KI

ITLAW SCHOOL
KI
ITUni
ver
sit
y,Bhubaneswar
-751024

COURSE:
B.A.
LL.
B,B.
B.A.
LLB&B.
Sc.
LL.
B(SEMESTERV)

(
Subj
ect
:Int
ernat
ional
Law)

Paper
:Publ
i
cInt
ernat
ional
Law[
LW3013]

COURSEDESI
GNEDBY
Mr
.Ani
rudhaChoudhur
y
Assi
stantPr
ofessor
,KI
ITLawSchool
,
Mr
.Bi
swanat
hDut
ta,
Assi
stantPr
ofessor
,KI
ITLawSchool
And
ChandanKumar
,
Facul
tyAssoci
ate,
KII
TLawSchool
 MECHANI
CALDATA

1.Cour
se:
B.A.LL.
B.,
B.Sc.LL.
B.&B.
B.A.LL.
B.(
Semest
erV)
2.Subj
ect
:Int
ernat
ional
Law
3.Nat
ureoft
hesubj
ect
:Compul
sor
y
4.Paper
:Publ
i
cInt
ernat
ional
Law
5.PaperCode:
LW-
3013
6.Subj
ectOv
erv
iew:Thecour
secov
erst
hemaj
orar
easofgener
ali
nter
nat
ionall
aw
andi
snotov
er-
speci
ali
sed.I
twi
l
lcov
ert
het
radi
ti
onalmaj
ort
opi
csi
nthi
sfi
eldsuch
as t
he sour
ces and subj
ect
s ofi
nter
nat
ionall
aw,t
he j
uri
sdi
cti
on ofst
ates,
i
nter
nat
ionall
awandt
heuseoff
orce,
andt
her
elat
ionshi
pbet
weeni
nter
nat
ionall
aw
andt
hei
nter
nall
awofst
ates.I
twi
l
lal
soaddr
essnewert
hemesi
nint
ernat
ionall
aw
suchast
hei
nter
nat
ionall
aw ofhumanr
ight
sandi
nter
nat
ionalcr
imi
nall
aw.The
cour
sewi
l
lrev
iew anddi
scussanumberofi
nter
nat
ionall
aw casesdeci
dedby
nat
ionalandi
nter
nat
ionalt
ri
bunal
s,aswel
lascer
tai
ntr
eat
ies,r
esol
uti
onsandot
her
i
nter
nat
ionall
egali
nst
rument
sofi
mpor
tance.Thepr
imar
yfocusoft
hiscour
sei
s
uponpubl
i
cint
ernat
ionall
aw,whi
chi
str
adi
ti
onal
l
yconsi
der
edt
oencompasst
he
bi
ndi
ngnor
mat
iver
ulesandpr
inci
plesdeal
i
ngwi
tht
heconductofst
atesandof
i
nter
nat
ional
organi
zat
ionsandwi
tht
hei
rrel
atonsi
i nterse.
7.Nameoft
hePr
inci
pal
teacher
:Mr
.Bi
swanat
hDut
ta
8.Nameoft
hesuppor
ti
ngt
eacher
:Mr
.Ani
rudhaChoudhur
y,Mr
.ChandanKumar
9.Room No:

OBJECT:

Thi
scour
sei
sint
endedt
oint
roducest
udent
stot
hebasi
cconcept
sandpr
obl
emsof
publ
i
cint
ernat
ional
law,
int
ernat
ional
legal
syst
em andoft
hei
nter
nat
ional
legal
order
.
Thesubj
ecthasv
eryconsi
der
abl
epr
act
ical
signi
fi
cance,
par
ti
cul
arl
yforper
sonswho
consi
derent
eri
ngt
heser
viceofi
nter
nat
ionalor
gani
zat
ions,
NGOs,
for
eignmi
nist
ri
es
oft
hei
rcount
ri
es,orspeci
ali
zed pr
ivat
e pr
act
ice (
par
ti
cul
arl
yint
he ar
eas of
commer
cial
lawandofhumanr
ight
s).
OBJECTI
VE:

