Martable Management Plant

PT Agincourt Resources
Environmental Management Plan

Martabe Gold Mine Project
Batangtoru District, South Tapanuli Regency
North Sumatera Province
March 2008
PREFACE
Martabe Gold Mine Project is located at Batangtoru District, South Tapanuli

Regency, and North Sumatra Province. PT Agincourt Resources (PTAR) holds
the sixth generation of Contract of Work (CoW) based on the Presidential
Decree Number B-143/Pres/1997 dated 17 March 1997 and the CoW area
covers 256,300 Ha. The proposed of mining area (Martabe Project) within CoW
is around 28,600 ha.
PTAR will conduct mining and processing of gold and silver ore, as well as
developing all the necessary infrastructures. Mining activities have the positive
and negative impacts to the environment. This study is focused in minimizing
the negative impacts and increasing the positive impacts.
Based on the Decision of Head of South Tapanuli Regency No. 305/KPTS/2007

regarding approval for Term of Reference of Environmental Impact Analyze
(KA ANDAL) document, PTAR will prepare the Environmental Management
Plan (RKL). Preparation of the RKL refers to the Decree of Minister of
Environmental No. 8/2006 regarding Guide lines for the Compilation of the
Environment Impact Assessment Study and Decree of Minister of Energy and
Mineral Resources No. 1457K/28/MEM/2000 Regarding Technical Guidelines
in the Mining and Energy Sector
PTAR express his gratitude to all sources which support in compiling this RKL
document.
Jakarta, 10 March 2008

PT. Agincourt Resources
Dominic Heaton
(General Manager - Operational Director)
CONTENTS
PREFACE 2
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION........................................................................ 5
I.1 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE ............................................................................ 5
I.1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................ 5
I.1.2 OBJECTIVES .................................................................................. 5
I.2 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ............................................................................ 6
I.3 RKL FUNCTION ......................................................................................... 6
CHAPTER II ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT APPROACH........... 8
II.1 TECHNOLOGY APPROACH .................................................................... 8
II.2 SOCIAL ECONOMIC APPROACH.................................................................... 9
II.2.1 Anticipative Approach ..................................................................... 9
II.2.2 Direct and Indirect Approach ........................................................ 10
II.2.3 Segmented Approach ..................................................................... 10
II.2.4 Simulative Approach ..................................................................... 10
II.2.5 Qualitative and Quantitative Approach........................................ 10
II.2.6 Community Development Approach ............................................. 11
II.3 INSTITUTIONAL APPROACH........................................................................ 11
II.4 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT APPROACH .......................................... 11
CHAPTER III ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN..................... 12
III.1 PRE -CONSTRUCTION STAGE...................................................................... 12
III.1.1 Economic, Social and Culture Component .................................... 12
III.2 CONSTRUCTION STAGE .............................................................................. 14
III.2.1 Geophysics and Chemical Component ........................................... 14
III.2.2 Economy, Social and Culture Component..................................... 18
III.3 OPERATION STAGE ..................................................................................... 24
III.3.1 Geophysics and Chemical Component ........................................... 24
III.3.2 Biology Component........................................................................ 39
III.3.3 Economic, Social and Culture Component .................................... 43
III.3.4 Public Health Component.............................................................. 49
III.3.5 Community Development Program............................................... 50
III.4 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN IN POST OPERATION STAGE ..... 57
FIGURE III. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
LOCATION MAPS ................................................................................ 61
BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................ 62
ATTACHMENT A ...................................................................................................... 66
SUMMARY MATRIX OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
OF PTAR .................................................................................................. 66
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
I.1 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE
I.1.1 Purpose
The objectives of Environmental Management Plan are:

‐ To comply with all regulations in pollution control, waste management,
and supervision on the environmental quality.
‐ To ensure the activity of PTAR meets the environmental resources
management in order to develop national economy in general and
especially, socio economic development at South Tapanuli Regency.
‐ To manage the environmental changes due to gold and silver mining
activities in order to keep the environmental quality.
‐ To increase the positive impacts (benefits) and minimize the negative
impacts (risks).
The compilation of Environmental Management Plan (RKL) is to keep the

balancing of environment component at surrounding area by:
‐ Determining the precautionary action, negative impact control and
positive impact development due to gold and silver mining activity of
PTAR.
‐ Involving the related institution in handling environmental management
in the surrounding area.
‐ Providing sufficient funds to perform RKL and RPL in order to maintain
the environmental condition
I.1.2 OBJECTIVES
The objectives of Environment Management Plan are:

‐ To provide specific directions and principles in performing environmental
management and monitoring at mining activity of PTAR.
‐ To make efforts in order to maintain the environmental changes due to
mining activity of PTAR at South Tapanuli Regency, North Sumatra
Province.
‐ To maintain the environmental quality at surrounding Mining area at South
Tapanuli Regency, in North Sumatra Province.
‐ To increase and develop the positive impact and minimize the negative
impact of gold and silver mining activity.
‐ To construct the environmental impact coordination mechanism with
related institution.
I.2 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
PTAR achieves environmental awareness and refers to the company policy. In

line with the company mission, PTAR is enforced to comply with the prevailing
laws and regulations in the field of environmental, safety and health and
participate in community development around mining activity. PTAR is
committed to do the international best practice related to environmental
management, health and safety (K3L). PTAR realizes that environmental
management must be integrated in all stages of mining activity including
exploration, mining, processing and mine closure. Successful performance of
environmental management is reflected from:
‐ Available work environment for employees to perform duties

without injury risk or work related disease.
‐ Pollution prevention.
‐ Rehabilitation of post mining land into safe condition and
productive in accordance with the prevailing regulations and
permits.
‐ Protection of biodiversity.
‐ Compliance of government law along with company’s commitment.
‐ Accomplishment aspirations from all stakeholders including
employees, local community, government, share owner, and
customers of PTAR.
‐ Utilize efficient resources
‐ Sustainable enhancement and repair.
To achieve best method of management, company will run safety, health and
environment management system (K3L) as follows:
‐ Identifying K3L risks related to all job aspects of PTAR.
‐ Determine the objective and target for all significant risks.
‐ Implement the plan, standard and procedures to handle or
supervise the risks.
‐ Audit routinely, evaluate and report K3L performance.
‐ Restore the unfulfilled subject according to the appropriate rule.
The completed organization chart of mining activity of PTAR presented in

attachment A.
I.3 RKL FUNCTION
The function of the Environmental Management is to maintain the smoothness

of project execution in developing gold mining activity referring to the
schedule in order to maintain the environmental supporting capacity.
Environmental Management Plan (RKL) for supporting the gold mining of

