ANA Part 5: Cases
|
|
|
{
4
\
country. China is also a lucrative market for electric vehicles (EVs), and Chevrolet is
optimistic about how the Chevy Volt will fare. Yet the company also faces many chal-
Jenges in its plans to introduce EVs into China. The Chinese government has mandated
that foreign EV automakers enter into joint ventures with domestic companies to pro-
duce EVs in China, Such joint ventures offer many advantages but also require Chevrolet
to share some of its trade secrets with its partners. For this reason, GM has decided to
import the Chevy Volt, forgoing certain benefits rather than share the Volts
technologies.
Another challenge for Chevrolet relates to customization. Customizing vehicles to
ferent markets takes time, and GM managers want to increase production and dectease
the commercialization process. This has led GM to consider a new design for its vehicles
that incorporates “global core architecture.” Such a move would enable GM brands to
create @ more standardized design with slight adaptations for different markets. This,
would likely save GM both time and money, but because cultural tastes can significantly
differ, a globalized design is not without risks. It is uncertain whether Chevrolet can cre-
ate a standardized vehicle that will be accepted by several different cultures.
Challenges and Recovery
Afier nearly a century in business, Chevrolet faced its greatest threat with GM’s bank-
ruptcy in 2008, The company required a massive $50 billion government bailout, and
although GM has rebounded, its reputation will take a while to recover, According to
GM CEO Dan Akerson, the company “failed because we failed to innovate.” Ford, the
only one of the Big Three automakers that did not accept a government bailout, took a
combative approach against its competitors in its advertising. The company filmed one
ad of a customer who had just bought a new Ford pickup truck as saying, “I wasn’t going
to buy another car that was bailed out by our government. I was going to buy from a
‘manufacturer that’s standing on their own: win, lose, or draw.” Although the commercial
was later pulled from the air (Ford stated that it had run its course), this viewpoint
represented the sentiments of many Americans who felt that GM and Chrysler had over-
extended themselves and then depended upon taxpayers to bail them out for their
mistakes.
Des] these dark times for GM, CEO Akerson stated that he viewed Chevrolet
as an innovation powerhouse and believed the brand would bring GM back from the
brink of collapse. The recovery, however, has been painful for GM. The company
dropped half its brands from its product mix, including Pontiac, Hummer, Saturn,
and Saab. Although this gives customers fewer vehicle brands from which to choose,
it might benefit Chevrolet in the long run as GM can now focus more upon modify.
ing its remaining brands.
Such modifications will be important as environmental conditions in the market
continue to change. For instance, new and impending regulations require automakers
to create vehicles that are more fuel efficient. By 2025, vehicles must be able to reach
54.5 miles per gallon. Such changes will be costly and demand that GM take action
now. Thus, new Chevrolet ‘chicles are likely to be lighter and possess more energy
saving technologies. Such modifications are essential to ensuring that Chevrolet meets
both consumer demands and the regulatory demands of the government,
The Chevrolet brand is a model to which marketers aspire, Unlike so many other
brands, it has lasted for a century due to its innovative product modiffcations and ability
to rebound from failures. It must continue to seize market opportunities, constantly
modify its products, and adapt its brand to changing customer tastes, Successfully meen,
ing these criteria could enable the Chevrolet brand to succeed for another century,#s¢ % Chevrlet: 109 Years of Maat banowation AAS
Brom the begin st
spinning, Ford has also mad
Se ‘ Mateo a naive for itself in yaeings history. startin
th founder Henry Ford's 190L win against peofostonat d Al ioe ot
Vehicle he manutacturesd
le he manufactured himself, Ever since racinye hha Fi
Vos DNA. The eampany his had tthe rset te ty 300
One, and NASCAR series, with drivers. like
Force. and even Pant Newman chonsi
He presetice inv the Indy. 500, Formule
Tom Kendall, faques Villeneuve, John
' ‘ te race Hurd vehicles, Creating, solid connections
fo Mneticn’s past isan important part af bond's branding strates
Ford and Gener Mote
While Chevrolet's 4
wale take very di
Hine “Chevy Rims Deep” is an attempt
‘it approaches toward marketing.
