Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Manifestari Oculare Ale Afectiunilor Tiroidiene
Manifestari Oculare Ale Afectiunilor Tiroidiene
PATHOGENESIS
Signs about the eyes have been recognized as part of the picture of
hyperthyroidism since the disease was first described as a clinical
entity over one hundred years ago (1, 2, 3, 4). Both changes in the lids
and exophthalmos have been observed, but a differentiation between
lid retraction and proptosis has often not been properly made. Many
thoughts concerning their pathogenesis have been proposed, and the
outstanding theories may be discussed under three main headings:
SMOOTH MUSCLE OVERACTION AND STRIATE MUSCLE UNDERACGION
Following Claude Bernard's (5) classic experiment in 1852, in which
lid retraction and exophthalmos in dogs were produced by stimulating
the cervical sympathetic nerves, sympathetic overactivity has been
TR. Amr. OPHTH. Soc., vol. 57, 1959
Ocular Alan ifestations of Thlyriyoid Disease557;31
widely upheld as the cause of both the lid signs and exophtlhalmos.
Arguments in favor of this theory are: (a) increase in circulating
thyroxine, which occurs in thyrotoxicosis, is known to potentiate the
action of circulating epinephrine (6, 7), as well as to produce a
generalized myasthenia (8, 9); (b) weakness of the ocular recti
muscles in hyperthyroidism has been demonstrated by Wilson (10)
and others (11); and (c) contraction of orbital smooth muscle,
secondary to a relative sympathetic overaction, is believed to result
in lid retraction and exophthalmos. The latter is thought to be en-
hanced by loss of tone in the recti muscles. Hovever, there are certain
strong objections to this hypothesis. Suclh a theory demands the
demonstration of smooth muscle in the human orbit capable of these
effects, and such an anatomic demonstration has not been made. After
repeated dissections in man, Moore (12) and Whitnall (13) were able
to find only vestigial remnants of Muller's orbital smooth muscle in the
region of the inferior orbital fissure. Landstrom's muscle, which was
originally described as a cylindrical band of fibers running from the
septum orbitale to the equatorial region of the globe, is also rudi-
mentary in humans, and Whitnall and Beattie (14) felt that it did little
more than move the conjunctiva during horizontal movements of the
eye. It is, therefore, not surprising that Pochin (15) and Friedgood
(16) were unable to demonstrate a significant proptosis by stimulating
human cervical sympathetic nerves. Undoubtedly for the same reason,
Wagener (17) was able to demonstrate enophthalmos in only one of a
series of 94 cases of clinical Horner's syndrome. Although there is
some difference of opinion as to whether the lower lid is raised or
lowered in hyperthyroidism (18, 19), lid retraction is primarily con-
fined to the upper lid, and Pochin (15, 20) has shown that cervical
sympathetic stimulation in man results in a definite retraction of both
lids. Pupillary abnormalities, which should be expected in a state of
sympaticotonia, are conspicuously absent. Furthermore, upper lid re-
traction and exophthalmos are often much more marked in one eye
than the other (21), an unlikely result of generalized sympathetic
overactivity. Retraction of the upper lid tends to decrease following
control of the hyperthyroidism, but it may persist for many months
after re-establishment of the euthyroid state. This is a strong argument
against the view that the lid signs are secondary to a sympathicotonia
resulting from thyrotoxicosis. From these facts it may be concluded
that although the sympathetic nervous system may contribute to the
production of upper lid retraction and lid lag, it does not play a
primary role in the pathogenesis of exophthalmos.
574 Rober t M. Day
ALTERATIONS IN ORBITAL TISSUE
LABORATORY STUDY
c1-
to C
tn
C-4
z
w
.q
9
w
riq .&I %)
x
w .t
(n
:D
1-4
04
804
w I,*P
H ,-A. V-4 r-. V-
w
0
ri)
:D
0
z
.D
974
1.4
w
04
m
H
A,) .0
Cqi Cq cq
o qt b b
Q "
C4 Cq Cq
. . .