PTAR will be utilized and required not only by the management of PTAR but
also by other related institutions. The functions and fundamentals of RKL
document are:
‐ To direct the proponent in environmental management.
‐ As guidance to the proponent, government and related institution in
carries out environmental management based on each function and
task.
‐ To assist the government in decision making, planning and
environmental management.
‐ To assist the local government in supervision and environmental
development as an effort for environmental preservation.
‐ To prevent conflict between community and proponent.
‐ To avoid environmental degradation and to increase positive impact
sfor community and the local government.
CHAPTER II
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT APPROACH
II.1 TECHNOLOGY APPROACH
Process and technical system used to prevent, restrain, decrease, and overcome
negative impact from project activity according to existing technology. Many
efforts must be strived in order to guarantee the values of environmental
preservation, and to avoid exceeding the support to environmental. The
specific technical program will cover:
• Air Pollution Management Technology
‐ To anticipate emission of air pollution produced as a processing

activity of gold ore, PTAR plan to turn on the CEMS (Continuous
Emission Monitoring System) as control tools for air emission flow
out from chimney could be depressed and reduced.
• Liquid Waste Management Technology
‐ Liquid waste management performs in 2 (two) ways, (a) cover

liquid waste management from factory and (b) liquid waste
management by using sediment pond.
• Sediment Management Technology
‐ Increase the quality design of the existing sediment pond and refer
to International Standards (MAC Standards).
‐ Perform routine reclaim if sediment pond is full.
Reclamation Technology and Erosion

• Re-vegetation on precipitous land by using jute net and hydro seeding
technology.
• Provide cultivation of seeding to produce local plants.
• Survey and mapping of source of plants seed.
• Increase the monitoring system towards rehabilitation of the plants
growth.
• Effectiveness in using cover crop to control the erosion and drainage in
order increase the productivity of land.
• Apply base standard on land preparation (elevation, erosion control,
drainage, sediment control, sediment pond and Restoration of Topsoil)
• Conduct research with relevant institution to produce variety of local
plants
• Conduct topsoil conservation
• Apply multi species planting
• Trying several pattern of land rehabilitation
Controlling the acid rock drainage formation
‐ Using combine segregation, deep burial and encapsulation to isolate
the potential overburden rock produce acid from the oxidation
process between air and water.
‐ Management in acid drain pond.
Management of Tailings
‐ Store tailing in Tailings Storage facility.
II.2 SOCIAL ECONOMIC APPROACH
The approaches are the steps taken by the proponent in the effort to overcome
Significant Impact through few actions based on social interaction and
government aid. The activities performed include:
1. Involving the community in business plan and/or activity to be
more active in participating within Environmental management
activity.
2. Giving priority in absorbing the local labor according to their skill
and knowledge and fulfill the standard commencement from
selection process of PTAR.
3. Cooperating with third party in supplying goods and services to
enhance the regional economy.
4. Giving donation for public facility to local community in business
plan and/or activity according to the ability of the proponent.
5. Combining harmonic social interaction with local community to
prevent social jealousy.
II.2.1 Anticipative Approach
This approach is identical with effort for prevention to avoid the estimated
impact at the earliest convenience, or if it can not be avoided, the impact must
be depressed to a minimal level.
The beginning step is giving transparent information regarding the activity

related to the project. Information is presented in a clear, concise format and
packed in easy language understood by local citizens to avoid difference in
perception between the proponent and the local community.
Anticipative approach is carried out according to periodical meeting.

II.2.2 Direct and Indirect Approach
Direct approach: Performed directly to the member of community that has

important concern towards the project existence.
Indirect approach: Performed with approaching informal figures (elite figure,
priest/religious leader, priest, custom figure, etc) which lead the non
government institutions and assumed as leader by community.
II.2.3 Segmented Approach
Segmented approach will be performed when the problem becomes very

complex and is related to each other.
To find the way out from this dispute needs a mediator which is able to
approach in proportion, without ignoring the obstacles that retard the
completion between the related parties.
This type of approach is also effective enough to handle social unrest problem
both for demobilization of project’s labor and also local community member
which feel misplaced at the time the construction ends.
II.2.4 Simulative Approach
This type of approach is more oriented in how to fix social economic culture
impacts after the time the construction ends. However, the adaptation of social
process between local community members with the project in the middle of
their life will not merely finish at the start of the operation stage. Village
member must find their new identity as an integrated result between
traditional and mining patterns.
Many stimulants must be specified in order to stop the remaining gaps caused
from primary impacts from continuing and becoming derivative impacts
(secondary impacts).
II.2.5 Qualitative and Quantitative Approach
Qualitative approach: The emphasis is to measure the success level of

environmental management related to social culture parameters. Parameters
such as: culture, customs and traditions, community perception and others are
unapproachable with physical science methods. Therefore the analogy method
and value judgment hold important roles in the qualitative approach.
Quantitative approach: Quantitative approach can be used as the guide to

evaluate success level of environmental management in social economics.
Quantitative counting can measure the increase/decrease in the level of income
before and after project existence, the progress/non-progress in business, asset
owned, sales turnover, ongoing capitals and others.
II.2.6 Community Development Approach
In order to manage Environmental impacts as the consequence of the project

activity, therefore the proponent needs to approach through community
development programs. It is hoped to accommodate the involvement of the
community together with proponent in environmental management.
II.3 INSTITUTIONAL APPROACH
As already known, the environmental management activity is not only a part of

proponent responsibility, but needs involvement and integrity from various
related institutions.
‐ Coordinate with Directorate General of Mineral, Coal and Energy
Resource in order to instruct and supervise the environmental and
safety work.
‐ Coordinate with Government of South Tapanuli Regency and its
related institution to handle the social problem might emerge.
‐ Cooperate with various parties including LSM and informal figures
in local community in performing community development
programs.
‐ Socialize to local community regarding the objective and benefit of
gold mine project done by proponent.
II.4 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT APPROACH
As a commitment to high standard of environmental management, the

proponent plans to approach environmental management system. The
Environmental management approach refers to the standards Oxims, ISO 14001
and Proper.
CHAPTER III
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
III.1 PRE -CONSTRUCTION STAGE
III.1.1 Economic, Social and Culture Component
III.1.1.1 Land Ownership
1) Significant Impact and Source of Impact

‐ Significant Impact
• Land Ownership
‐ Source of Impact
• Land Acquisition for Mining Activity.
2) Impact Benchmark
• The change of land ownership in the surrounding project area.
• Community unrest due to land acquisition
3) Environmental Management Plan Objective

