You are on page 1of 5

4CTb

Standard Method of Test


for

Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates


AASHTO DESIGNATION: T 27-99l
(ASTM DESIGNATION: C 136-96a)
--`,,``,,,,`,```,`,`,`,,````,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

1. SCOPE T 11 Materials Finer than tionships concerning porosity and


75-pm (No. 200) packing.
1.1 This method covers the determi- Sieve in Mineral Ag- 5.2 Accurate determination of mate-
nation of the particle size distribution of gregates by Washing riaí finer than the 75-pm (No. 200) sieve
fine and coarse aggregates by sieving. T 248 Reducing Samples of cannot be achieved by use of this method
1.2 Some specifications for aggre- Aggregate to Testing alone. Test Method T 11 for material
gates which reference this method con- Size finer than 75-pm sieve by washing
tain grading requirements including both 2.2 ASTM Standards: should be employed.
coarse and fine fractions. Instructions are C 125 Terminology Relating
included for sieve analysis of such aggre- to Concrete and Con- 6. APPARATUS
gates. crete Aggregates
1.3 The values stated in SI units are C 670 Practice for Preparing 6.1 Balance-The balance shall
to be regarded as the standard. The values Precision and Bias have sufficient capacity, be readable to
in parentheses are provided for informa- Statements for Test O. 1 percent of the sample mass, or better,
tion purposes only. Specification M 92 Methods for Construc- and conform to the requirements of M
designates the size of sieve frames with tion Materials 231.
inch units as standard, but in this test 6.2 Sieves-The sieve cloth shall be
method the frame size is designated in 3. TERMINOLOGY mounted on substantial frames con-
SI units exactly equivalent to the inch structed in a manner that will prevent
units. 3.1 Definitions-For definitions of loss of material during sieving. The sieve
1.4 This standard may involve haz- terns used in tiis standard, refer to cloth and standard sieve frames shall
ardous materials, operations, and equip- ASTM C 125. conform to the requirements of M 92.
ment. This standard does not purport Nonstandard sieve frames shall conform
to address all of the safety problems to the requirements of M 92 as appli-
associated with its use. It is the responsi- 4. SUMMARY OF METHOD cable.
bility of whoever uses this standard to
consult and establish appropriate safety NOTE 1-It is recommended that sieves
and health practices and determine the 4.1 A sample of dry aggregate of mounted in frames larger than standard 203.2
applicability of regulatory regulations known mass is separated through a series mm (8 in.) diameter be used for testing coarse
prior to use. of sieves of progressively smaller open- aggregate to reduce the possibility of over-
ings for determination of particle size loading the sieves. See Section 8.3.
2. REFERENCED DOCUMENTS distribution.
6.3 Mechanical Sieve Shaker-A
mechanical sieving device, if used, shall
2.1 AASHTO Standards: 5. SIGNIFICANCE AND USE create motion of the sieves to cause the
M 92 Wire-Cloth Sieves for
Testing Purposes particles to bounce, tumble, or otherwise
5.1 This method is used primarily turn so as to present different orientations
M 231 Weighing Devices to determine the grading of materials
Used in the Testing to the sieving surface. The sieving action
proposed for use as aggregates or being shall be such that the criterion for ade-
of Materials used as aggregates. The results are used
R 1 Use of the Interna- quacy of sieving described in Section
to determine compliance of the particle 8.4 is met in a reasonable time period.
tional System of Units size distribution with applicable specifi-
T 2 Sampling of Aggre- cation requirements and to provide nec- NOTE 2-Use of a mechanical sieve
gates essary data for control of the production shaker is recommended when the size of the
of various aggregate products and mix- sample is 20 kg or greater, and may be used
'
Except for Sections 6.1. 7.7. 8.1, and 8.4, this test tures containing aggregates. The data for smaller samples, including fine aggregate.
method is identical to ASTM C 136-96a. may also be useful in developing rela- Excessive time (more than approximately 10