 Thecour
sewi
l
lfami
l
iar
izet
othest
udent
sthet
radi
ti
onalmaj
ort
opi
csi
nthi
s
f
iel
dsuchast
hesour
cesandsubj
ect
sofi
nter
nat
ionall
aw,t
hej
uri
sdi
cti
onof
st
ates,i
nter
nat
ionall
aw andt
heuseoff
orce,andt
her
elat
ionshi
pbet
ween
i
nter
nat
ional
lawandt
hedomest
icl
awofst
ates.
 Thecour
sewi
l
lal
soaddr
essnewert
hemesi
nint
ernat
ionall
aw suchast
he
i
nter
nat
ionall
aw ofhumanr
ight
s,i
nter
nat
ionali
nst
it
uti
ons,i
nter
vent
ionand
i
nter
nat
ional
cri
minal
law.

TEACHI
NGLEARNI
NGMETHODOLOGY
Casest
udi
esandcaseanal
ysi
sisoneoft
hemet
hodsofdi
scov
eri
ngl
awi
nbookst
o
suppor
tthel
awi
nact
ion.Si
mil
arl
ypr
obl
em or
ient
edst
udi
esi
sidealf
orgener
ati
ng
i
nter
estamongt
hest
udent
s.Sot
eachi
ngwi
l
lbebyl
ect
uremet
hodsuppl
ement
ed
bycl
assr
oom di
scussi
ons,t
utor
ial
sandpr
obl
em sol
vi
ng.Thel
ect
ureswi
l
lgi
vet
he
st
udent
sanov
eral
lvi
ew oft
het
opi
c. Thet
utor
ialwi
l
lpr
ovi
deanoppor
tuni
tyf
or
di
scussi
on. Al
ldoubt
sregar
dingt
hesubj
ectcoul
dber
aisedi
nthecl
ass. The
t
eacherwi
l
lcl
eart
hedoubt
sthenandt
her
e.I
fthequest
ioncannotbeanswer
edat
t
hatpoi
ntoft
ime,
itwi
l
lbedeal
twi
thl
ateronasdeci
dedbyt
het
eacher
.Thet
eacher
wi
l
lbeav
ail
abl
eint
hecampust
hroughoutt
hewor
kinghour
s.Thet
eachercanbe
appr
oachedf
orcl
ari
fi
cat
ionofanydoubtr
egar
dingt
hesubj
ectev
enaf
tert
hecl
ass
hour
s. Thel
ect
urewi
l
lbemai
nlyont
het
opi
csment
ionedi
nthecour
seout
li
ne.
St
udent
sar
eexpect
edt
oat
tendt
hel
ect
uresr
egul
arl
yandact
ivel
ypar
ti
cipat
eint
he
di
scussi
ons.Theyar
eexpect
edt
oreadt
hepor
ti
onsf
rom t
het
extbooksandcome
t
othecl
ass.Necessar
yreadi
ngmat
eri
alswi
l
lbepr
ovi
dedt
othest
udent
sont
he
subj
ectt
othemaxi
mum possi
bleext
ent
.Nodoubt
sshoul
dbel
eftuncl
ari
fi
edand
t
het
eachershoul
dbeconsul
tedf
ort
hatpur
pose.

EVALUATI
ONSYSTEM

Theper
for
manceoft
hest
udent
swi
l
lbeassessedont
hebasi
sof100
mar
ks.The100mar
kisdi
vi
dedi
nto50mar
ksf
ort
heI
nter
nalAssessmentand50
mar
ks f
ort
he End Semest
erExami
nat
ion. The quest
ion f
orEnd Semest
er
Exami
nat
ionwi
l
lbeofl
onganswer
s,pr
obl
emsandshor
tnot
es.