• Avoid the community unrest due land acquisition activity.
4) Environmental Management Plan

• Prepare mining activity plan and coordinate with related institution
towards the proposed mine area.
• Persuasively approach to land owner in collect information regarding
the statue of the land ownership and land size.
• Record the land ownership.
• Land acquisition process will coordinate with related institution.
• Make memorandum of understanding between proponent and land
owner concerning the compensation value and refer to the regulation.
5) Environmental Management Location

• All area in mining project located in Batangtoru District, South Tapanuli
Regency.
6) Environmental Management Period

• During the operation of mining activity.
7) Environmental Management Institution

• Environmental Management Executor: External Relation of PTAR.
• Environmental Management Supervisor: Environmental Impact
Management Office (Kapedalda) of South Tapanuli Regency, Mining
Agency of South Tapanuli Regency, Environmental Impact
Management Agency (Bapedalda) of North Sumatera Province, Mining
And Energy Agency of North Sumatera Province and Department of
Mineral and Energy Resource.
• Environmental Management Reporting: Environmental Impact
III.1.1.2 Community Unrest

• Community Unrest.
• Land clearing for mining activity.
2) Impact benchmark
• Complaint from local community regards borderline and land size.
• Disagreement in determine the agreement of compensation value for
land acquisition and/or plants

• To minimize the community unrest due to land acquisition process.

• Create work plan contains of land acquisition mechanism, land
compensation system and monitoring plan.
• Socialize and disseminate the accurate information regarding land
Acquisition activity.

• Villages surrounding project are in Batangtoru District, South Tapanuli
Regency.

• During mining activity.
III.2 CONSTRUCTION STAGE
III.2.1 Geophysics and Chemical Component
III.2.1.1 Air Quality (Total Suspended Particulate-TSP)

• Air quality (TSP).
• Land preparation.
• Mobilization and demobilization of material and construction
equipment.
2) Impact benchmark
• Increasing of TSP content on the ambient air

• Minimize TSP content on the ambient air.

• Water spreading, especially for non-asphalt road.
• Decelerate transport vehicle with maximum speed for 40 km/hour.
• Using mask /nose mask for employee near dust location.

• The passage road passed by construction vehicle in mining project area.
• During construction period.

• Environmental Management Executor: Mining Department, SHE
department of PTAR.
III.2.1.2 Soil

• Soil erosion.
• Land preparation.
• Mine road construction.
2) Impact benchmark
• The changes of soil erosion.

• Minimize the soil erosion.

• Construct sediment trap.
• plant cover crop (legume) at the left and right edge of the road
• Construct open space inside factory area and it’s another support
facility as water catchments area.

• Factory area and another support facilities at mining road construction

• Environmental Management Executor: Mining Department and SHE
Department of PTAR.
Mineral and Energy Resource
III.2.1.3 Hydrology
a. Rate of Surface Water Run Off

• Rate of water surface run off.
• Hauling road construction
2) Impact benchmark
• Rate of surface water run off.

• Minimize the rate of water surface run off

• Construct canal to trap sediment.
• Plant cover crop (legume) at the left and right edge of the road
• Construct open space area inside of factory and other support facilities
as water catchments area.
• Construct and maintain the drainage at left and right access road.

• Drainage channel at left and right of access road.

• During construction period continued to mine operation period.

• Environmental Management Executor: Mining Department and SHE
Department of PTAR.
b. Pattern of River flow

• Pattern of river flow.
‐ Impact Source
• Divert of river flow.
2) Impact benchmark
• Change of river flow.

• Keep the water yield not approach to zero level.

• Maintain the water level Supply at sub-watershed of Aek Pahu
Hutamosu River.
• Flowing from Divert pond 2 to Aek Pahu Hutamosu River.

• Aek Pahu Hutamosu River.

• During construction period and operation.

‐ Environmental Management Executor: Mining Department and
SHE Department of PTAR.
‐ Environmental Management Supervisor: Environmental Impact
Management Office (Kapedalda) of South Tapanuli Regency,
Mining Agency of South Tapanuli Regency, Environmental
Impact Management Agency (Bapedalda) of North Sumatera
Province, Mining And Energy Agency of North Sumatera
Province and Department of Mineral and Energy Resource.
‐ Environmental Management Reporting: Environmental Impact
Management Office (Kapedalda) of South Tapanuli Regency,
Mining Agency of South Tapanuli Regency, Environmental
Impact Management Agency (Bapedalda) of North Sumatera
Province, Mining And Energy Agency of North Sumatera
Province and Department of Mineral and Energy Resource
III.2.2 Economy, Social and Culture Component
III.2.2.1 Work Opportunity

• Work opportunity.
• Recruitment of construction Labor.
• Releasing of construction labor.
2) Impact benchmark
• Number of labor that working in PTAR and contractors.
• Amount of local contractor involved in project execution.

• Optimize the work opportunity for local community
• Prioritizing labor recruitment for local community.

• Provide work opportunity for local community appropriate with the
needs of company.
• Development of skill for Indonesia worker.

• Villages surrounding mining project area located at District of
Batangtoru, South Tapanuli Regency.

• Environmental Management Executor: Human Resources Department
and External Relation Department of PTAR.
III.2.2.2 Business Opportunity

• Business opportunity.
• Construction of factory and supporting facilities.
2) Impact benchmark
• Availability of business opportunity for local community.

• Increase the participation of local entrepreneur in mining project
activity.

• Provide the opportunity for local entrepreneur to participate in material
supply and service.
• Cooperate with related institution in developing local entrepreneur.

• Villages surrounding mining project area located at Batangtoru District,
South of Tapanuli Regency.

• Environmental Management Executor: Commercial and Logistic
Department and External Relation Department of PTAR.
III.2.2.3 Community Income

• Community Income.
• Employment of construction labor.
• Unemployment of construction labor.
• Construction of factory and supporting facilities.
2) Impact benchmark
• Amounts of local labor employed by PTAR.
• The growth of new business surrounding mining area.

• Optimize the work opportunity for local community.
• Prioritizing labor recruitment for local community.
• Increase the participation of local entrepreneur in mining project
activity.

• Related to management of work and business opportunity.

• Villages surrounding project area located at District of Batangtoru,
South Tapanuli Regency.

• Environmental Management Executor: Commercial and Logistic
Department and External Relation Department of PTAR.
III.2.2.4 Migration

• Migration.
• Recruitment of construction labor.
2) Impact benchmark
• Amount of non-local labor employed at PTAR and the contractor.
• Amount of non-local labor married with local citizen and living at
villages surrounding mining area.

