See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/299467654

The Asian Financial Crisis of 1997-1998 Revisited: Causes, Recovery, and the
Path Going Forward

Research · March 2016

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3147.1768

CITATIONS READS

0 3,511

1 author:

Omid P. Panahi
University of Nevada, Reno
5 PUBLICATIONS   4 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Omid P. Panahi on 29 March 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 The Asian Financial Crisis of 1997-
1998 Revisited: Causes, Recovery, and
the Path Going Forward

Omid P. Panahi

Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation

I

Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1
2.0 The 1997-1998 Asian Financial Crisis ...................................................................................... 1
3.0 The Major Causes of the 1997-1998 Asian Financial Crisis ..................................................... 2
3.1 Crony Capitalism ................................................................................................................... 2
3.2 Fixed Exchange Rates ........................................................................................................... 2
3.3 Moral Hazard ......................................................................................................................... 3
3.4 The Contagion Effect ............................................................................................................ 3
4.0 Recovery from the 1997-1998 Asian Financial Crisis............................................................... 3
5.0 How Future Financial Crises Could Be Prevented .................................................................... 4
6.0 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 6
7.0 References .................................................................................................................................. 7

II



1.0 Introduction
This assignment is conducted on the 1997-1998 Asian financial crisis, which adversely affected
a considerable number of Asian, Latin, and European economies. This paper aims to do the
following: (1) identifying the major causes of this financial crisis; (2) examining the recovery
of the affected economies by the early 2000s; and (3) determining the ways in which future
financial crises could be prevented. Subsequent to the main sections of the paper, concluding
remarks will be made.

2.0 The 1997-1998 Asian Financial Crisis

The 1997-1998 Asian financial crisis is considered the third international financial crisis in
modern history (Garg, et al., 1999). According to Ardiansyah (2002), the first sign of the
financial crisis was the declaration made by the Thai real estate developer Somprasong Land
on February 5, 1997, that it had defaulted on a $3.1 million interest payment for a $80 billion
Euro-convertible bond. This was followed by the bankruptcy of Finance One, Thailand’s
largest financial institution. As a result of these two startling events, Thailand’s currency, the
Baht, became unstable and depreciated significantly against the U.S. dollar. The decline of the
Thai currency caused the financial crisis to spread to Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines,
and subsequently to South Korea, Hong Kong, and China. During the financial crisis of 1997-
1998, the impacted countries experienced a substantial loss of the value of their currencies, as
well as the value of their domestic stock markets (Ardiansyah, 2002). The crisis, also, resulted
in lower demands for imported goods, lower rates of export, less government and private
spending, higher poverty rates, reduced production, massive layoffs, and hence increased
unemployment.

Pang (2000) summarizes the Asian financial crisis in a series of events: (1) the collapse of the
regional economies mainly as a result of dysfunctional, overvalued currencies, which were
themselves caused by high rates of inflowing foreign direct investment (FDI) and foreign
portfolio investment (FPI); (2) the sudden and swift liberalization of the regional capital
markets to entice more FDI and FPI; (3) heavy corporate and private debt in Dollar and Yen;
(4) the public backlash to the excessive crony capitalism present in the region; (5) the
insufficiency of the remedial tools and state policies utilized in the region; (6) the rise and
global contagion of investor panic; and (7) the governments’ fake promises of bailout to local
corporations. The Asian financial crisis, according to Davidson (2005), came as an economic

crash with the end of what he calls the “Asian miracle,” which is the remarkable performance
of East Asian economies in the previous two decades.

3.0 The Major Causes of the 1997-1998 Asian Financial Crisis

In his book The Asian Financial Crisis, Lee (1998) argues that the Asian financial crisis of
1997-1998 was caused by a combination of equally important factors, and cannot be adequately
explained by a single, unequivocal cause. In this section of the assignment paper, the major
causes of the financial crisis will be identified and thoroughly evaluated.

