Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Scope
1.2 Objective
1.3 Definitions
1.4 Responsibility
1.5 References
2.0 DESCRIPTION
2.1 General
2.2 Design and Development Planning
2.3 Design Review
2.4 Design Verification
2.5 Design Changes
3.0 APPENDICES
1.1 Scope
This procedure describes the system and organisation to be adopted for contracts
which have a design element as part of the workscope.
1.2 Objective
To obtain a standard method for the control of design activities, organisation and
responsibilities.
1.3 Definitions
None
1.4 Responsibility
The senior CAD Draughtsman is responsible for updating this procedure. The
overall responsibility for Design activities will be the Senior Project Engineer or
Project Manager.
1.5 References
2.0 DESCRIPTION
2.1 General
The following procedure has been developed to ensure that Seaway (UK)
produce, through standard methods a design to meet the customers' specification.
In general this procedure will not apply to detail design work associated with a
call-off contract, i.e. small scale modifications.
A Quality Assurance Plan shall be produced for all Design and Development
contracts which shall display the organisation, interface with other departments,
job descriptions and quality control activities to be used to verify the produced
documents throughout all phases of the contract.
2.3.1 Objective
- Ambiguous specifications
- Novelty
- Complexity
- Lack of relevant experience within the Company
- Absence of relevant Engineering Standards or Procedures
- Lesser known codes, standard and statutory regulations.
To ensure that the appropriate technical resources are made available to the
project, and that the responsibility for resolving technical problems is allocated
to suitably qualified and experienced individuals.
Note: The Design Review is intended to cover principally technical items i.e.
arising from the nature of the process itself, materials selections, the
equipment or the environment. Other matters that may affect
engineering such as project administration, contractual or execution
requirements shall, if necessary be the subject of a separate review.
- Equipment List
- Preliminary Plot Plan
- Comment issue of Process & Instrument Diagrams
- Process Specifications for major equipment
- Approved list of codes, standards and specifications
- Project Safety Policy
There shall be a final design review meeting where as well as assessing the
overall design output versus input the following information should be
sufficiently comprehensive and clear:
- Material take-off
- Purchasing
- Specialist Plant/Equipment
- Manufacture/Fabrication
- Inspection
- Assembly
- Installation
- Test
- Operations
- Maintenance
The criteria for all design review meetings shall be; is what we are producing
what the client has specified?
All drawings and documents produced shall be checked. Check activities may
include:-
A self check shall be performed by the design documentoriginator who shall sign
the documents as evidence of the performance of the check.
This check follows the self check and is performed by an engineer of the same
discipline. If a project team does not warrant two of the same discipline
engineers, the Project Manager or Senior Engineer shall assume responsibility for
this check.
This check may, where specified, include alternative calculations.
The design package documents check copy shall be signed as "checked" by the
checker.
Where design documents have been noted in the drawing register as requiring
Interdiscipline Check this shall be performed by routing the document through
the other disciplines. A routing list (Appendix 2) shall be attached to the check
document. The document originator shall expedite it through the system.
The requirements for the review of drawings and documents shall be assessed
during the planning phase of the work. All drawings and documents shall be
listed in the Project Document Register (Appendix 3) and the Project Engineer
or his authorised delegate shall define which of the drawings and documents
require Inter Discipline Checking. The list of drawings and documents may be
drawn from the following:-
In addition, the client may also wish to review the project document register to
select documents that shall require checking by departments and disciplines
within the client's organisation.
- Client Review
- Interface Review towards other contractors
- Interface Review towards sub-contractors and vendors.
The drawings and documents selected for Client Review shall be identified in the
Document Register. The interface documents shall be identified in co-operation
with Seaway (UK), contractors and any sub-contractors or vendors involved.
The Project Engineer shall be responsible for all review drawings and documents.
This includes:-
The Project Engineer shall instruct the Document Controller of the specific project
requirement.
3.0 APPENDICES
AB0000.PC.28.002 Rev. 2
APPENDIX 2
AB0000.PC.28.002 Rev. 2
APPENDIX 3
DOCUMENT REGISTER
AB0000.PC.28.002 Rev. 2