• Keep and maintain local culture preservation through the community
leader, culture and religious involvement from local community

• Preserve the values of local culture through the community leader,
culture and religion figure involvement.

• Villages surrounding mining project area located at District of


III.2.2.5 Pattern of Livelihood

• - Pattern of livelihood.
2) Impact benchmark
• The changes of livelihood pattern of local community

• Increase social welfare for the community surrounding project area

• Prioritizing labor recruitment for local community
• Provide training and business knowledge for local community



• Divert of river flow
2) Impact benchmark
• Complaint from local community about recruitment and releasing of
local labor
• Community unrest due to divert of river flow.
• Local community unrest that employed in construction stage, but
unemployed in operation stage

• Prevent and decrease the community unrest towards the acceptance and
release of local during construction period.
• Prevent community unrest due to divert of river flow.

• Preparation of work plan for local labor recruitment .
• Conduct socialization to community regarding local labor recruitment
and the qualification
• Conduct socialization to community regarding the qualification of
construction labor that acceptable in operation stage.
• Provide information regarding divert of river flow and water balance to
community.



III.3 OPERATION STAGE
III.3.1 Geophysics and Chemical Component
III.3.1.1 Air Quality
a. TSP

• T S P (Total Suspended Particulate).
• Operation of mining equipment.
• Land clearing.
• Stripping and Placement of topsoil.
• Mining activity.
• Crushing and conglomeration of ore.
2) Impact benchmark
• TSP Concentration change in the ambient air.
• Dusty in the area of mining.

• Decrease TSP and dust falls in the ambient. air

• Road watering for access and non asphalt road.
• Decelerate the speed of transport vehicle with maximum speed of 40
km/hour.
• Using nose mask/casing use for employee work near dust location.

• Access road and mine project area.

• During mining operation period.

• Environmental Management Executor: Production and Processing
Department, Mining Department and SHE Department of PTAR.
b. SOx

• SOx.
• Operation of power plant.
2) Impact benchmark
• Changes of SOx concentration on the ambient air.

• Decrease of the Sox impact.

• Placement the SOx tool reduction in the power plant.

• The stack of power plant.


• Environmental Management Executor: SHE Department of PTAR.
III.3.1.2 Noise

• Noise level.
• Drilling and explosion.
2) Impact benchmark
• Changes of noise level.

• Decrease of noise impact.

• Install the sound proof in space nearby explosion source.
• Socialization to local community regarding the schedule of explosion.
• Use ear plug for labor that work nearby explosion activity.

• Explosion activity area.


III.3.1.3 Physiographic/Morphology

• Landscape
• Digging and placement of overburden.
• Mining of gold ore.
• Land reclamation.
2) Impact benchmark
• Changes of topography and slope.
• Managed the stability of slope.
• Minimize soil erosion and increase the level of water catchments.

• Use slope stability criteria in mine planning and overburden placement
area.
• Manage the contour in reclamation area.

• Mining activity area.

• During mining operation period. Mine Closure Plan of PTAR will
provide direction for further management accordance with the end
condition of Martabe Project.

• Environmental Management Executor: SHE Department and Mining
Department of PTAR.
III.3.1.4 Soil

• Soil erosion.
• Land clearing.
• Stripping and placement of topsoil.
• Digging and placement of overburden.
2) Impact benchmark
• Changes of soil erosion.

• Minimize the soil erosion.

• Land clearing and topsoil stripping will perform in gradually.
• Placement and maintain the topsoil and sub soil in different location
and plant with cover crop or legume.
• Construct sediment trap in drainage channel.
• Construct open space area inside of factory and supporting facilities as
the water catchments area.

• Mining and surrounding mining area.
• Topsoil placement area.


Department of PTAR.
III.3.1.5 Hydrology Component
a. Rate of Water Surface Run Off

• Land clearing.
• Stripping and placement of topsoil.
• Stripping the location of overburden.
• Ore mining.
• Reclamation.
2) Impact benchmark

• Minimize the rate of water surface run off.

• Construct sediment trap in drainage channel.
• Increase the interception through re-vegetation.
• Construct open space area inside of factory and other supporting
facilities as the water catchments area.
• Construct and maintain the drainage channel on left and right of access
road, around the factory and supporting facilities.

• Mining area.
• Open area within project location.


Department of PTAR.
III.3.1.6 Hydrogeology Component
a. The Pattern of Ground Water Flow

• Pattern of ground water flow.
• Ore mining.
• Dewatering of pit.
2) Impact benchmark
• There is no decrease of ground water surface at community well.

• Maintain the flow of ground water.

• Maintain the catchments area surrounding the project area
• Perform quick re-vegetation in the open area by using cover crops, fast
growing plant species, local or non local plants.

• Mining area and catchments area.

• During mine operation period. Mine Closure Plan of PTAR will provide
direction for further management accordance with the end condition of
Martabe Project.

Department of PTAR.
b. Quantity of Ground water

• Quantity of ground water.
• Ore mining.
2) Impact benchmark
• Reduction of ground water surface.

• Prevent and decrease the reduction of ground water surface.

• Maintain the catchments area surrounding the project area
• Perform quick re-vegetation in the open area by using cover crops, fast
growing plant species, local or non local plants.

• Mining area.
• Open area at the outside of mining area.

Martabe Project.

Department of PTAR.
III.3.1.7 Surface Water Quality
a. Contains of Total Solid Suspended (TSS)

• Contains of Total Solid Suspended (TSS).
• Land clearing.
• Striping and placement of topsoil.
• Striping and Placement of overburden.
• Reclamation.
2) Impact benchmark
• Changes of TSS contain.
• The regulation of Minister of Environmental no. 202 year 2004
regarding related standard of TSS.
• Government Regulation no. 82 year 2001 regarding water pollution
control and related to standard quality of TSS.

• Control TSS contain on water surface.

• Construct and operate sediment pond at mining area.
• Flow the surface water run off from mining area to sediment pond.
• Periodically dig the sediment pond and put in to topsoil placement area.

• Mining area.
Martabe Project.

Department of PTAR.
b. Contain of Zn, Fe, As and Mn

• - Contain of Zn, Fe, As and Mn.
• - Digging and locate overburden rock.
2) Impact benchmark
• The changes of Zn, Fe, As and Mn contain.
• The Regulation of Environmental Minister no. 202 year 2004 regarding
… related to standard quality of Zn, Fe, As and Mn.
• Government Regulation no. 82 year 2001 regarding water control of
contamination related to standard quality of Zn, Fe, As and Mn.

• Control contains of Zn, Fe, As, Mn in water discharge from water
processing facilities and/ or acid drain.

