheological Characterization of Mayonnaise Functional Properties of Mayonnaise.
t.s

.Part 2: Flow and Viscoelastic Properties at Journal of Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und-


Different Oil and Xanthan Gum Technology, 35(6), 517-525.
Concentrations. Journal of Food Mcclements, D. J. (1999). Food
Engineering, 25, 409-425. emulsions, principles, practice and
Choonhahirun, A. (2008). Influence of techniques. CRC press. pp. 1-16.
Added Water and Konjac Flour as Fat Miyamoto, H., Yamane, C., Seguchi, M.
jfb

Replacer on Some Quality Characteristics of & Okajima, K. (2009). Structure and


Celery Mayonnaise. AU JT, 11(3), 154-158. Properties of Cellulose-Starch Blend Films
Chouard, G. (2005). 100% Indulgence Regenerated from Aqueous Sodium
0% Guilt—be in Phase, Bring Connectivity Hydroxide Solution. Journal of Food
to Your Low-Fat Mayonnaise. Innovations Science and Technology Research, 15(4),
in Food Technology, 29, 98–100. 403-412.
Depree, J. A. & Savage, G. P. (2001). Mun, S., Kim, Y. L., Kang, C. G., Park,
Physical and Flavor Stability of Mayonnaise. K. H., Shim, J. Y. & Kim, Y. R. (2009).
Journal of Trends in Food Science & Development of Reduced Fat Mayonnaise
Technology, 12, 157-163. Using 4αGTase-Modified Rice Starch and

33
M. Aslanzadeh et al.

Xanthan Gum. International Journal of Shen, R., Lou, S. & Dong, J. (2010).
Biological Macromolecules, 44(5), 400-407. Application of Oat Dextrine for Fat
Murphy, P. (1999). Low Fat Substitute in Mayonnaise. Food Chemistry,
Developments with Specialty Starches. Food 126(1), 65-71.
Technology International, 22, 24. Trueck, H. U. (1997). A Mayonnaise-
Nancy, I. H. (1997). Replacing Fat with Like Product. E. U Patent 0768042A1.
Food Technology. Journal of the American Wendin, K., Ellekjr, M. R. & Solheim, R.
Dietetic Associations, 97. (1999). Fat Content and Homogenization
Ognean, C. F., Darie, N. & Ognean, M. Effects on Flavour and Texture of

.ir
(2006). Fat Replacers. Journal of Mayonnaise with Added Aroma, Lwt, 32(6).
Agroalimentary Processes and Worrasinchai, S., Suphantharika, M.,
Technologies, 7(2), 433-442. Pinjai, S. & Jamnong, P. (2006). Beta
Pedersen, A. & Christian, H. (1997). No Glucan Prepared from Spent Brewer’s Yeast

ac
and Low Fat Mayonnaise Compositions. U. as a Fat replacer in Mayonnaise. Journal of
S Patent 5641533. Food Hydrocolloids, 20(1), 68-78.

u.
ia
rb
t.s
jfb

34

You might also like