‘nian the brand ay &
ctitical part of America’s heritage, Ford's tagline “Ford, Drise ne.” and ite previous
taglines of "Bold Moves” and “Have You Driven a Ford Lately?” evake a more exclusive
than Chevrolet, Ford and GM also dlitfer in how they bran their sehicles, Ford
takes a fantly branding approach to its vehicles, placing the Ford marae alg with thy
brand of the vehiele on the car, General Motors, hossever, has embraced insble Pram
architecture, beginning in 2009. Prior to this time, GM was placing 1 Mark of Excel
2009, GM
lence” logo on its vehicles to connect them with the parent compar
expressed ils intention of allowing its vehicles to stand on its crs. Nove ¢
cles will not have any visible affiliation with GM, nor will GMs +
branding strategy has both advantages and disadvantay
sumers when the same company offers 2 slate of different vehicles. 1 the coast
favorable impression of the company or even an individual mort
likely to carry that perception over to another company model, On
ily branding risks contaminating the entire family if one produ
to be inferior. In the case of GM, the company’s bankruptcy «
had the ability to contaminate its four brands of vehicles, in spi
merits, By adopting invisible brand architecture, GM is reduc
contamination.
es. Family branding fi "
International Marketing
Chevrolet sells over 4 million vehicles in more than 140 ev
roughly 70 percent ofall GM sales in foreign markets, While Chevso
ate a consistent brand image across the world, ils products
instance, South Africa Chevrolet’s product line includes the Chevro!
Lumina, Optra, Cruze, Orlando, and Sonic. In Brazil, Chevro
the Camaro as well as the Chevrolet Captiva, Prisma, S10, M
‘The different models appeal to the differing tastes of Chevrolet's various &
‘Although for years Chevrolet has portrayed itsell ay an American brand, to reality the
brand has become truly globalized. In fact, marketers at Chevrolet 2
now trying 10
embed the Chevrolet brand into other cultures just ay they set off tom Soe
part of American culture. hv an attempt to erate greater brand awareness, GM has
vavcded to rebrand Daewoo—a South Korean brand that GM acquired inthe cary
2000s evrolet, Despite the fet that sales of Daewuo vehicles have increased in
ecent years, GM recognizes that unany South Korvants Lick aysareness of the Chevrolet
brand, It hopes that recasting Daewoo as Chevrolet will increase awareness and allow
Chevrolet to compete against its competitors
Chevrolet’s sales are still highest in the United States, fallowedl by Brazil: How
Chien ts not far behind, China is now the thin! largest market for Chevrolet and is the
largest market in the world for vehicles. Chevrolet sells a variety of vehicles i ann
Fae ing the Volt, Camaro, Captiva, Aveo, Sail and Spark. GM his entered tate serena
joint ventures with Chinese companies in order to sell eer aeons
chevrolet vehicles within theY
Desby, which it would continue to support for
e All-American Soap Box jeff Gordon and Jimmie
the All: as Jk
1e next decade, Chev drivers such
chicles driven by drivers s
the next decade, Chevrolet vehicles dri neta
Teneo wou! go oo become a summon SH a TS alines sch as
ae ort Bey” and. “Baseball, hot dogs, apple pie and
Bost Sllen meses Bost NY ike a Rock” began in 1991 to describe
ane ee tap tuck The tagline imbued the brand with a sense of| strength and
soa apie ‘ulopted in 1994 and its most recent “Chevy Runs Deep.
The Chews bran resonates wih consumers, so ach so thatthe companys mare
eters mist exert caution when implementing changes. For instance, in 2010 GM
desided the company would stop using the popular American nickname Chevy
only use Chevrolet in corporate communications and advertising, Although 4 cao
consumers were encouraged to still use the popular nickname, employees were not to
use Chevy internally. The reasoning behind this was that international buyers of Chevro-
let tended to get “Chevy” and “Chevrolet” confused, believing that they were different
cars. However, consumer backlash and managerial changes convinced GM to drop this
an,
Changing the tagline to “Chevy Runs Deep” has not been free from criticism either.