S.No. ModeofAssessment Mar

ks
1 I
nter
nal
Assessment 30+20=50
- Mi
d – Semest
er Exami
nat
ion (
30
mar
ks)
- Pr
oject(
20mar
ks)
2. EndSemest
er 50
Tot
alMar
ks 100

DI
SPUTERESOLUTI
ON

Oncet
hev
aluat
ioni
scompl
etedt
hemar
kswi
l
lbeshownt
othest
udent
s
andal
sopubl
i
shont
henot
iceboar
d. Anyst
udentwhoi
snotsat
isf
iedwi
tht
he
mar
kscanappr
oacht
hesubj
ectt
eacher
.

ANNEXUREI
:

DETAI
LEDSYLLABUS

Thesy
ll
abusoft
hiscour
sei
sdi
vi
dedi
ntoei
ghtmodul
es.
=
Modul
e1:
Theor
y,pur
pose,
andmaki
ngofi
nter
nat
ional
law
1.
1Theor
iesofi
nter
nat
ional
law

1.
2Whati
sint
ernat
ional
law?

1.
3 Sour
cesofI
nter
nat
ional
Law

-
Art
icl
e38(
1)I
CJSt
atut
e

Modul
e2:
Ther
elat
ionshi
pbet
weeni
nter
nat
ional
andnat
ional
law

3.
1Di
ff
erentconcept
ionsoft
her
elat
ionshi
pbet
weeni
nter
nat
ional
andnat
ional
law
Dual
- i
sm
-
Moni
sm
-Anal
ter
nat
iveappr
oach
3.
2Nat
ional
lawi
nint
ernat
ional
law
-
Int
ernat
ional
lawi
ssupr
emei
nit
sdomai
n
-Theappl
i
cat
ionofnat
ional
lawwi
thi
nint
ernat
ional
law
-Useofnat
ional
lawbyi
nter
nat
ional
tri
bunal
stor
esol
vedi
sput
es
-
Useofnat
ional
lawt
oresol
veast
ate’
sposi
ti
ononaquest
ionofi
nter
nat
ional
law
3.
3Int
ernat
ional
lawi
nnat
ional
law
3.
4Di
ff
erentappr
oachest
othei
mpl
ement
ati
onofi
nter
nat
ional
lawi
nnat
ional
law
Tr
- ansf
ormat
ion
-I
ncor
por
ati
on
-
Thei
mpl
ement
ati
onofcust
omar
yint
ernat
ional
law/t
reat
ylawi
ntonat
ional
law
Thei
mpl
ement
ati
onoft
reat
ylawi
ntonat
ional
law
Modul
e3:Recogni
ti
on&St
ateResponsi
bil
i
ty
3.
1Recogni
ti
on
-
Pol
i
tical
recogni
ti
onofst
atehood
-
Decl
arat
oryandconst
it
uti
vet
heor
iesofr
ecogni
ti
on
-
Def
act
oanddej
urer
ecogni
ti
on
-
Cur
rentr
ecogni
ti
onpr
act
ice
3.
2.Nat
ureofSt
ateResponsi
bil
i
ty
3.
2.1Dr
aftar
ti
cl
esonResponsi
bil
i
tyofSt
atesf
orI
nter
nat
ional
l
yWr
ongf
ulAct
s
(
2001)
-Gener
alPr
inci
ples.
-At
tr
ibut
ion
-Def
ences
-Consequences

Modul
e4:
Stat
eJur
isdi
cti
on
4.
1.I
ntr
oduct
ion
4.
2.Ter
ri
tor
ial
jur
isdi
cti
on
4.
3.Ext
ra-
ter
ri
tor
ial
jur
isdi
cti
on
4.
4.Uni
ver
sal
jur
isdi
cti
on
4.
5.Quasi
-uni
ver
sal
jur
isdi
cti
on
4.
6.I
mmuni
ty
-
Dipl
omat
ici
mmuni
ty
-
Stat
eimmuni
ty

Modul
e5:LawofI
nter
nat
ional
Transact
ion
5.
1Int
roduct
ion
5.
2Def
ini
ti
onandConcl
usi
onofTr
eat
ies
5.
3Reser
vat
ions
5.
4Obser
vanceofTr
eat
ies
5.
5Inv
ali
dit
y,Ter
minat
ion,
andSuspensi
onofTr
eat
ies