• Construct waste water treatment plant (WWTP) to treatment the waste
water from processing factory prior to flow to Batangtoru River.
• Install the pipeline to flow the processed water to Batangtoru River.
• Mining area.

Martabe Project.

Department of PTAR.
III.3.1.8 Ground Water Quality
a. Contain of Cn, Fe, As and Mn

• Contain of Cn, Fe, As and Mn.
• Striping and placement of overburden.
2) Impact benchmark
• Changes of Contain of Cn, Fe, As and Mn on ground water meet the
water quality standard.

• Control contain of Cn, Fe, As and Mn on ground water.

• Construct tailing storage facilities (TSF) that prevent absorption of
metals and cyanide into ground water system.
• Treat the water from TSF at WWTP prior to flow out to Batangtoru
River or surrounding environment.
• Perform quick reclamation include re-vegetation at the end location of
overburden pile and open area by using cover crops, fast growing plant
species, and local or non local plants.

• Mining area.

• During mine operation period.
• Mine Closure Plan of PTAR will provide direction for further
management accordance with the end condition of Martabe Project.

Department of PTAR.
III.3.1.9 Acid drain

• Contains of acid drain.
2) Impact benchmark
• Acidic level of surface water.
• Control the acidic level of surface water.

• Acid drain from mining and other area will flow to acid drain
processing facilities.
• Control the acidic level of water that transmitted from water processing
facilities and/ or acid drain.
• As part of the whole waste disposal concept, waste rock produced from
mining operation in both of Potential Acid Forming (PAF) and Non-
Acid Forming (NAF) will be merged into embankment construction.
PAF material will encapsulate in the cover of surface by using low
permeability topsoil in order to minimize long term potential of acid
drain formation.
• Overflow of surface water from embankment will be removed into
Sediment pond. Sediment pond will be overlaid by high density
composite that spread on solid soil.
• Potential acid from below of embankment will be gathered at the main
below ditch and also flow out to sediment pond.

• Mining area.
• TSF.
• Sediment pond.


Department of PTAR.
III.3.1.10 Tailing

• Tailing disposal.
2) Impact benchmark
• Tailing pond in well condition.

• Prevent pollution of tailing to the surrounding environment.

• Construct Tailings Storage Facility/TSF. Tailing embankment will be
constructed to relocate more than 36.9 million ton (dry weight) of
tailings.
• Minimize the possibility of leakage from TSF.
• Decantation water will be managed with three stages of sediment and
treated in the WWTP prior to remove to Aek Pahu Hutamosu River.

• Location of tailing pond.


Department of PTAR.
III.3.2 Biology Component
III.3.2.1 Terestrial flora

• Structure and composition of terrestrial flora.
2) Impact benchmark
• Change of structure and composition of terrestrial flora.

• Minimize the disturbance of terrestrial flora.

• Minimize the land clearing, only at necessary land for ongoing activity.
• Before perform land clearing, seeds and local plants species will be
collected to be used in re-vegetation program.
• Monitoring the topsoil and seed for reclamation activity.

• Permanent plot location in the Martabe project area.


• Environmental Management Executor: Exploration Department, SHE
Department and Mining Department of PTAR.
III.3.2.2 Terrestrial Fauna

• Habitat quality of terrestrial fauna.
2) Impact benchmark
• The changes of type of wild animal species, especially endemic
fauna/scarce/protected, and changes of population structure and tropic
level balance of wild animal.

• Minimize disturbance of terrestrial fauna.

• Inventory of fauna’s species after and before land clearing.
• Perform conservation activity ex situ towards preserve fauna and
cooperate with related institution.

• Permanent plot location in Martabe project area.


III.3.2.3 Biodiversity Component

• Biodiversity of flora and fauna.
• All mining activities of PTAR and another supporting facilities activity.
2) Impact benchmark
• Disturbance of biodiversity.
• Level of employee’s knowledge and community regarding importance
of protection of species of flora and fauna.

• Protect the flora and fauna from destroyed.
• Increase the awareness of PTAR employee and contractor regarding the
protection to flora and fauna which threatened to be destroyed.

• Locate the notice board “forbidden to hunt the protected fauna “in
strategic places.
• Cooperate with institution and/or with related government agency and
NGO to conduct ex-situ conservation of protected fauna.
• Provide the seeds of scarceness local plant at nursery of PTAR to be
used in reclamation activity, and if necessary will contribute to local
community.
• Make and apply the wisdom of prohibition for PTAR employee and all
contractors to hunt, cultivated and trading the protected fauna.
• Conduct regular socialization (importance to protect the protected flora
and fauna) to employee and community in partnership with local NGO.

• All mining blocks within Contract of Work area of PTAR at South
Tapanuli Regency.
• Villages surrounding mining blocks within Contract of Work area of
PTAR at South Tapanuli Regency.

• During mine operation.

• Environmental Management Executor: Exploration Department, SHE
Department and Mining Department of PTAR.
III.3.2.4 Aquatic Biota

• Abundance of plankton, benthos and fish.
• - Land clearing
• Striping and Placement of overburden.
2) Impact benchmark
• Changes of aquatic biota abundance.

• Minimize the disturbance of aquatic biota.

• Control of soil erosion, hydrology management and water quality
control.

• Mining project area.


III.3.3 Economic, Social and Culture Component
III.3.3.1 Work Opportunity

• Work opportunity.
• Recruitment of operational labor.
• Operational of employee housing and office.
• Reclamation.
2) Impact benchmark
• Amount of total labor employed by PTAR and the contractor.
• Local and non local employee percentage that employ by PTAR and the
contractor.

• Optimize work opportunity for local citizen.

• Priority the recruitment for local labor according to their ability and
skill as need by PTAR and the contractor.
• Assist skill training for local citizen.
• Villages located nearby mining blocks within Contract of Work area of


• Environmental Management Executor: External Relation Department,
Human Resources Department and SHE Department of PTAR.
III.3.3.2 Business Opportunity

‐ Significant impact
• Business opportunity.
• Reclamation.
• Operational of employee housing and office
2) Impact benchmark
• Create the business opportunity for local community.

• To increase the participation from local entrepreneur in mining project
activity.

• Inventory and mapping the material and services that provided by local
entrepreneur.
• Give the opportunity to local entrepreneur to participate in project
activity.
• Provide training for local entrepreneur to meet business standard.

• Villages nearby mining blocks within Contract of Work area of PTAR at


• Environmental Management Executor: External Relation Department
and SHE Department of PTAR.
III.3.3.3 Community Income

• Community Income.
2) Impact benchmark
• changes of Community Income surrounding project area.