3.1 Crony Capitalism

The financial crisis could be partly attributed to the failure of the Asian economic model, which
fundamentally deviated from the basic principles of free market capitalism (Lee, 1998). Almost
all of the countries that were affected by the crisis pursued a version of the economic system
often referred to as “crony capitalism.” Enderwick (2005) defines crony capitalism as “a form
of capitalism that restricts the allocation of economic resources and opportunity to a country’s
privileged elite or politically connected ‘cronies.’” This economic system is closely associated
with corruption and rent-seeking practices, which result in lower incentives for wealth creation
and a misallocation of resources (Aligica & Tarko, 2014). The ubiquity of cronyism in the East
Asian economic systems significantly contributed to the emergence of the 1997-1998 Asian
financial crisis.

3.2 Fixed Exchange Rates

Fixed exchange rates – also referred to as pegged exchange rates – could be identified as
another cause of the Asian financial crisis. In his book Asian Contagion, Jackson (1999) notes
that fixed exchange rates were widely used across East Asia in order to minimize foreign
exchange rate variations for domestic borrowers and foreign investors. Although this was
temporarily beneficial in that it fostered low inflation, contributed to currency stability, and
boosted exports, it eventually resulted in overvalued currencies in East Asian countries (Kim
& Haque, 2002; Glăvan, 2008). As a result, these countries significantly lost their
competitiveness in export markets, which prompted an effort on the part of their governments
to raise interest rates with the purpose of curtailing consumption and imports (Pang, 2000).
Thus fixed exchange rates constitute another factor that enabled the Asian financial crisis to
take place.

3.3 Moral Hazard

Another factor that led to the Asian financial crisis is the phenomenon of “moral hazard,” which
refers to governments’ and the international community’s artificial guarantees of financial
stability, with implicit promises of bailout to corporations at times of economic crisis (Pang,
2000). Prior to the financial crisis, many such guarantees and promises were made by East
Asian governments to politically connected individuals and corporations, which, in turn,
encouraged riskier behavior on the part of borrowers, lenders, and investors (IMF Staff, 1998).
This resulted in a misallocation of investments, declining returns on investment, and ever-more
fragile financial systems (Lee, 1998). The Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998 was made
possible partly by the problem of moral hazard, which negatively affected the East Asian
economies to various degrees.

3.4 The Contagion Effect

The contagion of the financial panic initiated by the depreciation of the Thai Baht, also, played
a role in the occurrence of the Asian financial crisis (Baig & Goldfajn, 1999). Kim and Haque
(2002) note that it is typical of transnational financial crises to quickly spread beyond the
boundaries of their country of origin, as was certainly the case with the Asian financial crisis
of 1997-1998. Upon the eruption of Thailand’s local financial crisis, the majority of
international short-term creditors withdrew their loans from the entire East Asian region,
assuming the homogeneity of the East Asian economies (Radelet & Sachs, 1998). As a result,
a severe foreign exchange and stock market turmoil spread in East Asia, with significant
consequences for the economies of Thailand’s neighboring countries, namely Indonesia,
Malaysia, the Philippines, and Korea (Baig & Goldfajn, 1999). Thus the Asian financial crisis
was partly caused by the contagion of financial panic in the international investment
community.

4.0 Recovery from the 1997-1998 Asian Financial Crisis

In order to stabilize their economies, the crisis-struck countries requested bailout packages
from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). According to Ardiansyah (2002), Thailand
requested for $17.2 billion, Indonesia for $40 billion, and South Korea for $57 billion, from
the IMF. In addition, the IMF provided $36 billion to the countries worst hit by the crisis –
namely Thailand, Indonesia, and South Korea – to support governmental and economic reform
programs (IMF Staff, 1998). For instance, the IMF demanded the Indonesian government to
eliminate the subsidies and tax cuts that it grants to the country’s monopolies; and the South

Korean government to implement free market reforms and open its market to foreign
investment and ownership (Ardiansyah, 2002). These requests of reform were met with an
initial hesitation on the part of the authorities, which further exacerbated the crisis by causing
declines in the currencies and stock markets (IMF Staff, 1998). Eventually, however, the
necessary commitments were made and the proposed reforms were implemented.

