Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This report describes a rare case of intrauterine midgut particularly fortunate that the volvulus occurred at a point in
volvulus that presented at term. The pregnancy was uncom- gestation when she was mature enough to tolerate birth and
plicated. There were no signs of fetal distress or polyhydram- surgery. This case is also the first demonstration that volvu-
nios, and the child was delivered vaginally. This patient had lus can present with abdominal distension in the immediate
the unusual presentation in that at the time of delivery, the newborn period.
patient was distended and acidotic. She immediately re- J Pediatr Surg 34:1280-1281. Copyright o 7999 by W. B.
quired an extensive resection of gangrenous small bowel. Saunders Company.
Comparing this case to the 10 other cases of fetal intestinal
volvulus that have been reported, it seems this child was INDEX WORDS: Midgut volvuIus.
1280 Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Vol 34, No 8 (August), 1999: pp 1280-l 281
FETAL MIDGUT VOLVULUS AT TERM 1281
Finally, one reported case describes spontaneous delivery prenatal signs certainly underscores the acute nature of
at 30 weeks of a fetus with a history of polyhydramnios the onset of this affliction.
and neonatal abdominal distension.* This child also It is interesting to consider the similarities between the
survived after resection of gangrenous small bowel from current patient and the survivors in the other reported
volvulus. cases of in utero intestinal volvulus. The amount of
From these previously reported cases, we might try to intestine that is compromised by the volvulus as well as
generate a list of prenatal signs suggestive of in utero the timing of the event with respect to gestational age
intestinal volvulus. A number of the affected fetuses were appear to be important variables. Some investigators
diagnosed with polyhydramnios, which certainly is con- have stipulated that small segmental volvuluses occur-
sistent with intestinal volvulus causing complete obstruc- ring early in gestation may be a cause of intestinal
tion. One of the reports suggested that ultrasound scan atresias seen in neonates.‘v8 The previously reported cases
may be a useful tool in helping to make this rare of prenatal volvulus would suggest that a midgut volvu-
diagnosis.‘0 In that report, a static abdominal mass with lus occurring during this same time frame might be an
dilated intestinal loops was visualized. A number of adequate insult to compromise the viability of the fetus
reviews of malrotation and midgut volvulus have cited a and cause miscarriage. These reports also suggest that a
high association of its occurrence with other congenital similarly large insult occurring in the third trimester will
anomalies (omphalocele, gastroschisis, congenital dia- induce premature labor. A relationship between prenatal
phragmatic hernia, and trisomies).4.11 Furthermore, sev- midgut volvulus and preterm delivery has been postu-
eral of the case reports cited above describe general signs lated previously.7J2 It has been suggested that acute fetal
of distress, particularly decreased fetal motion and poor stress may activate adrenal and hypothalamic hormones,
heart rate variability. Interestingly. none of these prospec- which may induce premature uterine activity and birth. It
tive signs was noted in the current case. This patient had would seem, then, that the critical factor predicting the
an uncomplicated prenatal course with a normal spontane- survivability of a fetus with a substantial intestinal
ous vaginal delivery at full term. She was clearly no less volvulus is its maturity. In the current case, the child was
ill than the previously reported patients that delivered simply fortunate that when her bowel was compromised,
prematurely, requiring an extensive resection of gangre- she was mature enough to tolerate delivery as well as
nous small bowel. The absence of a reliable set of major abdominal surgery.
REFERENCES
1. Torres A. Ziegler M: Malrotation of the Intestine. World J Surg 7. Ashworth T: Fetal volvulus of the small intestme. J Clm Path01
17:326-331. 1993 41.594-595, 1988
2. Andrassy R. Mahour G: Malrotation of the midgut in infants and 8. Usmani S, Kenigsberg K: Intrauterine volvulus without malrota-
chtldren: A25year revtew. Arch Surg 116:158-160. 1981 tton. J Pediatr Surg 26:1409-1410, 1991
9. Witter E Molteni R: Intrauterine mtestinal volvulus with hemoperi-
3. Messineo A, MacMillan J, Palder S, et al: Clinical factors
toneum presenting as fetal distress at 34 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet
affecting mortahty in children with malrotation of the intestine. J
Gynecol 155:1080-1081, 1986
Pediatr Surg 21: 1343.1345, 1992
10. Samuel N, Dicker D. Feldberg D, et al: Ultrasound diagnosis and
4. Powell D, Othersen H, Smith C: Malrotation of the intestines in
management of fetal intestmal obstruction and volvulus in utero. J
children: The effect of age on presentation and therapy. J Pediatr Surg Perinat Med 12:333-337, 1984
24.777-780, 1989 11. Ford E, Senac MO Jr, Srikanth MS. et al: Malrotation of the
5. Seward J, Zusman J: Hydrops fetalis associated with small-bowel intestme in children. Ann Surg 215:172-178, 1992
volvulus. Lancet 252-53, 1978 12. Felice CD, Massafra C, Centini G, et al: Relationship between
6. Noganu W. Weber T, Lemons J: Hydrops fetahs associated with intrautenne midgut volvulus without malrotation and preterm dehvery.
nudgut volvulus. J Pediatr Surg 20:177-178, 1985 Acta Obstet Gynecol Stand 76:386, 1997