• Optimize the work opportunity for local community.
• Prioritize labor recruitment for local community.
• Increase local entrepreneur participation level in mining project activity.
• Provide opportunity for local community and local contractor to involve
in project as according to qualification, policy and procedure of PTAR.
• Provide opportunity to develop the ability of local employee and local
contractor.



III.3.3.4 Migration

• Migration.
2) Impact benchmark
• Quantity of non local labor that lived in the village surrounding the
mining area
• Quantity of outsider interacted to form a family along with local
community.
• Keep and maintain local culture preservation.

• Preserve the local culture values through the involvement community
leader, custom and religious figure.



III.3.3.5 Pattern of Livelihood

• Pattern of livelihood.
2) Impact benchmark
• Change of community livelihood pattern.

• Assist to increase the welfare level of local community.

• Prioritize labor recruitment for local community
• Provide training and business skill for local community




• Drilling and explosion.
2) Impact benchmark
• Complaint from local community regarding the recruitment of local
labor.
• Complain from local community regarding explosion activity.
• Community unrest regarding dewatering of pit influences the quality
and quantity of well water.
• Prevent and decrease community unrest due to labor recruitment,
dewatering pit and explosion activity.

• Create work plan of recruitment of local labor.
• Create and arrange the explosion schedule.
• Socialize and spread the information of dewatering pit and explosion
activity.

• Villages located mining blocks within Contract of Work area of PTAR at


III.3.4 Public Health Component
III.3.4.1 Public Health

• Number of morbidity.
• Unhealthy live pattern and potential impact from activity of PTAR
2) Impact benchmark
• Illness level caused of bronchi disease.

• Assist to decrease prevalence of bronchi disease.

• Cooperate with local government, in decreasing bronchi disease
through socialization of healthy live and therapy program.
• Assist to increase public health facilities through the supply of health
facilities at Padangsidimpuan hospital and clinic.



• Environmental Management Executor: External Relation Department of
PTAR.
III.3.5 Community Development Program
III.3.5.1 Providing of Education Service and Facilities

• Service and education facilities for local citizen.
• Increasing of service needs and education facilities.
2) Impact benchmark
• Spread of education facilities around mining project area at district of
• Budget amount for community development program for education
service and facilities.

• Assist government in supplying education service and facilities that
needed by community through community development program.
• Make sure the fund for community development program used
effectiveness and fully responsibilities.

• Cooperate with related stakeholders in the formal education field and
training tin order to increase quality of local community resource.



III.3.5.2 Providing Public Health Service

• Equipment and Public Health infrastructure.
• Increasing of request for local service and health facilities.
2) Impact benchmark
• Distribution of equipment and Public Health service around mining
project area of PTAR at Batangtoru District, South Tapanuli Regency.
• Budget of community development program for providing health
facilities and service.

• Assist government in providing equipment and health service through
community development program.
• Make sure the fund for community development program of PTAR
used in fully responsibility and effectiveness.

• Cooperate with stakeholders in the health field.

• Villages located nearby mining blocks in Contract of Work area of


III.3.5.3 The Initiative of Agriculture Business Enhancement and Agriculture
Cultivation

• The productivity of agriculture within Contract of Work area of PTAR
at South Tapanuli Regency.
• The low level of agriculture commodity knowledge which has economy
valuable among the youth farmer.
• The low interesting level of youth generation to elaborate agriculture
field.
• Limitation of agro product input.
• Limitation of high quality equipment for agro production facility.
• Low level utilization of agricultural equipment among the farmer.
2) Impact benchmark
• The productivity of agriculture commodities around mining project area
of PTAR at Batangtoru District, South Tapanuli Regency.

• Keep and increase the productivity of agriculture due to mine
operation.
• Increase the competitiveness of local agriculture commodities.

• Cooperate with stakeholders in the local agriculture field.

• Villages located nearby mining blocks in Contract of Work area of


III.3.5.4 Solid and Liquid Waste

• Heavy metal, dangerous material and toxic and infected waste.
• Entire mining activities of PTAR and supporting facility that potential
to produce toxic and dangerous material waste (B3) also non-B3.
2) Impact benchmark
• Government regulation no. 18 year 1999 and government regulation no.
85 year 1999.

• Decrease impact to surface water quality and ground water.
• Make sure the B3 waste managed in right way according to B3
regulation.
Solid waste:
• Collect the entire non B3 solid wastes from non-industry activity
(household, office, trade, and other).
• Burn the wastes which can not used and can not recycle, if possible.
• Dispose of inert/ non-put risible waste (can not rotten) and put risible at
TPA (End Disposal Place).
• Remove the slag with special vehicle and accumulate it in determine
location.
Liquid waste:
• Treat the domestic liquid waste from the entire activities of PTAR at the
Domestic Waste Water Treatment installation.
• Identify the possibility in utilization of dry sludge from waste water
treatment installation as of fertilizer in reclamation activity.
B3 Waste:
• Collect the entire infected wastes from hospital and burn it at waste
incinerator.
• Make sure that equipment and material that bought by PTAR is not
contain of PCB, asbestos, ODS (Ozone Depleting Substances) and
another ingredient that forbidden to be used.
• Neutralize the liquid of acid batteries and keep the ex battery in the
secure place.
• Collect the used oil and reuse as energy material for ore processing
factory.
• Construct the secondary relocation container (secondary containment)
around flammable storage tanks and dangerous, as per condition.
• Provide training periodically to employee in order of handling the B3
disposal.
• Handling the B3 waste separately and deliver to B3 waste disposal
facilities which have official permission.

• Contract of Work area at South of Tapanuli Regency.
• Temporary of B3 waste storage.
• End disposal of non B3 waste.
• Domestic Waste Water Treatment Installation.
• Ore Processing Factory.

• During mine operation period.