Modul
e6:Pr
ohi
bit
ionofFor
ceandNon-
Int
erv
ent
ion

6.
1.TheschemeunderUNChar
ter
6.
2.Cat
egor
iesofFor
ce
 Ret
orsi
on
 Repr
isal
s
 Ther
ightofSel
f-
Def
ense
 Thepr
otect
ionofnat
ional
sabr
oad
 Col
l
ect
iveSel
f-
Def
ense
6.
3.I
nter
vent
ion
Modul
e7:Lawoft
heSea

7.
1.Thet
err
it
ori
alsea
7.
2.Theexcl
usi
veeconomi
czone
7.
3.Thecont
inent
alshel
f
7.
4.Jur
isdi
cti
onont
hehi
ghseas
Modul
e8:
Indi
vi
dual
cri
minal
responsi
bil
i
tyi
nInt
ernat
ional
law
8.
1.I
nter
nat
ional
Humani
tar
ianLaw
-
int
ernat
ional
armedconf
li
ct
-
non-
int
ernat
ional
armedconf
li
ct
8.
2.I
nter
nat
ional
Cri
minal
Cour
t&Tr
ibunal
s
-
Int
ernat
ional
Cri
minal
Tri
bunal
forYugosl
avi
a
-I
nter
nat
ional
Cri
minal
Tri
bunal
forRwanda
-TheI
nter
nat
ional
Cri
minal
Cour
t
  I
nter
nat
ional
cri
mes
 Genoci
de
 Warcr
imes
 Cr
imesagai
nsthumani
ty
 Aggr
essi
on

ANNEXUREI
I:

READI
NGS
Akehur
st,
Michel
,Moder
nint
roduct
iont
oInt
ernat
ionalLaw,
5thed(
Geor
geAl
l
enand
Unwi
n,London,
1984)
.
Br
ier
ly ,Law ofNat
,J.L. ions:AnI
ntr
oduct
iont
otheLaw ofPeace,6t
hed(
Oxf
ord
Uni
ver
sit
yPr
ess,
London,
1998)
.
Har
ri ,CasesandMat
s,D.J. eri
alsonI
nter
nat
ionalLaw,6t
hed(
ThomsonandSweet
andMaxwel
l
,London,
2004)
.
Shaw,
M.N.
,I
nter
nat
ionalLaw(
Cambr
idgeUni
ver
sit
yPr
ess,
NewYor
k,2005)
.
St
arke,
J.G.
,I
ntr
oduct
iont
oInt
ernat
ionalLaw,
(10t
hedBut
ter
wor
th’
s,London,
1992)
.
Par
let
tKat
e.TheI
, ndi
vi
duali
ntheI
nter
nat
ionalLegalSy
stem:Cont
inui
tyandChange
i
nInt
ernat
ionalLaw,
(Cambr
idgeUni
ver
sit
yPr
ess,
UK,
2011)

Leonar
dWei g,Gl
nber obalTer
ror
ism:ABegi
nner
'sGui
de,(
onewor
ldpubl
i
cat
ions,
2005)

GusMartn,Under
i standi
ng Ter
ror
ism chal
l
enges,Per
spect
ive and I
ssues(
Sage
Publ
i
cat
ions,
2006)

Br
uceHof
f I
man,nsi
deTer
ror
ism (
Col
ombi
aUni
ver
sit
ypr
ess,
1954)

Jour
nal
sandRepor
ts:
Ther
ear
esev
eralj
our
nal
sofgoodr
eput
ewhi
chcanber
efer
red.Thef
oll
owi
ngar
e
t
hemosti
mpor
tantsour
ceswhi
char
erecommended.
 Amer
icanj
our
nal
ofI
nter
nat
ional
Law;
 I
nter
nat
ional
Legal
Mat
eri
als;
 I
nter
nat
ional
LawRepor
ts

Websi
tes
 www.un.
org
 www.
¬ohchr
.¬or
g
 www.
ref
wor
ld.
org
 Lexi
sNexi
s
 West
law
 JSTOR
 HEI
NONLI
NE