Apart from the reform programs introduced by the IMF, additional measures were taken by
East Asian countries to manage the financial crisis. One of the most remarkable among them
is the reorganization of the financial sectors, where many of the ailing banks and financial
institutions in the region were shut down (Kim & Haque, 2002). Throughout 1997 and 1998,
Thailand liquidated 56 of its 91 financial institutions; Indonesia closed 16 of its commercial
banks; South Korea suspended 14 of its 30 merchant banks; and Malaysia restructured its 39
financial institutions (15 were restructured into six anchor groups, and 14 were absorbed by
their parent banks) (Radelet & Sachs, 1998; Chotigeat & Lin, 2001). These actions were taken,
according to Radelet and Sachs (1998), to minimize the losses that were being accumulated by
these financial institutions, as well as to send a strong message that the East Asian governments
were determined to implement reforms and restore confidence in their countries’ banking
systems. Overall, this strategy helped the East Asian economies recover from the 1997-1998
financial crisis.

5.0 How Future Financial Crises Could Be Prevented

Prior to the 1997-1998 Asian financial crisis, Singh (1998) notes, the East Asian economic
model was characterized by the following: (1) close relationships between governments and
businesses; (2) frequent government interventions through a system of “administrative
guidance” (as opposed to formal legislation); (3) long-term relationships between corporations
and financial institutions; (4) cooperative relationships between corporations’ managers and
labor; (5) governments’ deliberate management and restriction of competition in markets; and
(6) strategic and limited integration with the world economy. In his paper, Pang (2000) argues
that the Asian financial crisis was due to the failure of the East Asian economic model, which
he refers to as the “Asian developmental state.” To overcome the challenges of globalization
and prevent crises of this sort, he writes, it is crucial for East Asian countries to redefine their
roles as states and strategically reposition themselves.

Pang (2000) goes on to describe what the new East Asian economic model should look like.
The new economic model or developmental state, he writes, should entail the following: (1)

the pursuit of market-driven, as opposed to state-centric, development; (2) limited state

domination in political, economic, and social life; (3) little to no interference of political affairs
with the market; and (4) the preservation of ethnic cohesion and solidarity, built on economic
prosperity and equality. In order to achieve this, East Asian states would need to reduce their
role as financiers, planners, and producers; increase transparency and public accountability;
invest in physical and human infrastructure; and propagate democratic values. There is, lastly,
a need for East Asian countries to maximize trade and financial integration with Japan, Taiwan,
Australia, the European Union, and North America.

In the post-financial crisis era, according to Singh (1998), East Asian countries face a number
of policy challenges: (1) restoring the confidence of international investors to resume normal
capital flows into the region; (2) ensuring long-term economic growth; and (3) providing
immediate aid and assistance to the people who have, as a result of the financial crisis, become
unemployed or pushed back into poverty. In order to tackle these challenges, East Asian
countries would need to encourage cooperation not only between governments and
corporations, but also between labor and civil society organizations. A state of “political unity”
needs to be achieved, which would, in turn, ensure the implementation of credible economic
policies that are supported across the domestic political spectrums.

In a 1998 paper published by the International Monetary Fund, the IMF’s staff note, regarding
the Asian financial crisis, that “A key task for future policymakers is to identify and address
vulnerability before crises erupt” (IMF Staff, 1998). In some cases, they write, countries might
need to modify their exchange rate regimes, and adopt mechanisms such as currency pegs and
currency unions. These systems would help stabilize East Asian countries’ economies, given
the anchor currencies and the rate at which the pegs are set are appropriate, and certain policies
are implemented to maintain the rates. In other cases, countries might decide to shift toward
higher exchange rate flexibility, in order to avoid the risk of excessive foreign currency
exposure created by fixed exchange rates. Decisions of this sort have to be made with close
consideration of domestic economic circumstances.

In order to liberalize capital movements, the IMF staff (1998) argue, East Asian countries
would need to develop a robust financial system that accommodates the moderate regulation
and supervision of financial institutions. In addition, the liberalization of domestic financial
systems would need to be accompanied by the reception of foreign investors, since this will
stimulate the growth of domestic capital markets. Overall, the initiatives proposed by the

International Monetary Fund would help East Asian countries foresee, and ideally prevent,
future financial crises.