Matrix Summary of Environmental Management Plan (RKL) could be seen in
attachment B, while the Location of Environmental Management Plan showed
in Picture III. 1
III.4 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN IN POST OPERATION STAGE
PTAR will compose the Mine Closure Management Plan (RPPT) and submit to
the government to give description regarding the operation of Mine Closure
aspects. PTAR concept the plan of mine closures as part of feasibility study for
operated at the upcoming period. PTAR operate several mining blocks
concurrently. Closing program will start when the mines not produce anymore.
Therefore, in a period of operation, mine closing program for every mine
location could be started.
Although Mine Closure Management Plan as a separate document from

revision of RKL and RPL, but both have mutual benefit. The activity of post
operation management (include related operational activity which influence
directly in mine closure) will continued to perform and develop by using
various technology approach and socio-economic that relevant with regulation,
and international practice.
The matrix summary of mine closing plan is visible in Table III.
Tabel III. 1 Summary of Mine Closing Plan

Closing Deliberation
Sector/Facility Issue/Impact Stage (All closing deliberations reflect current
thoughts and can modified in Mine
Closing Management Plan: RPPT)
PLANING
1. Mine Closing • Mine is in From • Issue of mine closing should
Management Plan temporary land operation begin to consider in operation
till post stage and ascertain to
operation understandable the important
potential impacts.
• Reclamation in concerned
region create stable region, and
if possible, make it become
productive region, acceptable by
local community and related
institution
• Generally, the utilization of
nature will considering around
region, with planted initiate
plants (especially original
species) and stabilization the
natural ecosystem
Final purpose of land utilize at
region of as impact of mining
operation put into RPPT and
discussed with community and
local government.
• Report of Mining From • PTAR prepare RPPT consist of
Closing Activity operation mine closing concept accordance
till post with the acceptable regulation in
operation general then submit to the
authorize government
institution
• RPPT consistence with this RKL-
RPL document
2. Reclamation • Reclamation of From • Push the return of various

Management Plan disturbance lands operation biological gradually on the
(RPR) perform in till post disturbance land
progressive during operation • Push the growth of local plants
mining operation species which grow naturally
period
• End destination of land utilizing
which hit ny the impact of
mining operation will be fill in
RPPT and will discuss with the
community and local
government
• Report of From • Reclamation activity will put
Reclamation’s operation into RKL/RPL’s report during
Activity till post the operation stage and post
operation operation
• Reclamation activity based on
reclamation annual plan
• The ecosystem development at
reclamation area covering the
restoration in gradually
structure and composition o
landflora and fauna
MINING OPERATION
1. Physiographic • Modification of From • The end surface at mine location

/Morphology Unfold Nature operation and the support facilities which
• The Changes of till post will be perform to keep the long
Water Surface Flow operation term stabilization
Pattern • The drainage channel of water
• Precipitation Pool surface will built as the last
unfold nature plan
• Precipitation pools will be
function as water source pockets
• The stability of slope will be
continue monitoring during
mining operation and
periodically after the mining
operation finish till the slope
stability achieve
2. Hydrology • The mine activity From • The drainage channel of water
and topography operation surface will build to direct the
changes could till post water avoid the closing mine’s
impact the flow operation region
pattern of water • The underground water system
surface wil be monitor during the mine
• The mine activity operation period till post
and topography operation if needed
change could • The quality of water surface and
influence the quality underground water wil be
of water surface and monitor during the mine
underground water operation period till post
operation
• Flow and chemical characteristic
of water comes from
precipitation pool will be
monitored
3. Reclamation and • The changes of From • All reclamation activity will
Various of habitat structure operation perform based on recamation
Biological (Flora and Fauna till post annual plan.
Community) cause operation • Pilot project using small scale
by mine operation land will be execute during
mine operation to evaluate
economy feasibility and
continuitas
• Push to return the biodiversity
gradually in disturbance land
• Push the growth of local plant
species grow naturally
• Reclamation activity will put
into RKL/RPL report during
mine operation stage and post
operation stage
• The ecosystem development of
the reclamation region will
cover gradually structure
restoration and the composition
of terrestrial flora and fauna
• End use destination in region
which impact by mine operation
will put into RPPT and discuss
with community and local
government
SUPPORT FACILITY
1. Mine Support • Every support Post • All support facility on post mine
Facility, Ore facility operation operation will manage as in
Processing Factory, • At the end of mine rules written in the Contract of
PLTD, Employee closing, the land Work of PTAR
Housing, Logistic
owner will be hand
Way
over to government
• Access and safety
for community and
employee
ECONOMI, SOCIAL AND CULTURE ASPECT

1. Working Field • Reduce the amount Post • Prepare labor to get skill could
of labor in the Operation be develop after the end of mine
mining post operation
operation stage • Labor reduce in gradually
• The affordable of accordance with valid
local community in regulation
adapting with kind
reduce and amount
of mine activity
• The potential
movement from
citizen out from
Batangtoru District
and its surround to
looking for another
working field
alternative
2. Expand of Local • Decrease of Operation • PTAR will prepare RPPT consist
and Regional economy activity time till of mine closing accordance with
Economy related to mine at post acceptable practice in general to
the end of mine time operation be submit to the authorized
government institution
3. Land Ownership • At the end of mine Post • PTAR will prepare RPPT consist
closing, the property Operation of mine closing accordance with
of land will be acceptable practice in general to
shifted to the be submit to the authorized
government government institution
• Region of Contract of Work will
be deliver to the government at
the end of mine closing
Figure III. 1 Environmental Management Plan Location Maps
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APHA, 1992. Standard Methods, APHA, AWWA, WPCF, Washington DC.