32
Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO Licensee=Purdue University/5923082001
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 09/10/2007 13:53:04 MDT
T 27 METHODS OF SAMPLING AND TESTING 33

minutes) to achieve adequate sieving may 7.5 Coarse and Fine Aggregates weight aggregate, for example). Also, samples
result in degradation of the sample. The same Mixtures-The mass of the test sample may be dried at the higher temperature associ-
mechanical sieve shaker may not be practical of coarse and fine aggregate mixtures ated with the use of hot plates without affect-
for all sizes of samples, since the large sieving ing results, provided steam escapes without
shall be the same as for coarse aggregate
area needed for practical sieving of a large generating pressures sufficient to fracture the
nominal size coarse aggregate very likely
in Section 7.4. particles, and temperatures are not so great
could result in loss of a portion of the sample 7.6 Samples of Large Size Coarse as to cause chemical breakdown of the aggre-
if used for a smaller sample of coarse aggre- Aggregate-The size of sample required gate.
gate or fine aggregate. for aggregate with 50-mm nominal maxi-
mum size or larger is such as to preclude 8.2 Select sieves with suitable open-
6.4 Oven-An oven of appropriate convenient sample reduction and testing ings to furnish the information required
size capable of maintaining a uniform as a unit except with large mechanical by the specifications covering the mate-
temperature of 110 i 5°C (230 f 9°F). splitters and sieve shakers. As an option rial to be tested. Use additional sieves
when such equipment is not available, as desired or necessary to provide other
information, such as fineness modulus,

--`,,``,,,,`,```,`,`,`,,````,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
instead of combining and mixing sample
7. SAMPLING increments and then reducing the field or to regulate the amount of material
sample to testing size, conduct the sieve on a sieve. Nest the sieves in order of
7.1 Sample the aggregate in accor- analysis on a number of approximately decreasing size of opening from top to
dance with T 2. The mass of the field equal sample increments such that the bottom and place the sample, or portion
sample shall be the mass shown in T 2 total mass tested conforms to the require- of the sample if it is to be sieved in
or four times the mass required in Sec- ments of Section 7.4. more than one increment, on the top
tions 7.4 and 7.5 (except as modified in 7.7 In the event that the amount of sieve. Agitate the sieves by hand or by
Section 7.6), whichever is greater. material finer than the 75-km (No. 200) mechanical apparatus for a sufficient pe-
7.2 Thoroughly mix the sample and sieve is to be determined by T 11, use riod, established by trial or checked by
reduce it to an amount suitable for testing the procedure described in Section 7.7.1 measurement on the actual test sample,
using the applicable procedures de- or 7.7.2, whichever is applicable. to meet the criterion for adequacy of
scribed in T 248. The sample for test 7.7.1 For aggregates with a nominal sieving described in Section 8.4.
shall be approximately of the mass de- maximum size of 12.5 mm (1/2 in.) or 8.3 Limit the quantity of material on
sired when dry and shall be the end result less, use the same test sample for testing a given sieve so that all particles have
of the reduction. Reduction to an exact by T 11 and this method. First test the opportunity to reach sieve openings a
predetermined mass shall not be per- sample in accordance with T 11 through number of times during the sieving oper-
mitted. the final drying operation, then dry sieve ation. For sieves with openings smaller
the sample as stipulated in Sections 8.2 than 4.75-mm (No. 4), the quantity re-
NOTE 3-Where sieve analysis, including through 8.7 of this method. tained on any sieve at the completion of
determination of material finer than the 75- 7.7.2 For aggregates with a nominal the sieving operation shall not exceed 7
km (No. 200) sieve, is the only testing pro- maximum size greater than 12.5 mm kg/m2 (4 g/in.*) of sieving surface area
posed, the size of the sample may be reduced
in.), a single test sample may be (Note 5). For sieves with openings 4.75
in the field to avoid shipping excessive quan-
tities of extra material to the laboratory.
used as described in Section 7.7.1 or mm (No. 4) and larger, the quantity re-
separate test samples may be used for tained in kg shall not exceed the product
7.3 Fine Aggregate-The size of the T 11 and this method. of 2.5 X (sieve opening, mm x (effec-
test sample of aggregate, after drying, tive sieving area, m2)). This quantity is
shall be 300 g minimum. shown in Table 1 for five sieve-frame
8. PROCEDURE dimensions in common use. In no case
7.4 Coarse Aggregate-The mass of
the test sample of coarse aggregate shall shall the quantity retained be so great as
8.1 If the test sample has not been to cause permanent deformation of the
conform with the following:
subjected to testing by T 11, dry it to sieve cloth.
Nominal Maximum constant mass at a temperature of 110 8.3.1 Prevent an overload of material
Size Square Minimum Mass +_ 5" C (230 ? 9°F) and determine the on an individual sieve by one of the
Openings, of Test Sample, mass of it to the nearest 0.1 percent of following methods:
mm (in.) kg (lb) the total original dry sample mass. 8.3.1.1 Insert an additional sieve
9.5 (3/*) 1 (2) with opening size intermediate between
12.5 (I/*) 2 (4) NOTE 4-For control purposes, particu- the sieve that may be overloaded and
19.0 5 (11) larly where rapid results are desired, it is the sieve immediately above that sieve
25.0 (1) 10 (22) generally not necessary to dry coarse aggre- in the original set of sieves.
37.5 (il/?) 15 (33) gate for the sieve analysis test. The results
are little affected by the moisture content
8.3.1.2 Split the sample into two or
50 (2) 20 (44)
63 (2'/?) 35 (77) unless (1) the nominal maximum size is more portions, sieving each portion indi-
75 ( 3 ) 60 (1 30) smaller than about 12.5 mm (I/* in.), (2) the vidually. Combine the masses of the sev-
90 (3'/?) 100 (220) coarse aggregate contains appreciable mate- eral portions retained on a specific sieve
100 (4) 150 (330) rial finer than 4.75 mm (No. 4), or (3) the before calculating the percentage of the
125 ( 5 ) 300 (660) coarse aggregate is highly absorptive (a light- sample on the sieve.

Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials


Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO Licensee=Purdue University/5923082001
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 09/10/2007 13:53:04 MDT
I 34 METHODS OF SAMPLING AND TESTING T 27

TABLE 1 Maximum Allowable Quantity of Material Retained on a Sieve, kg cle will pass. Start the test on the smallest
Nominal Dimensions of SieveA sieve to be used. Rotate the particles, if
-._.-
9ipve
necessary, in order to determine whether
openingSize, 203.2-mm 254-mm 304.8-III~ 350 by 350 372 by 580
dia' dia' diaB mm mm they will pass through a particular open-
mm ing; however, do not force particles to
Sievine Area. m2
pass through an opening.
0.0285 0.0457 0.0670 O. 1225 0.2158 8.7 Determine the mass of each size
c c c c 67.4 increment by weighing on a scale or bal-
125
c

--`,,``,,,,`,```,`,`,`,,````,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
1O0 c C
30.6 53.9 ance conforming to the requirements
90 c c 15.1 27.6 48.5 specified in Section 6.1 to the nearest O. 1
75 c 8.6 12.6 23.0 40.5 percent of the total original dry sample
63 c 7.2 10.6 19.3 34.0 mass. The total mass of the material after
50 3.6 5.7 8.4 15.3 27.0 sieving should check closely with origi-
37.5 2.7 4.3 6.3 11.5 20.2
1.8 2.9 4.2 7.7 13.5
nal mass of sample placed on the sieves.
25.0
19.0 1.4 2.2 3.2 5.8 10.2 If the amounts differ by more than 0.3
12.5 0.89 1.4 2.1 3.8 6.7 percent, based on the original dry sample
9.5 0.67 1.1 1.6 2.9 5.1 mass, the results should not be used for
4.75 0.33 0.54 0.80 1.5 2.6 acceptance purposes.
A Sieve frame dimensions in inch units: 8.0411. diameter: 10.0-in. diameter: 12.0-in. diameter: 13.8 by 13.8 in.
8.8 If the sample has previously been
(14 by 14 in. nominal): 14.6 by 22.8 in. (16 by 24 in. nominal). tested by T 11, add the mass finer than
'The sieve area for round sieve frames is based on an effective diameter 12.7 mm (% in.) less than the nominal the 75-pm(No. 200) sieve determined by
frame diameter, because Specification M92 permits the sealer between the sieve cloth and the frame to extend that method to the mass passing the 75-
6.35 mm ($ in.) over the sieve cloth. Thus the effective sieving diameter for a 203.2-mm (8.0-in.) diameter sieve
frame is 190.5 mm (7.5 in.). Some manufacturers of sieves may not infringe on the sieve cloth by the full 6.35
pm (No. 200) sieve by dry sieving of the
mm (Y4 in.). same sample in this method.
Sieves indicated have less than five full openings and should not be used for sieve testing except as provided
in 8.6