Furthermore, Kim (1998) points to the need for corporations to revise their internal objectives
and decision-making procedures. In order for East Asian countries to boost the productivity of
capital, he contends, domestic corporations must “realign managerial interests with the claims
of shareholders by linking managerial compensation to value creation.” Such a reform would
require the abandonment of the “growth at any cost” strategy, and the adoption of a merit-based
compensation system. Moreover, domestic corporations need to take the necessary steps to
protect foreign investors from the expropriation of their wealth. This will require higher
transparency in financial reporting, accountability on the part of managers, and additional legal
protections. This way, the likelihood of a future financial crisis could be significantly
diminished.

6.0 Conclusion
The 1997-1998 Asian financial crisis was the central topic of this assignment paper. Initially,
the financial crisis was briefly introduced and put in historical perspective. In the subsequent
section, the origins of the Asian financial crisis were thoroughly discussed, identifying its major
causes as (1) crony capitalism, (2) fixed exchange rates, (3) moral hazard, and (4) the contagion
effect. The following section described the manner in which East Asian countries recovered
from the 1997-1998 financial crisis. And the last section explored at length the measures that
could be taken by East Asian countries to predict, and ultimately prevent, future financial crises
of the sort that erupted in 1997. The developing countries in Asia have many lessons to learn
from the 1997-1998 financial crisis, and should harness this knowledge to better position
themselves in the 21st century world economy.

7.0 References
Kim, S. H. & Haque, M., 2002. The Asian Financial Crisis of 1997: Causes and Policy Responses.
Multinational Business Review, 10(1), pp. 37-44.

Ardiansyah, M., 2002. Impact of the 1997--1998 Asian Financial Crisis on the Indonesian and
Malaysian Palm Oil and Palm Kernel Oil Industries. Oklahoma State University.

Pang, E.-S., 2000. The Financial Crisis of 1997-98 and the End of the Asian Developmental State.
Contemporary Southeast Asia, 22(3), pp. 570-593.

Davidson, S., 2005. The 1997-98 Asian Crisis: A Property Rights Perspective. Cato Journal, 25(3),
pp. 567-582.

Lee, E., 1998. The Asian Financial Crisis: The Challenge for Social Policy. Geneva, Switzerland:
International Labour Organization.

Enderwick, P., 2005. What’s Bad About Crony Capitalism?. Asian Business & Management, 4(2), pp.
117-132.

Aligica, P. D. & Tarko, V., 2014. Crony Capitalism: Rent Seeking, Institutions and Ideology. Kyklos,
67(2), pp. 156-176.

Jackson, K. D., 1999. Asian Contagion: The Causes and Consequences of a Financial Crisis.
Boulder, Colorado, United States: Westview Press.

Garg, R., Kim, S. H. & Swinnerton, E., 1999. The Asian Financial Crisis of 1997 and Its
Consequences. Multinational Business Review, 7(2), pp. 32-36.

Glăvan, B., 2008. The Quantity Theory of Money and Financial Crises: Evidence from the 1997
Asian Crisis. Romanian Economic and Business Review, 3(2), pp. 103-108.

IMF Staff, 1998. The Asian Crisis: Causes and Cures. Finance and Development, 35(2), pp. 18-21.

Baig, T. & Goldfajn, I., 1999. Financial Market Contagion in the Asian Crisis. IMF Staff Papers,
46(2), pp. 167-195.

Radelet, S. & Sachs, J., 1998. The Onset of the East Asian Financial Crisis. National Bureau of
Economic Research, Issue w6680.

Chotigeat, T. & Lin, J. B., 2001. Coping with the 1997 Financial Crisis: Policy Issues in Southeast-
Asia. Multinational Business Review, 9(2), pp. 52-56.

Singh, A., 1998. “Asian Capitalism” and the Financial Crisis. CEPA Working Paper Series III.

Kim, E. H., 1998. Globalization of Capital Markets and the Asian Financial Crisis. Journal of Applied
Corporate Finance, 11(3), pp. 30-39.

View publication stats