Chevrolet fans did not feel that the slogan was as strong as previous ones, and others
were unsure about what it meant. This confusion caused GM to begin overhauling its
marketing to clear up the confusion, According to Chevrolet’s marketing director, the
tagline is meant to have an emotional impact while tying Chevrolet to its American
heritage.
While Chevrolet modifies its taglines to fit certain countries, many of its taglines are
used for multiple countries to create strong brand cohesiveness. Globally, the company
positions its vehicles along four values: durability, value, practicality, and friendliness
In South Africa, Chevrolet commercials have emphasized familial values as well ae
excitement, Taglines include “Captiva. Made for Memories.” and “Where Will Chevrolet
Take You?” Although Chevrolet has adopted more of a global brand strategy, it still cus-
tomizes its branding to appeal to certain markets,
(On the promotior
“America
General Motors’ Rivalry with Ford
General Motors is one of the “Big Three” carmakers in the United States, along with
Ford and Chrysler. Although Ford and Chrysler are formidable competitors to Cherrelet,
‘most View Ford as being the more serious rival. Ford and Chevy vehicles ate both con.
fered to be practical and affordable cars, and although Chevy is generally viewed
being sportier than Ford, Ford's sports vehicles like the Mustang are divest competitors
to Chevy's sports cars. While Chrysler came onto the scene later curing the 1920s, Ford
ape Chevrolet are closer in age and have been competing since the inception of
Chevrolet.
‘his highly competitive rivalry has challenged many of Chevrolet's branding state-
gies, For instance, Ford is also deeply entrenched in American culture. Many view the
Model TT as the first American car, although it would be more accunste to say it was
the first one produced for the masses. The unproven statement by founder Henry Ford
regarding the Model T, “You can paint it any color, so long as it's black,” is remembered
re & century later. Ford also claims that its Ford Aerospace engineers and techie
helped place a man on the moon by helping to design and provide services for NASA’
Mission Control Center. Supporters of Ford are more likely to view Ford ae a greater
jPart of America’s heritage than Chevrolet, : .Case 9: Chevra
100 Years of Product Innovation 411
Chevrolet Volt
Chevrolet’s product mix would not be complete without venturing into the electric vehi-
cle industry. Its Chevrolet Volt, unleashed in 2010, runs on a battery but also uses gaso-
line once the electrical charge is depleted. The Volt’s battery allows the vehicle to travel
35 miles on electricity; it can then travel 37 more miles using gas.
Initial views of the Volt seemed positive. In 2011, it was named as the winner of the
World’s Green Car award. However, the Volt may take longer than anticipated to go
from the introductory to the growth stage of the product life cycle. GM's plans to sell
10,000 Volts in 2011 were too optimistic: only approximately 8,000 Chevrolet Volts
were sold. Many Chevrolet dealers were hesitant to sell the Volt due to a perceived lack
of local demand, Such obstacles are not uncommon with new products, as both dealers
and consumers need to learn more about the product before making a commitment to
purchase it. The high price tag of $1,000 also increases the risk of purchase. While the
current interest in electric vehicles is high, demand may take longer to catch up due to
the high level of perceived purchase tisk.
The Volt faced a more serious challenge when its lithium-ion battery proved to be
problematic in crashes. The battery caught on fire after Uhree government crash tests,
but the fires themselves would not occur until days or weeks after the crashes. Further
investigations revealed that the coolant Tine got damaged during the crash tests. Coolant
leaked onto the battery wires, eventually causing a fire,
After these safety issues came to light, GM took quick action to address the problem.
It created a plan to increase the reinforcement surrounding the battery pack and issued a
voluntary recall on the more than 7,000 Volts already sold as well as the more than 4,000
in its showrooms. It also provided loaner cars for consumers to use until their Volts were
modified and offered to buy Valts back from customers who no longer wanted them.
Although this quick action might have saved the Volt from an early demise, the initial
safety challenges could still have a significant effect on demand.