9. CALCULATION
8.3.1.3 Use sieves having a larger 8.5 In the case of coarse and fine
frame size and providing greater sieving aggregate mixtures, the portion of the
area. sample finer than the 4.75 mm (No. 4)
9.1 Calculate percentages passing,
sieve may be distributed among two or
NOTE 5-The 7 kg/m2 amounts to 200 total percentages retained, or percentages
more sets of sieves to prevent overload-
g for the usual 203.2-mm (8-in.) diameter in various size fractions to the nearest O. 1
ing of individual sieves.
sieve (with effective sieving surface diameter percent on the basis of the total mass of
8.5.1 Alternatively, the portion finer
of 190.5 mm (7.5 in.)). the initial dry sample. If the same test
than the 4.75 mm (No. 4) sieve may be
sample was first tested by T 11, include
8.4 Continue sieving for a sufficient reduced in size using a mechanical split-
the mass of material finer than 75-pm
period and in such manner that, after ter according to T 248. If this procedure
(No. 200) sieve by washing in the sieve
completion, not more than 0.5 percent is followed, compute the mass of each
analysis calculation; and use the total dry
by mass of the total sample passes any size increment of the original sample as
sample mass prior to washing in T 11 as
sieve during 1 minute of continuous hand follows:
the basis for calculating all the percent-
sieving performed as follows: Hold the W ages.
individual sieve, provided with a snug- A = - X B 9.1.1 When sample increments are
w2
fitting pan and cover, in a slightly in- tested as provided in Section 7.6, total the
clined position in one hand. Strike the where: masses of the portion of the increments
side of the sieve sharply and with an retained on each sieve, and use these
A = mass of size increment on total
upward motion against the heel of the masses to calculate the percentage as in
sample basis,
other hand at the rate of about 150 times Section 9.1.
W , = mass of fraction finer than 4.75-
per minute, turn the sieve about one- 9.2 Calculate the fineness modulus,
mm (No. 4) sieve in total sample,
sixth of a revolution at intervals of about when required, by adding the total per-
W , = mass of reduced portion of mate-
25 strokes. In determining sufficiency of centages of material in the sample that is
rial finer than 4.75-mm (No. 4)
sieving for sizes larger than the 4.75- coarser than each of the following sieves
sieve actually sieved, and
mm (No. 4) sieve, limit the material on (cumulative percentages retained), and
B = mass of size increment in re-
the sieve to a single layer of particles. dividing the sum by 100; 150 pm (NO.
uuced pertien sieved.
If the size of the mounted testing sieves loo), 300 pm (No. 50),600 pm (No. 3Üi,
makes the described sieving motion im- 8.6 Unless a mechanical sieve shaker 1.18 mm (No. 16), 2.36 mm (No. 8), 4.75
practical, use 203.2-mm (8-in.) diameter is used, hand sieve particles larger than mm (No. 4), 9.5 mm (3/s-in.), 19.0 mm
sieves to verify the sufficiency of 75 mm (3 in.) by determining the smallest (3/4-in.), 37.5 mm (l'/*-in.), and larger,
sieving. sieve opening through which each parti- increasing the ratio of 2 to 1.

Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials


Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO Licensee=Purdue University/5923082001
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 09/10/2007 13:53:04 MDT
T 27 METHODS OF SAMPLING AND TESTING 35

