12/10/2019 G.R. No. L-48336 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES vs. FELIPE MAPOY, ET AL.

ChanRobles™Virtual Law Library™ |

chanrobles.com™

Like 0 Tweet Share

Custom Search Search

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE

Home > ChanRobles Virtual Law Library > Philippine Supreme Court
Jurisprudence >

EN BANC

G.R. No. L-48336 September 21,

1942

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-

Appellee, vs. FELIPE MAPOY and R. M.
MAIPID, defendant-appellants.

Romualdo Constantino for appellants.

Ross, Selph, Carrascoso & Janda as private

www.chanrobles.com/scdecisions/jurisprudence1942/sep1942/gr_48336_1942.php 1/3
12/10/2019 G.R. No. L-48336 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES vs. FELIPE MAPOY, ET AL.

prosecutors.
Assistant Solicitor-General Enriquez and Solicitor
Alikpala for appellee.

1. CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE; VIOLATION

OF BULK SALES LAW (Act No. 3952); WHEN
PAYMENT OF INDEMNITY TO OFFENDED PARTY
DOES NOT LIE. - Defendants were charged with
violation of the Bulk Sales Law in that they
mortgaged all of their stock of goods, etc.,
without any notice to Daido Boeki Kaisha, Ltd.,
one of the offended parties, to which they were
indebted in the sum of P2,568.85. They pleaded
guilty and its sentenced by the Court of First
Instance of Manila to pay a fine of P100, and the
costs, and to indemnify Daido Boeki Kaisha, Ltd.,
jointly and severally in the sum of P2,568.85,
with subsidiary imprisonment in case of
insolvency. Held: That it was error for the trial
court to consider said indebtedness as a liability
arising from the crime charged, and to order
defendants to indemnify Daido Boeki Kaisha,
Ltd., in the sum of P2,568.85, with subsidiary
imprisonment in case of insolvency. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

2. ID; ID; ID; - Inasmuch as under section 4 of

the Bulk Sales Law, the mortgaged in question
was fraudulent and void, and there being no
proof that the mortgaged goods have
disappeared, the same are still subject to
attachment for the satisfaction of creditors'
lawful claims against the defendants. Daido
Boeki Kaisha, Ltd., may still bring a separate civil
action against defendants herein for the
collection of any indebtedness that may be due
from defendants, and if the latter will not pay
the judgment in such civil case, the goods
involved in the instant case may be seized and
sold. Therefore, the obligations of defendants to
pay Daido Boeki Kaisha , Ltd., the sum of
P2,568.85, which was already existing when the
mortgage was signed, was not the result of the
violation of the Bulk Sales Law, nor was it
affected by said violation.

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE

1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920
1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940

1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960
1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

FEATURED DECISIONScralaw

www.chanrobles.com/scdecisions/jurisprudence1942/sep1942/gr_48336_1942.php 2/3
12/10/2019 G.R. No. L-48336 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES vs. FELIPE MAPOY, ET AL.

Main Indices of the Library ---> Go!

Search for www.chanrobles.com

Search

QUICK SEARCH

1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920

1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940
1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960
1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Copyright © 1998 - 2019 ChanRoblesPublishing Company| Disclaimer | E-mailRestrictions ChanRobles™Virtual Law Library ™ | chanrobles.com™ RED

www.chanrobles.com/scdecisions/jurisprudence1942/sep1942/gr_48336_1942.php 3/3