Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fertigation2016JournaloffarmscienceNAAS4 42
Fertigation2016JournaloffarmscienceNAAS4 42
net/publication/328851800
CITATIONS READS
0 134
4 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All India Coordinated Research Project on Palms (Oil Palm) View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Sanjeevraddi Reddi on 10 November 2018.
200
J. Farm Sci., 29(2): 2016
Table 1. Effect of fertigation treatments on the number of bunches/palm, bunch weight (kg) & FFB yield (t/ha) of oil palm
Treatment Number of bunches/Palm Bunch weight (kg) FFB yield (t/ha)
2012 2013 Pooled 2012 2013 Pooled 2012 2013 Pooled
T1 3.11 2.04 2.58 13.58 14.88 14.23 6.04 4.34 5.25
T2 2.56 2.37 2.46 15.15 15.81 15.48 5.55 5.36 5.45
T3 2.67 2.80 2.73 13.15 18.04 15.60 5.02 7.22 6.09
T4 3.00 3.12 3.06 19.74 18.48 19.11 8.47 8.25 8.36
T5 2.28 3.10 2.69 16.74 19.67 18.20 5.46 8.72 7.00
T6 2.53 2.23 2.38 14.74 17.73 16.23 5.33 5.65 5.52
T7 2.50 3.48 2.99 14.20 17.29 15.74 5.08 8.60 6.73
S.Em± 0.19 0.21 0.26 0.79 2.00 1.40 0.44 0.45 0.52
C.D.(0.05) 0.57 0.61 NS 2.34 5.95 4.26 1.29 1.32 1.53
C.V % 12.67 13.22 16.86 9.00 19.95 15.24 13.56 10.92 14.20
T1: 300:150:300g NPK, T2: 600:300:600g NPK, T3: 900:450:900g NPK, T4: 1200:600:1200g NPK,
T5: 1200:600:1800g NPK, T6: 1200:600:2700g NPK, T7:1200:600:2700g NPK
Note: T1 to T6 - Fertigation, T7 - Soil application FFB: Fresh fruit bunches
NPK /Palm/year through fertigation recorded higher number of of the oil palm. These results are close to the findings of Narsimha
bunches per palm (3.11) as compared to T5: 1200:600:1800g NPK/ Rao et al.,2011 and Masthana Reddy et al., 2009.
palm/year (2.28 bunches), T6: 1200:600:2700g NPK/Palm/year
Fresh Fruit Bunches Yield (FFB)
(2.53 bunches) through fertigation and T7: 1200:600:2700/palm/
year (2.5 bunches) through soil application. During 2013, the The results on Fresh Fruit Bunches of oil palm yield showed
number of bunches per palm was found to be significantly higher significant difference due to the effect of different fertigation
with the treatment T7 : 1200:600:2700 NPK/palm/year through treatments during 2012 and 2013 as presented in Table 1. The
soil application (3.48 no’s ) as compared to T1: 300:150:300 g data on FFB yield differed significantly among various
NPK/Palm/year, T 2 : 600:300:600g NPK/Palm/year, treatments. The fertigation treatment T4:1200:600:1200 g NPK/
T3: 900:450:900g NPK/Palm/year and T6: 1200:600:2700 g NPK/ palm/year recorded significantly higher FFB yield of 8.47 t/ha
Palm/year through fertigation and it was on par with as compared to other fertigation and soil application treatment
T4: 1200:600:1200 g NPK /Palm/year & T5: 1200:600:1800 g NPK / during 2012. During 2013, the FFB yield was recorded
Palm/year through fertigation. However, the pooled data on significantly the higher (8.72 t/ha) with the treatment receiving
number of bunches per palm did not show significant difference fertigation of 1200:600:1800 g NPK/palm/year as compared to
among the various treatments. These results are close to the T1: 300:150:300 g NPK/Palm/year, T2: 600:300:600 g NPK/Palm/
findings of Gnanamurthy and Manickasundaram (2001). They year & T6: 1200:600:2700 g NPK/Palm/year through fertigation
reported that fertigation in oil palm with water soluble fertilizer and it was on par with T4: 1200:600:1200 g NPK /Palm/year,
improved the trunk girth, number of fronds and yield with a T3: 900:450:900 g NPK/Palm/year through fertigation &
saving of fertilizer and water by 20-33 per cent over control. T7: 1200:600:2700 g NPK/Palm/year through soil application.