C9
580 Robert Al. Day
TABLE 2. F UNDULUS HEROCLITUS E1XPERIMENTrS
A.M. 10:20 10:30 10:40 10:55 11:05 11:15 11:25 11:35 11:45 11:55
Injection (c.c.) 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
A.M. 1:40 1:40 1:40 1:45 1:30 1:45 1:45 1:25 1:25 1:30
Injection (c.c.) 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
P.M. 3:50 3:55 4:00 4:05 4:10 4:15 4:25 4:20 4:30 4:35
12.4 12.1 14.0 12 .8 11.8 13.0 14.4 11.4 12.0 11.5
12.6 12.2 14.0 12.8 11 .7 13.0 14.1 11.3 12.3 11.7
12.4 12.2 14.4 12.7 11.9 12.8 14.0 11.4 12.1 11 .6
12.8 12.4 14.3 12.7 11.9 12.8 14.3 11.5 12.2 11.7
12.7 12.4 14.2 12.8 11.9 12.7 14.1 11.5 12.1 11.5
12.8 12.:3 14.3 12.7 11.8 12.7 14.1 11.8 12.3 11.8
12.7 12.:3 14.4 12.6 11.9 12.8 14.2 11.8 12.4 11 . 9
Average 12.6 12.3 14.2 12.7 11.8 12.8 14.2 11.5 12.2 1 1. 7
P.M. 3:55 4:00 4:05 4:10 4:15 4:20 4:30 4:25 4:35 4:40
Injection (c.c.) 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
A.M. 8:05 8:25 8:15 8:55 8:00 8:45 8:35 8:30 8:40 8:10
Mary 7,11958 12.5 11.6 14.6 12.2 12.2 12.6 14.0 11.0 12.4 11 .6
12.3 11.4 14.8 12.2 12.2 12.3 14.0 11.0 12.0 11 .9}
12.2 11.5 14.5 12.3 12.1 12.4 14.2 11.0 12.0 11.9
12.3 11.7 14.6 12.3 12.2 12.4 14.1 11.0 12.0 11.8
12.3 11.6 14.5 12.4 12.4 12.4 14.0 11.3 12.0 11.5
12.4 11.6 14.6 12.5 12.0 12.3 14.0 11.2 12.1 11 .7
12.5 11.5 14.6 12.5 12.2 12.3 14.2 11.1 12.3 11.6
.Avcrage 12.4 11.6 14.6 12.3 12.2 12.4 14.1 11.1 12.1 1 1.7
A%.M. 8:10 8:30 8:20 9:00 8:05 8:50 8:40 8:35 8:45 8:15
Injection (c.c.) 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
12:15 12:05 12:20 12:40 12:05 12:15 12:50 12:30 12:40 12:35
Manlifestation.s of
Ocutlarl IhItyoi(l Disease 581
TABI.E 2 (coiitinnlle(l)
FICURE 1
..
Exophthalimic Ftundulus heteroclitus on the left receix ed injections of beef anterior
pitmiitary. Normal control on the right.
RESULTS
A total of 62 goldfish were injected, in addition to 17 controls.
(Tables 3 and 4) Of the 62, 45 received various TSH preparations,
three received serum from a hypothyroid patient, four were injected
with sertim from a thyrotoxic individu.il, six received serum from
patients with severe ophthailmopathy, and four received tri-iodo-
thyronine. Only five goldfish developed a significant exophthalmos.
oo
p lo o oLo - o- to
U)
H
z
z
0*
U)
I-
H
.
. _.
O
11-
C e eooooo
- s -H 00
o5c)0
c- oo e o >
. N - C6
Qs N c0 00N LU eq to q cq C4 cq
Q C14 10 0 0 OO 0
00>
%0
Uo 00I L o
s
10 ko t 0 10 L
t- t- ,=
C)
eD e ct !°
--- C
ffi~~~~~~-
cj
ff EEE zE ;m
o~~~~~~~~~~~~~dC
o o o ¢ 0: ¢m
O 0 0 0 C O
C,
Q
0 0 0 O O
U)
0
1-
W t.W
C-)
.14
0-
z A) *
0
go4
1-
r. 6 6
6
eq
LO to
eq
o o 6
10l eq
eq eq*eq
0 0 0 0( -4
E 0q ¢
¢
E: '
M.-
=
o
Ocular Manifestationis of Thyroid Disease S8S
All five of these positive results were obtained with preparations of
Armour pituitary, and positive results occurred with all three Armour
extracts employed. No exophthalmos resulted from the administration
of hypothyroid or hyperthyroid human serum. Tri-iodo-thyronine also
failed to produce any proptosis, as did the sera from the two patients
with acute, active advancing ophthalmopathy.
DISCUSSION
CLINICAL EVALUATION
NVumnber of patients
Sex and age, White Negro
Female
15-25 16 7
26--35 30 8
36-45 :34 8
46-55 :30 2
56---65 13 1
(66 75 4
roTrAL 127 27
Mfale
15-25 2 0
26-35 8 ,)
36-4;5 9 2
46557)4#(
5;6 6.5 13 0
66-75 0 0
T'OTAL 39
The percentages of patients in both the mild and the severe group
showing each of the six ocular signs evaluated are summarized in
Table 6. By far the most common sign is retraction of the upper lid,
occurring in over 90 percent of both groups. Lid lag, on the other
hand, was evident in only about one-third of the patients. The last
four signs were naturally found more frequently in the severe than in
the mild group. However, their occurrence became less as they repre-
sented increasing severity of the ocular process. Thus, lid fullness and
deep conjunctival injection were more common than extraocular muscle
involvement and chemosis.
'TABLE 6. PEftCENTA;E, OF 200 PATIENTS SHOWING EACHI OF T'rHE
OCULAR SIGNS EV'ALUATED
Average Range
Group Number (mm.n) (mmt-.)
Group I: Lid retractioni
or lid lag 46 18.6 14.5-25.5
Grouip II: Lid fullness or
bulhar injection 62 20.5 14.5-29.0
Grouip III: ExtraocLular mtiscle
involvement 66 21.4 16.5-31.5
Group IV: Chemosis 26 22.5 13.5-29.5