Arsyad, S., 1989. Konservasi Tanah dan Air (Soil and Water Conservation), IPB
– Press, Bogor.
Ausenco Limited, 2005. Martabe Gold Project Feasibility Study Draft Report.
Clear Creek Consultants, 2003. Baseline Hydro Meteorological data Evaluation
Report.
Cox, G. W., 1975. Laboratory Manual of General Ecology. Wm. C. Brown Co.
Inc. Dubuque, Iowa.
Dinas Kesehatan Daerah Kab. Tapanuli Selatan. 2002. Profil kesehatan tahun
2002. Padang Sidempuan.
Dinas Kesehatan Propinsi Sumatra Utara. 2002. Profil kesehatan propinsi
Sumatra Utara 2001. Medan.
Dutch, S.L., J. S. Monroe, and J.M. Moran. 1998.Earth Science. Wadsworth
Publishing Company.Newyork.
Fluor, 2003. Pre-feasibility Study 2003.
GHD, 2007. Report on Martabe Feasibility Study: TSF Design, Hydrology &
Water Balance and Geotechnical Investigation. June 2007. Revision
Draft.
Haitjema, H.M.1995. Analytical Element Modelling of Groundwater Flow.
School of Public and Environmentalal Affairs Indiana University
Bloomington, Indiana. Academic Press. San Diego.
Hammer, W.I. 1981. Second Soil Conservation. Consultant Report.
AGOF/INS/78/006. Tech. Note No. 10. Centre for Soil Research, Bogor,
Indonesia.
Linsley, R.K., J.P. Franzini, and D. Sasongko. 1985. Teknik Sumber Daya Air.
Jilid 1 Edisi ke 3. Penerbit Erlangga Jakarta. Jl. Kramat IV No. 11 Jakarta
10420.
Linsley, R.K., J.P. Franzini, and D. Sasongko. 1985. Teknik Sumber Daya Air.
Jilid 2 Edisi ke 3. Penerbit Erlangga Jakarta. Jl. Kramat IV No. 11 Jakarta
10420.
London, J.R. 1984. Soil Suitability for Crops. Booker Tropical Soil Manual,
Booker Agric, Int’l Ltd, London.
Lorax, 2003. Martabe 2003 Baseline Program: Water and Sediment Quality,
Aquatic Ecology, and Marine Environmental.
Lorax, 2004. Field surveys of baseline oceanographic conditions at five
sampling sites along the coastal area of Sibolga and to the south.
Lorax, 2004. Martabe 2004 Baseline Program: Water and Sediment Quality,
Aquatic Ecology, and Marine Environmental - draft report.
Neitsch, S.L., J.G. Arnold, J.R. Kiniry, J.R. Williams, and K.W. King. 2002. Soil
and Water Assessment Tool. Theoretical Documentation Version 2000.
Grassland, Soil and Water Laboratory – Agriculture Research Service
808 East Blackland Road- Temple, Texas 76502.
Neuman, W. L. 2000. Social Research Method: Qualitative and Quantitative
Approaches. Fourth Edition. Allyn & Bacon. New York.
Newel, G.E, R.C. Newel. 1963. Marine Plankton a Practical Guide. Hutchinson
Educational Ltd. Great Portland Street, London.
Odum, E.P., 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology., W.B. Saunders and Co.
Philadelphia.
Pohan, M.N. 2002. Profil kesehatan puskesmas Batang Toru. Kabupaten
Tapanuli Selatan.
PT Hatfindo Prima, 2005. Survey of Terrestrial Ecology, Air quality and Noise
for the Martabe Project Area, North Sumatra Indonesia.
Pusaka Sejati Foundation, 2004. Baseline Economic Survey.
Pusaka Sejati Foundation, 2004. Final report, Archeology Survey, Sub-District
Batangtoru, District of South Tapanuli.
Pusaka Sejati Foundation, 2004. Final report, Social Economy Survey, Sub-
District Batangtoru, District of South Tapanuli.
RSG Global, 2007. Martabe Gold Silver Project. Feasibility Study – Mining –
July 2007.
Rusli, Said. 1996. Pengantar Ilmu Kependudukan (Introduction to Population
Sciences.). Edisi 7 (Revisi). LP3ES. Jakarta.
Soemarwoto, O. 1991. Analisis Dampak Lingkungan (Environmentalal Impact
Analysis) . Gajah Mada University Press, Yokyakarta.
Soerianegara dan Irawan. 1985. Ekologi Hutan Indonesia (The Ecology of
Indonesian Forest). Departemen Managemen Hutan. Fakultas
Kehutanan IPB, Bogor.
Suratmo, G., 1988, Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan (Environmentalal
Impact Assessment), Gajah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.
Jnr, T.D.J. 1984. A hand book of Gravity-Flow Water Systems. Intermediate
Technology Publications. Unicef 1980. Printed by Russel Press, Gamble
Street, Nottingham.
Water Management Consultants, 2004. Draft 2004 Baseline Study Martabe
Project – Hydrogeological, Hydrometeorological, and Geochemical
Characterisation.
Water Management Consultants, 2004. Preliminary Mine Water Management
System Layout – Martabe Project.
Water Management Consultants, 2007. Preliminary Estimate of Water
Treatment Requirements – Martabe Project.
Wishmeyer, W.H., and D.D. Smith., 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: a
guide to conservation planning. USDA Agr. Handbook.
Attachment A
SUMMARY MATRIX OF ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT PLAN OF PTAR
Attachment B
Organization Chart of PTAR

Martable Management Plant

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Martable Management Plant

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PT Agincourt Resources

Environmental Management Plan

Martabe Gold Mine Project is located at Batangtoru District, South Tapanuli

Based on the Decision of Head of South Tapanuli Regency No. 305/KPTS/2007

Jakarta, 10 March 2008

I.1 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE

The objectives of Environmental Management Plan are:

The compilation of Environmental Management Plan (RKL) is to keep the

The objectives of Environment Management Plan are:

PTAR achieves environmental awareness and refers to the company policy. In

‐ Available work environment for employees to perform duties

The completed organization chart of mining activity of PTAR presented in

I.3 RKL FUNCTION

The function of the Environmental Management is to maintain the smoothness

Environmental Management Plan (RKL) for supporting the gold mining of

II.1 TECHNOLOGY APPROACH

‐ To anticipate emission of air pollution produced as a processing

• Liquid Waste Management Technology

‐ Liquid waste management performs in 2 (two) ways, (a) cover

• Sediment Management Technology

‐ Perform routine reclaim if sediment pond is full.

Reclamation Technology and Erosion

‐ Management in acid drain pond.

II.2 SOCIAL ECONOMIC APPROACH

II.2.1 Anticipative Approach

The beginning step is giving transparent information regarding the activity

Anticipative approach is carried out according to periodical meeting.

Direct approach: Performed directly to the member of community that has

II.2.3 Segmented Approach

Segmented approach will be performed when the problem becomes very

II.2.4 Simulative Approach

II.2.5 Qualitative and Quantitative Approach

Qualitative approach: The emphasis is to measure the success level of

Quantitative approach: Quantitative approach can be used as the guide to

In order to manage Environmental impacts as the consequence of the project

II.3 INSTITUTIONAL APPROACH

As already known, the environmental management activity is not only a part of

II.4 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT APPROACH

As a commitment to high standard of environmental management, the

III.1 PRE -CONSTRUCTION STAGE

III.1.1 Economic, Social and Culture Component

III.1.1.1 Land Ownership

1) Significant Impact and Source of Impact

3) Environmental Management Plan Objective

4) Environmental Management Plan

5) Environmental Management Location

6) Environmental Management Period

7) Environmental Management Institution

III.1.1.2 Community Unrest

1) Significant Impact and Source of Impact

3) Environmental Management Plan Objective

4) Environmental Management Plan

5) Environmental Management Location

6) Environmental Management Period

III.2 CONSTRUCTION STAGE

III.2.1 Geophysics and Chemical Component

III.2.1.1 Air Quality (Total Suspended Particulate-TSP)

1) Significant Impact and Source of Impact

3) Environmental Management Plan Objective

4) Environmental Management Plan

5) Environmental Management Location

7) Environmental Management Institution

1) Significant Impact and Source of Impact