TABLE 2 Precision 10. REPORT


Acceptable
Standard Range of 10.1 Depending upon the form of
Total Percentage of Deviation Two Results the specifications for use of the matenal
Material Passing (ls), %A (d2s), %A under test, the report shall include the
Coarse AggregawB following:
Single-operator < 100 395 0.32 0.9 10.1.1 Total percentage of material
precision <95 385 0.81 2.3 passing each sieve, or
<85 380 1.34 3.8 10.1.2 Total percentage of material
<80 360 2.25 6.4 retained on each sieve, or
<60 320 1.32 3.7 10.1.3 Percentage of material re-
<20 a 15 0.95 2.7 tained between consecutive sieves.
<15 310 1.00 2.8
<10 35 0.75 2.1
10.2 Report percentages to the near-
<5 32 0.53 1.5 est whole number, except if the percent-
<2 >O 0.27 0.8 age passing the 75-pm (No. 200) sieve
Multilaboratory < 100 295 0.35 1.o is less than 10 percent, it shall be reported
precision <95 385 1.37 3.9 to the nearest 0.1 percent.
<85 280 1.92 5.4 10.3 Report the fineness modulus,
<80 360 2.82 8.0 when required, to the nearest 0.01.
<60 220 1.97 5.6
<20 215 1.60 4.5
< 15 310 1.43 4.2
<10 s5 1.22 3.4
<5 22 1.o4 3.0
<2 >O 0.45 1.3
Fine Aggregate: 11. PRECISION AND BIAS
Single-operator <100 s95 0.25 0.7
precision <95 3 60 0.55 1.6 11.1 Precision-The estimates of
<60 220 0.83 2.4 precision for this test method are listed
<20 a 15 0.54 1.5 in Table 2. The estimates are based on
<15 210 0.36 1 .o the results from the AASHTO Materials
<10 a2 0.37 1.1
<2 >O 0.14 0.4
Reference Laboratory Proficiency Sam-
Multilaboratory <loo s95 0.23 0.6 ple Program, with testing conducted by
precision <95 260 0.77 2.2 T 27 and ASTM C 136. The data are
<60 a20 1.41 4.0 based on the analyses of the test results
<20 2 15 1.10 3.1 from 65 to 233 laboratories that tested
<15 310 0.73 2.1 18 pairs of coarse aggregate proficiency
<10 22 0.65 1.8 test samples and test results from 74 to
<2 >O 0.31 0.9 222 laboratories that tested 17 pairs of
A These numbers represent, respectively, the (Iss) and (d2s) limits as described in ASTM C 670. fine aggregate proficiency test samples
’The precision estimates are based on aggregates with nominal maximum size of 19.0 mm (3/4 in.). (Samples No. 21 through 90). The values
in the table are given for different ranges

TABLE 3 Precision Data for 300-g and SOO-g Test Samples


~ -~ ~ ~~~~

Fine Aggregate Proficiency Sample Within Laboratory Between Laboratory


Test Result Sample Size Number Labs Average 1s d2s IS d2s

AASHTO T 27lASTM C 136


Total material passing the No. 4 sieve (%) 500 g 285 99.992 0.027 0.066 0.037 0.104
300 g 276 99.990 0.021 0.060 0.042 0.117
Total material passing the No. 8 sieve (%) 500 g 28 1 84.10 0.43 1.21 0.63 1.76
300 g 274 84.32 0.39 1.29 0.69 i .92
Total material passing the No. 16 sieve (9’0) 500 g 286 70.11 0.53 1.49 0.75 2.10
300 g 272 70.00 0.52 1.74 0.76 2.12
Total material passing the No. 30 sieve (%) 500 g 287 48.54 0.75 2.10 1.33 3.73
300 g 276 48.44 0.87 2.44 1.36 3.79
Total material passing the No. 50 sieve (%) 500 g 286 13.52 0.42 1.17 0.98 2.73
300 g 275 13.51 0.45 I .25 0.99 2.75
Total material passing the No. 100 sieve (%) 500 g 287 2.55 0.15 0.42 0.37 i .O3
300 €! 270 2.52 0.18 0.52 0.32 0.89
Total material passing the No. 200 sieve (%) 500 g 278 1.32 0.11 0.32 0.3 1 0.85
300 g 266 1.30 0.14 0.39 0.3 i 0.85

--`,,``,,,,`,```,`,`,`,,````,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials


Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO Licensee=Purdue University/5923082001
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 09/10/2007 13:53:04 MDT
36 METHODS OF SAMPLING AND TESTING T 27

of total percentage of aggregate passing Aggregate Proficiency Test Samples 99 g test sample size when a sufficient number
a sieve. and 100 (Samples 99 and 100 were es- of Aggregate Proficiency Tests have been
11.1.1 The precision values for fine sentially identical) produced the preci- conducted using that sample size to provide
aggregate in Table 2 are based on nomi- sion values in Table 3, which indicate reliable data.
nal 500-g test samples. Revision of only minor differences due to test sample
ASTM C 136 in 1994 permitted the fine size. 11.2 Bias-Since there is no ac-
aggregate test sample size to be 300 g cepted reference material suitable for de-
minimum. Analysis of results of testing NOTE 6-The values for fine aggregate termining the bias in this test method,
of 300-g and 500-g test samples from in Table 2 will he revised to reflect the 300- no statement on bias is made.

--`,,``,,,,`,```,`,`,`,,````,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials


Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO Licensee=Purdue University/5923082001
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 09/10/2007 13:53:04 MDT

You might also like