‘The safety issues have also provided threats and opportunities for the Chevy Volt’s
prime competitor, the Nissan Leaf, Although both the Leaf and the Volt are electric vehi-
cles, they are positioned differently. The Nissan is a truly electric car, whereas the Volt
will ran on gasoline if needed. GM's VP of marketing saw this as a major advantage,
using it to position the Volt as “a car first and electric second” and claimed that the
Volt can give drivers the peace of mind that they will not become stranded if they use
up the clectricity reserves. However, the recent battery fires have reduced faith in the
Volt and cast doubt on the electric vehicle industry as a whole, Nissan was quick to
respond to these safety concerns by detailing the triple layer safety structure of its batter-
ies. In 2011, the Nissan Leaf appeared to be taking the lead in the number of vehicles
sold, but the Volt was catching up. With analysts predicting that only one will win in
grabbing the majority of the U.S. market share, the stakes are high.
Chevrolet's Branding Strategy
Although the Chevrolet brand has evolved over the years, it maintains many of the
same themes'that it started out with a century ago: a quality vehicle with deep roots in
America’s past. When Durant first envisioned Chevrolet, his desire was to create a low-
priced vehicle that could compete head on with Ford. Therefore, one of its first slogans,
“Quality at low cost” comes as no surprise. As Chevrolet vehicles became more popular
with Americans, minus a dip during the Great Depression, the company wanted to
firmly entrench the brand as a key part of American culture. It found part of this solu-
tion by associating itself with American sporting events. In 1935, Chevrolet started
|410 Part 5: Cases
magazine Motor Trend's Truck of the Year award for its ability to tow 21,700 pounds, its
reduced vibrations, and its smoother ride. The ability to haul or tow large loads seemed
to gain importance during the recession. For those who love big trucks but hate the large
amounts of emissions they generate, the Silverado HD comes equipped with a new sys-
tem that reduces nitrogen-oxide emissions. .
"Chelsea between Amer lve for big tuk
(the two best-selling vehicles in 2011 were trucks) and being environmentally friendly.
s a result, it began manufacturing a hybrid Silverado. ‘The hybrid Silverado has many
of the same characteristics of a traditional Silverado, including high torque and horse-
+ yet it can get 20 mpg in the city and 23 mpg on the highway (versus 15 mpg in
pow
the city and 20 mpg on the highway for the light duty Silverado). By making the Silverado
greener, Chevrolet is not only preparing itself for tougher emissions regulations, but also
appealing to the market's demand for less-polluting trucks,
Chevrolet SUVs/Crossover Vehicles
SUVs, or sports-utility vehicles, became a hit during the 1990s as they provided owners
with a sense of prestige and power. To meet this demand, GM created several SUV lines
such as the Hummer. However, because SUVs require so much fuel, rising gas prices and
greater concem for the environment contributed to their decline, As a result, GM dis-
continued its Hummer Tine along with several of its Chevrolet SUVs, including the
‘Trailblazer.
Although SUVs seemed to be on the decline, they appear to be gaining in popularity
once more. In 2008, when fuel prices were high, many consumers began switching to
hybrid vehicles and smaller cars with greater fuel efficiency. However, when gas prices
| dropped to under $4 a gallon, SUVs made a comeback—with some slight modifications,
Auto companies such as GM began manufacturing SUVs with better fuel efficiency, The
safety of SUVs has also improved. Thanks to the addition of stability control within SUV
models, studies indicate that drivers of SUVs are less likely to die in a crash than those
driving smaller cars; the death rate for SUV drivers dropped 66 percent afier newer
models were introduced.
This is good news for Chevrolet’s SUVs, which include the Suburban and the
Tahoe. First emerging in 1936, the Suburban is the oldest surviving vehicle model
in the United States. Today the Suburban appears to be in the growth stage as a
favorite among families and was nominated by Kelley Blue Book as one of the Top
i 10 Family Cars for 2011. One likely reason is due to its safety features, which
include six airbags and traction control. In contrast, the Tahoe is targeted more
’ foward those who need lots of space and who travel in more rugged terrain. The
Tahoe has been one of the most popular SUV models since the 1990s. To attract
!