The pooled data of FFB yield differed significantly among
Bunch weight
various treatments. The treatment T4: 1200:600:1200 g NPK /
An analysis of data in table 1 depicts that, bunch weight Palm/year through fertigation recorded the significantly higher
(kg) of oil palm as influenced by the different fertigation (8.36 t/ha) FFB yield as compared to other fertigation and soil
treatments differed significantly during 2012 and 2013. Among application treatments. The two years pooled data indicated
the different fertigation treatments, the T4: 1200:600:1200 g NPK/ that the treatment T4:1200:600:1200 g NPK/Palm/year through
palm/year was recorded the significantly higher (19.74 kg/bunch) fertigation with 6 equal splits recorded higher FFB yield and
bunch weight as compared to other fertigation treatments and yield attributes. The higher FFB yield due to the application of
soil application treatment during 2012. During 2013, bunch fertilizers along with micro-irrigation this will leads to the fertilizers
weight was significantly higher with the treatment receiving and water directly supply to the root zones of the oil palm, this
fertigation of 1200:600:1800 g NPK/palm/year (19.67 kg/bunch) will leads to the quick absorption of fertilizers by roots of oil
as compared to T 1: 300:150:300g NPK/Palm/year through palm. Hence there was no wastage of the fertilizers and water.
fertigation treatment and it was on par with all other fertigation These present results were in conformity with the findings of
and soil application treatments. The Pooled data of two years Narsimha Rao et al. 2011 and Masthana Reddy et al. 2009.
was showed significant difference. The treatment
Economics
T 4: 1200:600:1200g NPK/palm/year was recorded the
significantly higher bunch weight (19.11 kg/bunch) as The gross return, net return and B:C of FFB yield of oil
compared to T 1: 300:150:300g NPK/Palm/year through palm significant difference among the various treatments as
fertigation. The remaining treatments were on par with presented in the Table 2. The fertigation treatment
T4: 1200:600:1200g NPK through fertigation. This may be due to T4:1200:600:1200 g NPK/Palm/year was recorded significantly
the application of appropriate dose of fertilizers through fertigation higher (` 58,535 ha-1) gross return as compared to other
with 6 equal splits at bi-monthly will increases the bunch weight fertigation and soil application treatments. A significant
201
Effect of fertigation on yield and economics of .............................
Table 2. Influence of fertigation treatments on the economics of the difference was noticed in the net return of oil palm FFB yield
oil palm with respect to different fertigation treatments. Application
Treatments Cost of Gross Net B:C of 1200:600:1200 g NPK/palm/year through fertigation
cultivation return return recorded higher net return (` 32,378 ha-1) as compared to other
(` ha-1) (` ha-1) (` ha-1)
treatments except T1:300:150:300 g NPK/Palm/year through
T1 17,441 36750 19309 2.11
T2 20,347 38119 17772 1.87 fertigation. The fertigation treatments T4:1200:600:1200 g NPK/
T3 23,251 42631 19380 1.83 Palm/year recorded significantly higher B:C (2.24) as compared
T4 26,157 58535 32378 2.24 to other fertigation and soil application treatments except
T5 28,622 49007 20385 1.71 300:150:300 g NPK/Palm/year (2.11). The treatment T4
T6 32,321 38666 6345 1.20 :1200:600:1200 g NPK/Palm/year recorded higher gross return
T7 32,321 48606 16285 1.46 and net return and found to have better prospects for
S.Em+ 3960 2875 0.16 adaptation under Tungabhadra command area which can be
C.D.(0.05) 11649 8457 0.48 recommended for farmers adoption.
T1: 300:150:300 g NPK, T2: 600:300:600 g NPK,
T3: 900:450:900 g NPK, T4: 1200:600:1200 g NPK, The study over the years indicated that fertigation in Oil
T5: 1200:600:1800 g NPK, T6: 1200:600:2700 g NPK, palm with treatment T4:1200:600:1200 g N P2O5K2O/ palm/year
T7:1200:600:2700 g NPK in six equal splits at bi-monthly interval recorded higher Fresh
Note: T1 to T6 – Fertigation, T7 – Soil application Fruit Bunches yield and higher gross and net returns.
References
Gnanamurthy, P. and Manickasundaram, P., 2001, In: Advances in Narsimha Rao, B., Suresh, K., Ramachandrudu, K. and Mary Rani,
Integrated Nutrient Management System for Sustainable Crop K. L., 2011, Influence of fertigation on Growth and Yield of
Productivity and Soil Fertility, October, 4-24, 2001. Tamil Oil Palm. Intr. J. Oil Palm., 8 (1&2): 13-16.
Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, pp, 110-116.
Rethinam, P., 2014, Increasing vegetable oil production through oil
Mahalakshmi, M., Kumar, N., Jayakumar, P. and Soorianathasundaram, palm cultivation in India-Status and Strategies. Technical
K., 2001. Fertigation studies in banana under normal system Bulletin of Society for Promotion of Oil Palm Research &
of planting. South Indian Hort., 49: 80-85. Development (SOPOPRAD): 1-18.
Masthana Reddy, B. G., Patil, D. R., Pattara, Arulraj, S. and Hanama Solamalai, A., Bhaskar, M., Sadasakthi, A. and Subburammu, K.,
Shetty, 2009, Irrigation and NPK Requirement of Oil Palm for 2015, Fertigation in high value crops - A review. Aric, Rev.,
Tungabhadra Command Area. Int. J. Oil Palm., 6(1): 35-38. 26(1): 1-13.
202